Rod Stewart says country should ‘give Farage a chance'
The 80-year-old singer backed the Reform UK leader ahead of appearing in the festival's afternoon legends slot on Sunday, 23 years after he headlined the Pyramid Stage.
'I've read about (Sir Keir) Starmer cutting off the fishing in Scotland and giving it back to the EU. That hasn't made him popular,' he told The Times.
'We're fed up with the Tories. We've got to give Farage a chance. He's coming across well. Nigel? What options have we got?
'Starmer's all about getting us out of Brexit and I don't know how he's going to do that. Still, the country will survive. It could be worse. We could be in the Gaza Strip.'
Admitting his wealth ensures 'a lot of it doesn't really touch me', he insisted he is not out of touch and expressed his support for Ukraine – criticising US President Donald Trump and Vice-President JD Vance for their treatment of Ukrainian President Volodomyr Zelensky on his visit to the White House – and Gaza.
'It's depressing, what's going on in the Gaza Strip,' he said. 'Netanyahu doesn't realise that this is what happened to his people under the Nazis: total annihilation. And Trump is going to turn the Gaza Strip into Miami?'
Stewart said a prolonged bout of flu, which forced him to cancel five shows in the US, nearly forced him to withdraw from a Glastonbury appearance he described to ITV as his 'World Cup final'.
'This time last week I was thinking of cancelling,' he told The Sun, crediting his wife Penny Lancaster with nursing him back to health.
'I have had Influenza A. It's been so terrible. It's the worst thing anyone could possibly have, I wouldn't wish it on anyone.
'Apart from (Vladimir) Putin. I'd wish it on him.'
Stewart told The Sun he had negotiated an extra quarter of an hour on top of the allotted 75 minutes for his set.
He confirmed he will be joined at Glastonbury by former Faces bandmate Ronnie Wood, Simply Red's Mick Hucknall and Lulu, as well as performing the song Powderfinger by Saturday headliner Neil Young.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump ends trade talks with Canada, says US could move other deadlines
"Based on this egregious Tax, we are hereby terminating ALL discussions on Trade with Canada, effective immediately," Trump said. "We will let Canada know the Tariff that they will be paying to do business with the United States of America within the next seven day period." More: Trump praises Amy Coney Barrett, rips NYC mayoral candidate Mamdani: Recap The announcement came after a White House press conference where Trump presented an ambiguous timeline for reciprocal tariffs he put on most other nations to go into effect. Trump introduced the tariffs in April and then paused them. If no further action is taken, they will go into effect on July 9. Trump's administration was separately working on deals with Canada, Mexico and China. At the June 27 news conference, Trump said his administration would soon send out letters to U.S. trading partners informing them of their tariff rate. "We talked to many other countries and we're just going to tell them what they have to pay to do business in United States," he told reporters. "Maybe before, we're going to send out a letter." Trump also signaled later that countries could be facing an even shorter timeline. "We can do whatever we want. We could extend it. We could make it shorter. I would like to make it shorter. I'd like to just send out letters to everybody," Trump said in the previously-unscheduled White House news conference. The president also lashed out at economists who predicted his administration's tariffs could cause a recession. He said they should "go back to business school," while defending his second-term levies. "We're taking in billions and billions of dollars from China and a lot of other countries," Trump added. Trump unveiled a slew of tariffs that roiled economic markets, but paused many of them as he negotiates trade deals and later lowered steep tariffs on China. Markets have since recovered. Stocks rose on June 27, after the administration said it had solidified an agreement with Beijing, then fell after his social media post on Canada. More: Trade deals and better vibes lift S&P 500, Nasdaq to record highs. Dow jumps, too. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick boosted investor confidence when he said on June 26 that a framework agreement between the U.S. and Canada had been finalized and the administration was close to reaching deals with 10 nations. His comments came after Trump said at an East Room event "we just signed with China yesterday." The White House later clarified that he was referring to an adjustment to an earlier framework that would expedite shipments of rare earth materials to the United States. Trump counted China on June 27 in a tally of countries he said he'd made deals with, including the United Kingdom. The president also predicted a deal would come about soon with India. The latest round of negotiations between the European Union and the United States wrapped up not long before Trump addressed reporters. EU commissioner for Trade and Economic Security Maros Sefcovic said in a social media post that he'd just spoken to U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. Trump threatened in May to put a 50% tariff on the EU before returning to the July 9 deadline. Contributing: Zac Anderson
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Narcissistic activists aren't Britain's real enemy
Should Irish rappers Kneecap be banned from playing Glastonbury today? Far better to ask: should anyone care? These talentless anti-Israel bigots and the perpetual adolescents attending the outdated Worthy Farm jamboree deserve each other. Perhaps the quinquagenarians paying through the nose to watch 70-year-olds flogging their old hits for the thousandth time, whilst desperately trying to stave off dysentery, think watching Kneecap will make them 'edgy'. Leave them to it. Because narcissistic rappers are just a distraction. Along with Palestine Action – a group which takes to Britain's streets to support homophobes and misogynists – they may have handed the Met and the Culture Secretary an opportunity to pretend they're taking a 'muscular' approach to far-Left extremism in our wondrously multicultural society. But they could also be swatted away for good if the Government showed some genuine bottle, and should not be the primary object of our contempt. The real fifth columnists aren't these provocateurs and cosplayers, but the pathetic politicians and jobsworth civil servants indulging them. What Keir Starmer doesn't grasp, when he issues flabby statements about the 'inappropriateness' of Kneecap at Glasto, is that the root of our frustration isn't just the inability of our authorities to clamp down on this nonsense. It's the knowledge that, at every turn, those who genuinely want to keep us safe will come up against others working against it. Take (please!) the diversity hire in charge at Brize Norton, a woman who has spent her time in the RAF working in personnel and administration ('HR' for short), and who in 2019 wrote that patriotism is 'undesirable'. It's the silly so-and-sos who believe our Armed Forces need woke recruiting practices, even if it exacerbates staff shortages. We've not got enough people to fly our planes, but at least we can try to say RAF staff perfectly reflect our society's demographic makeup. And it's the people who would never openly share their disdain for the majority, but who work unobtrusively every day to undermine their democratic will. The foot-dragging lanyard class – unelected, unaccountable, secretly ideological – thwarts policies they are paid to implement. If you want to understand why the Tories accomplished next to nothing over their 14 years in power, look no further than a King's College London study which found civil servants are significantly less satisfied, and thus less motivated to work hard, if they hold different political views from the government. Nowhere is this issue clearer than on immigration. The Tory Government attempted to introduce policies that would deter illegal crossings, only to be met with legalistic sabotage and a landmark legal challenge from the senior civil servants union. Brits want bogus asylum claims thrown out, but charities and NGOs push for an open doors policy that is impoverishing and angering our country, transforming it beyond recognition with no mandate. Or consider counter-terrorism: the Shawcross review revealed Right-wing extremism was being discussed disproportionately, despite Islamist craziness being by far the most likely problem. We have gradually dismantled our Armed Forces whilst money is endlessly squandered on welfare to appease Leftists who live in La La Land. We allow subtle attacks on allies and make excuses for terrorists. We continually undermine our troops with dubious prosecutions and pointless inquiries. Why can't we be tough and resourceful, as the Israelis are on a much smaller budget? Their country has many internal political differences but its people understand there is one shared nation to be defended at all costs. Can the same be said for Britain? The prescription isn't hard: deport illegals, lock up the most dangerous radicals and stop patronising the airheads, tell the soggy sympathisers the game is up. That the counter-terrorism police have now arrested four people after military planes were sprayed with paint during the break-in at Brize Norton – a stunt that could have cost lives – might indicate we are going to get a bit tougher. Let's hope so. But Britain is a long way from confronting the real enemy within.
Scotsman
an hour ago
- Scotsman
How ‘single stupidest thing any country has ever done' is behind benefit cuts and high taxes
Sign up to our daily newsletter – Regular news stories and round-ups from around Scotland direct to your inbox Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Over the next few days, the Labour party may well continue to tie itself in knots over cuts to welfare and efforts to balance the books. Keir Starmer's original proposals would have saved the Treasury an estimated £5 billion but also meant about 300,000 disabled and sick Scots would have lost hundreds of pounds needed simply to make ends meet. After the plan was condemned by more than 100 charities, which warned it could push some of the most vulnerable people into 'destitution', cross-party social justice committees in the Edinburgh, Cardiff and Belfast legislatures raised 'significant concerns', and a rebellion by some 120 Labour MPs, changes by the government will see people who currently receive personal independence payments continue to do so but the cuts will still affect future claimants. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The devolved administrations are right to be worried. Here's the rub, there may often be a focus in the media on the Scottish Government's spending, but it is Westminster that has an outsized impact on our day-to-day lives. Decisions made in London are the overwhelming factor in how much money the Scottish Parliament can spend, and are keenly felt by Scottish citizens. People who supported Brexit celebrate on the day the UK formally left the European Union. Few seem quite so enthusiastic today (Picture: Jeff J Mitchell) | Getty Images Eye-watering Westminster waste These welfare cuts might be aimed at saving the UK Government cash but they will affect Holyrood's ability to tackle poverty, potentially costing the Scottish Government more. The UK remains a heavily centralised state compared to many of our neighbours and it shows. When these issues arise in the Scottish Parliament there is often, rightly, a focus on any waste and where the money could be found or saved. That is appropriate and all governments should be scrutinised for their expenditure. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad However, if you are really looking for savings, expensive policy decisions and want to get into the really big bucks, you could do worse than cast your eye over Westminster waste. Given the UK is seeking to save billions with a highly damaging hit to the poorest in society, causing quite the political headache, it is worth reflecting on why Westminster could do with being more careful with our taxes. Let's run through a few of them, starting with the recently scrapped Rwanda scheme, that never delivered anything, and yet cost £715 million between 2022 and 2025. That's small beer when you compare it with the costs of PPE procured during the pandemic, with an estimated £4bn of equipment being unusable and £9bn being written off by the UK Department for Health. High speed, high expense Even that pales in comparison with the costs of the High-Speed Rail link. At 2019 prices, it has cost £33bn, so far, and is set to rise to £67bn (in 2024 prices) with no train due to go anywhere until 2033. That will simply connect London and Birmingham, with phase two having been scrapped, but not before it had swallowed up £2.5bn. All that money and effort to shave about half an hour off the Birmingham to London journey. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It should also tell us something of the parlous state of the UK's infrastructure planning when the country remains one of the few in western Europe without high-speed rail. It could have been transformative for this island. When Alex Salmond was First Minister, he gave the line planning permission from Edinburgh and Glasgow to the Border, since the business case was stronger if it included Scotland, yet that was rejected. It says something of an overly centralised UK that it was decided to start building from London, despite that being the hardest part of the line. If you want to look at the even bigger levels of cash, the Truss budget was said to have cost UK homeowners £300bn and the government billions more due to higher borrowing costs and other costs to the Treasury. This matters with UK Government borrowing now at the second highest level since records began, and the UK's net debt to GDP ratio sitting at 96.4 per cent. Brexit calamity Let's not forget the Brexit calamity. US politician and businessman Michael Bloomberg told an audience in Dublin this week that leaving the EU is 'the single stupidest thing any country has ever done'. And boy has it cost us all. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad As we marked (no one celebrated) the ninth anniversary of the EU referendum earlier this week, it is estimated it has led to a £40bn hole in public finances, a 4 per cent drop in UK productivity, and a 15 per cent drop in trade, along with £100bn's worth of tax rises – not helped by the UK Government's decision to pursue the hardest of hard Brexit. Why Labour continue to pursue this disastrous policy is beyond me. Government is hard, and no government gets it all wrong or all right. That said, there is an unwillingness to tackle some of the structural issues with governance in the UK. Instead of taking bold steps, Labour has decided that the simplest course of action is to cut benefits – that will cost us all in the long term. This Labour government is seeking to save money on the backs of those who can afford it the least whilst failing to tackle deeper problems that the UK faces because of bad choices, poor governance and unnecessary waste. The UK isn't working, and its spending choices deserve more scrutiny. I would argue – and I would – that we should be showing Westminster and its wasteful ways the door. Mind you, the newest door that was put into the House of Parliament cost £10m (60 per cent over the original estimate) and guess what, it isn't working either.
