logo
'Dangerous escalation': World reacts to US strikes on Iran

'Dangerous escalation': World reacts to US strikes on Iran

IOL News6 days ago

A man holds a sign near US Marines from 2nd Battalion, 7th Marines, standing guard at a protest condemning the US and Israeli strikes on Iran
Image: Bing Guan / AFP
The United States struck three nuclear sites in Iran on Sunday, joining Israel's bombing campaign after days of speculation over Washington's involvement in the conflict.
"Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities have been completely and totally obliterated. Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace," US President Donald Trump said after the strikes.
Here is a roundup of the key reactions:
Iran: 'Everlasting consequences'
Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi condemned the US attacks as "outrageous" and said his country had a right to defend its sovereignty.
"The events this morning are outrageous and will have everlasting consequences," he posted on social media, calling the attacks "lawless and criminal" behaviour.
Araghchi later said the United States and Israel crossed "a very big red line" with the attacks, and said he would head to Moscow later Sunday for talks with President Vladimir Putin.
Israel: 'Change history'
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu congratulated Trump, saying the attacks would "help lead the Middle East and beyond to a future of prosperity and peace".
"Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history," Netanyahu said in a video message, adding that the attacks demonstrated "America has been truly unsurpassed".
He also told Israelis that his promise to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities had been "fulfilled".
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Ad loading
EU: 'Step back'
The European Union's top diplomat Kaja Kallas called for de-escalation and a return to negotiations.
"I urge all sides to step back, return to the negotiating table and prevent further escalation," Kallas wrote on X, adding that Iran must not be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and that EU foreign ministers would discuss the situation on Monday.
Russia: 'Irresponsible' strikes
Russia "strongly condemned" the bombings, calling them "irresponsible" and a "gross violation of international law".
"A dangerous escalation has begun, fraught with further undermining of regional and global security," the Russian foreign ministry added.
Ukraine: 'Clear signal'
Ukraine's foreign ministry said the strikes were justified to prevent Tehran from developing nuclear weapons, praising them as a "clear signal".
"Ukraine is convinced that Iran's nuclear programme must be stopped so that it never again poses a threat to the countries of the Middle East or any other state," it said.
UN: 'Dangerous escalation'
UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called the strikes a "dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge".
"There is no military solution. The only path forward is diplomacy. The only hope is peace," Guterres said in a statement.
OIC: Dialogue and 'peaceful means'
The Organization of Islamic Cooperation warned that the strikes could lead to "heightened tensions and threaten regional security, peace, and stability".
It called for "de-escalation and self-restraint, and for resorting to dialogue and returning to negotiations and peaceful means."
Britain: 'Stability is priority'
UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer called on Iran to "return to the negotiating table and reach a diplomatic solution to end this crisis".
"Iran can never be allowed to develop a nuclear weapon and the US has taken action to alleviate that threat," Starmer said on X, adding that "stability in the region is a priority".
France: 'Exercise restraint'
French President Emmanuel Macron called a meeting of the country's defence council, with his office saying he had spoken with the leaders of Saudi Arabia and Oman.
France is urging "all parties to exercise restraint to avoid any escalation that could lead to an extension of the conflict", Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot posted on X.
China: 'Cease fire'
China's foreign ministry said it "strongly condemns" the US strikes, warning that they "escalate tensions in the Middle East".
"China calls on all parties to the conflict, especially Israel, to cease fire as soon as possible," the ministry said.
North Korea: 'Violated UN charter'
North Korea also condemned the US strikes, calling it a violation of the United Nations charter and blaming the tension in the Middle East on the "reckless valor of Israel".
"The Democratic People's Republic of Korea strongly denounces the attack on Iran by the US, which severely violated the UN Charter with respect for sovereignty," said a spokesperson of the North's foreign ministry, according to a statement carried by the state news agency.
Pope Leo XIV: 'Crying out for peace'
Pope Leo XIV said that "humanity is crying out for peace" and called for an end to all wars.
"Each member of the international community has the moral responsibility to end the tragedy of war before it becomes an irreparable chasm," Leo said during his weekly Angelus prayer at the Vatican.
Saudi Arabia: 'Exercise restraint'
Saudi Arabia expressed "great concern" after the strikes on its neighbour, the "sisterly Islamic Republic of Iran".
"The Kingdom underscores the need to exert all possible efforts to exercise restraint, de-escalate tensions and avoid further escalation," the foreign ministry posted on X.
Pakistan: 'Violate international law'
Pakistan, the only nuclear-armed Muslim country and a longtime Washington ally, said the US attacks "violate all norms of international law".
"We are gravely concerned at the possible further escalation of tensions in the region," Pakistan's foreign ministry said, adding that Iran had the "right to defend itself under the UN Charter".
Hamas: 'Brutal aggression'
The Palestinian militant group Hamas condemned the "blatant US aggression against the territory and sovereignty of the Islamic Republic of Iran".
"This brutal aggression is a dangerous escalation," Hamas said, calling the attack "a flagrant violation of international law and a direct threat to international peace and security".

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Africa in need of a robust strategy to mitigate conflicts
Africa in need of a robust strategy to mitigate conflicts

IOL News

time38 minutes ago

  • IOL News

Africa in need of a robust strategy to mitigate conflicts

An Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) speed boat is sailing along the Persian Gulf during the IRGC marine parade to commemorate Persian Gulf National Day, near the Bushehr nuclear power plant in the seaport city of Bushehr, Bushehr province, in the south of Iran, on April 29, 2024. Dr Sizo Nkala The global shocks Africa has had to deal with have been coming fast and furious in recent years. The COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine war and the re-election of Donald Trump as the US President in 2024 are some of the external shocks that have had a massive impact on Africa's economic standing and prospects. As the continent was still trying to find its feet from the devastation caused by these geopolitical wrecking balls, another, potentially more devastating one, suddenly emerged on the horizon. On the 14th of June, the world woke up to the news of Israel's surprise attack on its long-time foe, Iran in the so-called Operation Rising Lion. The Jewish state deployed hundreds of its warplanes over the Iranian skies dropping bombs on the Islamic Republic's nuclear and other military facilities while also targeting key military leaders and nuclear scientists. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu justified his country's actions arguing that Iran was rapidly moving towards developing a nuclear weapon which would have presented an existential threat to Israel. Netanyahu said Israel was therefore carrying out pre-emptive strikes to prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon. As expected, Israel retaliated with a barrage of missiles striking different cities in Israel proclaiming the right to defend itself. The latest attacks mark a significant escalation of long-simmering tensions between the Middle East's two largest and most powerful militaries. The two countries exchanged limited attacks in April and October last year over Israel's assassination of the Hamas leader, Ismail Haniyeh, in Iran, the Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah and the leader of the Iran Revolutionary Guard Council (IRGC) Abbas Nilforoushan. The United States also joined the war on the side of Israel after Donald Trump ordered the bombing of three nuclear sites in Iran on June 21. Although the three countries - the US, Iran and Israel have agreed to a ceasefire – it is not certain how long the ceasefire will last. A major war between the powerhouses in a region responsible for 26 per cent of global oil production is certain to have a catastrophic impact on the global economy from which no region, including Africa, would be spared. Immediately after the beginning of the conflict oil prices went up 7 percent because of the uncertainty over continued supplies from the Middle East. Following the US attack, the Iranian parliament approved a move to close the Strait of Hormuz. Iran's Supreme National Security Council had to make the final decision. The strait is a critical maritime chokepoint about 33 kilometers wide which connects the Persian Gulf to the Indian Ocean. About 20 per cent of the world's oil supplies – 20 million barrels – passes through the strait every day. Iran controls the north bank of the Strait of Hormuz while the south bank is in Omani territory. Major oil producers in the Middle East like Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Iraq, the United Arab Emirates, and Qatar depend on the Strait of Hormuz for their oil exports. While the world's oil supply has become significantly diversified ever since the development of the fracking technology which has seen the US become the world's largest oil producer, the closure or disruption of Hormuz chokepoint would have sent the oil prices through the roof. As a result, Africa's annual fuel import bill of approximately US$30 billion would have ballooned triggering a major economic fallout. The increase in consumer inflation would have put the price of basic commodities beyond the reach of many thus exacerbating poverty, food insecurity and the risk of instability. It is not only through the disruption of oil supplies that Africa would have suffered had Iran followed through on its resolve to close the Strait of Hormuz. About 20 per cent of global liquefied natural gas supplies go through the Strait of Hormuz. As LNG is a major input in the production of fertilizer, the decline in fertilizer supply would increase its prices with a negative impact on food production in Africa which imports 90 percent of its fertilizer consumption. Fertilizer prices have increased by almost three times since 2020 due to the Covid-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war which made the critical input out of reach for the majority of Africa's small-scale farmers. Another increase would have spelt disaster for the continent's struggling agricultural sector which would have worsened food shortages. Indirectly, the closure of the Strait of Hormuz would hit China the hardest as the Asian giant imports about 5 million barrels of oil per day through the strait. The economic damage this would cause in China would be felt in Africa as China is by far Africa's biggest bilateral trade partner. Approximately 20 per cent of Africa's exports are destined for China. Chinese demand for African exports would be drastically reduced further diminishing African countries' revenue generation. All this is counterfactual now because Iran did not follow up on its threat to close the Strait of Hormuz. And the world should be thanking its stars. However, it would be foolhardy to believe that the temporary truce between Israel and Iran will hold indefinitely. Should there be a re-escalation of hostilities, Iran's closure of the critical chokepoint cannot be ruled out especially if such a development can be spun as a consequence of Israel's act of aggression. It is important that Africa prepares for a worst-case scenario and enhances the resilience of its economy against the impact of global shocks. * Dr. Sizo Nkala is a Research Fellow at the University of Johannesburg's Centre for Africa-China Studies. ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL, Independent Media or The African.

1000 Afrikaners prioritised for US refugee status
1000 Afrikaners prioritised for US refugee status

The South African

time14 hours ago

  • The South African

1000 Afrikaners prioritised for US refugee status

The US administration, under President Donald Trump, is expected to welcome 1000 Afrikaner 'refugees' this year as part of its resettlement programme. This comes after two groups of white South Africans were granted asylum in America over their 'fear of persecution' and claims of 'racial discrimination' in the country. Meanwhile, in a controversial move, Trump has indefinitely halted refugees from other countries earlier this year. According to the Washington Post, US authorities have pledged to resettle around 1000 Afrikaner 'refugees' in the coming months. The group will be prioritised above any other countries that have applied for the US Refugee Admissions Programme (USRAP) The resettlement process is expected to run until the end of September. According to the publication, the Trump administration will also move to block 160 refugees who were scheduled to travel to the US ahead of the February ban. Another 1200 had been vetted and had their flights booked to arrive in the US after the ban was imposed. International Refugee Assistance Project attorney Melissa Keaney said of the administration: 'It simply doesn't want to process any other refugee populations other than white Afrikaners'. More white South Africans are expected to take up Trump's refugee status. Image: Saul Loeb / AFP. While US authorities claim that refugee status is open to all 'racial minorities' in South Africa, the first two groups that have resettled abroad have been from the white population. Despite initially being targeted at Afrikaner farmers and white people, US authorities have since included coloured, Indian, and 'mixed-race' South Africans. Applicants must prove that they are 'persecuted' South Africans who are victims of 'racial discrimination'. Jaco Kleynhans, of the Solidarity Movement, stated that many Afrikaners had applied for refugee status. He told the media earlier this month: 'Several more groups will fly to the USA over the next few weeks. The US Embassy in Pretoria, in collaboration with the State Department in Washington, DC, is currently processing 8,000 applications. And we expect many more Afrikaner refugees to travel to the USA over the next few months. 'They are settling in states across the USA, but particularly southern states such as Texas, North and, South Carolina, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Nebraska.' He continued: 'Our primary focus is not refugee status for Afrikaners. But rather to find ways to ensure a free, safe, and prosperous future for Afrikaners in South Africa. We remain 100% convinced that South Africa can and must create a home for all its people.' Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp , Facebook , X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

Six Israelis detained for attacking soldiers in West Bank: military
Six Israelis detained for attacking soldiers in West Bank: military

The Citizen

time17 hours ago

  • The Citizen

Six Israelis detained for attacking soldiers in West Bank: military

The Israeli military declined to say whether those arrested were residents of Israeli settlements in the territory. Israeli army forces deploy around the religious site of Joseph's Tomb in the occupied West Bank city of Nablus on June 27, 2025 after a group of Israelis entered the site without coordination with Palestinian security forces. (Photo by Jaafar ASHTIYEH / AFP) Six Israelis were detained for assaulting soldiers near a village in the occupied West Bank where deadly clashes with Palestinians erupted this week, the military said on Saturday. The fresh violence around the central West Bank village of Kafr Malik came after the Palestinian health ministry said three men died there in an attack by Israeli settlers on Wednesday. Soldiers went to disperse a gathering of Israelis near the village overnight, the military said in a statement. 'Dozens of Israeli civilians hurled stones toward them and physically and verbally assaulted the soldiers, including the Battalion Commander,' it said. 'In addition, the civilians vandalised and damaged security forces' vehicles, and attempted to ram the security forces,' it added. 'The security forces dispersed the gathering, and six Israeli civilians were apprehended and transferred to the Israel Police for further processing.' Contacted by AFP, the Israeli military declined to say whether those arrested were residents of Israeli settlements in the territory, occupied by Israel since 1967. The military referred the query to the Israeli police, which was not available to comment. 'I strongly condemn the serious incidents of violence and the attack on IDF soldiers,' Israel's Defence Minister Israel Katz said in a statement. 'I call on the law enforcement authorities to act immediately to locate all those who resorted to violence and bring them to justice.' ALSO READ: Israel accused of starving Gaza 'by design' — South Africa addresses ICJ Israel, Palestine West Bank violence In a separate incident on Wednesday, the Palestinian health ministry said three men died in Kafr Malik in an attack by settlers. AFP journalists saw several hundred people gather for the three men's funerals on Thursday. The Palestinian foreign ministry alleged 'official complicity' by Israel in Wednesday's attack, in a message on X. 'Israeli occupation forces prevented ambulance crews from reaching the wounded and obstructed civil defence teams from entering the village for several hours, allowing fires ignited by the settlers to spread and destroy dozens of homes,' it said. The Israeli military did not respond to a request by AFP to comment on those claims. A military spokesman told AFP its forces intervened on Wednesday after 'dozens of Israeli civilians set fire to property in Kafr Malik' and a 'confrontation' involving 'mutual rock-hurling' broke out between Israelis and Palestinians. Referring to action by the Palestinians, the spokesman said: 'Several terrorists fired from within Kafr Malik and hurled rocks at the forces, who opened fire toward the source of fire and the rock-hurlers.' ALSO READ: Israel can't break laws and then cry foul Israelis arrested Five Israelis were arrested, the military added. Left-leaning Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported that the five were released on Thursday. Police did not comment. Israeli settlements in the West Bank are considered illegal under international law. Their growth has accelerated since Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu returned to office in 2022 in an alliance with far-right parties who wish to annexe the territory outright. Countries including Britain and France and several human rights groups have condemned settler violence against Palestinians in the West Bank. Violence has surged in the West Bank since Israel launched its offensive in Gaza in response to the October 7, 2023 attack by Palestinian militant group Hamas on Israel. The Palestinian Authority says Israeli troops or settlers have killed 945 Palestinians, many of them militants but also scores of civilians, since the start of the Gaza war, according to Palestinian health ministry figures. Israel says 34 of its soldiers and civilians have been killed in Palestinian attacks or during Israeli military raids since that date. NOW READ: Israeli forces seize Gaza-bound Madleen with aid and Greta Thunberg [VIDEO]

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store