End of Sounds Air route raises concerns
Wānaka Stakeholders Group chairwoman Meg Taylor said Sounds Air's cancellation of its Wanaka-Christchurch route was due to similar operational costs that had caused Air New Zealand to reduce or pull out of several regional routes.
"It's hard to make such routes pay even with turboprops," Ms Taylor said.
"Which is why we are nervous that an agenda still exists to develop Wānaka Airport for larger aircraft."
The airport's owner, Queenstown Airport, says jetliner travel is not on its governing body's radar.
Sounds Air announced yesterday it was quitting its three daily flights between Wanaka and Christchurch from September 28, due to increased passenger levies it said would cost it an extra $305,000 a year and push the price of tickets between to the two centres from $350 to at least $500.
Managing director Andrew Crawford said the company could no longer afford it and felt it had been forced to drop the route after five years of fighting for a solution.
"Costs are out of control and since Covid, costs have double and tripled."
The Civil Aviation Authority had introduced a 145% increase on passenger levies, he said.
"Even then [$500 is] not enough. There is only so much people can pay, so it just has to stop.
"They [CAA] are all the time holding their hands out saying give us more, give us more — and at some point you just can't," he said.
The problem was not passengers, as they had never had more in the company's history, he said.
Ten staff would be made redundant and the planes used on the route, which took nine passengers at a time, sold.
"I wouldn't be surprised if other airlines follow," Mr Campbell said.
The Wanaka Stakeholders Group is an Upper Clutha community group that has been actively involved in discussions and legal challenges regarding the future of Wanaka Airport and its potential development for commercial jet services.
In May, the group launched its own proposal for the airport, advocating for a development model centred on strong local input.
Ms Taylor said it would be interesting to see if the Queenstown Lakes District Council still wanted to push ahead with plans to expand Wanaka Airport and have larger commercial flights in and out of it given that there would now be no scheduled commercial flights from it.
The required certification involved spending more than $11 million at the airport as well as a more expensive management structure, she said.
Queenstown Airport manager of sustainability and corporate affairs Sarah Irvine said jetliner travel was not on the governing body's radar.
"Our strategy is 100% not that."
Queenstown Lakes District Mayor Glyn Lewers said the announcement from Sounds Air was disappointing for air connectivity to and from Wānaka.
"Some in the community really relied on this service and I certainly feel for the staff who will lose work as a result of this decision."
Interim Queenstown Airport chief executive Todd Grace also said the axing was disappointing.
"We share in the disappointment that this popular connection between Wanaka and Christchurch will be withdrawn. The Sounds Air team has worked hard to build a highly valued service and we know this will be missed by the local community."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
24 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Housing market recovery delayed despite rising sales volumes
Cotality (formerly known as CoreLogic and one of the foremost authorities on the housing market) recently noted that volumes have been gradually rising for about two years. It points out that the rise in May activity pushed sales levels to 5% above anything we've seen at that point in the year since 2016. On that basis, the slump looks to be behind us, but we haven't seen a recovery on the pricing front. The REINZ house price index (HPI) has fallen for six out of the past seven months. Nationwide prices are unchanged over the past 12 months and still 16.3% below the peak in late 2021. That's not the case everywhere, of course. The South Island has performed much more strongly, with Canterbury, Otago and Southland more buoyant and all within 5% of the peak. The impact of a solid agricultural sector is likely to be part of the reason for that. In contrast, Auckland and Wellington have struggled and are still more than 20% below the heady levels of a few years ago. The median number of days to sell is also elevated, reflecting a sluggish market in which properties sit unsold for longer. It rose to 50 days in June, and has averaged 47 in the past 12 months. That's the highest since mid-2023, when interest rates were rising quickly and the economy was in recession. Excluding that period, it's the highest since 2008 and 2009, during the Global Financial Crisis. There are numerous reasons to explain our underperforming housing market. For a start, affordability is still awful. Prices have been flat for two years, having fallen almost 20% from the peak before that. However, the rise during 2020 and 2021 was so dramatic (48% in less than two years) that, even after the multi-year slump, prices are still more than 20% above pre-Covid levels. That boom was primarily driven by ultra-low borrowing costs, with the one-year mortgage rate falling to 2.2%. In data going back to the early 1960s, there's never been a time when interest rates have come close to being that low, and we might not see them again in our lifetime. Many would argue that prices were pumped up so much during that period that they might need to fall further (or at least languish for a little longer) for reality to catch up. Other costs of home ownership – such as rates, insurance and maintenance – have also increased sharply, while the policy backdrop hasn't been friendly to investors. Net migration has declined much more than expected, after hitting record highs in 2023. To use a technical phrase, it's fallen off a cliff. New migrant numbers (of working age) were comfortably above 100,000 a year 18 months ago, but they've dropped to fewer than 10,000 today. Apart from the Covid-era when the borders were closed, that's the lowest since the 2010-13 period, and before that 2000-01. For many of those who are still here, job security is a concern. The unemployment rate has been steadily increasing for three years, and it's sitting at 5.1%. Apart from one quarter during the unusual Covid period, that's the highest in more than eight years. People are reluctant to make major financial commitments when they don't feel completely safe in their jobs. Unemployment is expected to push a little higher, so a shift in sentiment could be unlikely until late this year or into next year. Nobody can accurately say where house prices will go from here. Plenty of people incorrectly predicted declines in early 2020, and just as many expected a recovery to be under way by now. Reserve Bank forecasts suggest prices will grow by 4.2% annually over the coming three years. That's below the long-term average (which has been 5.7% since 1990) but it's slightly above inflation, GDP and population growth expectations. All these headwinds, as well as a high number of listings, have swung the power balance in favour of buyers, including those looking for a first home. That's unlikely to change in the near term, which is good news in many ways. I'm not sure if any of us should be hoping for another boom. A stable-but-sluggish period for house prices could be a more desirable outcome for the economy, and society overall. For the first time in a long while, the housing market is working more for buyers than sellers, and that rebalancing might be exactly what we need. Mark Lister is investment director at Craigs Investment Partners. The information in this article is provided for information only, is intended to be general in nature, and does not take into account your financial situation, objectives, goals, or risk tolerance. Before making any investment decision, Craigs Investment Partners recommends you contact an investment adviser.
1News
16 hours ago
- 1News
Why NZ can't shake the recession: 'Brought to its knees'
New Zealanders were told to "survive till '25" for the economy to pick up - but now one major bank economist says it's probably going to be 2026 before any real improvement happens. Kiwibank's latest Annual Regional Note shows small improvements across the country, but weak scores overall. The national average score has lifted from three out of 10 to four. Southland and Otago top the table at five. Otago was boosted by a recovery in international tourism and improvement in employment. Northland, Taranaki and Gisborne went backwards. Taranaki had the biggest fall in employment of anywhere in the country, at 8%. Northland reported a double-digit drop in building consents. ADVERTISEMENT Retail sales remain below their average levels over the past decade in most regions, as weak household confidence weighs on consumption. Kiwibank said Wellington recorded the steepest annual decline at -3.3%, while regions like Waikato, Northland and the Bay of Plenty experienced a slight improvement on last year. 'Wellington is just more pessimistic' Wellington's score improved from a two out of 10 to a three out of 10 while Auckland lifted from a three to four. "Wellington is just more pessimistic," Kiwibank chief economist Jarrod Kerr said. "It's gone through a lot in recent years. You can see it in their activity, you can see it in the housing market. You can see it in the economy, the city has been brought to its knees and it's been struggling to shake the pessimistic vibe." He said both Auckland and Wellington were well below average. "If you look across the regions, some of them have gone backwards and others are improving but it's not good. "When you look at the South Island things are better, people are definitely more optimistic in the South Island but even then the top-scoring regions get a five out of 10." ADVERTISEMENT He said the report helped solidify the view that rate cuts to date had not been enough to turn around the economy. "We're really crawling out of this recession rather than regaining our footing and looking to grow from here. We're still struggling across the entire country." He said Kiwibank customers last year had talked about needing to hold on until this year. "We are halfway through the year and, yes, things are better but only by a little bit." Worse off than Australia New Zealand was worse off than Australia, he said. "Their economy is much stronger than ours but in their terms it's soft… where everything washes out is the labour market and, you know, the unemployment rate tells you a lot. Our unemployment rate is over 5% and theirs is pretty close to 4%." ADVERTISEMENT Part of the reason was the more aggressive interest rate hikes from the Reserve Bank, he said. "We were much more aggressive in our rate hikes than in Australia. We were much more aggressive on inflation than across the Tasman. "I think both the RBA and RBNZ made mistakes as I think every central bank did through the Covid period, we overstimulated in hindsight but at the time it was the right thing to do. And then we had to deal with the inflation problem." He said the Reserve Bank had kept the official cash rate at 5.5% for too long as it worked to tackle inflation. "We had a really bad recession last year, which the Reserve Bank openly orchestrated, they said 'look, we need a recession to get inflation back down'. The Australians didn't orchestrate a recession, they didn't slam the economy into the floor." Kerr said recovery was still coming but he had hoped it would have started more obviously by now. "We're hoping it takes off in the second half of this year as more and more people refix on to lower rates. Then it's more of a 2026 story now."
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
KiwiSaver hardship reveals hidden cost of this economic downturn
We had news last week that KiwiSaver members withdrew more than $470 million for hardship reasons in the past 12 months amid continuing economic stress. Inland Revenue figures showed $470.7m was taken out of KiwiSaver in the June financial year, up 56.6% from $300.5m over the prior period. Looking back through the figures, there has certainly been a big spike in withdrawals in the past two years, but they have been on the rise for several years. Since Covid, both the number of people withdrawing funds and the amount withdrawn have risen steadily. As a barometer of the general economic situation, that isn't great. But the bigger problem with these hardship withdrawals is that the ultimate cost is (quite literally) compounded through the years. More than $1.3 billion of KiwiSaver funds has been withdrawn for hardship reasons in the past five years. If we do some back-of-the-envelope calculations and assume this money could have earned around 7% returns for the next 20 years, then we get a figure of more than $5b that will be missing from the nation's pool of retirement funds by 2045. Given the current trend of withdrawals, I suspect this is a conservative estimate. I understand why we allow withdrawals for hardship. It doesn't make sense for people to lose their homes or to go hungry when they have thousands of dollars sitting in a KiwiSaver account, so I'm not advocating that we stop allowing the withdrawals. However, there is a hidden cost and the situation highlights just how crucial it is for the Government to put more focus on retirement savings. There is a lot more money coming out of the KiwiSaver scheme to fund people into their first homes. Since Covid hit, an average of about $1.2b a year has been withdrawn from KiwiSaver for first home purchases. A home is an asset at least, and home ownership is an important step on the path to financial independence. I suspect we just have to accept the first home buyer withdrawals as a feature of the KiwiSaver scheme. If young people are in the scheme from the start of their working life and have $10,000 or $20,000 to put towards a house deposit, they are probably ahead of where many in my generation were at the same age. But the reality is that as a nation, we're well behind on where we need to be with our retirement savings. According to Stats NZ projections, the percentage of the population aged 65+ will increase from roughly 16-17% in the early 2020s to about 19-20% by 2030. By 2050, around 24-26% of New Zealanders are expected to be 65+. The old-age dependency ratio (ratio of elderly to working-age population) is expected to nearly double between 2020 and 2050. Our annual superannuation bill already comes in at more than $20b, and Treasury has projected that to rise to about $45b by 2037. According to Budget 2025 data, New Zealand Superannuation costs $4352 per person per year, making it the third-largest area of government spending after welfare ($6181 per person) and health ($5804 per person). From the Treasury's long-term fiscal projections, spending on NZ Super is projected to grow from 4.3% of GDP in 2010 to 7.9% in 2060, an increase of 3.6 percentage points. It is also rising as a percentage of the Government's total tax revenue – from about 17% now, it is projected to rise above 21% by 2037. So we know we have a problem. It seems almost certain that the age of superannuation will have to be raised to 67 in the coming years – despite the current opposition of NZ First and Labour. Future governments will almost certainly come under more pressure to means-test. KiwiSaver, which currently has total funds of $122b, is one of our great hopes. But the total figure is flattering. There are more than three million KiwiSaver members so the average fund size is just $37,000. Hopefully, that will be skewed by a lot of young people who will see their savings grow dramatically in the next decades. That brings us back to the downside of withdrawing funds early for hardship, though. We need to be saving more, not less. Moves by the Government to lift the default contribution rate for both employees and employers to 4% from April 2028 were a step in the right direction. However, they pale in comparison to Australia's compulsory scheme, which requires 12% employer contributions. The scheme has the equivalent of $4.5 trillion invested, making Australia the fifth-largest holder of pension fund assets in the world, not per capita but in nominal terms. Australia, for the record, also allows people to withdraw funds for hardship, but one suspects fewer people there need to. If we want to make the most of the KiwiSaver scheme we have, we need to look more closely at who is withdrawing their money and why. Meanwhile, young Kiwis are voting with their feet and joining the Australian Superannuation scheme ... by virtue of moving to work there. Liam Dann is business editor-at-large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, and also presents and produces videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.
