Entitled Married At First Sight star Jacqui Burfoot is slammed for accusing Jetstar cabin crew of stealing her partner's $800 jacket - before shock twist in the saga
The Married At First Sight star took to TikTok this week to recount an ordeal while flying with the budget airline.
She wasted no time letting her thoughts about Jetstar be known – telling followers from the start she was not a fan.
'Clint and I flew Jetstar. We never pick Jetstar, we are not fans of Jetstar because they're just budget. They do things poorly,' Jacqui said.
Jacqui went on to explain that when she and Clint recently caught a flight with the airline, she was wearing her partner's Hugo Boss jacket, worth 'somewhere between $400 and $800', to keep her legs warm.
From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop.
'The flight attendant came over and said, "Hey, we need to put your jacket away, can I please take that jacket from you?" And I was like, "Yeah, sure. Fine,"' she recalled.
The reality bride said the couple forgot about Clint's jacket until they arrived at their hotel.
'We get off the flight, we leave with our bags, we check into our hotel and Clint is like, "F***! Where is my jacket?" And I'm like, "Oh my God, babe. The lady took it off me."'
Already miffed about leaving the jacket behind, Jacqui became enraged when she called Jetstar to report the garment missing.
'The guy was like, "There was no lost property handed in today – we're going to file a case for you."'
This did not sit well with Jacqui, who then accused the cabin crew of taking off with Clint's jacket.
'I was like, "f*** off. If the cabin crew have f***ing nicked that jacket, I am going to blow my brains out. I am not happy about this at all,"' she said.
'I am fuming right now. I am like, "No f***ing way. You hand that jacket in right now." God help you Jetstar, if this jacket is not returned.'
Jacqui's rant drew a flurry of comments from followers, with many slamming the reality star for suggesting the airline would pilfer the article of clothing.
'As a former cabin crew, the likelihood of the crew taking the jacket is very, very slim,' one commented.
'There's no way any crew could get away with something like that. It's more likely it's been passed on to ground crew and just lost in the mix.'
Another offered: 'Girl, it's your fault, you should've asked for it once landed. Proves it's not that important if you forgot. if you fly often, you know it's a safety thing!!'
A third commented: 'I get the disappointment, but I feel like it's not that much of a big deal to be honest. Accidents happen.'
Yet another summed up the sentiment of many with: 'Your jacket, your problem.'
Jacqui returned to TikTok the following day to share a shock twist in the mile-high ordeal.
This time, Clint also featured in the clip, and he was happy to report the jacket had been found.
'Jetstar called. They have got the jacket in their hands at Sydney Airport and they're going to deliver it tonight,' he said.
Unlike his partner's previous spray, Clint was full of praise for Jetstar's customer service.
'They were so good, they were actually brilliant,' he said.
'The customer service was amazing , they called me twice today.'
Jacqui added the reason for the delay in locating the jacket was due to the couple's high profile.
'The best news is that they said that because they recognised that they knew our names, they didn't put it with the usual lost property. They put it in the manager's office,' she said.
'I guess I was quick to judge. The jacket is still not returned yet, though.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE So, Bec Judd has finally come clean about those 'tweakments'. But we all know there's one thing she WON'T admit on her little podcast... AMANDA GOFF
Clap clap. Standing ovation. Take a bow, Bec Judd - your timing is impeccable. You've finally told the truth about your beauty secrets. How stunning, how brave, how… convenient.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Is the F-word offensive in Queensland? The tiny record shop that answered that question in court – and changed the law
It was one of the first odd, angry shots fired in what we now know as the culture wars. On the morning of 14 February 1989, a plain-clothed officer from Queensland police's licensing branch was sniffing around Rocking Horse Records in Brisbane. He asked the owner, Warwick Vere, if he had any rude records that might be suitable for a 'wild Valentine's Day party'. A couple of hours later, farcical scenes ensued as four uniformed police raided the store, seizing suggestively titled records and tapes by (among others) Sydney punk band the Hard-Ons, Guns N' Roses' blockbuster album Appetite for Destruction and – most tellingly – a number of items by San Francisco satirists the Dead Kennedys. Vere was subsequently charged under the Vagrants, Gaming and Other Offences Act for exhibiting and selling obscene material. To this day, Vere remains incredulous. 'It was like they'd just gone through the handbook of far-right Christian groups from America,' he says. Rocking Horse has just turned 50. After Perth's Dada (est 1971), it is the oldest independent record store in Australia. Originally a tiny space in an Adelaide Street arcade, the shop has since moved several times – expanding, contracting and nearly going broke, before surfing the vinyl revival all the way to its current premises on Albert Street in the heart of Brisbane. Over the journey, it's been a meeting place for young musicians, a local lurk for generations of collectors and – during the 70s and 80s – a countercultural beacon during the repressive Bjelke-Petersen years. By 1989, though, Bjelke-Petersen was gone – forced out by the ruling National party as the Fitzgerald inquiry into police corruption engulfed the state government. On the ropes, it was mounting a fire-and-brimstone campaign to save the state from a multitude of sins – including by subjecting 'pornographic' rock music to the state's strict censorship laws. Like all good culture wars, it was imported from the US. In 1985, Tipper Gore (the then wife of future presidential candidate and environmental campaigner Al Gore) had brought home a copy of Prince's Purple Rain for her 11-year-old daughter, only to be whipped into a foam of moral panic by a reference to masturbation in His Purpleness's song Darling Nikki. Sign up for the fun stuff with our rundown of must-reads, pop culture and tips for the weekend, every Saturday morning Along with a number of other politicians' wives, Gore formed the Parents Music Resource Centre, which succeeded in convincing the record industry to introduce advisory warnings of explicit content in music. Notable opponents of the PMRC at the time included Frank Zappa, John Denver, Twisted Sister's Dee Snider and the Dead Kennedys frontman Jello Biafra. Biafra was a persistent thorn in the side – and a target – of America's self-proclaimed Moral Majority. In 1986, he himself became the subject of an obscenity prosecution when the PMRC made a complaint about a poster by the acclaimed Swiss artist HR Giger, which was included in the Dead Kennedys' third album Frankenchrist. The subsequent trial nearly drove Biafra into bankruptcy. The Dead Kennedys also had an esteemed place in Brisbane's punk history. In 1983, on the band's first Australian tour, drummer DH Peligro was arrested after their show at Festival Hall. Biafra later told American fanzine Maximumrocknroll that 'I felt safer walking around the streets of East Berlin than I did in Brisbane'. In Rocking Horse's case, Queensland police were acting on a complaint by a local Pentecostal preacher, John Pasterkamp. 'They sent a poor old detective in who later told me that they didn't really want to do it,' Vere remembers. 'But because it was going to be an election issue, they weren't about to give me any latitude.' Pasterkamp, too, had form. He'd already theatrically destroyed a copy of the Dead Kennedys' In God We Trust EP for the benefit of news cameras. He'd also appeared on A Current Affair, all het up about the Painters & Dockers song Kill Kill Kill – not realising it was a cover of a song that originally appeared on Get Smart. Host Jana Wendt tried not to laugh at him. Sign up to Saved for Later Catch up on the fun stuff with Guardian Australia's culture and lifestyle rundown of pop culture, trends and tips after newsletter promotion The seizure of the Gunners' Appetite for Destruction, however, delighted Vere. The album was available everywhere, raising the obvious question of why an independent record store was being targeted. 'I then engaged Warner and various other record companies to say to them, 'Well, this is your fight, as well as my fight',' he says. Money poured in for his legal defence. Nothing from Appetite for Destruction featured in Vere's trial in May 1989, though. At the centre of the case were two songs by the Dead Kennedys: Too Drunk to Fuck and I Kill Children. The surreal trial marked a turning point in Queensland history: the case hinged on whether or not the word 'fuck' could still be regarded as obscene by the average Queenslander at the time. And so the courtroom was repeatedly regaled with the delightful strains of Too Drunk to Fuck – to the evident despair of the magistrate, Don Fardon, who later noted in his judgment that the song 'repeats those same words monotonously, over and over, concluding with a sound I think intended to imitate vomiting'. Vere's counsel argued that community standards had changed by drawing on other contemporary examples of film and literature from the era. 'We went to see the Academy Award-winning movie of the year, which was Rain Man. That had 17 'fucks' in it!' Vere says. 'So we basically painted the magistrate into a corner, saying if he was going to convict us, all this other stuff would have to be banned as well.' As for I Kill Children, Vere says, 'It's a satire, and they didn't go beyond the title. We compared it to Jonathan Swift's A Modest Proposal, where he describes how to bake Irish babies for the English table and the best way to baste them. It was just nonsense.' Fardon – who had just found comedian Rodney Rude guilty of using offensive language – was forced to admit that 'amongst men in men-only situations its use is such that [fuck] is quite a common word, sometimes it amounts to every second word, and little or no objection seems to arise from it. It may well be the same at women's-only gatherings, but I don't know about that … In this community today, I think the word itself has well and truly ceased to shock or alarm even the tenderest of feelings if it is used with some circumspection.' The charges were dismissed. The National party government was banished to the political wilderness six months later, and everything in Brisbane, and Queensland, began to change. But Rocking Horse Records has survived. Taking pride of place above the counter is a coat of arms bearing the copy of In God We Trust, Inc torn in half by Pasterkamp – and signed by Biafra.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Walkouts, feuds and broken friendships: when book clubs go bad
'Friendships of over six years were broken overnight,' Rosa* says of the sudden, dramatic dissolution of her book club in Victoria, Australia some months ago. What started as a chance to share notes on the finer points of dramatic literature had become a real-life drama. The book club had been an important fixture of Rosa's calendar for several years and, like many others, was hosted on rotation in the homes of different members each month. Although its primary purpose was discussing books, Rosa felt it was equally about socialising, and members were encouraged to dress up in outfits relating to the month's book, with prizes for the best dressed. Cracks started appearing after a survey of the club's 12 members, all women in their early thirties, was shared to gather views on how it was working. When the anonymous feedback was presented at the next meeting, the moderator reported that most attenders felt there needed to be more 'commitment' to finishing the book, a comment which didn't go down well with some members. A few people felt singled out by the survey. 'It came to be interpreted as 'you need to finish the book or maybe don't come,'' says Rosa. Although the group was ostensibly used to sharing different points of view, this gap couldn't be bridged: before the night was over, some members had walked out, and left the group chat the next day. The book club hasn't met since. Book clubs are a staple in the diaries of literature lovers the world over and are reportedly increasing in popularity in Australia and the UK. Sometimes formed of friends, but just as often frequented by strangers connected only by locality, book clubs occupy a peculiar position somewhere between casual socialising and a semi-structured membership club. Perhaps unsurprisingly, bringing people together, often with alcohol, then encouraging them to voice their opinions can sometimes lead to bust ups. Erin Johnson, 42, has been running her London-based book club for nearly 10 years. With an open invitation policy, and 3,400 members online, the club usually attracts 10 to 20 people per in-person meeting. Inevitably some book club discussions 'veer off topic' into wider social issues, Johnson says. She sees this as par for the course. But when characters don't mesh well, discussions can sometimes get heated and disagreements have moved online after some meetings. This is a step too far for Johnson. 'Please don't air your dirty laundry on the public group for thousands of people to see – it's just meant to be a nice fun book club!' Although the world is not short of complicated, tough questions and strongly held beliefs, personal and procedural issues can be just as fractious as politics. A 2019 BookBrowse survey of nearly 4,000 book club members found the most commonly reported gripe was over-dominant personalities, followed by irregular attendance and members not reading the book. Karen Stillman, 47, a North Carolina native, has first-hand experience. 'For over a year, four women would turn up to our book club without having touched the book, saying they hadn't had a chance to read it. These women are all retired! How did they not have the time?' One evening, Stillman ran out of patience. 'They walked in without saying hello to half the group, so I went down to tell them: you need to read the book.' Her point was made: they left immediately and didn't return. These experiences highlight a tension at the core of many book club bust-ups: a difference in expectations. 'I think pretty much everyone joins a book club because they want to make new friends and meet new people, but people stay for different reasons,' says Becky, who lives on the west coast of the US. Becky's book club began as a monthly meeting of strangers but blossomed into meeting regularly for wider social activities. She had started the club to meet new people and shared organising duties with an old friend from high school. Club admin had begun to take its toll and Becky, who is now in her 30s, felt she was pulling more weight than her co-coordinator. 'I felt book club was a big part of my social life and very important to me, but my friend didn't respect it in the same way,' Becky says. The issue took up headspace for her friend, too: 'She wrote me a long email on Christmas Day breaking up with me!' Her friend hasn't come to book club since. Book clubs are a very simple form of community gathering. The entry requirements rarely extend beyond reading the book. Most are timid affairs that go off without issue, but since her own book club breakup, Rosa wonders if tightening this loose arrangement might have prevented disaster. 'The fallout makes me wonder whether these kind of semi-structured social events do need some sort of 'house rules',' she says. 'It's all a bit meta, but humans are complicated.' *Some names have been changed
