N. Korea warns of 'accidental' war risk from US-South Korea drills
SEOUL — North Korea on Monday condemned joint US-South Korean military drills as a "provocative act", warning of the danger of sparking war with "an accidental single shot," days after Seoul's air force mistakenly bombed a village on its own territory.
"This is a dangerous provocative act of leading the acute situation on the Korean peninsula, which may spark off a physical conflict between the two sides by means of an accidental single shot," said Pyongyang's foreign ministry, as quoted by state media.
The joint US-South Korea "Freedom Shield 2025" exercise was set to kick off on Monday, and will involve "live, virtual, and field-based training", according to a US statement.
The exercise will run until March 21, the statement said.
Military cooperation between Seoul and Washington regularly invites condemnation from Pyongyang, where the government sees such moves as preparation for an invasion, and often carries out missile tests in response.
The latest exercise comes after two South Korean Air Force fighter jets accidentally dropped eight bombs on a village during a joint training exercise with US forces on March 6.
Fifteen people, including civilians and military personnel, were wounded in that incident, South Korea's National Fire Agency said.
Relations between Pyongyang and Seoul have been at one of their lowest points in years, with the North launching a flurry of ballistic missiles last year in violation of UN sanctions.
The two Koreas remain technically at war since their 1950-1953 conflict ended in an armistice, not a peace treaty.
The United States stations tens of thousands of soldiers in the South, in part to protect Seoul against Pyongyang.
The large-scale Freedom Shield exercises are one of the allies' biggest annual joint exercises.
In its statement on Monday, North Korea's foreign ministry dubbed the exercises "an aggressive and confrontational war rehearsal".
Last week, Pyongyang slammed the United States for "political and military provocations" over the visit of a US Navy aircraft carrier to the South Korean port of Busan.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Bawaba
25 minutes ago
- Al Bawaba
Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron sue Candace Owens over 'Brigitte Is a Man' claims
Published July 24th, 2025 - 02:01 GMT ALBAWABA - Emmanuel and Brigitte Macron sue Candace Owens over defamation claims. French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife, Brigitte Macron, sued right-wing podcaster Candace Owens in the US on Wednesday for defamation after she said Brigitte could be a man. The case has 22 counts. A statement from the Macrons' lawyer, Tom Clare, says that the case filed in Delaware Superior Court says Owens has been running "a relentless year-long campaign of defamation against the Macrons." rance's President Emmanuel Macron (R) and his wife Brigitte Macron (L) (Photo by Ludovic MARIN / AFP) The complaint says that in March, right-wing commentator Candace Owens brought up an absurd conspiracy theory again in a YouTube video called "Is France's First Lady a Man?" Owens called the conspiracy idea "likely the biggest scandal in political history," and he talked about it a lot on X. 🚨 WATCH: Candace Owens just poured gasoline on the Macron lawsuit, straight-up telling Brigitte, 'You were born a man and you'll die a man… See you in court.' She's pledging to fight 'on behalf of the entire world,' daring the French First Family to drag this into discovery. — Brian Allen (@allenanalysis) July 24, 2025 Owens has made many videos about Brigitte Macron since then for her almost 4.5 million YouTube fans. One of these is a series called "Becoming Brigitte," which is made up of several videos. The lawsuit also says that she sold things that supported the story. Tom Clare, the Macrons' lawyer, said on Wednesday that they had asked Owens to stop making the claim for about a year and only sued her as a "last resort" when she stopped. According to the lawsuit, Owens was the first person to tell the US media and people around the world about these false claims. The couple is suing for punitive damages and says they have been hurt "substantially economically," which means they have lost business chances in the future. Owens shared a screenshot of a story about the Macrons' lawsuit on Instagram on Wednesday, along with a picture of the couple and the words, "I will be coming for this wig today." 'Watch this space.' Later, she made a video on YouTube in which she called the lawsuit "an obvious and desperate public relations strategy." CNN has tried to get Owens to say something. France's first lady Brigitte Macron (Photo by Mohammed BADRA / POOL / AFP) Brigitte Macron also sued two French women in 2022 for making similar claims. CNN station BFMTV says the women won an appeal this year after winning the first case. The case will now go to a higher court. The statement says Owens was asked to retract her claims along with "incontrovertible evidence disproving her allegations and proving, among other things, that Mrs. Macron was born a woman named Brigitte Trogneux, that she is not a blood relative of President Macron," and that the Macrons are not being manipulated or blackmailed by unknown forces through a program linked to the CIA. The official complaint said that Owens used this false statement to promote her own brand, get attention, and make money. © 2000 - 2025 Al Bawaba (
Jordan Times
an hour ago
- Jordan Times
France's top diplomat calls for foreign press access to Gaza
PARIS — French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot on Tuesday called on Israel to allow foreign press into the besieged Palestinian territory of Gaza, as warnings of famine mount after 21 months of war. He spoke after the AFP news agency warned that the lives of Palestinian freelance journalists it was working with in Gaza were in danger and urged Israel to allow them and their families to leave the occupied coastal territory. "I ask that the free and independent press be allowed to access Gaza to show what is happening there and to bear witness," Barrot told France Inter radio in an interview from eastern Ukraine. Asked if France would help AFP stringers leave Gaza, Barrot said France was "addressing the issue" and hoped to be able to evacuate freelancers working with French journalists "in the coming weeks". On Monday, an association of journalists at AFP called the Societe des Journalistes (Society of Journalists) sounded the alarm, urging "immediate intervention" to help reporters working with the agency in Gaza. The SDJ cited the example of one such freelancer, a 30-year-old living with his family in Gaza City, who reported on Sunday that his older brother "fell because of hunger". "We have lost journalists in conflicts, we have had injuries and prisoners in our ranks, but none of us can remember seeing a colleague die of starvation," it said. AFP management responded in a statement posted on X and Instagram which said that it shared the anguish about the "dire situation" of colleagues in Gaza. "Since October 7, Israel has prohibited access to the Gaza Strip for all international journalists. "In this context, the work of our Palestinian freelancers is crucial to inform the world," it said. "But their lives are in danger, which is why we urge the Israeli authorities to allow their immediate evacuation along with their families." AFP evacuated its eight staff members and their families from Gaza between January and April 2024. Barrot called for an "immediate ceasefire" after Israel on Monday expanded military operations to the central city of Deir el-Balah. "There is no longer any justification for the Israeli army's military operations in Gaza," he said. "This is an offensive that will exacerbate an already catastrophic situation and cause new forced displacements of populations, which we condemn in the strongest terms."
Ammon
5 hours ago
- Ammon
Trump push to ban birthright citizenship unconstitutional, US court rules
Ammon News - Donald Trump's effort to repeal birthright citizenship has hit another a stumbling block, with a federal appeals court in San Francisco declaring the president's attempt unconstitutional. The three-judge ruling panel in the 9th US circuit court of appeals echoed a district court in New Hampshire that blocked the executive order earlier this month. 'The district court correctly concluded that the executive order's proposed interpretation, denying citizenship to many persons born in the United States, is unconstitutional. We fully agree,' the verdict said. The case is now one stop further on the long road to the US supreme court. Trump's executive order banning birthright citizenship was signed just hours after the president took office on 20 January and was immediately challenged in a spread of courts across the country. It has faced a tumultuous legal battle ever since. Birthright citizenship is a legal principle that allows nearly everyone born on US soil to become a US citizen. In under a month since the executive order's filing, multiple judges across the country have filed injunctions blocking the order. Trump's administration then took to the supreme court to fight the injunctions. In a major decision, the US supreme court ruled that injunctions by the lower courts were exceeding their given authority, effectively transforming the mechanics of the US justice system. The verdict did not address the legality of the birthright citizenship ban itself. The Guardian
