
Police drop inquiry into protester who said ‘Hamas are terrorists'
Niyak Ghorbani, an Iranian dissident, became well known last year for protesting against Hamas while standing along the routes of several protests held in London against Israel's retaliation to the Oct 7 attacks.
In November last year, he was accused of making racially aggravated threats to kill a supporter of Palestine at a demonstration outside Queen Mary University of London in Mile End. A police investigation was launched after the pro-Palestinian protester alleged that Mr Ghorbani said: 'I'll kill you, you Arab b------'.
Mr Ghorbani was campaigning against the university's decision to host Francesca Albanese, a UN special rapporteur, who previously compared Israeli actions with the Holocaust.
Ms Albanese, who was appointed to her position in 2022, had also previously said that American opinion on the Israel-Palestine conflict was 'subjugated by the Jewish lobby'. On the day of Hamas's attacks against Israel, she tweeted: 'Today's violence must be put in context.'
A formal protest against her was cancelled due to security concerns but several protestors including Mr Ghorbani continued nonetheless, where they were met by pro-Palestinian counter-protesters.
Mr Ghorbani has since been told that the investigation into his behaviour has been dropped, according to the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism.
Stephen Silverman, director of investigations and enforcement for the Campaign Against Anti-Semitism, said: 'We welcome the decision to drop the ludicrous investigation against Niyak Ghorbani, who should never have been subjected to this ordeal in the first place.
'It is appalling that those who speak out against terrorism are targeted while actual extremists go unchallenged. We are proud yet again to have provided legal assistance to Mr Ghorbani and we will continue to stand with all those who stand with the Jewish community and face repercussions for doing so.'
In April last year, a judge told the Metropolitan Police it could not stop Mr Ghorbani from attending pro-Palestinian protests with his sign which reads 'Hamas are terrorists'.
The 38-year-old has been manhandled and attacked by some protesters, but insists he is doing nothing wrong in pointing out that Hamas is a proscribed terror group under UK law.
In May last year, Mr Ghorbani was arrested for racism after eating a banana during a pro-Palestine protest. He had been accused of making a racist gesture with it while standing with counter protesters in central London.
Mr Ghorbani's lawyer insisted his actions were not racially motivated and the bail conditions were unnecessary and disproportionate.
After his arrest, police imposed bail conditions on the 38-year-old, banning him from attending any protest relating to Palestine or from entering the London boroughs of Camden or Westminster. But a judge threw out the strict bail conditions, ruling that the conditions were neither proportionate nor necessary.
A Met Police spokesman said: 'No further action will be taken against a man who was arrested following an altercation in Mile End Road on Nov 12 2024.
'Inquiries are still ongoing into an allegation of perverting the course of justice relating to the same incident.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mail
23 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
DAN HODGES: I thought Starmer was just weak. But after what ministers told me this week, I've had a chilling revelation about our manipulative Prime Minister
Last October, Keir Starmer sat down on the plush green sofa of the Downing Street White Room and looked into the eyes of the families of the hostages who were snatched away by Hamas the previous year. It was, he said, a profoundly moving moment. For a while he listened to their harrowing stories. Then talk turned to the wider Gaza situation and the search for peace.


Telegraph
23 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Taiwan has a stronger claim to statehood than Palestine. Will Starmer recognise it?
Now that Sir Keir Starmer has declared his intention to recognise the imaginary state of Palestine, perhaps he might want to consider affording similar status to one that does actually exist: Taiwan. Starmer's decision to recognise Palestine at the UN next month might have helped to appease his restless backbenchers, who champion the Palestinian cause without having the faintest notion what they are talking about. But recognising a state that does not exist, is incapable of holding democratic elections and where a decent proportion of the population are in thrall to Islamist-inspired terrorism is hardly a blueprint for success. Taiwan, by contrast, is a self-proclaimed independent territory that regularly holds free and fair democratic elections – despite the malign efforts of China's Communist rulers to disrupt the process – where the overwhelming majority continue to uphold their right of self-determination. Apart from being a fully functioning democracy, Taiwan is also a valued trading partner, with total trade between the UK and Taipei currently averaging around £9.3bn. And yet, despite his willingness to offer full recognition to Palestine, an area that has no formal borders, a non-functioning administration and meagre trading options, our prime minister appears strangely reticent on the subject of upgrading our diplomatic ties with a democratic and prosperous ally such as Taiwan. This aversion to addressing the issue is all the more remarkable given that the official policy is to protect Taiwan from Chinese aggression, a position that means the Royal Navy regularly conducts freedom of navigation exercises in the region – including through the Taiwan Strait – to demonstrate Britain's solidarity. The extent of the UK's military support for Taiwan is evident from the participation of HMS Prince of Wales, the Royal Navy's new 65,000-tonne aircraft carrier, in the Talisman Sabre exercises currently taking place in the Asia-Pacific region. The British warship is part of a 35,000-strong multi-national force conducting military exercises aimed at deterring China from launching an attack against Taiwan. Indeed, Defence Secretary John Healey was at his most bullish when asked about the UK's commitment to defend the region from Chinese aggression, commenting, 'If we have to fight, as we have done in the past, Australia and the UK are nations that will fight together. We exercise together, and by exercising together and being more ready to fight, we deter better together.' It is unlikely that we would ever see Healey, or any other Labour minister, making such robust comments about defending a future Palestine state – assuming, that is, that one ever materialises. The Starmer Government's desire to steer clear of any serious military entanglements in the Middle East was evident during the recent confrontation between the US and Iran. While the US deployed its aircraft carrier groups to the Gulf in anticipation of war with Tehran, the Prince of Wales, which was sailing through the region at the time, continued on its passage to Australia, out of harm's way. If the Government is so determined to defend Taiwan's right to exist, even risking the prospect of war with China by doing so, then it begs the question: why, having recognised a non-state like Palestine, will it not make the same commitment to Taipei? Ever since the leadership of the original Republic of China fled from the mainland to Taiwan in 1949, successive British governments have sought to adopt a neutral position in its dealing with the territory. While the UK is perfectly willing to maintain lucrative trade ties, as well as providing declarations of military support, ministers have been reluctant to upgrade Taiwan's diplomatic status for fear of causing offence to China, its more powerful and prosperous neighbour. Since 1972, when London eventually recognised the People's Republic as the sole government of China, the view in Whitehall has been that the future status of Taiwan should be a matter for the Chinese to decide. A number of recent factors have made this compromise appear less satisfactory, not least Chinese President Xi Jinping's pronounced determination to reclaim Taiwan as Chinese sovereign territory. Having declared that the ' reunification' of China with Taiwan is a cornerstone of his aim of achieving the Chinese dream of nation rejuvenation by 2049, Xi has authorised the Chinese military to engage in a massive build up, with some Western military analysts predicting a Chinese invasion could take place by 2027. The gathering storm clouds over China's territorial ambitions towards Taiwan have already resulted in significant changes to British policy to the region, most notably the 2021 Integrated Review that proposed an Indo-Pacific 'tilt' in our military and security outlook. Apart from sending an aircraft carrier to participate in joint naval exercises, the Royal Navy is also committed to upgrading its 'persistent presence' in the region to include the rotational deployment of nuclear submarines from 2027 as part of the recent Aukus agreement signed between the UK, US and Australia. If the UK is preparing to defend Taiwan's sovereignty, it makes sense for Starmer to give serious consideration to offering the Taiwanese people the same level of recognition that he is prepared to give to the Palestinians. Otherwise the UK could one day find itself in the invidious position of fighting for a people whose sovereignty it does not even acknowledge.


Sky News
34 minutes ago
- Sky News
Hamas release video of Israeli hostage Evyatar David looking emaciated in a tunnel
The David family said in a statement: 'We are forced to witness our beloved son and brother deliberately and cynically starved in Hamas's tunnels in Gaza' Saturday 2 August 2025 16:43, UK