Europe Inc's trade deal relief tempered by tariff reality
The trade deal announced on Sunday imposes a 15% import tariff on most EU goods. After an initial rally on relief that some sort of deal had been reached, shares of carmakers and alcohol firms fell.
Leading the way lower were BMW (BMWG.DE), opens new tab, Volkswagen (VOWG.DE), opens new tab, Mercedes-Benz (MBGn.DE), opens new tab and Stellantis (STLAM.MI), opens new tab, along with Pernod Ricard (PERP.PA), opens new tab and Anheuser-Busch InBev (ABI.BR), opens new tab, all down between 1-2%.
The falls reflect how the deal is being seen as lopsided, more a win for U.S. President Donald Trump, as well as ongoing uncertainties about the fine print of the final agreement.
The 15% rate is better than the 30% once threatened by Trump and will bring clarity for European makers of cars, planes and chemicals, but it's well above initial hopes of a zero-for-zero agreement and an average rate last year of around 2.5%.
"The price is high for both sides. European exports are losing competitiveness. U.S. customers are paying the tariffs," said Wolfgang Große Entrup, head of the German Chemical Industry Association VCI, adding though that it could have been worse.
"Those who expect a hurricane are grateful for a storm."
The deal, which also includes $600 billion of EU investments in the United States and $750 billion of EU purchases of U.S. energy over Trump's second term, includes some exemptions, even if details are still to be ironed out.
For carmakers, the 15% tariff is down from more than 25% under the global levy imposed by Trump in April. The EU is also cutting its tariff on U.S.-made cars to 2.5%, a senior European Commission official involved in the talks said.
Car parts makers were amongst the strongest stock market performers. Valeo (VLOF.PA), opens new tab was up around 4% while French supplier Forvia (FRVIA.PA), opens new tab, which also announced robust results earlier on Monday, was up over 10%.
"Tariffs are lower than those imposed by the U.S. administration in recent months, and if it reduces volatility and uncertainty, it's better for all economic players," Forvia's CFO Olivier Durand said on an earnings call.
Aircraft and aircraft parts will be exempt - good news for French planemaker Airbus (AIR.PA), opens new tab - as will certain chemicals, some generic drugs, semiconductor equipment, some farm products, natural resources and critical raw materials.
Shares in pharmaceutical companies Sanofi (SASY.PA), opens new tab, Roche (ROG.S), opens new tab and Novo Nordisk (NOVOb.CO), opens new tab all edged up, while generics maker Sandoz (SDZ.S), opens new tab rose strongly.
"It's definitely better than 200%. Most had 25% factored. But I don't think anyone believes it until it's signed," an industry source told Reuters, referring to previous threats from Trump to tax pharmaceutical imports.
Shares in the world's biggest supplier of computer chip-making equipment ASML (ASML.AS), opens new tab also rose more than 4%, among the biggest gainers on the pan-European STOXX 600 (.STOXX), opens new tab index.
Dutch brewer Heineken (HEIN.AS), opens new tab cheered the deal, with CEO Dolf van den Brink welcoming the certainty it brought.
The world's No.2 brewer sends beer, especially its namesake lager, to the U.S. from Europe and Mexico, and has also suffered from the indirect effect on consumer confidence in important markets like Brazil.
The rate on spirits that could impact firms such as Diageo (DGE.L), opens new tab, Pernod Ricard and LVMH (LVMH.PA), opens new tab is still being negotiated though.
"It seems that in coming days there could be negotiations for certain agricultural products, zero for zero, which is what the European and U.S. sectors have been calling for," said Jose Luis Benitez, director of the Spanish Wine Federation.
Benitez added that a 15% rate could put Europe at a disadvantage versus other wine exporting regions subject to 10% tariffs.
"If there are any exceptions, we hope that the (European) Commission understands that wine should be one of them."
Lamberto Frescobaldi, the president of Italian wine body UIV, said on Sunday that 15% tariffs on wine would result in a loss of 317 million euros ($372.63 million) over the next 12 months, though the group was waiting to see the final deal text.
Others said that the agreement- which followed on the heels of a similar one with Japan - helped bring greater clarity for company leaders, but could still hurt European firms.
"While this agreement puts an end to uncertainty, it poses a significant threat to the competitiveness of the French cosmetics industry," said Emmanuel Guichard, secretary general of French cosmetics association FEBEA, which counts L'Oreal (OREP.PA), opens new tab, LVMH (LVMH.PA), opens new tab and Clarins among its members.
($1 = 0.8507 euros)
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
a minute ago
- Reuters
Dollar mixed after four-day rally, Fed meeting in focus
July 30 (Reuters) - The U.S. dollar struggled for direction on Wednesday after a four-day winning streak, as investors shifted their focus to the outcome of the Federal Reserve's policy meeting later in the session and to upcoming economic data. Meanwhile, the euro was poised to record its first monthly drop since December 2024,, following a sharp reaction to a U.S.-European Union trade deal earlier this week. Investors were hesitant to place bets before crucial economic reports and central bank meetings in Canada, Japan and the United States. 'Markets will be paying attention to (Fed Chair) Jerome Powell's remarks, regarding any signs of internal dissent within the committee and the chair's stance amid ongoing tensions with the White House,' said Julien Lafargue, chief market strategist at Barclays Private Bank and Wealth Management. 'A rate cut in September remains a strong base case, much will depend on incoming data, starting with the U.S. jobs report due this Friday,' he added. The U.S. central bank, to President Donald Trump's chagrin, will likely leave interest rates unchanged on Wednesday. The dollar index was up 0.02% at 98.774. It hit a 5-week high at 98.923 on Tuesday and was on course to post its first month of gains this year. Analysts noted the selloff in U.S. assets — including Treasuries and the dollar — began in early April, when the U.S. appeared poised to launch a trade war against its major allies. Trade agreements struck with Japan last week and the EU over the weekend signalled a renewed U.S. commitment to global engagement, easing investor concerns. Investors' focus is now on negotiations between China and the U.S. after officials agreed to seek an extension of their 90-day tariff truce. China and the U.S remain important trade and economic partners, the Chinese commerce minister told a U.S. business delegation on Wednesday, according to his ministry. The euro was down 0.03% to $1.1540 after dropping for the first two days of the week and hitting a one-month low of $1.15185 on Tuesday. The euro is up 11.7% since the start of the year but on course for its first monthly drop in 2025. "The stark divergence in growth news between the U.S. and Europe should underpin the euro bearish momentum," said Francesco Pesole, forex strategist at ING. Data showed on Wednesday that the German economy contracted in the second quarter, while France's economy beat forecasts. Some analysts expressed concern about the economic impact of tariffs and their implications for the European Central Bank's rate outlook. However, markets adjusted their expectations for the ECB's easing path, pushing back the timing of a potential rate cut to March 2026 last week, following the U.S.-Japan trade deal and an ECB hawkish tilt after its policy meeting. 'On a comparative basis, the outcome (of trade negotiations) is welcome, if not wholly reassuring (for the euro area),' said Modupe Adegbembo, economist at Jefferies. 'The EU has successfully avoided escalation and has not lost significant ground relative to other major exporters,' Adegbembo added, noting the 5% baseline tariff is more favourable than the 30% applied to Chinese goods and is on par with Japan's 15%. The yen firmed 0.33% to 147.98 against the dollar. The spotlight will be on comments from BoJ Governor Kazuo Ueda as investors hope the recent trade deal between Japan and the U.S. paves the way for the central bank to raise rates. Analysts flagged that a divergence in tone from Ueda this week relative to Deputy Governor Shinichi Uchida last week, who was perceived as being hawkish, could be a catalyst for further yen selling over the near-term.
The Independent
a minute ago
- The Independent
Data sovereignty must be more than a slogan
Nutanix is a Business Reporter client Why business leaders must build digital exit strategies before regulation or geopolitics forces their hand. Not long ago, cloud strategy was all about performance, price and scale. Today, something far more fundamental is at stake – control. In boardrooms across Europe, business and public sector leaders are asking the same question: how can we ensure our data stays within reach, and outside the grip of foreign companies and powers? This is the question at the heart of digital sovereignty, a concept that has shifted from technical jargon to strategic imperative in record time. For the UK, it is becoming a defining issue of the post-Brexit digital economy. For the rest of Europe, it is a response to growing fears that foreign control over digital infrastructure represents not just a business risk, but a national one. And for all of us, it raises a critical truth. If we cannot walk away from our digital providers, we don't really own our data. We're only renting it and hoping the landlord stays friendly. The legal reality behind the cloud The urgency behind digital sovereignty isn't ideological. It's legal. Businesses may believe that hosting their data in a local or regional data centre provides protection, but legal jurisdiction often overrides geography. Take the United States CLOUD Act. This legislation compels US-based technology companies to provide access to data, no matter where that data is physically stored, if requested by US law enforcement or intelligence agencies. Crucially, it can also prohibit providers from disclosing those requests to customers. That creates a chilling scenario for European organisations. A UK business using a US-owned cloud provider might find its data accessed by US authorities without ever being notified. And if services are suspended, whether due to sanctions, litigation or political pressure, there may be no immediate recourse. This isn't theoretical. It's happening. One high-profile incident this spring saw Microsoft temporarily restrict access to services for the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, reportedly in response to US sanctions. Whether politically motivated or not, it proved a point: legal control trumps marketing claims, and companies are more exposed than they realise. Sovereignty demands mobility Digital sovereignty is not about avoiding the cloud. It's about being able to move if you need to. And that's where many businesses are still unprepared. Over the past decade, enterprises have become deeply dependent on hyperscale cloud platforms. That's not a criticism as those platforms offer incredible agility and innovation. But it also means many organisations lack a plan B. They have no practical, tested way to exit a provider if trust breaks down, prices spike or the geopolitical climate shifts. In fact, we increasingly see governments stepping in. In Norway, regulators have begun requiring public institutions to develop exit strategies for their cloud services. In Germany and Switzerland, digital infrastructure investment is being weighed not only on technical merit but on the legal independence of the provider. The UK, too, is moving. A bill currently under discussion would require stress-testing of organisational data strategies. This reflects a growing recognition that resilience must include the ability to change providers, quickly and cleanly, without downtime or data loss. What boards need to ask today Is this really an IT problem, or is it a C-suite issue that demands board-level attention? Senior leaders must now assess their organisation's digital dependencies as carefully as their financial exposure. Can you move your workloads if you need to? Do you have contracts that support rapid migration? Have you mapped where your data resides and who has legal access? Do you have the internal capabilities to operate hybrid or multicloud environments? Visibility remains a major challenge. According to the 2023 Nutanix Enterprise Cloud Index, only 13 per cent of public sector IT leaders say they completely understand where their data is located and under which jurisdiction it falls. That lack of clarity introduces unacceptable risk in a landscape where legal access matters as much as physical access. These are not questions to leave for later. In a crisis, it's already too late to design a safe exit. Sovereignty is not something that can be switched on. Instead, it must be built into the architecture of your business. The opportunity in resilience The good news is that a better approach is emerging. Modern, cloud-native platforms are enabling businesses to operate across multiple providers without lock-in. Hybrid multicloud infrastructure makes it possible to move data and applications across environments, without sacrificing performance or compliance. This is more than a future vision: it is already the direction of travel. To this point, 84 per cent of public sector organisations globally now view hybrid multicloud as their ideal operating model. The appeal is clear: the ability to combine flexibility, resilience and compliance within a single architecture. At Nutanix, we work with customers across Europe who are building exactly this kind of resilience. Whether in financial services, public sector or healthcare, these organisations recognise that sovereignty is not about cutting ties with the global cloud ecosystem. It is about making sure those ties are balanced, reversible and governed by clear terms. One such example is the UK's Department for Work & Pensions (DWP), which has embraced a modern cloud strategy to ensure operational continuity and flexibility at national scale. As one of the country's largest public service departments, DWP's ability to manage critical infrastructure with both agility and control speaks to the strategic importance of sovereign-ready digital platforms. We are also seeing growing momentum from policymakers, regulators and industry leaders who want to ensure European organisations can retain digital self-determination without cutting themselves off from innovation. This is the real goal. Not isolation, but independence. Now is the time to act In times of stability, it's easy to overlook hidden dependencies. But we are not in a stable time. From economic volatility to political fragmentation, the risks of inaction are growing. Sovereignty cannot be retrofitted. It must be planned for, budgeted for and tested, just like any other pillar of enterprise risk management. That process starts with visibility, continues with strategy and succeeds only with executive support. European business leaders, especially in critical sectors such as government, finance and healthcare, now face a choice. Treat data sovereignty as a compliance box to tick or as a competitive differentiator. This is no longer a niche concern, as 72 per cent of public sector decision-makers now say their top priority for cloud deployment is the ability to move workloads freely across environments. Because in the digital age, true sovereignty is not just about where your data lives. It's about whether you can take it with you. For more information, visit
The Independent
a minute ago
- The Independent
Trump's latest tariff deadline is approaching. Here are the trade deals the US has announced so far
The clock is ticking closer to U.S. President Donald Trump 's latest tariff deadline of Aug 1. And while several more deals — or at least frameworks for deals — have been reached since his last tariff deadline of July 9 came and went, trade talks with many countries are still in flux. Trump unveiled sweeping import taxes on goods coming into the U.S. from nearly every country back in April. That included heightened so-called reciprocal rates for certain countries, the bulk of which have since been postponed twice. The first 90-day pause arrived in an apparent effort to quell global market panic and facilitate country-by-country negotiations, with the Trump administration at one point setting a lofty goal of reaching 90 trade deals in 90 days. But three months later, only two deals emerged: with the U.K. and Vietnam. A separate 'framework' for a deal was hashed out with China. And by early July, Trump began sending warning letters that higher tariffs would be imposed against dozens of countries on Aug. 1. Since then, the U.S. has announced trade frameworks with the European Union, Japan, the Philippines and Indonesia. But, key details remain sparse — or not immediately captured in writing. Here's what we know about the agreements so far, in the order of those most recently announced. European Union The U.S. and the EU announced a trade framework that imposes 15% tariffs on most European goods — warding off Trump's most recent threat of 30% if no deal had been reached by Aug. 1. But some key details require more work. The headline of the agreement, unveiled July 27, is that the 15% tariff rate will apply to 70% of European goods brought into the U.S. — with the EU later confirming that that rate applies to pharmaceuticals, semiconductors, and car and car parts. But the remaining 30% of those imports is still open for negotiations. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said that both sides had agreed to zero tariffs for a range of 'strategic' goods. Meanwhile, Trump pointed to heightened investments from European companies in the U.S. — including what Trump said was $750 billion (638 billion euros) worth of natural gas, oil and nuclear fuel over three years, as well as an additional $600 billion (511 billion euros) under a political commitment that isn't legally binding, officials said. Japan On July 22, Trump announced a trade framework to impose 15% tariffs on Japan — down from his previously-threatened rate of 25%. The U.S. president also said Japan would invest $550 billion into the U.S. and would 'open' its economy to American autos and rice. The newly-agreed on 15% tariff rate also applies to Japanese cars — marking a welcome relief for automakers like Toyota Motor Corp. and Honda — which, like other automakers, have faced a 25% levy on key parts and finished vehicles going into the U.S. since earlier this year. But car companies in other countries, including U.S. competitors, worry that this could put them at a disadvantage. Philippines Shortly after a July 22 meeting with Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos, Jr., Trump announced that he would lower his upcoming tariffs on imports from the country to 19% — down just 1% from his previous threat of 20%. In return, Trump said on Truth Social, the U.S. would not pay tariffs on American goods it shipped to the Philippines. But additional details remained unclear. Marcos said his country was considering options such as having an open market without tariffs for U.S. automobiles, but emphasized details were still left to be worked out. Indonesia On July 15, Trump again took to social media to announce that he's agreed to lower his planned tariffs on Indonesian goods to 19% — down from a previously-threatened levy of 32% — while American goods sent to the southeast Asian country will face no tariffs. A fact sheet from the White House later confirmed that 'over 99% of U.S. products' exported to Indonesia would be sent duty-free. Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto said he will continue to negotiate with Trump, in hopes of further lowering the coming U.S. tariffs. Vietnam On July 2, Trump announced a trade deal with Vietnam that he said would allow U.S. goods to enter the country duty-free. Vietnamese exports to the U.S., by contrast, would face a 20% levy. That's less than half the 46% 'reciprocal' rate Trump proposed for Vietnamese goods back in April. But in addition to the new 20% tariff rate, Trump said the U.S. would impose a 40% tax on 'transshipping'' — targeting goods from another country that stop in Vietnam on their way to the United States. Washington complains that Chinese goods have been dodging higher U.S. tariffs by transiting through Vietnam. United Kingdom On May 8, Trump agreed to cut tariffs on British autos, steel and aluminum, among other trade pledges — while the U.K. promised to reduce levies on U.S. products like olive oil, wine and sports equipment. The deal was announced in grandiose terms by both countries, but some key details remained unknown for weeks. When the deal was announced, for example, the British government notably said that the U.S. agreed to exempt the U.K. from its then-universal 25% duties on foreign steel and aluminum — which would have effectively allowed both metals from the country to come into the U.S. duty-free. But the timing for when those cuts would actually take effect stayed up in the air for almost a month. It wasn't until early June, when Trump hiked his steel and aluminum tariffs to a punishing 50% worldwide, that the U.S. acknowledged it was time to implement the agreement. And even then, U.S. tariffs on British steel and aluminum did not go to zero. The U.K. was the only country spared from Trump's new 50% levies, but still faces 25% import taxes on the metals. China At its peak, Trump's new tariffs on Chinese goods totaled 145% — and China's countertariffs on American products reached 125%. But on May 12, the countries agreed to their own 90-day truce to roll back those levies to 30% and 10%, respectively. And in June, details began trickling in about a tentative trade agreement. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said that China had agreed to make it easier for American firms to acquire Chinese magnets and rare earth minerals critical for manufacturing and microchip production. Meanwhile, the Chinese Commerce Ministry said that the U.S. would 'lift a series of restrictive measures it had imposed on China." Other key details of the deal remain murky — including the timing of implementation for these terms. On July 29, China's top trade official said the two sides had agreed to work on extending an Aug. 12 deadline for new tariffs on each other, following a two-day trade meeting in Stockholm. The U.S. side said extension plans were discussed, but not decided. _________
