Gray wolf pups seen on Colorado trail cam. What to know about 3 new wolf packs
Wildlife officials in Colorado have reported three new gray wolf packs as part of the state's plan to rebuild populations in the area, and shared footage of three pups captured on a trail camera.
Colorado Parks and Wildlife made the announcement on Thursday, July 17, sharing video of three gray wolf pups in Routt County, part of northwestern Colorado. In the footage, the pups appear to scratch their ears, rest a bit and playfully bite one another.
The new packs are known as King Mountain Pack in Routt County, One Ear Pack in Jackson County and Three Creeks Pack in Rio Blanco County.
According to the department, officials recognize wolf packs once a breeding pair has given birth to pups.
The department said staff members have seen pups at multiple dens, although the total pup count has yet to be confirmed. It can be difficult for wildlife officials to account for the pups during late spring or early summer because they are small, live in habitats with dense cover and they may spend time underground, the department said.
"Successful pack formation is vital to our wolf restoration plan – not just for bolstering Colorado's wolf population, but also for developing pack territories," the department said. "Defined territories help to monitor and better predict wolf behaviors."
More wolves will be relocated to Colorado during the winter of 2025 to 2026, officials said. Staff members are scheduling consultations with stakeholders in the planned release zone.
The ups and downs of Colorado wolf populations
Gray wolves were reintroduced to Colorado in 2023 and then again in 2025, but the move has been criticized because of the threat wolves pose to livestock and people.
The day the footage of the pups was shared, the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission awarded two Colorado ranchers nearly $200,000 in wolf depredation compensation claims, reported the Coloradoan, part of the USA TODAY Network.
A lawyer for one rancher said her client reported 89 missing and dead calves in 2024 and averaged 92 over the three years prior.
How are officials making sure wolf populations don't create conflict?
Colorado Parks and Wildlife said in this month's update that it has made efforts to minimize conflict as wildlife and livestock movements change with the seasons. These efforts have evolved, the department said.
One way the department is minimizing conflict is by having range riders present for animals in open range. Range riders look out for predators, monitor livestock health and track wildlife.
Colorado Parks and Wildlife has nine range riders focusing on areas with concentrated wolf activity; they can move to other areas if need be, though.
The department said it is also investigating cases where wolves do harm other animals, and works with the Colorado Department of Agriculture for carcass removal, including in remote areas.
Colorado officials: 5 wolves dead since January 2025, but that's no reason to stop the program
There have been five wolf deaths since January 2025, Eric Odell, the department's Wolf Conservation program manager said in the update. Two of the deaths were reported in Wyoming, while three were in Colorado.
The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will determine the cause of death for these wolves since they are from a protected species under the Endangered Species Act.
"We knew from the early stages of planning wolf restoration that there would be some level of mortality amongst translocated gray wolves," Odell said. "The mortality that has been experienced by the wolf population this year is not a reason to pause translocation efforts."
Colorado Parks and Wildlife said that soon, the program will hire a Wolf Damage and Conflict Minimization Manager. The individual hired will help support the program's primary goal, in addition to making sure things go smoothly when working with other agencies.
Contributing: Trevor Hughes, USA TODAY & Miles Blumhardt, The Coloradoan
Saleen Martin is a reporter on USA TODAY's NOW team. She is from Norfolk, Virginia – the 757. Email her at sdmartin@usatoday.com.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
4 days ago
- USA Today
Gray wolf pups seen on Colorado trail cam. What to know about 3 new wolf packs
The new packs are known as the King Mountain Pack in Routt County, the One Ear Pack in Jackson County and the Three Creeks Pack in Rio Blanco County. Wildlife officials in Colorado have reported three new gray wolf packs as part of the state's plan to rebuild populations in the area, and shared footage of three pups captured on a trail camera. Colorado Parks and Wildlife made the announcement on Thursday, July 17, sharing video of three gray wolf pups in Routt County, part of northwestern Colorado. In the footage, the pups appear to scratch their ears, rest a bit and playfully bite one another. The new packs are known as King Mountain Pack in Routt County, One Ear Pack in Jackson County and Three Creeks Pack in Rio Blanco County. According to the department, officials recognize wolf packs once a breeding pair has given birth to pups. The department said staff members have seen pups at multiple dens, although the total pup count has yet to be confirmed. It can be difficult for wildlife officials to account for the pups during late spring or early summer because they are small, live in habitats with dense cover and they may spend time underground, the department said. "Successful pack formation is vital to our wolf restoration plan – not just for bolstering Colorado's wolf population, but also for developing pack territories," the department said. "Defined territories help to monitor and better predict wolf behaviors." More wolves will be relocated to Colorado during the winter of 2025 to 2026, officials said. Staff members are scheduling consultations with stakeholders in the planned release zone. The ups and downs of Colorado wolf populations Gray wolves were reintroduced to Colorado in 2023 and then again in 2025, but the move has been criticized because of the threat wolves pose to livestock and people. The day the footage of the pups was shared, the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission awarded two Colorado ranchers nearly $200,000 in wolf depredation compensation claims, reported the Coloradoan, part of the USA TODAY Network. A lawyer for one rancher said her client reported 89 missing and dead calves in 2024 and averaged 92 over the three years prior. How are officials making sure wolf populations don't create conflict? Colorado Parks and Wildlife said in this month's update that it has made efforts to minimize conflict as wildlife and livestock movements change with the seasons. These efforts have evolved, the department said. One way the department is minimizing conflict is by having range riders present for animals in open range. Range riders look out for predators, monitor livestock health and track wildlife. Colorado Parks and Wildlife has nine range riders focusing on areas with concentrated wolf activity; they can move to other areas if need be, though. The department said it is also investigating cases where wolves do harm other animals, and works with the Colorado Department of Agriculture for carcass removal, including in remote areas. Colorado officials: 5 wolves dead since January 2025, but that's no reason to stop the program There have been five wolf deaths since January 2025, Eric Odell, the department's Wolf Conservation program manager said in the update. Two of the deaths were reported in Wyoming, while three were in Colorado. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service will determine the cause of death for these wolves since they are from a protected species under the Endangered Species Act. "We knew from the early stages of planning wolf restoration that there would be some level of mortality amongst translocated gray wolves," Odell said. "The mortality that has been experienced by the wolf population this year is not a reason to pause translocation efforts." Colorado Parks and Wildlife said that soon, the program will hire a Wolf Damage and Conflict Minimization Manager. The individual hired will help support the program's primary goal, in addition to making sure things go smoothly when working with other agencies. Contributing: Trevor Hughes, USA TODAY & Miles Blumhardt, The Coloradoan Saleen Martin is a reporter on USA TODAY's NOW team. She is from Norfolk, Virginia – the 757. Email her at sdmartin@
Yahoo
08-07-2025
- Yahoo
Colorado wildlife officials show patience with depredating Copper Creek wolfpack
The Copper Creek wolfpack has continued to chase and harass cattle in Pitkin County despite amped-up state resources, but wildlife officials are opting to give pack members a longer leash. Colorado Parks and Wildlife lethally removed a yearling member of the pack May 29. Since the removal, there have been no confirmed wolf depredations but several unconfirmed depredations and continued conflict on the same ranches for which the pack member was removed, agency staff reported at a special meeting July 7 focused on management options regarding the Copper Creek pack. The state wildlife agency desired to take a wait-and-see posture before removing any other pack members, Colorado Parks and Wildlife Director Jeff Davis told the agency's commission at the meeting. Davis said the agency promised the ranchers it will continue to spend resources — namely range riders around the clock — to keep the wolves from cattle on the McCabe and Lost Marbles ranches near Basalt, where a series of confirmed wolf depredations have taken place this spring. "There might be a need for additional actions taken, both nonlethal and potentially lethal," Davis told the commission. "My experience is that's rarely full pack removal, that's usually incremental. Those removals are intended to modify pack behavior. There is data out there that suggest we may not have modified that pack behavior enough." The data Davis presumably referenced is a thermal imaging video taken on one of the impacted ranches showing wolves chasing cattle and trying to separate a calf from its mother. You can watch that video below. Tai Jacober, a Pitkin County rancher and commission member, told commissioners and state wildlife staff that after range riders took a break from riding on the McCabe Ranch the night of July 3, the rancher, Brad Day, found his cattle scattered over other ranches in the area the next morning and had to retrieve them. 'This is a situation where we put these on the landscape, we recaptured them, knowing they were depredating, we let them out and they are behaving the same way they werel as before," Jacober said. "There's a limited amount of resources out there. At what point are we going to realize certain individuals are not worth all of the resources compared to the population we have to take care of?" Jacober made a motion at the commission's regular meeting in June to remove the Copper Creek pack. The motion was ruled out of order but prompted the special July 7 meeting. The Copper Creek pack has had seven confirmed depredations in Pitkin County this year after being implicated in the vast majority of the 18 confirmed depredations in Grand County last year. That prompted the state wildlife agency to capture pack members last fall and hold the breeding female and four pups at a facility until rereleasing them in January near the Lost Marbles and McCabe ranches, which went against the state's recovery plan of not rereleasing known depredating wolves. The pack's breeding male was also captured but was in poor condition when it was trapped and died days later. The state wildlife agency was unable to capture a fifth pup belonging to the pack. The agency confirmed at the July 7 meeting that the Copper Creek female, collar number 2312, and a wolf captured in British Columbia, 2305, had a litter of pups this spring. Lost Marbles and McCabe ranchers have said the den is near their cattle herds. Colorado Parks and Wildlife has poured resources into keeping the Copper Creek pack from more depredations in recent weeks, telling commissioners three to five range riders are riding the ranches and five of its nine wildlife damage specialists have worked with the ranches. Several commissioners who spoke at the meeting agreed with Colorado Parks and Wildlife's plan to give the conflict time to work itself out. Commissioner Jay Tutchton said removing the entire pack could jeopardize the state's federal 10(j) rule that allows lethal removal of depredating wolves in certain situations. "If we were start killing wolves for which we had no evidence or insufficient evidence that they had been involved in depredations, I think we would violate the 10(j) rule," Tutchton said. "That rule gives us flexibility to kill wolves involved in depredations but a bunch of puppies in a den, I do not think that's in line with the 10(j) rule." Commissioner Jack Murphy applauded the agency's handling of a difficult situation while learning as it goes along with implementing the state's wolf recovery plan that calls for releasing 10 to 15 wolves for three to five years in an effort to establish a self-sustaining wolf population. 'We don't have to kill everything, there are ways of dealing with things in a nonlethal way," Murphy said. "A lot on all sides need to relax a little bit and allow this to kind of play out. I feel for the ranchers that are having problems. Yes, it's a tough situation. Change is always difficult. I live in the city and I'm having to put up with traffic and that gets on my nerves, too." This article originally appeared on Fort Collins Coloradoan: Colorado officials are hesitant to kill another Copper Creek wolf
The Hill
16-06-2025
- The Hill
Activists urge Colorado to ban commercial sale of furs taken from state wildlife
Environmental activists are demanding that Colorado Parks and Wildlife prohibit the commercial sale of wildlife furs, filing a citizen rulemaking petition urging swift action on Monday. Contrary to the vast protections granted by Colorado to other animals, the Centennial State currently allows the for-profit sale of furs from all species deemed 'furbearers,' according to the Center for Biological Diversity, which filed the petition. Among the state's furbearers are beavers, ringtails, red foxes, pine martens and bobcats, as well as swift foxes, which is a species of special concern in the state, the group noted. 'Auctioning off piles of pelts from native animals is a relic of an era that drove iconic species, like beavers and bison, to the brink,' Samantha Miller, senior carnivore campaigner for the Center for Biological Diversity, said in a statement. Miller emphasized the need for Colorado to align with the policies of the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation — a set of principles that many agencies use to guide their wildlife management and conservation protocols. One key tenet of this model is the prohibition of commercial sales of wildlife, as such practices have hastened the declines and even extinctions of iconic species, the organization warned. Although the petition calls for the elimination of wildlife fur commercialization, it does include some exceptions for hand-tied fishing flies crafted with incidental fur and for traditional Western felted hats, in recognition of the cultural importance of these items. The petition also does not affect sales at stores that sell products with factory-farmed fur, as opposed to that of animals in the wild. 'Our state needs to modernize wildlife management to confront today's biodiversity crisis,' Miller said. Advancing a statewide regulation, as opposed to targeted local policies, would ensure uniformity and avoid the creation of a 'patchwork' of ordinances that cause enforcement difficulties, according to the petition. The document also stressed that a ban on commercial fur sales would remain 'consistent with the big game commercial hunting ban' upheld by Colorado, where it is a felony to sell or purchase big game. After receiving the petition, Colorado Parks and Wildlife then must review the document and recommend to the Colorado Parks and Wildlife Commission — the decisionmaker on citizen rulemaking petitions — whether the request should be denied or granted. The Hill has reached out to Colorado Parks and Wildlife for comment.
