logo
How love and taxes made Mick Jagger rock's biggest Francophile

How love and taxes made Mick Jagger rock's biggest Francophile

Telegraph5 days ago
All the usual suspects were present at Tuesday night's state banquet in Windsor Castle's St George's Hall in honour of French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife Brigitte. The King and Queen and the Prince and Princess of Wales rubbed shoulders with diplomats and dignitaries as they tucked into a Raymond Blanc-designed menu and sipped a special gin and pastis cocktail called L'entente.
But one of the more unexpected faces among the 160 guests was that of Sir Mick Jagger, the Rolling Stones frontman, who was seated just five places to the right of Macron. White of tie and flanked by royalty, the rocker who once released an album called Beggars Banquet found himself dining in altogether more salubrious circumstances.
It's not the first time Jagger has been part of a high-end Anglo-French nosh-up. In 2023 he was among the celebrities who joined the King and Macron at a state dinner at the Palace of Versailles.
The truth is that Dartford-born Jagger is a huge Francophile. Despite symbolising a sort of louche and moneyed Britishness, and in spite of an accent that has steadfastly stuck to its Thames Estuary origins, the 81-year-old's love affair with France stretches back decades. Jagger is fluent in French, as he demonstrated in an impressive 10-minute 2023 TV interview conducted in the language, an exchange in which he talked lucidly about the Beatles-Stones rivalry and extolled the virtues of London rapper Dave.
He also owns a French château (obviously), having paid £2.2 million for a 16th-century castle, La Fourchette, on the banks of the Loire in 1982. Jagger quarantined there during the pandemic, and he's often seen shopping in the local shops, or riding a mountain bike through the country lanes.
During last summer's Olympics in Paris, Jagger's was a face that regularly popped up on telly. He even attended a reception at the British Ambassador's residence to welcome Team GB as the games started, posing for selfies with the athletes.
'I spoke French from when I was a child, from when I was 11, in school and then I used to travel to France – my parents would take me,' Jagger explained in 2023. The terroir seemed to seep into his early life and career, even if subconsciously. Jagger attended the London School of Economics, modelled on L'École Libre des Sciences Politiques in Paris.
And rather than embracing the 1960s clichés of Swinging London, the Stones worked with avant-garde Parisian director Jean-Luc Godard on their experimental 1968 film Sympathy for the Devil, Godard's first English-language film.
But the singer's connections with France were really made for a brace of reasons two years later: love and tax.
At the end of September 1970 Jagger met 25-year-old Nicaraguan Blanca Pérez-Mora Macías (later Bianca Jagger) at a Stones aftershow party on the executive floor of Paris's Hotel George V. Jagger had recently split up with Marianne Faithfull and it wasn't long before he and Macías, who'd moved to Paris in 1961, were an item. This was confirmed in the eyes of the world's media when the pair enjoyed a fortnight's holiday in Nassau that November.
The second reason was more prosaic. Taxes for the rich in Britain were sky-high in 1971 so the Stones, and many other high-earning musicians, left the country. 'The tax rate in the early 1970s on the highest earners was 83 per cent,' Stones guitarist Keith Richards wrote in his autobiography Life, 'And that went up to 98 per cent for investments and so-called unearned income. So that's the same as being told to leave the country.'
The band toyed with moving to the Channel Islands (too dreary) but settled on France. With families in tow, they scattered themselves around the south of France in April 1971, just days before the new tax year started. Drummer Charlie Watts went to Vaucluse, guitarist Mick Taylor to St Tropez, Jagger to a château once owned by Pablo Picasso near Biot, bassist Bill Wyman to Grasse and Richards to the sprawling – and soon to be infamous – Villa Nellcôte in Villefranche-sur-Mer.
As Jagger's unauthorised biographer Alan Clayson put it: 'The reason for relocating to the Côte D'Azur wasn't the sunshine but because, despite the huge takings for the 1969 North American [tour], the Stones' revenue for the fiscal year had been overestimated. Expenditure exceeded income at a rate that couldn't cover [the tax bill].'
With matters of the heart and the wallet drawing him to France, Jagger's residency there coalesced around two key events in the summer of 1971. It was in Richards's rented Villa Nellcôte – all tall ceilings, statues and period furniture – that the band recorded what is widely held up as their finest album, the raggedy Exile on Main St.
The band never intended to use the house as a recording studio: they'd looked for facilities in Nice or Cannes to no avail. So a warren of tiny rooms in the mansion's basement became their makeshift studio (the place was a former Gestapo HQ), with leads and cables trailing out of the windows to the band's mobile recording studio parked outside, itself illegally jacked up to the French railway system's electricity supply.
Although technically the home of Richards, his partner Anita Pallenberg and their young son Marlon, the villa attracted all manner of guests, including country music star Gram Parsons. It became the smartest sleazy guest house in Europe. A local boy known as Fat Jack was employed as the chef, while Richards kept a 20-foot mahogany Riva motorboat on a jetty at the bottom of some cliffside stairs, enabling the band to nip out to lunch down the riviera.
Photos from that summer of Jagger and Richards taken by photographer Dominique Tarlé, who was invited to Nellcôte for a day but stayed for six months, ooze a rakish grandiosity that remains unsurpassed in rock 'n' roll photography. 'Incredible alchemy,' was how Tarlé described what he found there. One week, Jagger and Stones saxophonist Bobby Keys roamed the French coast on Honda 350 motorbikes, having been unable to locate Harley-Davidsons. A helmet-less Jagger is pictured tearing down the bucolic roads in a baseball shirt, local heads turning at the rock star in their midst.
The second key event of that summer was Jagger's marriage to Macías. It took place on May 12 in St Tropez with ceremonies in both the local council office and the Roman Catholic church. It was a star-studded event with the likes of Eric Clapton, Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr and Stephen Stills flying in specifically, most with their partners and kids with them. Pictures, again by Tarlé, show the biggest tower of profiteroles you've ever seen. As Richards noted, somewhat witheringly: 'Mick arranged what he saw as a quiet wedding, for which he chose St Tropez at the height of the season. No journalist stayed at home.'
While these two events marked Jagger's highest-profile French escapades, his love affair with the country was far from over. In October 1971, his and Bianca's daughter Jade was born in Paris's Belvedere Nursing Home. The Stones frontman is often seen at Paris Fashion Week (as, these days, are his offspring). And, this being Jagger, matters of the heart are often linked to the City of Light.
In the 1990s, he reportedly had an affair with model Carla Bruni, who would go on – years later – to become the first lady of France through her marriage to Nicolas Sarkozy. 'I thought I'd never get over it,' Bruni is quoted as saying in Christopher Andersen's 2012 biography, The Wild Life and Mad Genius of Jagger. Jagger's son with long-term partner Melanie Hamrick is called Deveraux, a common French surname.
Yet rather than have Sympathy for the Deveraux, we should embrace Jagger's clear Francophilia. Britain's relations with France have often been strained, as Macron himself has suggested on this visit. So with all his French ties, it's no wonder that Jagger is a willing vessel of soft power to smooth cross-channel bonds. He should keep sipping at the L'entente. Satisfaction guaranteed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Minister criticises BBC for ‘catastrophic failures' after Gaza report
Minister criticises BBC for ‘catastrophic failures' after Gaza report

Times

time25 minutes ago

  • Times

Minister criticises BBC for ‘catastrophic failures' after Gaza report

The BBC News chief has apologised for failing to sufficiently scrutinise a documentary, as the culture secretary criticises a 'series of catastrophic failures' at the corporation. An internal review found the BBC breached editorial guidelines by failing to give audiences the 'critical information' that the narrator of Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone, Abdullah al-Yazouri, was the son of a Hamas minister. It found that the programme, which was pulled from iPlayer days after it aired in February, breached editorial guidelines on accuracy, but not impartiality. Three members of the film's production company, Hoyo Films, knew who the 13-year-old's father was at the time the programme aired but did not tell the BBC, which the review called a 'significant oversight'. Peter Johnston, the BBC's director of editorial complaints and reviews, found that the corporation 'bears some responsibility' as 'it has ultimate editorial responsibility for the programme as broadcast'. He ruled the BBC team was not 'sufficiently proactive' with initial editorial checks and there was a 'lack of critical oversight of unanswered or partially answered questions'. Ofcom said that it had examined the BBC report and would be investigating under its Broadcasting Code. An spokesman said: 'Having examined the BBC's findings, we are launching an investigation under our rule which states that factual programmes must not materially mislead the audience.' On Monday Deborah Turness, the BBC News chief executive, apologised for the error, which she said had been taken 'incredibly seriously' by the broadcaster. 'I'm sorry this happened. It was a mistake,' she said. 'At BBC News, we are fully accountable for everything that we publish and everything we broadcast, but we didn't run those questions to ground.' However, she blamed Hoyo Films for the error. 'The questions should have been answered by the independent production company at the many times of asking,' she said. Lisa Nandy, the culture secretary, welcomed the acknowledgement by the BBC that there had been a 'series of catastrophic failures' over recent weeks, including its decision to broadcast punk duo Bob Vylan's Glastonbury performance which included chants of 'death, death to the IDF [Israel Defence Forces]'. 'Our national broadcaster is too important for its independence and impartiality to be called into question,' Nandy added. 'I am pleased that there has been progress over recent weeks but as the BBC itself has recognised, there is more that has to be done.' The BBC has said it would 'ensure accountability' and said it had no planned commissions with Hoyo Films. Tim Davie, the BBC's director-general, said: 'Peter Johnston's report identifies a significant failing in relation to accuracy in this documentary. I thank him for his thorough work and I am sorry for this failing. 'We will now take action on two fronts: fair, clear and appropriate actions to ensure proper accountability and the immediate implementation of steps to prevent such errors being repeated.' Johnston said that in hindsight the use of this child to narrate the film was 'not appropriate', but there was no evidence that Hamas or the boy's father influenced the film. He did not rule that the production company misled the corporation, but found that it bore most of the responsibility for the failure. The report detailed at least five occasions when the BBC asked Hoyo about 'background checks' on individuals. For example, on January 12, a month before the programme aired, an editorial policy adviser asked Hoyo: 'Has due diligence been done on those featured to ensure eg the lead boy doesn't have links in any way to [Hamas] — I'm sure it has but critics may raise something and I want to make sure we're completely sure.' The BBC said How To Survive A Warzone, which followed children as they lived through the Israeli siege of Gaza, could return to iPlayer as a series of edited, shorter films. Hoyo Films said: 'We take the findings extremely seriously and apologise for the mistake. Our team in Gaza risked their lives to document the devastating impact of war on children. Gaza: How to Survive a Warzone remains a vital account, and our contributors, who have no say in the conflict, deserve to have their voices heard.' The Campaign Against Antisemitism pressure group called for an independent investigation 'into bias in the BBC's Middle East coverage'. Its chief executive, Gideon Falter, said: 'If the BBC were an accountable organisation, senior executives would be scrambling to save their jobs. Instead, it's the usual weasel pledge to 'update some guidelines'.' He called for Davie's resignation, accusing him of steering the broadcaster 'from national treasure to national embarrassment'. In a note to staff sent on Monday, Turness said that the failings 'did not take away' from the division's wider achievements. Several staffers said that it felt 'tone deaf' in light of the conclusions. 'There have been repeated failures and apologies on getting it wrong on Israel coverage and it seems to always be one way,' said one. 'Deborah's email read like a 'aren't we brilliant, but here's one small failing'.' Katie Razzall, the BBC culture and media editor, said that 'eyebrows were raised' about how the film came to be broadcast having been classified as a 'high risk project' by bosses. Davie is preparing to meet the broadcaster's Jewish staff network on Wednesday. Responding to the review on Monday evening, Downing Street said the BBC must take 'swift action' to ensure 'such errors' are never repeated again. The prime minister's official spokesman said: 'The BBC must ensure that such errors are never repeated and the public rightly expect the highest standards from the BBC and the corporation must learn and take swift action from the report's findings.'

Ofcom to investigate after Gaza documentary breached BBC editorial guidelines
Ofcom to investigate after Gaza documentary breached BBC editorial guidelines

The Independent

time35 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Ofcom to investigate after Gaza documentary breached BBC editorial guidelines

Ofcom has announced it will investigate the BBC's Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone documentary after a review found it had breached the corporation's editorial guidelines on accuracy. The regulator said it had examined the BBC report and would be investigating under its broadcasting code, which states that factual programmes 'must not materially mislead the audience'. An Ofcom spokesperson said: 'Having examined the BBC's findings, we are launching an investigation under our rule which states that factual programmes must not materially mislead the audience.' The programme was removed from BBC iPlayer in February after it emerged that the child narrator, Abdullah, is the son of Ayman Alyazouri, who has worked as Hamas's deputy minister of agriculture. The review, conducted by Peter Johnston, the director of editorial complaints and reviews, which is independent of BBC News, said the programme was in breach of accuracy for 'failing to disclose information about the child narrator's father's position within the Hamas-run government'. But the review found no other breaches of editorial guidelines, including breaches of impartiality, and also found no evidence that outside interests 'inappropriately impacted on the programme'. The report said that 'careful consideration of the requirements of due impartiality was undertaken in this project given the highly contested nature of the subject matter'. Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone, which also aired on BBC Two, was made for the BBC by independent production company Hoyo Films. The detail of the background information regarding the narrator's father is deemed as 'critical information', which the report said was not shared with the BBC before broadcast. The report found that Hoyo Films did not 'intentionally' mislead the BBC about the position of the narrator's father, but said the independent production company 'bears most responsibility for this failure'. However, it further added that the BBC also 'bears some responsibility'. The report detailed that at the time the programme first aired the information regarding the position of the narrator's father was known only by three members of the production company, 'but not anyone within the BBC'. It said: 'In light of this inequality of information and the opportunities that the production company had to bring this information to the BBC's attention, which it did not take, the production company is the party with most responsibility for this failure. 'However, I do not consider that the production company intentionally misled the BBC about the narrator's father's position. 'The production company has been consistently transparent that, notwithstanding their belief that the father's position was a civilian or technocratic one, as opposed to a political or military position in Hamas, they made a mistake and should have informed the BBC about it.' The narrator's scripted contribution to the programme also did not breach BBC standards on due impartiality, the report said, adding: 'I have also not seen or heard any evidence to support a suggestion that the narrator's father or family influenced the content of the programme in any way.' But the use of a child narrator for this programme was 'wrong', the report added. It explained that in this instance, the narrator 'was put in a position where his narration had to be highly scripted (meaning there was a limited portrayal of his background, story and life) and where he had to carry the rights-of-reply of others, in particular the IDF. 'In light of what the production company knew about the narrator's family and background, putting him forward as the voice of the programme as it was scripted was wrong in my view.' The BBC's director-general Tim Davie said: 'Peter Johnston's report identifies a significant failing in relation to accuracy in this documentary. I thank him for his thorough work and I am sorry for this failing. 'We will now take action on two fronts – fair, clear and appropriate actions to ensure proper accountability and the immediate implementation of steps to prevent such errors being repeated.' The BBC Board said: 'We thank Peter Johnston for his work. His report is a comprehensive examination of a complex programme, the production of which spanned many months from concept through to broadcast – and is critical in laying bare the facts of what happened. 'Nothing is more important than trust and transparency in our journalism. We welcome the actions the executive are taking to avoid this failing being repeated in the future.' Hoyo Films said in a statement that they take the report findings 'extremely seriously' and 'apologise for the mistake that resulted in a breach of the (BBC) editorial guidelines'. They added: 'We are pleased that the report found that there was no evidence of inappropriate influence on the content of the documentary from any third party. 'We appreciate the rigorous nature of this investigation, and its findings that Hoyo Films did not intentionally mislead the BBC, that there were no other breaches of the editorial guidelines in the programme, and that there was no evidence to suggest that the programme funds were spent other than for reasonable, production-related purposes. 'Hoyo Films welcomes the report's recommendations and hope they will improve processes and prevent similar problems in the future. 'We are working closely with the BBC to see if we can find an appropriate way to bring back to iPlayer the stories of those featured in the programme. 'Our team in Gaza risked their lives to document the devastating impact of war on children. 'Gaza: How To Survive A Warzone remains a vital account, and our contributors – who have no say in the conflict – deserve to have their voices heard.' It comes as it was announced that Mr Davie and BBC chairman Samir Shah will face questions from MPs over the documentary, the investigation into allegations of misconduct made against Gregg Wallace, and its Glastonbury Festival coverage of Bob Vylan and Kneecap. The pair will appear before the Culture, Media and Sport Committee on September 9.

Can BBC learn from Gaza documentary controversy?
Can BBC learn from Gaza documentary controversy?

Sky News

time40 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Can BBC learn from Gaza documentary controversy?

👉 Listen to Sky News Daily on your podcast app 👈 The BBC breached its own editorial rules when it didn't explain that a 13-year-old, used to narrate a documentary about Gaza was, in fact, the son of a Hamas official. A review has found that the independent production company, Hoyo Films, bears most of the responsibility for what happened - but that BBC bosses should have had more oversight of the film. The corporation says it is taking action but, so far, nobody has lost their job. However, it is creating a new management role called 'Director of News Documentaries' as a result of the review. Niall Paterson speaks to correspondent Katie Spencer about the BBC's response - and former culture secretary John Whittingdale tells the podcast that he's concerned the corporation doesn't seem to learn from its mistakes.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store