Spain becomes first country to ban petrol advertisements
Spain will become the first country in the world to ban petrol advertisements under a law soon to be passed by its Left-wing government.
Petrol or diesel adverts will not be allowed unless the product contains some non-fossil ingredient such as biofuel, according to a draft bill announced on Tuesday by consumer affairs minister, Pablo Bustinduy.
The new legislative package is aimed at tackling 'greenwashing', with a ban on any type of advertising for energy products from companies in the oil and gas sector composed exclusively of fossil fuel derivatives, without the use of renewable components.
There will be no minimum requirement for the amount of green petrol or diesel that will allow companies to avoid the advertising ban, The Telegraph understands.
The draft sustainable consumption Bill will also transpose into Spanish law an EU directive on empowering consumers faced by confusing and ambiguous green claims by companies.
At the start of this year The Hague became the first city in the world to ban billboard advertisements for fossil fuels and related products, including combustion-engine cars, air travel and cruise ship holidays.
The Dutch city's ban responded to a call by UN secretary-general António Guterres to ban advertising by fossil fuel companies, just as ads for tobacco have been prohibited almost everywhere in the world.
A Dutch trade association for travel companies and tourism company TUI mounted a legal challenge against The Hague city council's ban but it was upheld by a court.
The argument against the ban was that it infringed on freedom of speech and entrepreneurship, but a court in The Hague ruled that citizens' right to health is more important than the commercial interests of advertisers.
The Spanish government's draft legislation also takes aim at generic environmental claims in advertising, meaning companies will have to justify the use of slogans such as 'environmentally-friendly', 'green', 'climate-friendly' and 'energy-efficient'.
Sustainability labels will have to be based on certification systems and companies will not be able to make carbon emissions claims based solely on the supposed impact of offset programmes.
Consumer minister, Pablo Bustinduy, said on Tuesday that the law would also 'put an end to built-in obsolescence by giving consumers the right to have electrical goods repaired and extending the length of guarantees'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Inspectors BLOCKED from nuke sites as Iran says they will never stop enriching uranium amid fears bomb is ‘months away'
It comes after Trump claimed the strikes went through Iran's nuclear bases "like butter" NUKE FEARS Inspectors BLOCKED from nuke sites as Iran says they will never stop enriching uranium amid fears bomb is 'months away' IRAN has blocked inspectors from entering its nuclear sites and pledged to never stop enriching uranium - amid fears the Ayatollah is months away from a bomb. The mullahs could possess a nuclear weapon in "a matter of months", the UN's nuclear watchdog said, adding that US strikes caused severe but "not total" damage. Advertisement 9 The Fordow plant before and after the the US bombed the site Credit: Reuters 9 The moment the missile hit the earth in the test footage 9 The International Atomic Energy Agency's head Rafael Grossi made the bombshell revelation following Donald Trump's Operation Midnight Hammer. The Don's blitz saw 12 30,000lb bunker busting bombs strike three of Tehran's nuclear facilities on June 22. The US President hailed the strikes at the time and said they "obliterated" their targets as planned - despite some claiming the hits were less successful than first thought. Speaking on the state of Iran's nuclear facilities after Trump's strikes, Grossi warned: "The capacities they have are there. Advertisement READ MORE WORLD NEWS DON THE ATTACK Trump rips critics & insists 'bombs went through like butter' at Iran sites "They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that." He added: "But as I said, frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there." And the watchdog head made the explosive claim that Iran still had "industrial and technological capabilities… so if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again". It comes after a leaked preliminary Pentagon assessment found the US strikes only set the nuclear programme back by a few months. Advertisement On Wednesday, Iran's parliament agreed to suspend all cooperation with the IAEA. The ban means blocking experts from assessing the true extent of the Israeli and US attacks on nuclear facilities. Iran was building warheads 'capable of blitzing London' as twisted regime raced to have world's biggest missile arsenal And it makes it more challenging to locate any highly enriched uranium Iran may possess which could help them make a nuke. Iran's ambassador to the UN Amir-Saeid Iravani told CBS: "I think that enrichment will never stop. Advertisement "Our cooperation with IAEA will be suspended." It comes after Trump told Fox News on Sunday morning that the US bombs on Iran went through enemy nuclear sites "like absolute butter". Celebrating his blitz on the mullahs, he said: "It was obliterated like nobody's ever seen before. "And that meant the end to their nuclear ambitions at least for a period of time." Advertisement The war in the Middle East lasted just 12 days as it quickly turned into a major conflict when Trump decided to strike the Iranian nuclear sites. Iran responded to Trump's intervention by unsuccessfully striking a US army base in Doha, Qatar - before the Ayatollah claimed victory over America and Israel. But Tehran contradicted Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei by admitting that Operation Midnight Hammer and the joint Israeli attacks did cause "excessive and serious" damage. Israel struck Iranian nuclear and military sites on June 13, after Tel Aviv claimed Tehran was dangerously close to developing a nuclear weapon. Advertisement 9 Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) Rafael Grossi said Iran could be months away from a bomb Credit: AFP 9 Trump had posted this Truth shortly after launching the strikes Credit: Truth Social 9 Overview of the the Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant one week after US strikes Credit: AFP The US attacks helped to end the war, according to Trump, with both Israel and Iran quickly declaring they had won the fight afterwards. Advertisement Tyrant Khamenei, 86, claimed victory over Israel and America despite his country being hammered for almost two weeks. The Supreme Leader ludicrously claimed Iran had almost crushed Israel and the government in Tel Aviv was on the verge of collapse. That's despite the IDF controlling the skies over Tehran, assassinating dozens of top generals and nuclear scientists, and destroying dozens of valuable missile batteries in just 12 days of fighting. Even with a ceasefire being agreed upon, Trump made it clear he would "absolutely" consider bombing Iran again if it was ever needed. Advertisement He told reporters in the White House he would "without question" attack the country if US intelligence pointed towards Iran enriching uranium to concerning levels. It comes as Iran held a funeral for the commanders wiped out in the war. The event was severely plagued by "Death to America" chants and the burning of Israeli flags across the day. 9 The Ayatollah bizarrely claimed victory over the US and Israel Credit: AFP Advertisement 9 Trump sat in the Situation Room of the White House a day before the US strikes Credit: AFP
ITV News
5 hours ago
- ITV News
Iran could begin enriching uranium in 'matter of months', head of UN nuclear watchdog says
The head of the UN's nuclear watchdog has said the US strikes on Iran fell short of causing fell short of causing total damage to its nuclear programme, and that Tehran could restart enriching uranium 'in a matter of months'. It contradicts US President Donald Trump 's claims that the US "completely and totally obliterated" Tehran's nuclear programme. Rafael Grossi's comments appear to support an early assessment from the Pentagon's Defence Intelligence Agency, first reported on by ITV News' US partner CNN. It suggested the United States ' strikes on key Iranian nuclear sites last week did not destroy the core components of its nuclear program, and likely only set it back by months. The 12-day conflict between Israel and Iran began earlier this month when Israel launched an unprecedented attack it said aimed at preventing Tehran developing a nuclear bomb. Iran has insisted its nuclear programme is for peaceful purposes. The US then struck three key Iranian nuclear sites before a ceasefire began. The extent of the damage to Tehran's nuclear program has been debated since. US military officials have provided some new information about the planning of the strikes in recent days, but offered no new evidence of their effectiveness against Iran's nuclear programme. Following classified briefings this week, Republican lawmakers acknowledged the US strikes may not have eliminated all of Iran's nuclear materials – but argued that this was never part of the military's mission. Asked about the different assessments, Grossi, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), told CBS's 'Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan': 'This hourglass approach in weapons of mass destruction is not a good idea.' 'The capacities they have are there. They can have, you know, in a matter of months, I would say, a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium, or less than that. "But as I said, frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there,' he told Brennan, according to a transcript released ahead of the broadcast. 'It is clear that there has been severe damage, but it's not total damage,' Grossi went on to say. 'Iran has the capacities there; industrial and technological capacities. So if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again.' Grossi also told CBS News that the IAEA has resisted pressure to say whether Iran has nuclear weapons or was close to having weapons before the strikes. 'We didn't see a programme that was aiming in that direction (of nuclear weapons), but at the same time, they were not answering very, very important questions that were pending.' CNN has asked the White House for comment on Grossi's claims. Grossi stressed the need for the IAEA to be granted access to Iran, to assess nuclear activities. He said Iran had been disclosing information to the agency up until recent Israeli and US strikes, but that 'there were some things that they were not clarifying to us.' 'In this sensitive area of the number of centrifuges and the amount of material, we had perfect view,' he said. 'What I was concerned about is that there were other things that were not clear. For example, we had found traces of uranium in some places in Iran, which were not the normal declared facilities. And we were asking for years, why did we find these traces of enriched uranium in place x, y or z? And we were simply not getting credible answers.' The initial Pentagon assessment said Tehran may have moved some of the enriched uranium out of the sites before they were attacked, but Trump has insisted nothing was moved. 'It's logical to presume that when they announce that they are going to be taking protective measures, this could be part of it (moving the material). But, as I said, we don't know where this material could be, or if part of it could have been, you know, under the attack during those 12 days,' Grossi told Brennan. Meanwhile, Tehran has made moves towards withdrawing from international oversight over its nuclear programme. Iran's parliament passed a bill halting cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog, while the Foreign Minister, Abbas Araghchi, also said that the country could also rethink its membership of the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which prohibits signatories from developing nuclear weapons.
Daily Mirror
8 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Iran could begin enriching uranium for nuclear bomb 'within months' in WW3 fears
The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said US strikes had not completely destroyed Iran's nuclear sites, as Donald Trump claimed, and that they could begin enriching uranium again soon Iran could start enriching uranium again - for a possible bomb - in 'a matter of months', the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog has said. Rafael Grossi, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), said the US strikes on three Iranian sites last weekend had caused severe but 'not total' damage, contradicting Donald Trump 's claim that Iran's nuclear facilities were 'totally obliterated'. 'Frankly speaking, one cannot claim that everything has disappeared and there is nothing there,' Grossi said. Israel attacked nuclear and military sites in Iran on June 13, claiming Iran was close to building a nuclear weapon. The US later joined the strikes, dropping bombs on three of Iran's nuclear facilities - Fordo, Natanz and Isfahan. On Saturday Grossi told CBS News that Tehran could have 'in a matter of months... a few cascades of centrifuges spinning and producing enriched uranium'. He added that Iran still possessed the 'industrial and technological capacities... so if they so wish, they will be able to start doing this again'. The IAEA is not the first body to suggest that Iran's nuclear abilities could still continue. A leaked preliminary Pentagon assessment also found the US strikes probably only set the programme back by months. US president Donald Trump responded furiously by declaring that Iran's nuclear sites were 'completely destroyed' and accused the media of 'an attempt to demean one of the most successful military strikes in history'. For now, Iran and Israel have agreed to a ceasefire, but Trump has said he would 'absolutely' consider bombing Iran again if intelligence found that it could enrich uranium to concerning levels. In a speech on Thursday, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said the strikes had achieved nothing significant. But its foreign minister Abbas Araghchi said 'excessive and serious' damage was done. Iran's already-strained relationship with the IAEA was further challenged on Wednesday, when its parliament moved to suspend cooperation with the atomic watchdog, accusing the IAEA of siding with Israel and the US. On Friday, Araghchi said on X that 'Grossi's insistence on visiting the bombed sites under the pretext of safeguards is meaningless and possibly even malign in intent'. Israel and the US attacked Iran after the IAEA last month found Tehran to be in breach of its non-proliferation obligations for the first time in 20 years. Iran insists that its nuclear programme is peaceful, and for civilian use only. Despite the Iranian refusal to work with his organisation, Grossi said that he hoped he could still negotiate with Tehran. 'I have to sit down with Iran and look into this, because at the end of the day, this whole thing, after the military strikes, will have to have a long-lasting solution, which cannot be but a diplomatic one,' he said. Under a 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, Iran was not permitted to enrich uranium above 3.67% purity - the level required for fuel for commercial nuclear power plants - and was not allowed to carry out any enrichment at its Fordo plant for 15 years. However, Trump abandoned the agreement during his first term in 2018, saying it did too little to stop a pathway to a bomb, and reinstated US sanctions. Iran retaliated by increasingly breaching the restrictions - particularly those relating to enrichment. It resumed enrichment at Fordo in 2021 and had amassed enough 60%-enriched uranium to potentially make nine nuclear bombs, according to the IAEA.
