Crackdown on public service leaks is leaked to RNZ
Photo:
RNZ / REECE BAKER
A crackdown on public servants leaking information has been revealed in an email leaked to RNZ.
RNZ has seen a copy of the email sent by a department head to staff outlining Public Service Commissioner Sir Brian Roche's warning against leaks of information.
"He is reminding us all of our responsibility as public servants and that leaking information goes against the core values of the Public Service and must stop.
"If individuals within our employment feel strongly on issues, there are mechanisms they can use but leaking of information isn't one of them," the message said.
It urged staff who had concerns to take their worries to their boss, or someone they trusted.
"If you have a concern about any work you are part of, or aware of something that is causing you concerns, please talk to your manager or someone within the ministry that you feel comfortable providing you with sound advice."
Sir Brian confirmed to RNZ he was aiming to put a stop to leaks, and in some cases public servants should be fired for doing so.
"I expect public service chief executives to take every possible action to ensure any leak is investigated and where appropriate those responsible are exited from our employment," he said.
"Public servants who leak information are undermining the government of the day and are in breach of the code of conduct. We all ultimately pay the price for the unprofessional actions of a few.
"This matter is really important to me."
The Commissioner's email was sent at 11.35am on 22 May, just hours after an RNZ report about a confidential pre-Budget decision seen by RNZ was
halted by court injunction
at the government's request just last week.
Other recent cases include documents seen by RNZ this month suggesting the government
would shut down the $118 million Kāhui Ako
programme;
more than 100 pages of internal feedback
in February over health data team cuts; leaks in December of a
report from the Interislanders ferries advisory group
; and leaks
relating to the Treaty Principles Bill
in September.
Green Party public service spokesperson Francisco Hernandez said it was a symptom of a public service that was seeing its advice and evidence ignored "in favour of evidence produced by the private sector and by
the tobacco lobby"
.
"I don't condone it, but I understand ... they're like 'well, if they're going to do this, if they're going to punch down on us, then what recourse do we have other than to actually go to the fourth estate'.
"When you ignore principles for good decision making, when you kind of rush through urgency, that leaves officials feeling frustrated and sidelined and obviously leaks aren't good but they are a manifestation of a deeper and unhealthy culture and contempt for democracy that this coalition has nurtured."
He said the relationship between the coalition government and the public service was mixed, and pointed to reporting on two
Official Information Act responses on the same matter
as an example of ministerial "interference" which could contribute.
"If public servants are sort of seeing that the ministers are trying to censor advice it's natural for them to feel frustrated and it's natural for them to actually see their advice which is evidence based, try and see the light of day."
RNZ has sought a response from the Public Service Minister Judith Collins.
Hernandez said the commissioner was just doing his job, but there needed to be balance - that he should also be ensuring ministers respected the neutrality of the public service.
Sir Brian also provided a copy of the email he had sent to public sector chief executives, which did not include the suggestion for staff to approach a manager over their concerns.
It reads:
Hi there,
You will have seen the media reports on the various leaks that are occurring in the system. Clearly this is unacceptable and we have to take every action possible to stop it.
The unauthorised release of information to third parties goes to the very heart of confidence and trust in our systems and us as public servants. We all ultimately pay the price for the unprofessional actions of a few.
Can I please ask you to reinforce within your respective agencies that this behaviour goes against the core values of the Public Service and must stop. If individuals within our employment feel strongly on issues there are mechanisms they can use but leaking of information isn't one of them.
Please reinforce the messages and take every action possible to ensure any leak is investigated and where appropriate those responsible are exited from our employment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
22 minutes ago
- RNZ News
Auckland YMCA accommodation staff scared of job losses if restructure goes ahead
The proposed restructure will affect the jobs of accommodation staff at the YMCA's City Lodge and at the Y's Pitt Street hostel in Auckland. Photo: Google Maps YMCA North staff who work in the Auckland accommodation team say they're scared of losing their jobs, worry about their mental health deteriorating and safety being compromised, if a proposed restructure goes ahead. The front-line accommodation staff at the Y's Pitt Street hostel and its City Lodge had a week to give feedback on a restructure proposal. If the proposal goes ahead, workers called Guest Service Agents who have been working both across day and night shifts will only be able to work either in a day or night role. Staff question how the proposal fits with the YMCA's key values. Guest Service Agents are staff who deal with customers who are staying at the YMCA's hostel and lodge, manage security, cleanliness, bookings and billing. Currently, they work both day and night shifts and are stationed at either the Pitt Street Hostel or the City Lodge. In the proposal - these roles will be disestablished. Staff will now have to apply to be either a day worker or a night worker and will work across two different locations. Night GSAs are the only reception and security staff on site - it means they must handle emergencies and security incidents by themselves. A staff member who usually works night shifts at the City Lodge hostel told Checkpoint they did not feel prepared. "All we had was a safeguarding training. The safeguarding is more related to protecting children and vulnerable people rather than yourself. So, in the security sense, we're not prepared." They said the security company the YMCA contracts is not based on site, so GSAs must call a hotline if they face issues. "I needed to evict an intruder that was in the building. A visitor there was not allowed to be there. He said, 'okay give me 40 minutes and I'll be there.' If we have a real emergency, real urgency, that's what we [are] dealing with. "Probably we'll have to sort it out ourselves or call the police." The worker said while they had been working people had tried to break in, the worker told Checkpoint they often carried a knife as they felt unsafe. As part of their roles, on the night shift they must watch the entrances and exits and do hourly walk throughs of public areas. "Night shifts are extra tough on health, on physical, mental health. You are extra tired even if you're just sitting on a chair [most] of the night." As part of Auckland Council's service agreements, which started on 1 April this year, service partners must pay their workers the living wage. Some Auckland Council leisure centres and pools are managed by the YMCA, meaning those YMCA staff must be paid the living wage. However, because the YMCA's accommodation centres are not part of this service agreement, it means workers don't have to be paid the living wage. The worker said after the restructure if they would only be working nights and the pay remained the same at $25 an hour, it would be unfair as they would be taking on more risk and a heavier workload. "We are the ones who are taking aggressive customers, being on safety hazards, we are the ones taking the burden." The worker said the way the proposal had been carried out went against the core values of the YMCA around Caring, Honesty, Respect and Responsibility. If the proposal is confirmed to stay the same, there will be interviews held over the rest of July and staff will be told the outcomes of the interviews at the end of the month. For staff who aren't selected for the new roles, if their current role is disestablished, they will be made redundant from 1 August. If the worker loses their job, they're worried about the current job market and if they will be able to find work at all within the next couple of months. "We live pay check by pay check, so I don't have any savings to my name. I should have like $10 to my name. It will be devastating, honestly, and I'm sure [it will] affect any area in my life financially, emotional, mental health wise." On 15 July accommodation staff who work across the YMCA's City Lodge and Pitt Street hostel were sent a letter outlining the proposal. The YMCA said it was because they were facing financial underperformance due to a mix of structural and market-related challenges. They say the roles will give clarity to the workers' responsibilities and accountability. YMCA North chief executive Rebecca Russell said in statement the proposed new structure would see greater streamlining across the two accommodation sites. The YMCA is actively seeking feedback from affected staff and no final decisions have been made. Security was a top priority, she said - with measures including mandatory door locking, pass cards and external security able to be called if needed. Russell said she would be concerned if staff were having to arm themselves and this had not been raised with management. But anyone worried about safety should provide that feedback during the consultation, she said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Anchor rediscovery reopens wounds from early encounter between Māori, European
The rediscovery of one of New Zealand's oldest European artifacts has reopened scars from an early encounter between Māori and a European explorer. An anchor that once belonged to the French ship Saint Jean Baptiste, captained by Jean-Francois Marie de Surville, has been located in the waters of Doubtless Bay in the Far North. In a storm in 1769 they lost an anchor and had to cut two more loose. Two of them have already been found - and the 3rd was discovered by Kelly Tarlton in 1982 - however the co-ordinates were misplaced until now. Photo: Hamish Williams Chair of Ngāti Kahu and Professor of Māori Studies at the University of Auckland Margaret Mutu said the crew of the Saint Jean Baptiste arrived in Doubtless Bay "in great disarray", several had scurvy and were nursed back to health by members of Ngāti Kahu. "That time of the year in December, January we know up at Karikari that that's a time when you're subjected to the tail ends of cyclones that come down from the Pacific, it happens every year. So storms were quite common and during a storm apparently one of their boats... got washed ashore. You know things get washed ashore up there at home, they're ours and we'll take them." Mutu said de Surville and his crew then "turned on" Ngāti Kahu, ransacked their kāinga (settlement) and then kidnapped a local rangatira named Ranginui. He latter died of thirst and scurvy aboard the Saint Jean Baptiste. The kidnapping was a portent of what was to come not unlike when Captain James Cook made first landfall at Tūranga, a visit that ended when the British killed or wounded nine Māori, she said. Ngāti Kahu chair Margaret Mutu Photo: RNZ / Leigh-Marama McLachlan Many years later Ngāti Kahu were approached at Haiti-tai-marangai Marae, not far from where the ship lost anchor, asking them to support a plaque commemorating de Surville, she said. "We talked about it at Haiti-tai-marangai... our mātua told us what had happened and we told those people to go away, we don't want to know about your de Surville." But she said the recovery of the anchor may be a chance to discuss this part of New Zealand's history. Mutu said one of the first things she did when she heard about this find was to ring home and make sure people there had heard it too. "Well people didn't know about it, so that's the first thing, we need to know about it, we need to sit down and talk about it and we will decide what happens to that anchor. "I just get a little bit annoyed about that people came into our territory, we welcomed them, we nursed them back to health, we saved them, they did the dirty on us and now they're coming back and telling us 'we're going to this, we're going to that, we're going to do the other.'" Heritage New Zealand have recommended the site of the anchor remain undisturbed until tangata whenua have been consulted, and the area can be assessed by a professional archaeologist. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Waitangi Tribunal pushes pause on seabed mine claim
The Tribunal parking the seabed mine claim is a rare setback for mana whenua who've resisted Trans-Tasman's plans since before the first application in 2013. Photo: Te Korimako o Taranaki The Waitangi Tribunal has rejected the application to halt a fast-track bid to mine the seabed off Pātea - but has left the door open if the process turns out to be unfair. Trans-Tasman Resources (TTR) has applied through the new Fast-Track Approvals Act (FTAA) to mine for iron, titanium and vanadium in the South Taranaki Bight. Multiple South Taranaki hapū and iwi sought a Tribunal injunction to block processing of the fast-track application, and an urgent hearing into alleged Crown Treaty breaches. But Tribunal deputy chair Judge Sarah Reeves agreed with the Crown that the fast-track needed a chance to be proven fair. The Crown argued a panel had not even been appointed - and that iwi will contribute to that selection and get a say once the decision-making panel is working. The Waitangi Tribunal grants urgent hearings in exceptional circumstances: applicants must be suffering - or likely to suffer - significant and irreversible prejudice from current or pending Crown actions. "I do not agree that the risk of significant and irreversible prejudice has crystallised, and the application is premature," said Judge Reeves. "The application does not yet meet the high threshold required to divert the resources and disrupt the Tribunal's inquiry programme that would result by granting an urgent inquiry," she ruled. "However, leave is reserved for the applicants to renew their application if circumstances change." Claimants said they had already suffered prejudice from their decade-long fight against TTR's mining application, right through to defeating the company in the Supreme Court. Mana whenua said government bias made the fast-track process unjust. Judge Reeves said the claimants believe "the Crown's vocal support of the [seabed mining] project and the FTAA appears to make meaningful engagement with the applicants or delay of the project to pursue alternative remedies 'highly unlikely'". On Friday in New Plymouth Shane Jones - the minister of oceans and fisheries, and of resources - called opponents a [ "belligerent, well-organised, rowdy] bunch of activists." He had previously dismissed mana whenua objectors as "pixie-like hapūs" - which many felt was an insult that still rankles in South Taranaki. Taranaki mana whenua claimants to the Tribunal are: Trans-Tasman Resources boss Alan Eggers says the seabed mine would bring jobs and riches without harming the environment. Photo: Te Korimako o Taranaki Other parties include Climate Justice Taranaki, Ngāruahine's school Te Kura o Ngāruahinerangi and from outside the region Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Porou ki Hauraki who also face an FTAA application. For the fast-track bid to be rejected the mine's negative impacts must significantly outweigh national and regional benefits - meaning environmental and cultural damage must be deemed greater than the money the mine makes for Taranaki and New Zealand. Last Thursday the organisers of the fast-track decision process ordered TTR to [ show where it had updated its evidence] since losing in the courts. "Almost all of the technical appendices are dated 2015 and were obviously prepared to support the 2016 application. Only a handful of those reports were updated in 2023 or 2024," noted panel convener Jennifer Caldwell. "The Cultural Values Assessment report, prepared by an independent consultant in 2017, was not updated despite what must have been new information as to the Māori concerns." A month earlier panel conveners ordered the Environmental Protection Authority to dig into the proposed seabed mine's [ environmental and economic impacts]. Every day of operation for at least 20 years the mining ship would discharge 180,000 tonnes of unwanted seabed sediment, a recognised pollutant, into the abundant waters of the Pātea Shoals. TTR claims region benefits of: A report for the miners predicted annual national gains of: LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ on Air.
