Why there's no one-size-fits-all solution to finding happiness
PARIS : In recent years, happiness has become a serious subject of study. Psychologists, economists and sociologists have joined forces to unravel the inner workings of human fulfilment.
With this in mind, researchers from several North American universities have analysed the lives of over 40,000 people in five countries.
Over a period of almost 30 years, they examined their level of general satisfaction, as well as their relationship to five essential dimensions of existence: health, income, housing, work and relationships.
It turns out that there is not just one, but a multitude of ways to be happy, specific to each individual and each context.
For some, happiness is based on tangible criteria such as income, employment or housing. For others, it depends on personal traits such as resilience or the search for meaning.
Some combine these two dimensions, while a minority seem to deviate from any pre-established model.
These findings call into question the two main theoretical models that have dominated until now. The first, termed 'bottom-up', assumes that happiness derives from satisfaction in the various areas of life.
The second, called 'top-down', argues that certain personal dispositions, such as optimism or emotional stability, influence one's perception of happiness independently of external circumstances.
This study proposes a third, more flexible path, closer to reality, with a 'bidirectional model,' in which internal and external factors are intertwined.
'These things are treated separately, but they aren't really. They feed into each other at a personal level,' explained Emorie Beck, assistant professor of psychology at the University of California, Davis and first author on the paper, quoted in a news release.
To promote well-being, public policies should be designed to take account of this diversity, rather than rely on universal approaches.
'We have to understand the sources of happiness to build effective interventions,' said Beck.
In other words, raising a society's level of happiness means taking each individual's needs into account. The same policy can transform the lives of some, while making no difference to others.
This study has served as a reminder that there's no magic formula for happiness. It is complex, specific to each individual, and sometimes even elusive.
But one thing seems certain: to better understand it, people need to stop thinking of happiness as a universal standard, and start thinking of it in terms of the individual.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Free Malaysia Today
3 days ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Seals sing ‘otherworldly' songs structured like nursery rhymes
Male leopard seals sing songs with five notes to broadcast their individual identity, researchers suggest. (Envato Elements pic) PARIS : When male leopard seals dive down into icy Antarctic waters, they sing songs structured like nursery rhymes in performances that can last up to 13 hours, scientists said on Thursday. The Australian-led team of researchers compared the complexity of the songs composed by the big blubbery mammals to those of other animals – as well as human musicians like the Beatles and Mozart. Lucinda Chambers, a bioacoustics PhD student at Australia's University of New South Wales, told AFP that people are often surprised when they hear the 'otherworldly' hoots and trills sung by leopard seals. 'It kind of sounds like sound effects from an '80s sci-fi movie,' said the lead author of a new study in the journal Scientific Reports. During the spring breeding season, male leopard seals dive underwater and perform their songs for two minutes before returning to the surface for air. They then repeat this performance for up to 13 hours a day, according to the study. The researchers determined that all leopard seals share the same set of five 'notes' that are impossible to distinguish between individuals. However, each seal arranges these notes in a unique way to compose their own personal song. 'We theorise that they're using that structure as a way to broadcast their individual identity, kind of like shouting their name out into the void,' Chambers said. The researchers believe the males use these songs to woo potential female mates – and ward off rivals. 'Songbirds of the ocean' The team studied recordings of 26 seals captured by study co-author Tracey Rogers off the coast of Eastern Antarctica throughout the 1990s. 'They're like the songbirds of the Southern Ocean,' Rogers, also from the University of New South Wales, said in a statement. 'During the breeding season, if you drop a hydrophone into the water anywhere in the region, you'll hear them singing.' The team analysed how random the seals' sequences of notes were, finding that their songs were less predictable than the calls of humpback whales or the whistles of dolphins. But they were still more predictable than the more complex music of the Beatles or Mozart. 'They fall into the ballpark of human nursery rhymes,' Chambers said. This made sense, because the songs need to be simple enough so that each seal can remember their composition to perform it every day, she explained. She compared it to how 'nursery rhymes have to be predictable enough that a child can memorise them'. But each seal song also needs to be unpredictable enough to stand out from those of the other males. Leopard seals, which are the apex predator in Antarctic waters, swim alone and cover vast distances. They likely evolved their particular kind of song so that their message travels long distances, the researchers theorise. Varying pitch or frequency might not travel as far in their environment, Chambers said. Female seals also sing sometimes, though the scientists do not know why. Chambers suggested it could be to teach their pups how to sing – though exactly how this talent is passed down is also a mystery. She added, however, that this behaviour has never been observed in the wild. 'The females could also simply be communicating with each other,' she said.
Malay Mail
4 days ago
- Malay Mail
Can microplastics harm our brains? What we know so far
PARIS, Aug 2 — Tiny shards of plastic called microplastics have been detected accumulating in human brains, but there is not yet enough evidence to say whether this is doing us harm, experts have said. These mostly invisible pieces of plastic have been found everywhere from the top of mountains to the bottom of oceans, in the air we breathe and the food we eat. They have also been discovered riddled throughout human bodies, inside lungs, hearts, placentas and even crossing the blood-brain barrier. The increasing ubiquity of microplastics has become a key issue in efforts to hammer out the world's first plastic pollution treaty, with the latest round of UN talks being held in Geneva next week. The effects that microplastics and even smaller nanoplastics have on human health is not yet fully understood, but researchers have been working to find out more in this relatively new field. The most prominent study looking at microplastics in brains was published in the journal Nature Medicine in February. The scientists tested brain tissue from 28 people who died in 2016 and 24 who died last year in the US state of New Mexico, finding that the amount of microplastics in the samples increased over time. The study made headlines around the world when the lead researcher, US toxicologist Matthew Campen, told the media that they detected the equivalent of a plastic spoon's worth of microplastics in the brains. Campen also told Nature that he estimated the researchers could isolate around 10 grammes of plastic from a donated human brain—comparing that amount to an unused crayon. Speculation 'far beyond the evidence' But other researchers have since urged caution about the small study. 'While this is an interesting finding, it should be interpreted cautiously pending independent verification,' toxicologist Theodore Henry of Scotland's Heriot-Watt University told AFP. 'Currently, the speculation about the potential effects of plastic particles on health go far beyond the evidence,' he added. Oliver Jones, a chemistry professor at Australia's RMIT University, told AFP there was 'not enough data to make firm conclusions on the occurrence of microplastics in New Mexico, let alone globally'. He also found it 'rather unlikely' that brains could contain more microplastics than has been found in raw sewage—as the researchers had estimated. Jones pointed out the people in the study were perfectly healthy before they died, and that the researchers acknowledged there was not enough data to show that the microplastics caused harm. 'If (and it is a big if in my view) there are microplastics in our brains, there is as yet no evidence of harm,' Jones added. The study also contained duplicated images, the neuroscience news website The Transmitter has reported, though experts said this did not affect its main findings. 'Cannot wait for complete data' Most of the research into the effects microplastics have on health has been observational, which means it cannot establish cause and effect. One such study, published in the New England Journal of Medicine last year, found that microplastics building up in blood vessels was linked to an increased risk of heart attack, stroke and death in patients with a disease that clogs arteries. There have also been experiments carried out on mice, including a study in Science Advances in January which detected microplastics in their brains. The Chinese researchers said that microplastics can cause rare blood clots in the brains of mice by obstructing cells—while emphasising that the small mammals are very different to humans. A review by the World Health Organization in 2022 found that the 'evidence is insufficient to determine risks to human health' from microplastics. However many health experts have cited the precautionary principle, saying the potential threat microplastics could pose requires action. A report on the health risks of microplastics by the Barcelona Institute for Global Health published this week ahead of the treaty talks said that 'policy decisions cannot wait for complete data'. 'By acting now to limit exposure, improve risk assessment methodologies, and prioritise vulnerable populations, we can address this pressing issue before it escalates into a broader public health crisis,' it added. The amount of plastic the world produces has doubled since 2000 -- and is expected to triple from current rates by 2060. — AFP
Malay Mail
29-07-2025
- Malay Mail
Global liver cancer cases set to nearly double by 2050 without action, study warns
PARIS, July 29 — The number of people with liver cancer will nearly double worldwide by 2050 unless more is done to address preventable causes such as obesity, alcohol consumption and hepatitis, a study warned today. New cases of liver cancer—the sixth most common form of the disease—will rise to 1.52 million a year from 870,000 if current trends continue, according to data from the Global Cancer Observatory published in the Lancet medical journal. It is also the third deadliest of all cancers, with the study predicting it would take 1.37 million lives by the middle of the century. However three out of five cases of liver cancer could be prevented, the international team of experts said. The risk factors are drinking alcohol, viral hepatitis and a build-up of fat in the liver linked to obesity called MASLD, which was previously known as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. The viruses that cause hepatitis B and C are expected to remain the leading causes of liver cancer in 2050, according to the study, published on World Hepatitis Day. Vaccination at birth is the best way to prevent hepatitis B, but vaccine coverage remains low in poorer countries including in sub-Saharan Africa, the study said. Unless vaccination rates are increased, hepatitis B is expected to kill 17 million people between 2015 and 2030, it added. Alcohol consumption is estimated to cause more than 21 percent of all cases of liver cancer by 2050, up more than two percentage points from 2022. Cancer due to obesity-linked fat in livers will rise to 11 percent, also up more than two percentage points, the researchers calculated. The large-scale study, which reviewed the available evidence on the subject, underscored 'the urgent need for global action' on liver cancer, the authors said. The experts called for more public awareness about the preventable danger of liver cancer, particularly by warning people with obesity or diabetes about fatty-liver disease in the United States, Europe and Asia.— AFP
