Is Swiping Fatigue Real? How Dating Apps Are Reshaping Mental Health
Recent studies show what many daters already feel: swiping through endless profiles can sap your mental health. Despite promising smarter, faster connections, dating apps are fueling rising levels of stress, self-doubt and emotional fatigue. While the technology keeps evolving, the human brain hasn't—leaving many users caught in a loop of micro-rejections, dopamine highs and quiet burnout.
The dating app industry is projected to surpass $13 billion by the end of 2025, fueled by innovations such as AI matchmaking, video-first profiles and "relationship prediction" algorithms. Despite this technological sophistication, users report rising levels of dissatisfaction, loneliness, and emotional fatigue.
A study published in Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking found that excessive dating app use is positively correlated with higher anxiety, depressive symptoms and decreased self-esteem. Even as user interfaces become more "intuitive," the emotional toll might grow heavier.
Behavioral science has long warned about the "paradox of choice": the more options we have, the less satisfied we often feel. Dating apps amplify this dynamic, offering an endless scroll of possibilities that, instead of empowering users, usually leave them overwhelmed, disillusioned and emotionally exhausted.
Decision fatigue sets in quickly when every swipe demands judgment and evaluation. Profiles blur together, genuine connections feel harder to spot, and the pursuit of "the next best thing" quietly chips away at attention spans and self-worth.
Compounding the problem is intermittent reinforcement, a psychological principle dating apps borrow from casino design. Occasional "wins" (think matches, messages, fleeting attention) can trigger dopamine spikes, encouraging users to stay engaged even when the experience feels increasingly hollow. In other words, the brain learns to chase the high, not the connection. In the end, more choice doesn't necessarily mean more love. Often, it simply means more second-guessing, more emotional wear and tear and less fulfillment.
Each swipe on a dating app isn't just a casual gesture. It activates the brain's reward system, triggering a rush of dopamine, the chemical associated with pleasure and motivation. Over time, this loop of expectation and intermittent reward can create addictive behavioral patterns similar to those seen in gambling.
But it's not just the dopamine rush that reshapes the brain. When matches don't materialize or conversations abruptly end (through ghosting, breadcrumbing or soft rejections), the brain's stress pathways light up. Cortisol, the primary stress hormone, spikes, leading to heightened anxiety, emotional dysregulation and, in chronic cases, burnout.
As Dr. Helen Fisher, a biological anthropologist and chief science advisor for Match.com, explains in her book, Anatomy of Love: A Natural History of Mating, Marriage, and Why We Stray, the human brain evolved for deep, gradual bonding, not the fast-paced, transactional nature of some app-based interactions.
Our neural wiring is still tuned for slow-cooked trust and attachment, not the dizzying buffet of micro-connections and rapid rejections that define today's digital dating culture. Dating apps might be leveraging neurobiology in ways our evolutionary systems aren't built to withstand, with real consequences for emotional resilience and psychological well-being.
The mental health consequences of dating app usage extend far beyond a few bad dates or bruised egos. Emerging research paints a fuller, more concerning picture; here's how:
While dating apps offer the illusion of limitless connection, the emotional reality for many users is far more complicated: increased isolation, lowered self-worth and a gradual erosion of authentic relational confidence.
Despite the challenges, dating apps don't have to be a mental health minefield. With more intentional design and more intentional usage, they can still serve as meaningful, telling tools for connection.
Some emerging platforms are already trying to shift the dynamic. Apps like Snack and Tame are moving away from the high-speed, high-volume model, introducing features like daily swipe limits, deeper profile prompts and compatibility-focused matching algorithms. These slow-dating features prioritize emotional resonance over instant gratification.
However, ethical app design is only part of the solution. Experts emphasize that users must also reclaim agency over how they engage with digital dating.
Practical strategies include:
The healthiest way to date today may not be to swipe faster or smarter but to swipe more mindfully, recognizing that real emotional health can't be outsourced to an algorithm.
Let's be clear: dating apps aren't inherently harmful, but they are powerful. And like any influential tool, they require thoughtful use, self-awareness and responsible design. When driven by algorithms optimized for attention, not well-being, these platforms can leave users more anxious, more isolated and less fulfilled than they were before they logged in.
But the solution isn't to delete every app or reject modern dating altogether. It's to engage more consciously and approach digital romance with the same care we bring to our mental health, our boundaries and our self-worth.
If the world moves faster than our nervous systems can process, the real challenge isn't finding love more efficiently. It's reconnecting with ourselves in the process. It's choosing depth over endless scrolls, intention over impulse and authenticity over algorithm.
Because the most meaningful matches won't come from swiping endlessly; they'll come from showing up as your whole self, grounded and well, whether online or off.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nvidia Chips Are Flowing to China Again -- What That Means for AI Adoption Trends
Key Points The U.S. government just changed its rules to allow Nvidia to ship its H2O chips to China. Most AI is still limited to large companies, and as Nvidia expands into new regions and clients, the technology will scale up and become more affordable. As the support for AI infrastructure grows, Nvidia stands to gain in the long term. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) has had an almost unreal ascent over the past few years. It crossed the $1 trillion market cap threshold in 2023 and became the fifth-largest company in the world. And it has skipped over the front-runners in two years, increasing by 329%, to become the most valuable company in the world, as well as the first to reach $4 trillion in value. The stock got a further boost this week when President Donald Trump relaxed the government's stance on selling Nvidia's chips to China. Let's see why this is important for Nvidia and what it means about artificial intelligence (AI) adoption trends globally. Image source: Getty Images. Nvidia, the U.S., and China Nvidia is the premier graphics processing unit (GPU) company, making the most powerful chips for several industries. Before OpenAI changed the tech landscape with the launch of ChatGPT a few years ago, Nvidia was most known for its gaming chips. Today, its greatest growth and potential are in generative AI. Nvidia is based in California, and as a U.S. company, it's subject to government rules and guidelines. Both the Biden administration and today's Trump administration have leveraged the U.S. lead in AI in its favor and attempted to curtail some of the country's best technology outside of the U.S., specifically in China. The situation has changed several times, and from this past April until this week, the U.S. had implemented new restrictions on what chips Nvidia could export to China. In the short term, the company had to take a $4.5 billion charge on its fiscal first-quarter (ended April 27) financial statements related to its H2O chips for orders it couldn't fulfill in China. CEO Jensen Huang has been outspoken in his disagreement with these policies and how he sees this working against the U.S. in the long term. Without Nvidia's products, he believes, Chinese tech companies will figure out how to build their own AI chips and models. "General-purpose, open-source research and foundation models are the backbone of AI innovation," Huang said. "We believe that every civil model should run best on the U.S. technology stack, encouraging nations worldwide to choose America."
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Wall Street is upbeat on tech megacaps, but big questions loom on AI spending, China, Trump tariffs
In this article AAPL AMZN MSFT META TSLA GOOGL Follow your favorite stocks CREATE FREE ACCOUNT Mark Zuckerberg, CEO of Meta Platforms Inc.; from left, Lauren Sanchez; Jeff Bezos, founder of Inc.; Sundar Pichai, CEO of Alphabet Inc.; and Elon Musk, CEO of Tesla Inc., during the 60th presidential inauguration in the rotunda of the U.S. Capitol in Washington, D.C., on Jan. 20, 2025. Julia Demaree Nikhinson | Bloomberg | Getty Images As Alphabet and Tesla get set to kick off the tech industry's second-quarter earnings blitz on Wednesday, Wall Street appears to be feeling good. The Nasdaq closed at a record on Monday, notching its sixth straight day in the green, and is now up 8% for the year after a rocky first quarter. But what happens over the next 10 days will likely determine whether the rally has legs. Following Wednesday's earnings announcements, the rest of the megacaps issue results next week, except for Nvidia , which should report in late August. Meta and Microsoft report earnings next Wednesday, with Amazon and Apple set to follow a day later. Last reporting period, investors worried about the strain of hefty tariffs on technology businesses and on whether big gambles on artificial intelligence would lead to returns for shareholders, or were signs of an inflating bubble. Three months later, stocks have bounced back, but the the industry is still grappling with the fallout from President Donald Trump's erratic global tariff policies and uncertainty over where duties on imports will ultimately land. Apple, Amazon and Alphabet all warned in the prior quarter that strained relationships with trading partners could weigh on profits, hurting product sales and ad spending. And the AI market has only gotten crazier, as tech companies show their willingness to pay astronomical sums for talent in addition to the tens of billions of dollars they're spending on infrastructure and model development. Meta's Mark Zuckerberg shocked the market in June, shelling out more than $14 billion to hire Scale AI CEO CEO Alexandr Wang and a few of his top staffers as part of an investment into the nine-year-old startup. Here's what investors will be closely following from the tech giants as earnings season commences. Alphabet Google CEO Sundar Pichai addresses the crowd during Google's annual I/O developers conference in Mountain View, California on May 20, 2025. Camille Cohen | AFP | Getty Images Alphabet 's dominant online ad business took a big hit earlier this year as worries mounted that Trump's tariff plans could crimp spending. Those fears haven't subsided. Revenue growth is expected to come in at 11%, according to LSEG, which would be the slowest rate of expansion for any period in two years. Alphabet shares have just turned positive for the year, still significantly lagging behind the Nasdaq. Last quarter, Alphabet narrowly beat estimates and fell short on YouTube revenue. Its chief business officer also said trade policies would "cause a slight headwind" to the company's ads business, primarily from retailers based in the Asia-Pacific region. Analysts have suggested of late that the business may be back on an upswing, thanks in part to advances in AI. Deutsche Bank analysts noted acceleration in the second quarter, while analysts at Goldman Sachs said the company's search business is in the "midst of a multi-year transformation." BMO Capital Markets analysts echoed that sentiment, writing in a recent note that return on ad spend (ROAS) should be improving. "As AI monetization continues to evolve, we believe Google will increasingly leverage its over twenty years of AI initiatives to continue expanding ROAS for its advertisers." the analysts wrote. Cloud revenue remains another key focus for shareholders eager to see how AI tools are boosting a unit that's trying to keep pace with Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure. Earlier this year, Alphabet said it would shell out $75 billion to beef up its data centers underpinning its AI and cloud business. Then there's the Waymo business, which has been a major source of investment for years. The robotaxi service now operates in five major U.S. cities and its vehicles had driven more than 100 million miles without a human driver or supervisor on board as of July 15. Tesla US President Donald Trump, right, and Elon Musk, chief executive officer of Tesla Inc., during a news conference in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, US, on Friday, May 30, 2025. Francis Chung | Bloomberg | Getty Images Tesla remains the biggest laggard in the group, with its stock down about 17% this year heading into Wednesday's earnings report after the bell. Earlier this month, Tesla reported a 14% year-over-year drop in second-quarter deliveries, marking a second straight quarterly decline. Automotive revenue in the first quarter fell 20%, and analysts are expecting a similar slide for the second quarter. Tesla is battling competition from Chinese and other EV makers that are offering cheaper alternatives. With Tesla, the story always revolves heavily around CEO Elon Musk. This earnings call will be the first since Musk's public split with President Trump. After spending over $250 million to help propel Trump back to the White House, Musk in May ended his stint as a special government employee leading Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), only to initiate a spat with the president over the multitrillion-dollar spending package he endorsed. Some investors may tune into the call to hear if Musk has anything to say regarding his current plan to build a new political party in the U.S. But most will be focused on the company's fundamentals and the many challenges it currently faces in trying to revitalize its EV sales. Tesla has long promised an affordable new EV model that could help it fend off the competition. Another big topic will likely be Tesla's robotaxi efforts after the company launched a limited driverless ride-hail service in Austin, Texas last month. While the Tesla Robotaxi rollout was seen by fans as a positive sign for the company, Bank of America analysts say it has "immaterial financial ramifications." Meta Mark Zuckerberg, chief executive officer of Meta Platforms Inc., during the Meta Connect event on Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2024. Bloomberg | Bloomberg | Getty Images Zuckerberg's AI spending spree has raised a lot of eyebrows. In addition to the hiring of Wang from Scale AI, Meta also brought on former GitHub CEO Nat Friedman and his investing partner Daniel Gross, who had been CEO of AI startup Safe Superintelligence. Zuckerberg later announced the creation of Meta Superintelligence Labs, led by Wang and Friedman. And Meta's CEO said last week that he plans to invest "hundreds of billions of dollars" into AI compute infrastructure, with plans to bring its first supercluster online next year. Last quarter, Meta upped its full-year capital expenditures outlook to between $64 billion and $72 billion from between $60 billion and $65 billion to reflect more data center investments in AI and potentially higher hardware costs. The pressure is on Zuckerberg to show results, or at least offer a clear strategy that investors can support. "While the recent talent hires and focus in this area are notable — and we expect meaningful improvements in models and user-facing applications — the road to platform leadership in AI remains long and highly competitive," analysts at MoffettNathanson wrote in a recent report. Analysts at Bank of America said they view Zuckerberg's latest commentary as "sign of confidence" in the strength of the company's business. Meta is expected to report revenue growth of 14.5% for the second quarter, according to analysts surveyed by LSEG, which would be the slowest growth rate since mid-2023, and Wall Street projects deceleration over the next two quarters. The Bank of America analysts wrote that Meta needs to "make a case for strong AI returns to drive multiple expansion." Microsoft Microsoft Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Satya Nadella speaks during the Microsoft Build conference opening keynote in Seattle, Washington on May 19, 2025. Jason Redmond | Afp | Getty Images Azure remains the focal point at Microsoft. It's the business that sparked CEO Satya Nadella's turnaround of the software maker over a decade ago, and is key to its ambitions in AI, where Microsoft has a tight but tense relationship with OpenAI. Microsoft's stock hit a record last week and is now up 20% for the year, about even with Meta and just behind Nvidia, which is the best performer this year among the megacaps. With a market cap of $3.8 trillion, Microsoft is firmly the second-largest company by value, trailing only Nvidia in that category as well. Analysts still see plenty of strength in Azure. However, Mizuho told clients about "one larger workload repatriation" during the quarter, which means the return to a physical data center. BMO analysts cited input from experts, who said President Trump's DOGE effort has "made it more difficult to close Fed deals." Amy Hood, Microsoft's finance chief, said in April that she expects 34% to 35% quarterly revenue growth for the current period from Azure and other cloud services. The growth rate was 35% last quarter. For Microsoft, which started its new fiscal year on July 1, investors also await fresh spending guidance. The consensus among analysts polled by Visible Alpha is about $99 billion. That would represent growth of 14%, compared with 56% expansion in the last fiscal year. Hood said in April that capital spending growth will slow. The company has already made cost-cutting strides this month, axing about 9,000 employees in its latest round of layoffs. Analysts surveyed by Visible Alpha see about $73 billion in operating expenses in Microsoft's fiscal 2026, which implies 11% growth. Apple Apple CEO Tim Cook speaks during Apple's annual World Wide Developers Conference at the company's headquarters in Cupertino, California, U.S., June 9, 2025. Laure Andrillon | Reuters Apple's biggest market may be the U.S., but the iPhone maker relies heavily on China and other Asian countries for parts and manufacturing for some of its most significant products. The company was one of the clearest losers from Trump's aggressive tariff agenda, which threatened to hamper global trade and hike the costs of selling products in the U.S. Apple shares have tumbled about 15% this year. Investors want more clarity on the company's strategy from here. In recent weeks, Trump has also held talks with India and Vietnam, where Apple has shifted some production in recent years. Revenue is expected to increase about 4% from a year earlier, according to LSEG, roughly inline with recent performance. Over the past four quarters, annual growth has ranged from 2% to 6%. Apple refrained from offering guidance last quarter, but CEO Tim Cook said the company was expecting an additional $900 million in costs for the period that ended in June. That was barring any changes to Trump's original tariff plans. The president lauded the company this year for its commitment to invest in U.S. manufacturing. Last week, Apple announced a $500 million deal with MP Materials to beef up manufacturing of rare earth materials in the U.S. Amazon Amazon CEO Andy Jassy speaks at a company event in New York on Feb. 26, 2025. Michael Nagle | Bloomberg | Getty Images Amazon's second-quarter results will offer fresh clues into how the e-commerce and cloud computing giant is navigating tariff uncertainty. Last quarter, Amazon forecast operating profit for the current period that was weaker than Wall Street anticipated. It called out "tariffs and trade policies," currency fluctuations and "recessionary fears" as factors that may affect its results. Investors were spooked by the guidance, despite reassurances from CEO Andy Jassy that Amazon is well positioned to weather the levies and could even take share from competitors, given its ability to offer low prices. Amazon said the company and many of its third-party sellers stocked up on inventory in anticipation of the tariffs. But once that inventory is sold through, new shipments from China and other countries could face higher import costs. Cloud growth is another major point of focus for Amazon shareholders. Revenue at AWS grew 17% in the first quarter, which was below analysts' estimates and the slowest growth in a year. Analysts are projecting about the same year-over-year growth for the second period. Jassy said in May that the cloud business was constrained by data center capacity limits around power and components like AI chips. "As fast as we actually put the capacity in, it's being consumed," Jassy told investors. He added that the company expects some of the constraints to ease up "as the year proceeds." Amazon shares are up about 4% this year. — CNBC's Jennifer Elias, Annie Palmer, Jordan Novet, Jonathan Vanian, Lora Kolodny and Kif Leswing contributed reporting. WATCH: Google might be in the lead in their AI capability watch now
New York Post
2 hours ago
- New York Post
US senators introduce bipartisan bill to make it easier to sue tech companies over AI copyright theft
Sens. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) and Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) rolled out bipartisan legislation to make it easier for people to sue tech companies for pirating their data to train artificial intelligence models — calling the rampant practice 'the largest intellectual property theft in American history' The proposed AI Accountability and Personal Data Protection Act — which follows a recent hearing in which the US lawmaker accused companies including Meta and OpenAI of pirating vast amounts of protected material — would bar AI companies from training on personal data or copyrighted works. 'AI companies are robbing the American people blind while leaving artists, writers, and other creators with zero recourse,' Hawley said in a statement. 'It's time for Congress to give the American worker their day in court to protect their personal data and creative works.' Advertisement 3 Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) is teaming up with a Democratic colleague to rein in Big Tech. Getty Images The bill would allow people to sue for use of their personal data or copyrighted works without giving consent. It would also require companies to disclose which third parties will be given access to data if consent is granted, and provides for financial penalties and injunctive relief. The Post has sought comment from Meta and OpenAI. Advertisement Hawley added that the 'bipartisan legislation would finally empower working Americans who now find their livelihoods in the crosshairs of Big Tech's lawlessness.' 3 Hawley and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) rolled out bipartistan legislation on Monday. Global Images Ukraine via Getty Images Blumenthal, his Democratic partner on the bill, underscored privacy risks and the need for legal recourse. 'Tech companies must be held accountable — and liable legally — when they breach consumer privacy, collecting, monetizing or sharing personal information without express consent,' he said. Advertisement In recent years, tech firms have been sued by content creators and publishers who allege that their copyrighted material was 'scraped' for use by AI models. Thomson Reuters successfully sued Ross Intelligence, saying Ross used Westlaw's copyrighted legal headnotes to build its legal research AI. In February, a federal court agreed, ruling that Ross was guilty of copyright infringement. 3 Several tech firms have been sued for allegedly using pirated material to train their large language models. AFP via Getty Images The news agency is seeking unspecified damages. Advertisement In December 2023, the New York Times filed suit against OpenAI and Microsoft alleging that its articles were used to train systems such as GPT‑4 without permission. That case is ongoing. Last month, a federal judge said Anthropic's use of books to train its AI model was 'highly transformative' and counted as fair use, but that keeping direct copies ('pirated' versions) in a central library was 'direct infringement.' The fight over damages and remedies is still ahead. Authors including Richard Kadrey say Meta used their books without permission to train LLaMA and other large language models. A court said Meta's use was also 'highly transformative' and fair use, but the case continues over whether any stored 'pirated' materials create liability.
