logo
NZ Faces $9.4b Hit From Invasive Caulerpa, Analysis Shows

NZ Faces $9.4b Hit From Invasive Caulerpa, Analysis Shows

Scoop08-05-2025
Article – Susan Botting – Local Democracy Reporter
New Zealand's economy risks a $9.4 billion hit as the invasive seaweed caulerpa gains an increasing stronghold – with reports of it now spreading to the Bay of Islands tourist town of Russell.
That's the stark warning after new NZIER analysis showed caulerpa's spread will impact tourism and recreation, commercial fishing, aquaculture and ecosystems if more is not done to stop the spread.
The analysis is part of a New Zealand-first iwi, community and council consortium December business case to the government pushing for a co-ordinated, scaled up approach.
The heavyweight consortium wants up to $215 million – $43 million annually – for the first five years of a 30-year fight against caulerpa, which would be funded through taxpayer contributions, local rates and vessel levies.
But Biosecurity Minister Andrew Hoggard has challenged the $9.4 billion economic impact figure.
'The impacts of exotic caulerpa in New Zealand are still not fully understood and long-term studies are underway to understand this better.
'Given that we are still studying how caulerpa behaves and affects local marine ecology it would be extremely difficult to identify a cost with any certainty,' Hoggard said.
Hoggard would not comment on how much money the government would be putting towards caulerpa in the 22 May Budget.
'The government always faces difficult choices about what to fund and I cannot discuss Budget ahead of its release later this month,' Hoggard said.
Exotic caulerpa has been described by independent scientific experts as the country's most serious marine biosecurity invasion in a lifetime.
Northland-based Conquer Caulerpa Trust chair Verdon Kelliher said the situation was desperate and the government wasn't doing enough to remedy the issue.
'We're talking about major impacts,' Kelliher said.
'Without immediate, co-ordinated action, our fishing grounds, tourism industry and cultural heritage face unprecedented damage.'
The caulerpa threat area stretches 1500 kilometres of coastline from Cape Reinga to East Cape, including the 'golden triangle' economic powerhouse of Auckland, Waikato and Bay of Plenty, as well as Northland.
It has spread to more than 90 locations from the Bay of Islands to the Mercury Islands, off the upper Coromandel Peninsula.
Ex-Tropical Cyclone Tam washed more than 500 tonnes of caulerpa ashore in thick carpets in the Bay of Islands' Omākiwi Cove and adjacent Whiorau Bay over Easter.
Local volunteers rushed to remove it due to fears of it creating a growth explosion.
The consortium wants a strengthened government approach to caulerpa with a stronger marine biosecurity framework to co-ordinate a scaled-up fight.
Its business case, by consultants Martin Jenkins and based on the NZIER economic analysis, was developed over four months by Hauraki Gulf-based Pou Rāhui iwi (Ngāti Pāoa, Ngāti Hei, Ngāti Tamaterā and Ngā Tai ki Tāmaki) with financial and/or other input also including from marine scientists and Northland Regional Council, Auckland Council, Waikato Regional Council, Thames-Coromandel District Council, Hauraki District Council, DOC plus affected industries.
Hoggard met Pou Rāhui iwi and councils behind the business case in March.
He said the meeting had been 'very useful' and asked officials to consider the business case and provide advice to him 'in due course'.
Pou Rāhui iwi spokesperson Herearoha Skipper said the cost of the government not taking appropriate action outweighed the cost of doing so.
'The arrival of caulerpa represents an unprecedented threat to our marine environment,' Skipper said.
'We are deeply concerned about the lack of a comprehensive approach to fighting this seaweed species and its potentially devastating impact.'
NZIER modelling suggested that without proper intervention, $9.4 billion of the upper North Island's natural capital asset value could be lost over the next 30 years.
That includes an $8.8 billion recreational and tourism loss including recreational fishing – fish biomass has been halved in overseas caulerpa infestations.
Recreational boating would be impacted with significant movement restrictions, the report said.
There would be a $118 million loss for commercial fishing, $24 million for aquaculture and $489.4 million in ecosystem services degradation, NZIER said.
Roles and responsibilities in the caulerpa fight were not clear and regulatory barriers often prevented rapid responses. Traditional frameworks failed to adequately incorporate mātauranga Māori and invasive species funding had been reactive rather than proactive, the report said.
New Zealand's first mainland exotic caulerpa infestation was identified in Omākiwi Cove in the eastern Bay of Islands in May 2023.
More than 1000ha – the equivalent of 1429 rugby fields – have been closed to boat anchoring since June 2023 to help stop its spread.
Sightings of caulerpa have now been reported outside this anchoring ban area including Russell's Kororarēka Bay, about 10 kilometres by boat from Omākiwi Cove.
It's also been reported at Long Beach (Oneroa) and Tāpeka Point.
'And it's highly likely that additional beaches are affected but remain unreported,' Kelliher said.
Hoggard said the caulerpa that had been shown globally to create dense monocultures were different species from those causing issues in New Zealand – where there was no clear evidence the marine pest was overgrowing seagrass.
Biosecurity New Zealand, mana whenua, regional councils, affected communities and other agencies had invested a huge amount of effort and money to tackle the situation, he said.
The government had put more than $20 million towards efforts to understand the pest, contain its spread and develop new technologies to remove it, Hoggard said.
World-leading technology was also helping to remove different types of caulerpa infestations including the development of a large-scale suction dredge in the Bay of Islands.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

FamilyBoost: Just 153 families getting maximum $75 weekly childcare tax credit
FamilyBoost: Just 153 families getting maximum $75 weekly childcare tax credit

NZ Herald

time15 minutes ago

  • NZ Herald

FamilyBoost: Just 153 families getting maximum $75 weekly childcare tax credit

The more a family spends on childcare, the higher the rebate. Labour released a scathing statement, saying the number of families who received the maximum credit was too low and it indicated the Government's flagship cost of living programme was 'in tatters.' 'A year in, only 153 people have received the [maximum] FamilyBoost entitlement for the entire year. National has broken its promises and is making life harder for New Zealanders. 'National is completely out of touch with what our communities need.' Finance Minister Nicola Willis flatly rejected the accusation National had broken a promise, saying they had delivered on 'every promise that we made in relation to FamilyBoost'. 'We were very clear prior to the election that how much you would get under FamilyBoost depended on how much you spent on ECE fees and what your income was. 'Everyone who has applied for a FamilyBoost rebate under the scheme has received their full rebate, as it was advertised to them, prior to the election.' She said Labour had 'made clear it would remove the FamilyBoost payment'. Willis said more than 60,000 families had claimed FamilyBoost, and Labour's plan would rob them of much needed cost of living relief. Recently, Willis announced the Government had tweaked the eligibility settings meaning 'thousands' more people would be able to make a claim. The maximum rebate has increased from 25% to 40% of a family's weekly childcare costs and the income cap has been raised from $180,000 to $230,000. Willis said about 16,000 more families are expected to enter the scheme as a result of these changes. 'Those numbers are annual and we will monitor uptake each quarter to see whether the expected uplift is occurring. 'I am confident that these more generous provisions will encourage more families to apply for FamilyBoost and will be welcomed by the families already benefiting from the scheme who can look forward to more generous rebates in future.' Families are required to keep copies of their early childcare invoices to submit for a payment, which has raised questions about how many eligible families would end up receiving the payment. When launching the policy in March 2024, the Government explained it had to weigh up waiting years so a direct childcare tax credit could be implemented or get going with payments that year but make parents wear the 'administrative burden'. Willis says IRD is looking into whether a direct refund model can be established. This could include automating payments with ECE providers. Julia Gabel is a Wellington-based political reporter. She joined the Herald in 2020 and has most recently focused on data journalism.

New Plymouth rates blunder caused by lack of financial reporting knowledge
New Plymouth rates blunder caused by lack of financial reporting knowledge

RNZ News

time15 minutes ago

  • RNZ News

New Plymouth rates blunder caused by lack of financial reporting knowledge

New Plymouth District Council chief executive Gareth Green concedes an earlier restructure played a part in the error. Photo: Taupō District Council / Supplied An external review following a New Plymouth District Council rates GST blunder - which could've cost it $20 million in lost revenue - indicates key managers may not have a sufficiently sophisticated understanding of the rating process and its impacts. The Simpson Grierson review found the council lacked financial reporting and modelling capability which "strongly suggests a need for training, and possibly recruitment/restructure and training". Council chief executive Gareth Green conceded an earlier restructure - which saved the district council $10 million - played a part in the error. "That necessitated some significant pressure being applied through the business. "I think that pressure along with other pressure points in the local government sector has contributed to this [mistake] occurring, so certainly the pressure that restructure has applied has had an impact, most definitely." He was instigating another restructure designed to bring more financial and local government experience to council staff. Green said this would result in a "small number of job losses" due to new positions being created. He wasn't thinking about falling on his sword. "I do take full responsibility for this, but I am not tendering my resignation at the current time. "My total focus at this point is leading this organisation through this situation and making sure we can resolve it in the best possible way." The Simpson Grierson review also uncovered two further bungles . It revealed the council hiked average residential rates 12.8 percent rather than 9.9 percent as advertised. The gaffe equated to $102 per ratepayer or $3.1 million. The review also identified an annual plan wording error relating to industrial water use which could've cost council a further $1.4 million in lost revenue. In his report, consultant Jonathan Salter said sophisticated knowledge and understanding of the rating process and rating impacts tended to be the domain of specialist officers with a long-standing understanding of the rating function. These staff were usually intimately familiar with the council's financial reporting and modelling systems, the valuation and rating information database and the district itself, he said. "There appears to have been a lack of capability in these two areas. This strongly suggests a need for training, and possibly recruitment/restructure and training." New Plymouth Mayor Neil Holdom. Photo: RNZ / Robin Martin Mayor Neil Holdom said one reason why he called for an independent review when the GST error was discovered was so council could learn from its mistakes. "I just want to make it clear the councillors - the governance team - made decisions based on information that was incorrect. "Our long-term plan was audited by Audit NZ and they also didn't pick up this error in our rating calculation model." Holdom said the proposed restructure would bolster the financial capability and bring people onboard council with local government experience. The Simpson Grierson report also recommended an independent legal review be a component of the annual rate setting process, and that council not rely on the Audit NZ review alone. Holdom said an extra-ordinary meeting on 22 July would consider a proposal for future annual-plan and long-term plan calculations to be externally peer reviewed as part of a parcel of steps to address the recent errors. Salter also wanted the council to review how it handled documents. "It appears that document management may have been an issue ... the restricted water supply targeted rate issue appears to have arisen from an incorrect 'cut and paste' from another document." Holdom earlier described the GST blunder as a "typo" and a "cut and paste" error. The Simpson Grierson consultant also thought council should consider moving away from an average residential rates model to an overall rates model. "This would be a more transparent and certain disclosure. If there is reference to the 'average' rather than 'overall' rates increase, this concept should be defined." At the extraordinary council meeting on 22 July, the mayor would recommend councillors approve a one-off rates refund to all residential property owners to ensure the average residential rates increase equalled 9.9 percent. That would require council to find $3.1 million in savings elsewhere. Councillors would also vote on amending the rates resolution wording regarding properties on a restricted water flow - usually industrial users - to ensure council was able to charge $418 for each cubic metre of water as intended. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

New Plymouth District Council rates blunder caused by lack of financial reporting knowledge
New Plymouth District Council rates blunder caused by lack of financial reporting knowledge

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

New Plymouth District Council rates blunder caused by lack of financial reporting knowledge

New Plymouth District Council chief executive Gareth Green concedes an earlier restructure played a part in the error. Photo: Taupō District Council / Supplied An external review following a New Plymouth District Council rates GST blunder - which could've cost it $20 million in lost revenue - indicates key managers may not have a sufficiently sophisticated understanding of the rating process and its impacts. The Simpson Grierson review found the council lacked financial reporting and modelling capability which "strongly suggests a need for training, and possibly recruitment/restructure and training". Council chief executive Gareth Green conceded an earlier restructure - which saved the district council $10 million - played a part in the error. "That necessitated some significant pressure being applied through the business. "I think that pressure along with other pressure points in the local government sector has contributed to this [mistake] occurring, so certainly the pressure that restructure has applied has had an impact, most definitely." He was instigating another restructure designed to bring more financial and local government experience to council staff. Green said this would result in a "small number of job losses" due to new positions being created. He wasn't thinking about falling on his sword. "I do take full responsibility for this, but I am not tendering my resignation at the current time. "My total focus at this point is leading this organisation through this situation and making sure we can resolve it in the best possible way." The Simpson Grierson review also uncovered two further bungles . It revealed the council hiked average residential rates 12.8 percent rather than 9.9 percent as advertised. The gaffe equated to $102 per ratepayer or $3.1 million. The review also identified an annual plan wording error relating to industrial water use which could've cost council a further $1.4 million in lost revenue. In his report, consultant Jonathan Salter said sophisticated knowledge and understanding of the rating process and rating impacts tended to be the domain of specialist officers with a long-standing understanding of the rating function. These staff were usually intimately familiar with the council's financial reporting and modelling systems, the valuation and rating information database and the district itself, he said. "There appears to have been a lack of capability in these two areas. This strongly suggests a need for training, and possibly recruitment/restructure and training." New Plymouth Mayor Neil Holdom. Photo: RNZ / Robin Martin Mayor Neil Holdom said one reason why he called for an independent review when the GST error was discovered was so council could learn from its mistakes. "I just want to make it clear the councillors - the governance team - made decisions based on information that was incorrect. "Our long-term plan was audited by Audit NZ and they also didn't pick up this error in our rating calculation model." Holdom said the proposed restructure would bolster the financial capability and bring people onboard council with local government experience. The Simpson Grierson report also recommended an independent legal review be a component of the annual rate setting process, and that council not rely on the Audit NZ review alone. Holdom said an extra-ordinary meeting on 22 July would consider a proposal for future annual-plan and long-term plan calculations to be externally peer reviewed as part of a parcel of steps to address the recent errors. Salter also wanted the council to review how it handled documents. "It appears that document management may have been an issue ... the restricted water supply targeted rate issue appears to have arisen from an incorrect 'cut and paste' from another document." Holdom earlier described the GST blunder as a "typo" and a "cut and paste" error. The Simpson Grierson consultant also thought council should consider moving away from an average residential rates model to an overall rates model. "This would be a more transparent and certain disclosure. If there is reference to the 'average' rather than 'overall' rates increase, this concept should be defined." At the extraordinary council meeting on 22 July, the mayor would recommend councillors approve a one-off rates refund to all residential property owners to ensure the average residential rates increase equalled 9.9 percent. That would require council to find $3.1 million in savings elsewhere. Councillors would also vote on amending the rates resolution wording regarding properties on a restricted water flow - usually industrial users - to ensure council was able to charge $418 for each cubic metre of water as intended. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store