Separatist's health failing, Kashmir leaders urge Centre for compassion
Former J&K chief minister Mehbooba Mufti called for compassion from the Centre, saying: 'Shabir Shah, incarcerated in Tihar jail for a considerable period, is reportedly suffering from prostate cancer and is in urgent need of surgery. Deeply unfortunate that the courts have barred his family from being present during his treatment.'
She also urged Union Home Secretary Govind Mohan to intervene on 'humanitarian grounds' and ensure that Shah's family be allowed to be by his side.
Shah was arrested in an alleged terror funding case in June 2019. However, he has spent considerable time in jail over the last 30 years, and his latest bail plea was rejected by the Delhi High Court on June 12.
In his Friday sermon at Srinagar's Jamia Masjid, Mirwaiz Umar Farooq also highlighted Shah's medical condition and made an appeal to the Centre not to make 'the process the punishment' for 'Kashmiri political prisoners'. 'Yesterday, I spoke to his wife, who told me that the family's bail plea citing his serious medical condition, too, has been rejected, and that she does not know how to help him,' he said.
People's Conference president Sajad Lone also urged compassion in Shah's case, saying that he is suffering from life-threatening ailments that need medical intervention.
'The best way would be to involve his family. He would want to be near his loved ones when he is wheeled in for surgery. He is more than 75 years of age,' Lone said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
32 minutes ago
- India Today
India says no one except Dalai Lama can decide his successor, snubs China
India on Thursday raised a strong objection to China's demand that Beijing must approve the reincarnation of the Dalai Lama, asserting that no one except the Tibetan spiritual leader himself has the authority to decide on his a statement, Union Minister for Minority Affairs Kiren Rijiju said, "The position of the Dalai Lama is of utmost importance, not just for Tibetans but for all his followers across the world. The right to decide on his successor rests solely with the Dalai Lama himself".advertisementRijiju and Janata Dal (United) leader Lallan Singh are visiting Dharamshala as representatives of the Indian government to attend events marking the Dalai Lama's 90th birthday. "This is purely a religious occasion," Rijiju added. The Union Minister's remarks came after the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader reaffirmed that the 600-year-old institution of the Dalai Lama would continue beyond his lifetime, and that the choice of the 15th Dalai Lama would rest entirely with the Gaden Phodrang Trust, the official office of the Dalai Lama."The process by which a future Dalai Lama is to be recognised has been clearly established in the 24 September 2011 statement, which states that responsibility for doing so will rest exclusively with members of the Gaden Phodrang Trust," the Dalai Lama's office said in a statement on however, has insisted that any reincarnation must be approved by Beijing. "The Dalai Lama's succession must comply with Chinese laws and regulations as well as religious rituals and historical conventions," the country's foreign ministry spokesperson Mao Ning said, reiterating Beijing's longstanding stance that the selection must happen within China's borders under its TIBETAN STRUGGLEThe Dalai Lama has lived in exile in India since 1959, when he fled Lhasa following a failed uprising against Chinese rule. While Beijing continues to label him a separatist bent on splitting Tibet from China, the Dalai Lama is seen worldwide as a symbol of non-violence, compassion and the Tibetan people's struggle to protect their cultural and religious Tibetans in exile fear that China could attempt to appoint its own Dalai Lama in the future, a move critics say would tighten Beijing's grip over the region it occupied by sending in troops in 2011, the Dalai Lama formally relinquished political authority to an elected government-in-exile representing around 1,30,000 Tibetans worldwide. Even then, he had cautioned that the spiritual institution of the Dalai Lama was at "obvious risk" of being exploited for political ends through manipulation of the centuries-old reincarnation process.- EndsTune In
News18
37 minutes ago
- News18
‘Mental Health, Victim Input Must Be Part Of Premature Release Decisions': Delhi High Court
The bench was ruling on petitions challenging the denial of early release to convicts, including one filed by Santosh Kumar Singh, convicted in the Priyadarshini Mattoo case In a judgement concerning the administration of criminal justice and the rights of convicts, the Delhi High Court has recommended sweeping reforms in the framework governing premature release of life convicts. The single bench of Justice Sanjeev Narula, while ruling on a batch of petitions challenging the denial of early release to convicts, including one filed by Santosh Kumar Singh, convicted in the infamous 1996 Priyadarshini Mattoo rape and murder case, flagged serious procedural gaps in the functioning of the Sentence Review Board (SRB). The court held that decisions on premature release must align with constitutional imperatives of fairness, non-arbitrariness, and reasoned decision-making. It observed that the current system lacks structural integrity and fails to reflect a substantive evaluation of a convict's reformative progress. Lack of Mental Health Evaluation 'Significant Shortcoming' The court found that the current framework under the Delhi Prison Rules (DPR) does not mandate formal psychological assessments by mental health professionals, a flaw the Court described as 'significant". 'A convict's transformation into a potentially reformed individual cannot be meaningfully evaluated without examining the underlying psychological trajectory," the court said. To address this, the court issued a set of binding guidelines recommending that the Delhi government and the department of prisons expeditiously institutionalise the involvement of qualified clinical psychologists and psychiatrists in the SRB process. It directed that psychological evaluations be formally incorporated either through amendments to the DPR or via administrative guidelines. The court emphasised that while the input of probation officers is valuable, it must be supplemented by expert psychological opinion, particularly in cases where the risk of reoffending is central to the decision. Inclusion of Victim's Perspective Must Be Standardised Highlighting the inconsistent implementation of 'victim response" in the current Social Welfare Department format, the court directed the GNCTD to evolve a structured protocol to incorporate victims' perspectives in a sensitive, time-bound, and trauma-informed manner. Where such input cannot be gathered despite reasonable efforts, the Social Welfare Officer must provide a reasoned explanation, and the SRB must document how any victim response was received and considered. SRB's Orders Must Be Reasoned and Non-Mechanical The court was hearing petitions filed by convicts serving life sentences in four separate cases. The petitioners, including Santosh Kumar Singh, had challenged the rejection of their premature release pleas by the SRB, arguing that the decisions were mechanical, lacked application of mind, and failed to account for their conduct during incarceration. In Singh's case, the court found that although the Social Welfare Department had made a favourable recommendation, the SRB failed to acknowledge or reconcile this with the opposing police report. The impugned decision showed no effort to evaluate Singh's positive post-conviction record, including his advanced educational qualifications and participation in prison rehabilitation programmes. 'Thus, in the opinion of this Court, the impugned decision of the SRB cannot be sustained. The rejection order neither discloses a meaningful application of mind nor does it reflect a reasoned analysis of the reformative efforts made by the Petitioner," the court said. The court set aside the SRB's orders in three out of the four petitions, including Singh's, and remanded them back for fresh consideration in accordance with the new directions. In one petition, however, the court upheld the SRB's decision. In doing so, the court stressed that the current functioning of the SRB requires both procedural and substantive overhaul to ensure fairness and transparency. Sukriti Mishra Sukriti Mishra, a Lawbeat correspondent, graduated in 2022 and worked as a trainee journalist for 4 months, after which she picked up on the nuances of reporting well. She extensively covers courts in Delhi.
Indian Express
39 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Successor to 14th Dalai Lama can be chosen only by established conventions: India
A day after the 14th Dalai Lama ended speculations on his successor, India Thursday said that the next leader would be 'chosen only by the present one and with the established conventions'. On Wednesday, the 14th Dalai Lama had said that the centuries-old institution of the Dalai Lama would continue, and the Gaden Phodrang Trust – a non-profit organisation that his office set up in 2011 — would have the 'sole authority' to recognise his reincarnation. New Delhi also said that Union Ministers Kiren Rijiju and Rajeev Ranjan Singh would be attending the 14th Dalai Lama's 90th birthday on Sunday. Govt is sending Union ministers @KirenRijiju and Rajeev Ranjan Singh to attend the 90th birthday celebration of Dalai Lama. India makes it clear that a successor to the 14th Dalai Lama could be chosen only by the present one and with the established conventions @IndianExpress — Liz Mathew (@MathewLiz) July 3, 2025 The Centre's statement also comes a day after China rejected the succession plan and reiterated that any future heir must receive its seal of approval. 'The Dalai Lama's reincarnation must follow the principles of domestic recognition, the 'golden urn' process, and approval by the central government, in line with religious traditions and laws,' Chinese Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said. Beijing's reaction came after the Dalai Lama had said: 'I hereby reiterate that the Gaden Phodrang Trust has the sole authority to recognise the future reincarnation. No one else has any such authority to interfere in this matter.'
