University of Edinburgh profited from slavery and promoted racist pseudoscience
It also found that the institution had not engaged meaningfully with students and staff concerned about its ties to Israel, and that students and staff experiencing racism tended not to report it.
A report entitled Decolonised Transformations: Confronting the University of Edinburgh's History and Legacies of Enslavement and Colonialism found that the institution raised the equivalent of at least £30million today from slavery and empire linked sources, with the value potentially over £800m if measured by 'Relative Output' which measures the amount of income or wealth relative to the total output of the economy.
It found that: "The University of Edinburgh was a haven for professors and alumni who developed theories of racial inferiority and white supremacism, such as the idea that Africans were inferior to whites and that non-white peoples could be colonised for the profit of European nations.
Read More:
We visit the University of Edinburgh student encampment protesting for Palestine
University of Edinburgh principal defends pay despite plans for £140m cuts
LIVE: Donald Trump in Scotland as President spends second day at Turnberry
"These ideas provided powerful intellectual justifications for enslavement and colonialism and underpinned the rapid expansion of European empires around the world.
"University of Edinburgh professors and alumni played an outsized role in developing racial pseudo-sciences that created civilisational hierarchies and habitually positioned Black people at the bottom and white people at the top.
"These ideas also provided the basis for British ethnology. Examples include Adam Ferguson, Dugald Stewart, David Hume, James Cowle Prichard, Robert Knox and Arthur James Balfour who, through research and teaching, proliferated racist ideas against African, Asian, Middle Eastern and other non-European peoples that underpinned enslavement and colonialism."
In a modern context, the report found many students and staff from racial minorities face ongoing racism, with reporting systems 'potentially inadequate' as these did not tend to be reported.
The report also made reference to the Balfour Declaration, the letter from British foreign secretary and chancellor of the University of [[Edinburgh]] to Lord Rothschild favouring the creation of a "national home for the Jewish people" in Palestine.
The UK Government had pledged to recognise Arab independence in the region in exchange for support against the Ottoman Empire in the First World War, and had also secretly agreed with France to divide what was then Ottoman Syria between the two nations.
A protest at the University of Edinburgh (Image: Newsquest) Following the war, British Mandatory Palestine was established and eventually partitioned to create modern day Israel and Palestine.
The report said: "One of the University's longest serving Chancellors, Arthur James Balfour (1891–1930), played a unique role in establishing and maintaining a century-long process of imperial and settler-colonial rule in Palestine through the 1917 Balfour Declaration.
"This Declaration led to the partitioning of Palestine and the permanent exile of many Palestinians from their homeland.
"Balfour assumed race to be a social and biological fact and upheld the right of white Europeans to govern and dominate non-Europeans. This racist view directly affected his attitude towards his governance of imperial and domestic affairs.
"The University of Edinburgh continues to be entangled in the historical harms that Balfour instigated through its direct and indirect investments that are supporting the Israeli government's human rights and international law violations against Palestinian people today."
Students currently enrolled at the University have protested about the institution's ties to [[Israel]] in the context of its ongoing occupation of Gaza and the West Bank, and it's military operations in the former.
The report said: "To date, the University of Edinburgh's senior leadership team and Court have not demonstrated sufficient direct engagement with the requests emerging from one of the most well-supported community mobilisations in the history of the University.
"Importantly, this mobilisation is comparable to the successful divestment campaign that took place in the 1970s from another apartheid state, South Africa. In 1971, the University of Edinburgh listened to students and staff, and after intense protests it sold all its investments complicit with apartheid. 148 But in the case of Palestine, the senior leadership team has deployed a 'conflict agnostic' approach, a term that denies the Nakba and its settler-colonial afterlife.
Read More:
Horrifying images are clearly the tipping point for public outrage over Gaza
SNP to force vote on recognising Palestine to coincide with UN summit
Glasgow University accused of profiting from 'blood money' due to Gaza ties
"This approach also means that the University of Edinburgh runs the risk of eluding due diligence and exposing itself to complicity with genocide, crimes against humanity and an illegal occupation."
The report recommended that the University of Edinburgh de-adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance definition of antisemitism.
The IHRA definition, which is used by most UK universities, includes 11 examples to support that definition, seven of which reference the state of Israel.
Falling under its definition of antisemitism are "claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavour", "applying double standards by requiring of it a behaviour not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation", and "drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis".
The University of Edinburgh report said: "The IHRA definition violates academic freedom and freedom of speech by framing any criticism of Israel's policies of settler-colonial dispossession driven by state racism as a form of antisemitism."
The report further found that donations explicitly sought from slavers were used to help build the Old College on South Bridge in the 1790s and the old medical school near Bristo Square in the 1870s.
The university had at least 15 endowments derived from African enslavement and 12 linked to British colonialism in India, Singapore and South Africa, and 10 of those were still active and had a minimum value today of £9.4m.
It currently has close to 300 skulls gathered in the 1800s from enslaved and dispossessed people adherents of phrenology, a racist pseudoscience which holds that intelligence can be determined by skull shape.
University Principal and Vice-Chancellor, Professor Sir Peter Mathieson said: "The publication of the University of Edinburgh's Race Review is a landmark moment in this ancient institution's willingness and determination to learn from its past, as well as its present, in order to shape its future.
"The University of Edinburgh acknowledges its role not only in profiting materially from practices and systems that caused so much suffering but also in contributing to the production and perpetuation of racialised thought which significantly impacted ethnically and racially minoritised communities.
"On behalf of the institution, I extend our deepest apologies to all individuals and communities impacted by the legacies of our connections to enslavement and colonialism.
"We cannot have selective memory about our past, focusing only on the historical achievements which make us feel proud. We are right to address its complexities too, and learn from those aspects which are highly challenging to confront. Only by fully engaging with and understanding the entirety of our institutional past can we truly learn and move forward. We are unwavering in our commitment to a future where racism, racial discrimination, and racialised inequalities have no place in higher education or society. The findings of the Race Review will help to inform our evolving policies and practices as we design a University fit for the future.
"Our institutional vision embodies a proactive approach to fostering an environment of racial equality and justice, through our research, teaching, improved institutional practices and community engagement. We will also continue to strengthen our global partnerships, recognising that we do not have all of the answers ourselves and that building progressive, consultative and equitable relationships is crucial.
"I am deeply grateful to everyone that contributed to the University of Edinburgh's Race Review, and in particular to Professor Tommy Curry, Dr Nicola Frith and Chris Cox who led the various sections, to community members for their active involvement in discussions and workshops and also to the Steering Group chaired originally by Sir Geoff Palmer: Geoff sadly died in June 2025 but he had seen the draft report and he and I reflected together on the importance of this work, and its legacy, very shortly before his death. We will honour his memory through our ongoing commitment and contribution to advancing race equality within our institution and in society more broadly. "
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a minute ago
- Yahoo
Controversy over how to use frozen Russian assets to help Ukraine
The £38m superyacht Phi should be earning her owner about £563,000 a week, hosting ultra-rich holidaymakers on trips around the sparkling Mediterranean. Instead, she is stuck at a dingy mooring in Canary Wharf, shrouded in scaffolding, her smart blue paintwork peeling and her electrics failing. And that is where, for the foreseeable future, she will stay, after the Supreme Court last week dismissed an appeal against the vessel's continued detention. More than three years after the Russian invasion of Ukraine, the judgment raised a question: what is the future of Russian assets frozen by the British state? In March 2022, Phi was in the UK having the finishing touches put to her plush interiors, which include an 'infinite' wine cellar, fluted leather wall panelling, an outdoor cinema and a freshwater swimming pool. Then Russia invaded Ukraine and the British government launched an aggressive round of sanctions against the Russian state and individuals connected to it. Since then, it has frozen £25bn of Russian-owned assets – including Phi. According to the judgment there is no evidence that her owner, Russian businessman Sergei Naumenko, has any connection to Vladimir Putin. He has not been sanctioned and internet searches reveal almost nothing about his life and business interests. The value of the Phi is dwarfed by that of other frozen Russian sovereign assets: held in Belgium, they are worth about £160bn. Nevertheless, former transport secretary Grant Shapps said detaining the yacht had 'turned an icon of Russia's power and wealth into a clear and stark warning to Putin and his cronies'. The Supreme Court's judgment, which also covered a case brought by the oil tycoon Eugene Shvidler, offered a more solid rationale: 'The very considerable income that Mr Naumenko claims that he could earn by chartering out the Phi to other wealthy people is likely to make its way to Russia,' it said. 'In this way it would be used to contribute to the Russian economy' – thus funding the Kremlin's war with Ukraine. Tom Keatinge, director of the Centre for Finance and Security at the Royal United Services Industry think tank, says this is typical of the government's approach to sanctions. In 2022, the focus was on taking headline-grabbing 'trophy' assets from big-name oligarchs. Now, this 'has shifted to a focus on how to seize for the benefit of Ukraine'. To an extent, this is working. The frozen funds have accrued interest, so even if the government can't use the assets directly, it can at least spend the interest they earn to benefit Ukraine. In June, the UK used £70m of interest payments received on frozen Russian funds to supply Ukraine with 350 missiles. UK government ministers have also stated an aim to direct the £2.5bn proceeds from Roman Abramovich's sale of Chelsea Football Club n 2022 to Ukraine. A government payment of £2.26bn into the Extraordinary Revenue Acceleration scheme, an international loan scheme designed to help Ukraine fund its war, will be repaid using profits from sanctioned Russian assets. However, physical assets, such as buildings and superyachts, are harder to manage. Phi is 'a mess', says Guy Booth, the vessel's captain. 'The paint on her hull is peeling off because it's been constantly rubbing on the fenders in exactly the same place for three years. The technical spaces are a mess, and 40% of our onboard machinery is inoperable.' Although the government's Office for Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) has issued a special licence to allow maintenance of Phi, Booth says insurers won't provide cover, so he cannot take engineers on board. The Department for Transport has engaged with the insurance industry over the matter. So far, the government's options regarding tangible assets, such as Abramovich's £150m, 15-bedroom mansion on Kensington Palace Gardens, have been limited. Selling them off would be regarded as expropriation, which the government is eager not to be accused of, in order not to frighten off other international investors. Another option might be to ask oligarchs to voluntarily give up their assets. In June 2023, the government offered a route for sanctioned individuals who say they support Ukraine to 'donate their frozen funds for Ukrainian reconstruction'. However there was no offer of sanctions relief in return for such a donation. In his Mansion House speech in June, the foreign secretary, David Lammy, announced that London would host a Countering Illicit Finance Summit, which will bring countries together to work on an international solution. 'I think there could be potential in creating new laws to look at taking that from freezing to seizing, but it would need very careful balancing with property rights,' says Ben Cowdock, senior investigations lead at the Transparency International charity. 'At the moment, every country is doing something a little bit different.' In the meantime, Phi waits for the courts to decide her fate. Naumenko intends to take his case to the European Court of Human Rights, says Booth, although there is concern that she might not last if the wheels of justice turn slowly. To restore her to her former glory – with a new coat of paint, plus the electrical work and carpentry that should have been addressed during regular maintenance stops – would cost up to £8m, says Booth. There have, he adds, been a series of small fires on board, which present a risk to the residents and businesses around her mooring. Each time, 'we assemble on the quay and then we assess whether we're going to enter the ship and combat the fire, as we would if we were at sea, or whether it's better just to let it burn, and let the City of London firefighters deal with it'. A Department for Transport spokesperson welcomed Tuesday's ruling, saying: 'This decision reinforces the UK government's determination to disrupt Russia's economic war machine and return peace to Ukraine.' Photograph by Sophia Evans/The Observer
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
£1 million Inactivity Trailblazer to help York people back into work
A project backed by around £1 million aiming to get more York people into work will focus on people with mental health issues, disabilities, veterans, and early retirees under council plans. Plans for Inactivity Trailblazer funding include helping the unemployed gain skills through archaeology and construction programmes, workplace health checks and help to move young people into work or further education. Cllr Pete Kilbane, York Council's Labour deputy leader and economy spokesperson, said it was a bold step to unlocking hidden talent and ensuring no-one is left behind. But disability rights activist Flick Williams has claimed attempts to remove barriers to work facing those in ill health would not address employers' unwillingness to take them on. It comes as proposals for the £1 million project are set to go before councillors for a decision on Tuesday, August 5. Cllr Pete Kilbane, Labour deputy leader and economy executive member on York Council. Picture is from York Council The funding is part of the £10 million given to the York and North Yorkshire Combined Authority by the Government to trial efforts to tackle long-term joblessness. The announcement that the region was among eight selected to host Inactivity Trailblazer programmes came as part of wider Government plans to reform the welfare system unveiled in November. They included plans to cut disability benefits which originally aimed to save £5 billion by 2030 but provoked a backlash, leading to them being watered down. RECOMMENDED READING: Library in York to receive £390,000 boost to improve its facilities Plans to close £18.5m shortfall for York Station Gateway scheme approved Tougher restrictions on holiday lets needed amid York housing shortage - council boss Employment Minister Alison McGovern told the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) in March the Trailblazer and wider reforms aimed to stop people out of work being left on the scrapheap. Official figures show that in York and North Yorkshire, economic inactivity due to long-term sickness rose by 72.2 per cent between 2019 and last year. Government figures show around one in eight young people nationally are not in work, education or training. A York Council report on plans to spend its £1,038,250 share of regional Trailblazer funding stated the situation locally was generally better than national picture. Almost one in five working age people in York, 19.8 per cent, are economically inactive compared to the English average of 21.1 per cent according to council figures. Locally, 5,900 people aged between 16 and 64 are out of work due to health issues but 77.3 per cent of those with physical or long-term conditions are in work. That compares to 65.3 per cent nationally. Plans to spend the Trailblazer funding in York include spending £120,000 to recruit two new Opportunities Brokers who would help people address barriers hindering them getting into work. Supported Pathways helping people into work or with wellbeing through the local Archaeology on Prescription programme and construction skills training is set for £175,000. Tailored support for young carers would receive £18,750, with help getting 16 to 25 year olds with social, emotional or mental health needs into working, learning and training getting £37,500. A programme encouraging early retirees or those considering leaving work before they reach pension age into vacant jobs in the council, further education and other areas would get £62,500. Improving access to jobs for veterans would be backed by £18,750, with Mental Health hubs and talking therapy to support people with severe issues would get £250,000. Efforts to draw together best practice from businesses to create a package of support for employment and recruitment would receive £100,000. A total of 15 schemes specific to York are set to be supported by the one-off funding which runs until the end of March. Council Deputy Leader Cllr Pete Kilbane said it aligned with the authority's ambition to create jobs and grow the local economy. Council Public Health Director Peter Roderick said it was an opportunity to make a difference to lives of those facing barriers to employment due to their health or personal circumstances. Mr Roderick said: 'We're proud to be delivering a programme that puts people first—offering tailored support, improving wellbeing, and helping individuals find meaningful work.' But activist Ms Williams said it the reason many disabled people and carers were out of work was because it was harder for them to get and keep a job. Speaking previously about the proposals, she said: 'If you had spoken to disabled people you may have learned about barriers to work such as inaccessible, unreliable, irregular transport, lack of accessible housing, barriers to obtaining mobility aids, social care support and timely healthcare. 'Where are all the employers willing to employ us, ready to make reasonable adjustments, offer the flexibility to employees to manage our impairment issues, health appointments or caring responsibilities?'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Clampdown on social media ads for Channel crossings unveiled
Anyone who advertises Channel crossings or fake passports on social media could face up to five years in prison under new government plans. Research suggests about 80% of migrants arriving to the UK by small boat used internet platforms during their journey - including to contact agents linked to smuggling gangs. While it is already illegal to assist illegal immigration, ministers hope the creation of a new offence will give police more powers and disrupt business models. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is also planning to introduce a fast-track scheme to tackle the asylum backlog, meaning decisions will be made within weeks. It comes as official figures show more than 25,000 people have arrived on small boats so far in 2025 - a record for this point in the year. Ms Cooper said it is "immoral" for smugglers to sell false promises online, adding: "These criminals have no issue with leading migrants to life-threatening situations using brazen tactics on social media. "We are determined to do everything we can to stop them, wherever they operate." The new offence prohibiting the online promotion of Channel crossings is set to be included in the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill already going through Parliament. Officials from the National Crime Agency already work with tech giants to remove such posts - with more than 8,000 taken offline last year. A Preston-based smuggler who was jailed for 17 years had posted videos of migrants thanking him for his help. Meanwhile, Albanian smugglers have created promotions for £12,000 "package deals" which claim to offer accommodation and a job in the UK on arrival. The Conservatives have described the measures as "too little, too late" - and say automatic deportations are the only way to tackle small boat crossings. Shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: "Labour still has no clear plan to deter illegal entry, no effective enforcement and no strategy to speed up removals. This is a panicked attempt to look tough after months of doing nothing." Read more UK news: It comes as protests outside hotels believed to be housing asylum seekers continue in towns and cities across the UK. Several demonstrators were detained - with police breaking up brief clashes - outside the Thistle City Barbican Hotel in north London yesterday. The government is legally required to provide accommodation and subsistence to destitute asylum seekers while their claims are being decided, most of whom are prohibited from working.