UK: Labour MP warns Starmer's immigration rhetoric could incite race riots
Earlier this week, Starmer caused consternation among several MPs when he said the UK risked becoming "an island of strangers" during a speech unveiling major immigration reforms in a newly published White Paper.
The rhetoric was likened by some to the language used by Enoch Powell in his controversial 1968 "Rivers of Blood" speech, in which he warned of a future where white people "found themselves made strangers in their own country".
Bell Ribeiro-Addy, a Labour MP for Clapham and Brixton Hill, told Middle East Eye's live show MEE Live that Starmer's rhetoric risked fuelling racism and emboldening the far right.
"We have to remember that a lot of the time when people say there are too many migrants in this country, they're talking about people like me," said Ribeiro-Addy, who represents one of London's largest Afro-Caribbean communities.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
"You are counting them by colours."
How Starmer careened from honourable left to racist right Read More »
Her comments come as Labour attempts to shore up support among socially conservative voters following losses to Reform UK in the recent local elections.
Reform, which has campaigned on hardline immigration policies, made gains in several areas, prompting Starmer to double down on controlling migration as part of his strategy to win over disaffected Tory voters.
But Ribeiro-Addy warned that Labour risks alienating core communities and repeating the mistakes of the past.
"It wasn't so long ago that immigration legislation retrospectively applied ruined people's lives," she said.
"We said we learned lessons from Windrush. And that's exactly the type of thing that's happening again."
She also warned that the government's tone could lead to a repeat of last year's riots, which erupted in several towns after the murders in Stockport in August.
In the aftermath of the killings, misinformation blaming migrant communities spread online, leading to targeted attacks, clashes with police, and protests organised by far-right groups.
"I am extremely concerned that we would go about this in a way that stokes division and incites the far right," Ribeiro-Addy said.
'Shame on you, Keir Starmer'
A number of other MPs also criticised Starmer's remarks, with Clive Lewis, a Labour MP for Norwich South, being among the first to compare it with Powell's "Rivers of Blood" speech.
"It's simply not sustainable for the prime minister to echo the language of Enoch Powell's 'rivers of blood' speech - invoking the idea of 'living in a land of strangers'," Lewis told The Independent.
Suspended Labour MP Zarah Sultana also accused Starmer of echoing Powell's speech.
"That speech fuelled decades of racism and division. Echoing it today is a disgrace. It adds to anti-migrant rhetoric that puts lives at risk. Shame on you, Keir Starmer," Sultana posted on X.
Sadiq Khan, the Labour mayor of London, said he would not have used the phrase "island of strangers", telling LBC: "The sort of language I use is different to the language used by others.
"That's not the sort of words I would use."
Meanwhile, Labour MP Richard Burgon took aim at the scapegoating of immigrants, saying: "Migrants didn't cause the housing crisis. Migrants didn't cause the NHS crisis. Migrants didn't drive up poverty levels. Years of austerity did all that.
"If you want to improve people's lives, stop the cuts, introduce a Wealth Tax, and properly invest in our communities," Burgon wrote on X.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Here's a timeline of Trump's comments on Gaza
After US President Donald Trump announced early in July that a 60-day ceasefire for Israel's war on Gaza was on the cards, people have been waiting with anticipation for the outcome of his meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House this week. Monday's discussions produced no reported breakthroughs, with talks expected to continue through Tuesday. Since returning to office on 20 January 2025, Trump has flip-flopped on plans for Gaza. Middle East Eye takes a look at the timeline of Trump's comments on Gaza. Trump's first mention of a captive deal and a ceasefire agreement: 15 January Five days before returning to the White House, Trump announced on his Truth Social platform that a hostage deal was underway. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters 'WE HAVE A DEAL FOR THE HOSTAGES IN THE MIDDLE EAST. THEY WILL BE RELEASED SHORTLY. THANK YOU!' Shortly after, he also announced that a ceasefire agreement was in place, brokered by Steve Witkoff, who at the time was the incoming Middle East envoy, as Trump had not yet been sworn into office. 'We're going to take it. We're going to hold it. We're going to cherish [Gaza]' - US President Donald Trump 'This EPIC ceasefire agreement could have only happened as a result of our Historic Victory in November, as it signaled to the entire World that my Administration would seek Peace and negotiate deals to ensure the safety of all Americans, and our Allies. I am thrilled American and Israeli hostages will be returning home to be reunited with their families and loved ones. 'With this deal in place, my National Security team, through the efforts of Special Envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, will continue to work closely with Israel and our Allies to make sure Gaza NEVER again becomes a terrorist safe haven. We will continue promoting PEACE THROUGH STRENGTH throughout the region, as we build upon the momentum of this ceasefire to further expand the Historic Abraham Accords. This is only the beginning of great things to come for America, and indeed, the World! 'We have achieved so much without even being in the White House. Just imagine all of the wonderful things that will happen when I return to the White House, and my Administration is fully confirmed, so they can secure more Victories for the United States!' Trump suggests displacing Palestinians in Gaza to neighbouring countries, and 'clean out that whole thing' : 25 January Just days after becoming president, Trump first touts that Jordan and Egypt should take in Palestinians from Gaza. "I'd like Egypt to take people, and I'd like Jordan to take people [from Gaza]," Trump said, adding he spoke that day with Jordan's King Abdullah. "It's literally a demolition site ... so I'd rather get involved with some of the Arab nations and build housing at a different location where they (Palestinians) can maybe live in peace for a change. We just clean out that whole thing." Trump reiterates plans for the forced displacement of Palestinians: 27, 30 and 31 January Trump reiterated his plan for Palestinian displacement on 27, 30 and 31 January. He said he expected Egypt and Jordan to agree to it despite their rejection of the proposal. 'I think he (Egypt's president) would do it, and I think the king of Jordan would do it, too," Trump said on 27 January. Trump proposes permanent displacement of Palestinians: 4 February Ahead of his first meeting with Netanyahu in Washington, Trump suggested permanently displacing Palestinians from Gaza, saying that Palestinians had no option but to leave the enclave because it had been ravaged by Israel's military assault, leaving tens of thousands of people both displaced and killed. Tony Blair Institute linked to Gaza plan condemned as ethnic cleansing: Report Read More » "I think they (Gazans) should get a good, fresh, beautiful piece of land, and we get some people to put up the money to build it. I don't know how they could want to stay (in Gaza)". Trump told reporters. The plan was condemned globally, with Palestinians, Arab nations, the United Nations and human rights experts saying it was tantamount to "ethnic cleansing". Trump proposes US takeover and redevelopment of Gaza: 4 February Later, on 4 February, Trump proposed a US takeover of Gaza during a press conference with Netanyahu, saying: "The US will take over the Gaza Strip... We'll own it and be responsible for dismantling all of the dangerous unexploded bombs and other weapons on the site". He proposed turning it into the "Riviera of the Middle East'. He said Washington would ask neighbouring countries with "humanitarian hearts" and "great wealth" to take in Palestinians. He said those countries will pay for rebuilding Gaza and housing displaced Palestinians. When asked if US troops would be sent, Trump said: "If it's necessary, we'll do that." When asked who will live in Gaza, Trump said: "I envision world people living there ... Palestinians also." Trump aides retract some of his statements about permanently displacing Palestinians: 5 February Trump's top aides walked back some of his statements about permanently displacing Palestinians and using the US military. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Palestinians should be "temporarily relocated" while Gaza is rebuilt, and Secretary of State Marco Rubio said Palestinians could leave Gaza for an "interim" period. Leavitt said Trump had not committed to putting "boots on the ground". Trump walks back his comments that US soldiers are needed in Gaza: 6 February Trump posted on social media: "The Gaza Strip would be turned over to the United States by Israel at the conclusion of fighting. The Palestinians ... would have already been resettled in far safer and more beautiful communities, with new and modern homes, in the region. No soldiers by the US would be needed!" Trump says Palestinians have no right to return: 10 February Fox News anchor Bret Baier asked Trump during an interview if Palestinians would have a right to return to Gaza under his plan, with Trump saying they would have "permanent" housing outside the strip. "No, they wouldn't because they're going to have much better housing." He added: "I'm talking about building a permanent place for them." Trump meets with Jordan's King Abdullah: 11 February On the day he met Jordan's King Abdullah II in Washington, Trump said that he would "take" and "hold" Gaza. "We will have Gaza. No reason to buy. There is nothing to buy. It's Gaza. It's a war-torn area. We're going to take it. We're going to hold it. We're going to cherish it". King Abdullah expressed his opposition to Trump's plans. Later that day, Trump was asked if he was going to withhold aid to Egypt and Jordan, which both rely on Washington for economic and military assistance. "You know, I think we'll do something. I don't have to threaten with money ... I do believe we're above that," he said. Trump releases AI-generated video of Gaza: 26 February Trump shares an incendiary AI-generated video on his Truth Social platform depicting a transformed Gaza under US control. The clip, posted without comment, is titled "Gaza 2025, What's Next?" The video faced global backlash. Trump's second meeting with Netanyahu in Washington: 7 April Trump met Netanyahu weeks after he broke the ceasefire agreement. Trump returned to his vision of a post-war exodus of Palestinians from Gaza, which Arab nations firmly rejected. "I think it's an incredible piece of important real estate," he said. "And I think it's something that we would be involved in, but you know, having a peace force like the United States there, controlling and owning the Gaza Strip, would be a good thing." "And if you take the people, the Palestinians, and move them around to different countries, and you have plenty of countries that will do that." Trump added: "A lot of people like my concept. But you know, there are other concepts that I like too, and there are some concepts I don't like". Arab leaders in March adopted a $53bn Egyptian reconstruction plan that would avoid displacing Palestinians from Gaza. Trump and Israel rejected it at the time. Trump announces a ceasefire deal is on the cards: 1 July Trump announced on Truth Social that a proposed 60-day ceasefire deal between Israel and Hamas is a possibility. 'We've had great cooperation from... surrounding countries' - US President Donald Trump 'My Representatives had a long and productive meeting with the Israelis today on Gaza. Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize the 60 Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the War. The Qataris and Egyptians, who have worked very hard to help bring Peace, will deliver this final proposal. I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Hamas announced that they were considering the deal and would like a permanent end to the war. Trump's third meeting with Netanyahu in Washington: 7 July When asked about displacing the Palestinians, Trump said the countries around Israel were helping out. "We've had great cooperation from... surrounding countries. ... So something good will happen," Trump said. Netanyahu said that Israel was working with Washington to find other countries to agree to such a plan. "If people want to stay, they can stay, but if they want to leave, they should be able to leave," Netanyahu said. "We're working with the United States very closely about finding countries that will seek to realise what they always say, that they wanted to give the Palestinians a better future. I think we're getting close to finding several countries." Washington has for decades backed a two-state solution between the Israelis and the Palestinians to create a state for Palestinians alongside Israel. Trump said, "I don't know" when he was asked if that solution was possible and referred the question to Netanyahu. "I think the Palestinians should have all the powers to govern themselves, but none of the powers to threaten us. That means a sovereign power, like overall security, will always remain in our hands," Netanyahu said.
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
US building air bases and ammunition warehouses in Israel
The US is building new infrastructure for Israeli aircraft and helicopters, along with other military buildings, according to public records. The current projects total more than $250m, with future ones expected to exceed $1bn, according to a call for interested contractors originally scheduled for June but postponed due to the Israel-Iran conflict. The Israeli news site Haaretz reported on the public documents on Monday. The US Army Corps of Engineers is using contractors to build ammunition depots and facilities for refuelling aircraft and helicopters, along with concrete structures for Israeli military bases. The documents also show that the US is looking for contractors to perform building maintenance repairs, including on air fields. One project for hangers, maintenance rooms and storage facilities for new Boeing KC-46 tankers that Israel is expected to receive in the coming years is projected to cost over $100m. Another project to house CH-53K helicopters is projected to cost up to $250m. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The US is also seeking tenders for the construction of ammunition storage buildings, which are estimated to cost up to $100m. Another tender spans seven years and is priced not to exceed $900m. It includes maintenance, repairs, construction, demolition, and infrastructure improvements at unspecified locations for the Israeli Ministry of Defence. Hamas ambush kills five soldiers in Israeli-controlled 'buffer zone' Read More » The projects are funded by foreign military financing. Israel receives $3.8bn annually in military aid. Under this system, the US and Israel decide how to spend the funds which go to US defence contractors. Since the Hamas-led 7 October 2023 attack on southern Israel, it has also received supplemental military aid totalling about $18bn. The US has previously used military aid to construct and maintain Israeli infrastructure. Previous public tender documents show that in 2012, the US did large-scale work at the Nevatim air base. The Washington Post reported at the time that the US was involved in the construction of a secret complex, which was named site '911'. The construction projects reported on Monday were planned before the recent Israel-Iran conflict. On Tuesday, Reuters cited an Israeli official confirming that Iranian ballistic missiles hit some Israeli military sites during their unprecedented 12-day conflict with Iran.
Middle East Eye
4 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
US has only 25 percent of Patriot interceptors needed for Pentagon planning: Report
The US has only about 25 percent of the Patriot missile interceptors that planners at the Pentagon assess are needed for all the US's military operations globally, according to a report by The Guardian on Tuesday. According to the report, deputy defence secretary Stephen Feinberg was so alarmed by the dwindling reserves that he ordered transfers to be halted while the Pentagon reviewed deliveries to US partners. Middle East Eye was the first to reveal during the recent Israel-Iran conflict that US officials were concerned about the pace at which they were using interceptors to defend Israel from ballistic missile attacks. A US official told MEE at the time that there were concerns a direct US strike on Iran could lead to bigger retaliation from the Islamic Republic, which would drain the US's stockpile to a 'horrendous' level. The conflict between Israel and Iran culminated in limited US strikes on Iran's Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan nuclear sites. Iran responded by informing the US via Qatar that it would fire 14 ballistic missiles at al-Udeid air base, southwest of Doha. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters According to open-source defence analysts, the US was expected to fire two to four interceptors for each missile fired. The Guardian reported that the US fired close to 30 patriot interceptors, or PAC-3s, to down the Iranian barrage. Even this relatively low number exacerbated the stockpile shortages, the report said. Dan Caine, US Air Force general and chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, told The War Zone news site that the operation to defend al-Udeid from Iran's symbolic attack was the 'largest single Patriot engagement in US military history'. Iran receives Chinese surface-to-air missile batteries after Israel ceasefire deal Read More » The relatively low numbers involved underscore just how precious a commodity Patriot missiles are, particularly at a time of increasing ballistic missile use in Eastern Europe and the Middle East. In 2024, Lockheed Martin reported that it produced and delivered 500 interceptors, a 30 percent increase from the previous year. In addition to firing Patriots during the conflict, the US joined in Israel's defence, using at least one Terminal High-Altitude Area Defence antimissile battery in the region and ship-mounted SM-3 interceptors. Roughly a week after the Israel-Iran conflict, the Trump administration confirmed reports that it had suspended the delivery of air defence interceptors and other weapons to Ukraine as it faced massive Russian air strikes. The shipments to Ukraine were halted when they were in Poland, The Wall Street Journal reported, and included Patriot air defence interceptors, air-to-air missiles, artillery rounds, Stinger surface-to-air missiles and Hellfire air-to-ground missiles. The suspension of Hellfire missiles to Ukraine is notable because just days before Israel launched its surprise attack on Iran in June, the US delivered hundreds of Hellfire missiles to Israel. MEE exclusively reported on the delivery. US President Donald Trump on Monday reversed the decision to halt shipments, stating that the US would send additional defensive supplies to Ukraine. However, he did not provide details on the weapons systems or numbers.
