Starmer accuses Farage of WANTING his 'migrant merry go round' Channel boats deal to fail
The PM insisted Mr Farage would become 'irrelevant' if illegal immigration comes under control as he desperately defended the pact with France.
Sir Keir trumpeted the agreement as the major win from Emmanuel Macron 's State Visit to the UK last week.
In theory it would mean some of making the perilous crossing would be immediately returned to France, with the UK instead accepting other asylum seekers.
Sir Keir argues that the scheme can act as a deterrent. But he has refused to say how many of the thousands arriving in Britain by dinghy will actually be removed.
Leaks had suggested it would be 50 per week - which would amount to one in 17 at the current level. However, in the end even that figure was not signed off by the leaders.
Human-rights campaigners have also said they will support court challenges brought by small-boat arrivals, while the EU is assessing whether the scheme complies with the 'spirit and the letter of the law'.
Writing in the Sunday Express, Sir Keir said: 'We're taking action, doing the real work of grown up, sensible, pragmatic diplomacy.
'The result? Three trade deals and agreements to stop illegal migration in its tracks. Farage is terrified of this Government succeeding at stopping illegal migration.
'He doesn't want the numbers to go down because he knows that when they do, he'll fade into irrelevance.'
Mr Farage has branded the deal with France an 'humiliation for Brexit Britain'.
'We have acted today as an EU member and bowed down to an arrogant French president,' he said.
Home Office sources said that any boat migrant who has been returned to France and then made a crossing again would not be able to apply for asylum.
Their identities would also be stored on a biometric database. A source said: 'At about £3,000 a crossing it would be a total waste of money for them to try again.'
Asked on Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme if he would congratulate ministers on the deal, shadow home secretary Chris Philp said: 'I'm not going to be congratulating the Labour Government or the Home Secretary for presiding over record-ever numbers of illegal immigrants crossing the Channel this year.
'This deal will only see about 6 per cent of illegal immigrants who arrive in the UK getting returned to France, and the idea that therefore 94 per cent can stay here is going to have any effect is absolutely ludicrous.
'Of course, if 94 per cent of illegal immigrants who cross can stay in the UK, that is no deterrent whatsoever.
'What might have been a deterrent is a 100 per cent removal policy, which was ready under the (previous Conservative government's) Rwanda scheme.'
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander said the UK had to work with European allies on illegal migration because 'we're not going to be able to do it on our own'.
'We believe that we've got a robust workable deal with President Macron. It's a deal that the previous government wasn't able to negotiate,' she told the BBC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
25 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Free speech under threat as Britons believe they can no longer speak their mind
Free speech is under threat because Britons feel they cannot speak out for fear of offending others over race, religion and immigration, a study has found. Nearly half of those polled (49 per cent) believe people are too easily offended, particularly if they speak out on race and immigration issues, according to research for the Commission for Countering Extremism, which advises the Government. The more outspoken people's views, the more likely they were to feel constrained by the risk of offending others. Older, white males without a university education are among the groups who feel the most restricted. The study, based on interviews with 2,500 people, was conducted by Ipsos to establish the state of free speech in Britain. It follows controversies such as the 2021 protests against a teacher in Batley, West Yorkshire, who received death threats and went into hiding after showing pupils a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed from Charlie Hebdo, the French satirical magazine, during a religious studies lesson. Similar concerns over the right to freedom of expression and protest have been raised in the aftermath of the Oct 7 Hamas terror attack on Israel and the ensuing Gaza conflict. More than a third (36 per cent) felt they had to hold back on expressing their views on race or ethnicity, while 32 per cent said they did not feel they could freely speak out on immigration or religious extremism. On asylum and Gaza, 31 per cent felt constrained, rising to 41 per cent for transgender issues. Groups that were predominantly white, male, older and non-graduate were more strongly in favour of free speech, regardless of the issue, but aat the same time felt more constrained in their ability to freely share their views about most topics. Nearly half of this group (48 per cent) said they felt they had to restrain their comments on race, far higher than the average of 36 per cent. The same was true on immigration, where 43 per cent felt they had to hold back on their views compared to an overall average among the public of 32 per cent who felt constrained. Christians were more likely to back the right to free speech, but also more likely than average to feel they had to hold back on expressing their views. Conversely, women, younger Britons and people from ethnic minorities or non-Christian religions tended to think that people needed to be more sensitive in the way they spoke. Just under a third (29 per cent) of all those polled agreed that people needed to be more sensitive. But this rose to 34 per cent amongst women, 45 per cent from ethnic minorities and 45 per cent for non-Christians. By contrast, men, people aged over 65 and those from white ethnicities and Christians were more likely to think that people are too easily offended. While on average 49 per cent felt people were too easily offended, this rose to 56 per cent of men, 54 per cent of those from a white ethnicity and 59 per cent for Christians. These were nearly double the rates for people from ethnic minorities and non-Christians. Race and ethnicity was the only topic overall where the balance of opinion was more towards avoiding offence rather than speaking freely (by 42 per cent to 34 per cent), according to the research. People predominantly held back from expressing their views to avoid causing offence or starting an argument. Forty-six per cent resisted expressing their views on any religious figure, text or teaching and just 35 per cent held back their political views to avoid causing offence. Some said they held back because of heightened concerns about their safety. For religious topics, 25 per cent said they restrained themselves because of safety fears, and 17 per cent over political views. The report said there was a group of people for whom free speech was a significant issue. They represented about 37 per cent of the total sample and were described by researchers as those who were most concerned about the pace of change. But they were also the group most likely to express 'heightened concerns' about their ability to speak freely about race, immigration, asylum and religious extremism. Robert Jenrick, the shadow justice secretary, said: 'The Left's determination to shut down debate around immigration has created a chilling environment for free speech. In this context, a catch-all definition of Islamophobia would be a disaster, worsening the culture of fear that has spread throughout society.'
BBC News
27 minutes ago
- BBC News
French PM looks to scrap two public holidays in bold bid to cut national debt
France's Prime Minister François Bayrou has proposed cutting two public holidays as part of a 2026 budget proposal to slash overall spending while also increasing defence suggested axing Easter Monday and 8 May, a day that commemorates the Allied victory at the end of World War Two in Europe. He said the various bank holidays had turned the month of May into a gruyère - a Swiss cheese full of holes - although he added he was open to other suggestions. Bayrou runs the risk of having his budget voted down in parliament in the autumn, which could eventually cause his government to collapse. But on Tuesday he stressed that France - the eurozone's second economy - was "in mortal danger" of being crushed by debt. Standing in front of a lectern emblazoned with the words "The moment of truth", Bayrou spoke for over an hour outlining a series of daring measures that he said should bring the annual budget deficit under include a freeze on public spending for next year, ending tax breaks for the wealthy and a reduction in the number of civil budget also needs to factor in President Emmanuel Macron's call for France's defence spending to rise by €3.5bn (£3bn) next year and then by a further €3bn in the proposal to cut the two May public holidays was the most eyecatching suggestion. It made headlines immediately - and drew condemnation from several sides. The far-right National Rally (RN) party immediately damned it as an attack on French history and on French workers, while Green party leader Marine Tondelier lamented that the day that commemorated victory against Nazism would no longer be a by reporters after his speech, Bayrou said his proposal was "basic arithmetic". "If we want to stay on course, we need to find more than €40bn," Bayrou argued, referring to the €43.8bn France needs to slash from its budget to rein in debt, which he said grows by €5,000 every second. The French government aims to bring the deficit down from 5.8% last year to below 4.6% next year and to under 3% by 2029, Bayrou said. The embattled centrist prime minister has only been in the job since December, following on from the short-lived premiership of Michel Barnier. Barnier's government used executive powers to push his own bill that sought to rein in France's deficit through an even harsher budget than Bayrou's. The move proved unacceptable to the National Rally and left-wing parties, which all voted against Barnier, causing the government to collapse through a no-confidence vote for the first time since same factions are now threatening to do it again when Bayrou's budget is put to a vote in the autumn. Jean-Luc Mélenchon of the radical left France Unbowed (LFI) said that the PM had to be ousted, while RN leader Marine Le Pen accused Bayrou of preferring to "attack the French, workers and pensioners, instead of slashing wastage", and vowed to bring him down "if he doesn't revise his plans".But Bayrou said his government "wanted to change things" to restore public finances and would do so "despite the risk" of a no-confidence last summer's surprise snap election the French parliament has been deeply divided into three blocs that have resisted working together. Another election may well result in a similar Bayrou's government collapses President Macron will have to choose a successor or appoint an unelected technocrat government - neither of which would be palatable to MPs. His own popularity is under 25% and there has been a clamour for him to step down sooner than the end of his second term in 2027 - something he has consistently resisted.
BBC News
27 minutes ago
- BBC News
Birmingham Sikh charity leader recognised for selfless service
The leader of a Birmingham-based Sikh charity has been recognised for his dedication to selfless service at an event in Sahib, Professor Mohinder Singh, spiritual leader of Guru Nanak Nishkam Sewak Jatha and chairman of the Nishkam Group of Charitable Organisations, has helped a variety of sectors grow across the UK and around the Sahib Ji was presented with the award "In recognition of his lifelong selfless service to the community" by British Sikh parliamentarians on Monday night. Rooted in Sikh principles, the charity has focused on interfaith dialogue and transformative community work in education, healthcare, heritage, and global humanitarian aid. Labour MP Jas Athwal called Bhai Sahib Ji a "true embodiment of humility, leadership and service".Speaking in Parliament, Bhai Sahib Ji said: "I am greatly overwhelmed and embarrassed to take any credit for what I have managed to do in my life."As Sikhs, we are lovingly advised to adopt the following strategy for spiritual and worldly success."Pray, work, share. To serve selflessly, sing, listen to and absorb divine praise."In a way we become what we serve. To serve the creator through serving creation is the path to living in God's image when done in tandem with prayer and devotion." Volunteers spoke of Bhai Sahib Ji's service, namely the creation of the peace charter for forgiveness and reconciliation in 2019, which promotes clemency as a way to pave the way for global peace.A trustee of the charity said: "We are celebrating 30 years, but it is not 30 years; it is a lifelong dedication."And added that "the whole foundation is built around humility".The Sikh charity has its headquarters in Birmingham and operates in cities across the UK, in India and in Handsworth, West Midlands, the charity helped regenerate 13 acres of inner-city launch of Zero Hunger and Nishkam SWAT (Sikh Welfare and Awareness Team) has fed thousands and is continuing to do Sahib Ji is the first Sikh to be awarded a Papal Knighthood of St Gregory the Great, which is usually reserved for Catholics, honouring his interfaith work.A volunteer described him as a reminder to "uplift and to unite", while he inspires others to "live truer and serve" through honouring the legacy of the Sikh Gurus.
