Leonardo Da Vinci's Helicopter Design Could Make Modern Drones Quieter And Stealthier
A flying machine resembling a helicopter, designed by Leonardo da Vinci, could be used to develop quieter and stealthier modern drones, according to a new study published in the journal Bulletin of the American Physical Society. Famous for his paintings such as the Mona Lisa and The Last Supper, Da Vinci was also an engineer and architect who conceptualised flying machines centuries before any of these machines became a reality for humans.
The prototype helicopter called Leonardo's aerial screw was conceived in 1480 and is regarded as the earliest known designs for a lift-generating rotor. Rajat Mittal at Johns Hopkins University in Maryland and his colleagues found that the "aerial screw" may require less power to generate the same amount of lift as a conventional drone rotor.
"We were surprised," said Mr Mittal, adding: "We went in thinking that because the shape of this spiral screw is just completely, in some sense, ad hoc, it was intuitive that the aerodynamic performance would be so bad that we would not be able to get any improvements over conventional blades."
The researchers built a simulation of the device and put it in a virtual wind tunnel to examine how it would perform while hovering in place. They found the aerial screw could generate the same amount of lift while rotating more slowly, meaning it would consume less power.
'The da Vinci propeller produced much less noise for the same given amount of lift being generated," said Suryansh Prakhar, a doctoral candidate in mechanical engineering who worked on the project.
The team is now planning to conduct more simulations to model the propellers' noise levels when the drones are larger and operating at higher speeds.
'We would expect similar results in noise reduction; however, the aerodynamic efficiency of da Vinci's propeller will be lower when compared to a traditional propeller since not all parts of the spiral screw shape can be optimized to produce a similar amount of lift force
Modern drones produce a high-pitched buzz sound as the propellers cut through the air. With their use for delivery, emergency response, photography and warfare rapidly increasing, these remotely operated vehicles continue to become bulky and noisy. However, if the study is anything to go by, the drone-making process could be revolutionised.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
2 days ago
- NDTV
Leonardo Da Vinci's Helicopter Design Could Make Modern Drones Quieter And Stealthier
A flying machine resembling a helicopter, designed by Leonardo da Vinci, could be used to develop quieter and stealthier modern drones, according to a new study published in the journal Bulletin of the American Physical Society. Famous for his paintings such as the Mona Lisa and The Last Supper, Da Vinci was also an engineer and architect who conceptualised flying machines centuries before any of these machines became a reality for humans. The prototype helicopter called Leonardo's aerial screw was conceived in 1480 and is regarded as the earliest known designs for a lift-generating rotor. Rajat Mittal at Johns Hopkins University in Maryland and his colleagues found that the "aerial screw" may require less power to generate the same amount of lift as a conventional drone rotor. "We were surprised," said Mr Mittal, adding: "We went in thinking that because the shape of this spiral screw is just completely, in some sense, ad hoc, it was intuitive that the aerodynamic performance would be so bad that we would not be able to get any improvements over conventional blades." The researchers built a simulation of the device and put it in a virtual wind tunnel to examine how it would perform while hovering in place. They found the aerial screw could generate the same amount of lift while rotating more slowly, meaning it would consume less power. 'The da Vinci propeller produced much less noise for the same given amount of lift being generated," said Suryansh Prakhar, a doctoral candidate in mechanical engineering who worked on the project. The team is now planning to conduct more simulations to model the propellers' noise levels when the drones are larger and operating at higher speeds. 'We would expect similar results in noise reduction; however, the aerodynamic efficiency of da Vinci's propeller will be lower when compared to a traditional propeller since not all parts of the spiral screw shape can be optimized to produce a similar amount of lift force Modern drones produce a high-pitched buzz sound as the propellers cut through the air. With their use for delivery, emergency response, photography and warfare rapidly increasing, these remotely operated vehicles continue to become bulky and noisy. However, if the study is anything to go by, the drone-making process could be revolutionised.
Time of India
20-06-2025
- Time of India
Cancer could be detected 3 years before symptoms appear with a simple blood test; new study reveals
One of the leading causes of death in recent years, cancer, is claiming to take millions of lives each year. Despite the significant advancements in the treatment, the biggest challenge in fighting cancer is that the detection is often too late. Detecting cancer earlier may dramatically improve survival rates and offer more treatment options. But, this is yet harder to diagnose at the earliest stage and is one of the crucial reasons for rising deaths worldwide. Now, a new study by Johns Hopkins University researchers suggests that a simple blood test could help identify cancer years before symptoms even begin to show, potentially transforming the future of early diagnosis and prevention. According to the study published in the peer-reviewed journal Cancer Discovery , this breakthrough might be a push in early diagnosis of cancer. A simple blood test may detect cancer early, before any symptoms start Cancer outcomes are heavily dependent on how early the disease is detected. When tumours are caught in their initial stages, they tend to be smaller, less aggressive, and more responsive to treatment. As researcher Yuxuan Wang from Johns Hopkins explains, 'Three years earlier provides time for intervention. The tumours are likely to be much less advanced and more likely to be curable.' This time advantage could make the difference between curable and life-threatening cancer, especially in aggressive forms of the disease. At the heart of the research is a type of genetic material called circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA). Tumours naturally shed fragments of their DNA into the bloodstream, but these traces are extremely minute and hard to detect, especially in the early stages. Science behind detecting cancer in blood To identify these fragments, scientists used multi-step algorithms and cross-checks to scan blood samples for modifications in DNA patterns that are commonly linked to tumours. The technique forms the basis of a Multi-Cancer Early Detection (MCED) test, designed to look for cancer-specific genetic changes in the blood. The research team analysed blood samples from 52 individuals, split into two groups: 26 people who were later diagnosed with cancer within six months of sample collection. 26 people who remained cancer-free. When subjected to the MCED test , eight cancer cases were flagged, indicating a 31% detection rate. While not perfect, this detection occurred before any formal diagnosis or visible symptoms appeared. Testing the method: What the study revealed What makes the findings even more groundbreaking is the analysis of older blood samples from some of the participants. Six of the eight individuals who were detected by the MCED test had blood samples available from 3.1 to 3.5 years before their diagnosis. Amazingly, cancer signals were found in four of those six samples. The ctDNA was present, although at levels up to 80 times lower than what the current test threshold requires. This suggests that tumours begin shedding DNA into the blood long before symptoms arise. if the tests are sensitive enough, these early signs could be caught. While the results are promising, they also highlight a key hurdle that the current technology needs to improve its sensitivity. The earlier the stage of cancer, the lower the ctDNA levels, making detection difficult. 'This study shows the promise of MCED tests in detecting cancers very early,' says Dr. Bert Vogelstein, a senior cancer researcher involved in the project. 'But it also sets the benchmark sensitivities required for these tests to succeed.' In simpler terms, we now know what we should aim for—but we're not quite there yet. What happens after a positive cancer blood test Even though the science is encouraging, moving from lab to the clinic is not straightforward. Blood-based cancer screening tests must undergo rigorous clinical trials to prove their reliability and safety. Once proven effective, they still require regulatory approvals before being adopted into regular medical practice. There's also the question of what comes after a positive test. Dr. Nickolas Papadopoulos from the Ludwig Centre notes, 'We need to determine the appropriate clinical follow-up after a positive test result. That includes further scans, biopsies, or even preventive treatments.' Despite the current limitations, this research represents a hopeful shift in cancer diagnostics. Combined with ongoing advances in treatment, especially therapies targeting multiple cancer types, the future holds the potential for significantly improved survival rates. This could mark a revolutionary step forward in how cancer is screened and treated. Also Read | 10 common monsoon diseases that might cause serious health problems; know symptoms and how to protect yourself One step to a healthier you—join Times Health+ Yoga and feel the change
India.com
20-06-2025
- India.com
This is most expensive substance in Universe, even one gram costs Rs 5270000000000000, it is..., can be used for…
To poets, philosophers, and hopeless romantics, love might be seen as the most precious thing in the world. But when it comes to tangible creations, the ultra-rich set their sights on rare and extravagant possessions—think Leonardo da Vinci's Salvator Mundi or the one-of-a-kind Bugatti La Voiture Noire. However, the most expensive material on Earth is not gold, diamonds, or the latest crypto coin backed by billionaires. It is something much more mysterious—and much more precious. This is most expensive substance in Universe, even one gram costs Rs 5270000000000000! To put things into better perspective, just one gram of this rare material could buy every lifestyle yacht, mansion, and private island in the world—and even give you enough change to fund your space program. The $400 million Boeing 747 private jet, recently gifted to the U.S. by the Qatari royal family, grabbed global attention for its sheer luxury and jaw-dropping value. But to truly grasp the worth of the most expensive substance on Earth, consider this: just one gram of it is enough to buy 155,000 of those ultra-luxurious jets—and still have money to spare. So what it is? Any guesses? What is Antimatter? The answer? Antimatter—a material that you can find as an actual part of physics, a fancy book from particle physics labs, or a thriller novel by Dan Brown. It is commonly described as the mirror or the 'evil twin' of regular matter. For every particle that one knows about, such as a proton or electron, antimatter has its counterpart that has the same mass but opposite electric charge. And what happens when matter and antimatter meet? They annihilate each other in a burst of energy that is sufficiently powerfultant to easily outrun a supernova. The downside? Antimatter is incredibly hard to make—and even harder to store! Scientists have the capability to make it in facilities like CERN's Large Hadron Collider, but only in minuscule quantities, and at a massive energy and time expenditure. So far, only a handful of nanograms have ever been made, and none have lasted long enough to seriously consider actually opening up a bank account, much less sit down with a financial advisor. So, why bother with something that is so hard to pinpoint? Antimatter could eventually change the future of energy and space travel. In theory, just one gram of antimatter could produce the same energy equivalent of a nuclear bomb without the prolonged radioactive fallout. The potential is great, but the task is enormous. Until scientists figure out how to contain it safely and make it economically viable it will remain less a source of power and more a science fiction possibility – shimmering just beyond the portal of possibility. Antimatter has an estimated price of around $62 trillion per gram—that's 62 lakh crore dollars for a minuscule amount of substance. Antimatter is now a more valuable substance than the total combined wealth of most continents, and that makes it the most expensive material ever known to existence.
