logo
Trump's sagging poll numbers become a concern for GOP

Trump's sagging poll numbers become a concern for GOP

Yahoo30-04-2025
President Trump's sagging poll numbers as he hits his 100th day in office are becoming a concern for Republicans, who have been steadfastly loyal to the White House but are starting to look ahead to the midterm elections.
While the White House is not expressing concern about Trump's downward trajectory in the polls, Republican operatives say Trump needs to stop with the turbulence on tariffs and focus on fulfilling the promises he made as a presidential candidate on the economy.
'It's actually incredibly simple,' said Republican strategist Kevin Madden. 'Trump won in 2024 because a broader coalition of voters were nostalgic for the pre-COVID economy of Trump's first term and they believed Trump was better suited to address their concerns about inflation.
'His approval has dropped because the pursuit of restrictive trade policies and higher tariffs has initiated a new round of concern among voters. Trump still has strong support from his most dedicated Republican voters, but the flight of moderates and independent voters, who tend to be nomadic, are currently diluting his political coverage.'
Madden added that Trump's drop in the polls is 'exactly the type of shift you worry about ahead of midterms.'
'When you lose the 'big middle' of the electorate, the swing races move away from you and the districts that usually have comfortable partisan margins can become surprise contests,' he said. 'It's still early, but the trend lines from the tariff policy are, so far, not looking good.'
A Decision Desk HQ survey out Wednesday morning showed Trump underwater, with an approval rating of 44 percent and 56 percent disapproving of his performance.
The poll was in line with a host of other surveys that also suggest Trump is in trouble, largely because of his trade policies.
Sixty-four percent in the Decision Desk HQ poll also said tariffs hurt consumers, and 91 percent said they were worried about inflation, an issue that Trump campaign on against President Biden. Sixty-two percent said they were very concerned about inflation, which can rise because of tariffs.
Other polls out in the last week also showed a sizable drop in Trump's approval ratings.
A Washington Post/ABC News/Ipsos poll out Sunday showed Trump's approval fell from 45 percent in February to 39 percent in March. Trump saw a similar drop in a New York Times poll, which revealed that 42 percent of those surveyed approved of Trump's job performance.
Republicans attribute the falling numbers to the headlines around Trump's tariffs, which sent markets plunging and left Americans worried about their retirement accounts. Markets have recovered a portion of those losses but remain below where they stood on Trump's first day in office.
'I think what's concerning people — and I think he knows this — are the economics of, and the uncertainty around this tariff protocol,' Sen. Shelley Moore Capito (W.Va.), a member of Republican leadership, told The Hill on Monday. 'I think that's what you see reflected.'
Susan Del Percio, a veteran Republican strategist who does not support Trump, said Trump arguably benefited from 'a bit of a Biden hangover' at the start of the presidency.
Voters fed up with rising costs at grocery stores felt the country was headed in the wrong direction under former President Biden and voted for change. But now they aren't seeing those price changes, Del Percio said.
Trump has the firm support of his base, which Del Percio said has got him through everything, and he hasn't signaled much worry about his polling or economic numbers. But Republicans are in a different political situation.
'I don't think the Trump team cares about its numbers as much as the House and Senate Republicans care about it,' she said.
In a speech to mark his first 100 days in office on Tuesday, Trump touted that prices 'are coming way down.'
'Gasoline prices are down by a lot. Energy prices are down. Mortgage rates are down,' Trump said. 'Prescription drug prices just took the biggest plunge … ever in the history of prescription drug prices.'
He added that 'grocery prices have gone down. Everything has gone down.'
He also argued the string of polls was inaccurate.
'They poll more Democrats than Republicans,' Trump said.
The poor polling numbers for Trump represent an opportunity for Democrats, who have been trying to figure out a new direction for their party. Some voices within the party said Democrats should seize upon Trump's performance in the polls, showing voters that he misled them in the run-up to last year's election.
Others have signaled an all-out war against Trump.
On Monday, Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, whom many expect to mount a 2028 presidential campaign, suggested his party could not take a passive approach when dealing with Trump.
'It's time to fight everywhere and all at once,' Pritzker told a group of Democrats in New Hampshire on Monday. 'Never before in my life have I called for mass protests, for mobilization, for disruption. But I am now. These Republicans cannot know a moment of peace.'
'The reckoning is finally here,' Pritzker added.
Republican strategist Shermichael Singleton, who worked in the first Trump administration, said he isn't concerned about Trump's approval numbers.
'Poll numbers go up and down,' Singleton said. 'That's part of politics.'
'Every leader has to lead in a way that they believe is going to yield the best results for the people who voted for them and sometimes the way people interpret those things are not always in sync so you have to make adjustments,' he added.
At the same time, Singleton pointed to a part of the Washington Post/ABC poll that showed while Trump's approval rating is on a downward spiral, he still instills more trust than Democrats in Congress.
'They still trust him more than Democrats to lead the country, and that says a whole lot,' he said.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Beyond Trump's trade deals, consolation for the little guy and other commentary
Beyond Trump's trade deals, consolation for the little guy and other commentary

New York Post

time11 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Beyond Trump's trade deals, consolation for the little guy and other commentary

Business desk: Beyond Trump's Trade Deals 'Dealmaker-In-Chief' Donald Trump has been 'positively monomaniacal' about trade lately, marvels Freddy Gray at The Spectator. His 'real coup' is the 'new framework arrangement with the European Union,' which is 'not simply a major breakthrough in and of itself,' but also 'a useful piece of leverage in the even bigger tariff struggle with China' — because it pulls 'Europe more towards a western trading orbit and less towards the east.' Trump then slammed India for 'buying up Russian oil and gas,' and pivoted sharply by praising a new deal with Pakistan, 'including an arrangement to invest in Pakistani oil.' Advertisement Meanwhile, his enthusiasm for Pakistan — 'an extension of China's empire' — may be part of a plan to 'ring loud alarm bells' in Beijing. From the right: Consolation for the Little Guy 'For all the political criticism they take, the federal courts keep delivering good outcomes more often than not,' cheers The Wall Street Journal's Editorial Board. In 2016, the Labor Department 'imposed hundreds of thousands of dollars in fines' on a fourth-generation farm, Sun Valley Orchards — first requesting penalties and then approving them itself, thus 'serving as prosecutor, judge and jury.' Advertisement But an appeals court just ruled the proceedings 'should properly be enforced in federal court' — the proper venues for federal agencies to impose fines. Sun Valley has since gone out of business,' but at least its owners 'have the consolation of a ruling that will vindicate the rights of other farmers and small businesses under the boot heel of the bureaucracy.' Libertarian: Get Honest About Gov't Spending 'What kind of government do Americans want seriously enough to pay for?' asks Veronique de Rugy at Reason. 'I suspect that most people aren't willing to pay the taxes required to fund everything our current government does.' Advertisement Yet 'all the benefits and subsidies that we're unwilling to pay for' but keep going 'will eventually have to be paid for in the future with higher taxes, inflation, or both' by our children and grandchildren. 'Growing the economy' can be 'part of the solution,' but it won't be enough, and 'raising taxes on the rich will fall short too,' since higher tax rates 'do not automatically translate to more tax revenue.' 'It's long past time' we 'ask what level of spending we truly want with the money we truly have.' Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Liberal: Hey, Dems — End the #Resistance Advertisement 'Nonstop Democratic fulminations in Trump's second term have been notably unsuccessful in resuscitating the party's toxic brand,' sighs the Liberal Patriot's Ruy Teixeira. Tellingly, 'voters, despite their negative views of Trump's performance on key issues, still prefer Republicans to Democrats.' Also, 'voters neither like nor trust' Dems, and thus don't see them as 'an obvious choice over their opponents.' Yet 'many Democratic politicians persist in reading — loudly — from the #Resistance script.' Why? The '#Resistance trope is what advantages individual Democratic politicians within the party because it generates adulation from activists, media coverage, and gushers of donations.' And taking back the House in 2026 will only 'convince #Resistance aficionados that nothing really needs to change.' Hello, President JD Vance. Health beat: Big Pharma Wins, Patients Lose 'In May, Dr. Vinay Prasad joined the Food & Drug Administration as the top regulator for vaccines,' yet he 'apparently knew the games too well,' gripes Alex Berensen at his Substack: After last week's attacks from Trump's allies, Prasad resigned: 'He was targeted because he posed a direct threat to Big Pharma profits.' Advertisement Just last month, he told Sarepta Therapeutics 'it needed to halt shipments of its gene therapy for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, or DMD.' 'Sarepta has never shown its drugs actually benefit patients.' The company won the right to a drug trial in 2016; 'nine years later, Sarepta still hasn't completed those trials.' Yet 'that hasn't stopped it from selling the drug — for up to $1.5 million per year.' Advertisement 'Big Pharma scalped Prasad for his honesty.' — Compiled by The Post Editorial Board

Economists defend labor data chief fired by Trump
Economists defend labor data chief fired by Trump

UPI

time12 minutes ago

  • UPI

Economists defend labor data chief fired by Trump

President Donald Trump speaks to reporters as he departs for a weekend in Bedminster, New Jersey, at the White House in Washington DC, on Friday, August 1, 2025. Photo by Aaron Schwartz/UPI | License Photo Aug. 3 (UPI) -- Economists are lining up to defend Bureau of Labor Statistics commissioner Erika McEntarfer, who was fired by President Donald Trump on Friday over his allegations that the agency manipulated a report showing low job growth for July. "It has been the honor of my life to serve as Commissioner of BLS alongside the many dedicated civil servants tasked with measuring a vast and dynamic economy. It is vital and important work and I thank them for their service to this nation," McEntarfer said on social media Friday. Her firing came after the July report had shown that jobs growth was slower than expected as the unemployment rose, with the United States only adding 73,000 new jobs for the month -- down from 147,000 new jobs added in June. "Today's jobs numbers were rigged in order to make Republicans and me look bad," Trump had said Friday afternoon in a Truth Social post. Former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers called Trump's accusations a "preposterous charge" in an interview with ABC News' "This Week" program Sunday. "These numbers are put together by teams of literally hundreds of people following detailed procedures that are in manuals. There's no conceivable way that the head of the BLS could have manipulated this number," Summers said. Summers said that the numbers in the job report were "in line" with data and information being reviewed in the private sector and criticized Trump for his "authoritarian" removal of McEntarfer. "Firing statisticians goes with threatening the heads of newspapers. It goes with launching assaults on universities. It goes with launching assaults on law firms that defend clients that the elected boss finds uncongenial," he said. "This is really scary stuff." Bill Beach, McEntarfer's predecessor, appeared in an interview with CNN's "State of the Union" on Sunday where he likewise called the move by Trump "totally groundless" and dangerous. "The commissioner doesn't see the numbers until Wednesday before they're published. By the time the commissioner sees the numbers, they're all prepared. They're locked into the computer system," Beach said. Beach said that the only thing the commissioner can do before the jobs report is published is review the text accompanying the data, as he explained part of the process of how they're compiled. "What I think really upset the president on Friday were the revisions to May and June, big revisions. But that's because, like every time we publish on Friday, there are revisions to the previous two months," he said. "This is a survey. And a survey has sample returns." Beach said the jobs reports are compiled from surveys that are sent out to Americans and hundreds of thousands of businesses each month. But the BLS doesn't receive all the returns in time, keeping the window for responses open an extra two months. "What you saw on Friday was the effect of trying to do a better job, getting more information," Beach said. During his interview, Beach was asked if he would believe future report numbers compiled by the BLS after a successor for McEntarfer is found. "I will, because I know the people who work there. They are some of the most loyal Americans you can imagine. They have worked in every kind of political circumstance. They are completely devoted to producing the very best gold standard data possible," he said. "And that's why BLS is the finest statistical agency in the entire world. Its numbers are trusted all over the world. So, I will trust those numbers." Still, White House officials aimed Sunday to double down on the president's claim that the data was being manipulated, without evidence. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett was interviewed on NBC News' "Meet the Press" on Sunday and said that the BLS needs a "fresh set of eyes." "There have been a bunch of patterns that could make people wonder," he said. "And I think the most important thing for people to know is that it's the president's highest priority that the data be trusted and that people get to the bottom of why these revisions are so unreliable." The far-right political activist Laura Loomer, who is not an official member of the Trump administration but has positioned herself as an informal chief adviser on personnel matters, called the BLS situation a "vetting crisis." "Great job by President Trump who just announced he is firing Biden holdover Erika McEntarfer, the Commissioner of Labor Statistics," she said on social media. "Every single Biden holdover must be FIRED."

After a blown deadline, what next for US-Canada trade?
After a blown deadline, what next for US-Canada trade?

Yahoo

time16 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

After a blown deadline, what next for US-Canada trade?

A self-imposed deadline for a new US-Canada trade deal came and went on Friday. So what happens next for these two deeply entwined neighbours? Canada and the US have been locked in a tariff war for six months and, despite talk of "intense" negotiations in recent weeks, a trade agreement remains elusive. Both President Donald Trump and Prime Minister Mark Carney have poured cold water on the idea they will reach a quick, and tariff-free, deal. And Trump's open criticism of Canada's move to recognise a Palestinian state dashed hopes for a last-minute agreement earlier this week. The pessimism marks a shift in tone from as recently as June's G7 meeting, when the two leaders set themselves the summer deadline. Canadian negotiators have come to the conclusion that "it's not the end of the world" if a quick deal isn't reached and "that quality over speed and a rushed agreement matters a lot", said Fen Hampson, a professor of international affairs at Carleton University in Ottawa. Carney - who has been tight-lipped about the negotiation details - has said as much himself, repeating that just "any deal" won't do. Still, there are pressures on both sides to give businesses a reprieve. Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre said on Friday he shares "Canadians' disappointment" that a deal was not reached by the deadline. He urged Carney's Liberals to do more to "take back control of our economic future". Canada is now facing a 35% tariff rate, though there is a carve out for goods compliant under a current free trade deal. American global tariffs on steel, aluminium, autos and auto parts are hurting, as the US is a top market for those sectors. On Sunday, Canada's minister for US-Canada trade Dominic LeBlanc told the BBC's US partner CBS News that trade talks will continue, and that negotiations so far have been "informative, constructive and cordial." LeBlanc added he expects Carney and Trump to speak again in the coming days. "We think there is an option of striking a deal that will bring down some of these tariffs, and provide greater certainty to investment," he said. The Trump administration has justified those tariffs by claiming a lack of co-operation on stemming the flow of illicit drugs like fentanyl. Canada denies that, noting about 1% of US fentanyl imports originate in Canada. It has also brought in new border protections and a "fentanyl czar" in recent months in an effort to address Trump's concerns. Threatened tariffs on copper and the expected end of a global tariff exemption used by shoppers of goods under $800 could also pinch. Canada has responded with C$60bn ($43.3bn; £32.3bn) in counter tariffs on various American goods - the only country along with China to directly retaliate against Trump. "It comes as no surprise that businesses are craving certainty after months and months of tumultuous announcements," said Catherine Fortin-Lefaivre, vice-president of international policy and global partnership at the Canadian Chamber of Commerce. "But at the same time, they're not craving certainty at the expense of a really bad deal." A few factors give Canada some breathing room. On paper, it looks like the country is facing a severe tariff rate from the US, but trade is currently more free than the levies suggest at first glance. In March, Trump announced a tariffs reprieve on goods compliant with the Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement, known in Canada as CUSMA and the US as the USMCA. That deal - negotiated during Trump's first term in office - came into force five years ago. Almost 90% of Canadian exports to the US are ultimately able to cross the border duty free, if firms file out necessary paperwork, under that agreement. "That has given us a buffer, no question about it, that other countries don't have right now," said Prof Hampson. It means Canada is overall paying a much lower tariff rate than many of the deals already inked with the US, like the EU, South Korea and Japan at 15%, or Indonesia and the Philippines at 19%. Ottawa has also brought in some relief programmes for affected industries and has also collected about C$1.5bn more in import duties than in the same period last year, due to the counter tariffs. Why Trump's global tariffs 'victory' may well come at a high price See the Trump tariffs list by country Five things now pricier in Canada due to tariffs 'In business, indecision is killer' - Canadian firms seek certainty And while in the US consumer confidence is up and prices there have remained contained, it helps Canada's negotiating position if they can wait for Americans to start feeling the pain of tariffs. "It's Americans who are going to squawk," said Prof Hampson. Ms Fortin-Lefaivre predicts US businesses, especially smaller firms that don't have the same resources to withstand them, will be pressuring political leaders. "So that pressure could play to our advantage," she said. Canadians also appear willing to give the new prime minister some leeway. Opinion polls suggest they are generally satisfied with his handling of trade. Carney "understands that doing what's best for the economy right now is actually what's best for him politically", Martha Hall Findlay, director of the University of Calgary's School of Public Policy and a former Liberal MP, told the BBC. Trump has said he is imposing tariffs to boost domestic manufacturing, open overseas markets and raise money for the government. He is also using them to push countries like Canada on a range of non-trade issues, including military spending. In the last few weeks, Ottawa has significantly ramped up its defence spending, boosted security at the shared border and killed a digital tax opposed by American tech firms. Those moves show Canada is "doing what the Americans wanted us to do", said Ms Fortin-Lefaivre. She hopes Canadian negotiators are pushing for tariffs to be as low as possible, as well as working to ensure the two deeply integrated supply chains are able to continue working together. Canada is pressing for relief on the 50% steel and aluminium tariffs, which are squeezing US automakers. And on Thursday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent signalled in an interview with CNBC that is an option on the table. Trump meanwhile, has raised a number of longstanding trade irritants besides fentanyl, including Canada's protections around its dairy industry. Ottawa has previously warned of more countermeasures to come if talks collapse, though political appetite for that may be waning. Retaliatory tariffs "haven't seemed to have had the kind of impact that we would hope for", British Columbia Premier David Eby recently told Bloomberg. On retaliation, Prof Hampson said: "The Americans have escalation dominance here. So you want to be smart about it." A spokesperson for Carney declined to say whether more countermeasures remained on the table. Meanwhile, Canadian negotiators have been in Washington most of this week and keep pushing talks forward, with the minister responsible for Canada-US trade saying on Friday an acceptable agreement "was not yet in sight". "We all crave the certainty of a deal," said Ms Fortin-Lefaivre. But research by her business group suggests firms are making contingency plans. Almost 40% of goods exporters have already diversified suppliers outside the US, and 28% have diversified buyers. They are also looking ahead to what may be more challenging talks with CUSMA, which has proven a critical backstop, as it is up for review next year. It is all part of a wider push by the country to diversify trade away from the US, pull down barriers that have hindered trade between provinces, and press forward more quickly on major projects. The economic links between the two countries will stay strong - Canada will still be one of the largest trading partners and economic and security allies of the US. But the irony is that Trump's threats may be "forcing Canada to understand we have to get our own economic house in order," said Ms Hall Findlay. "It's going to take some really tough decisions. And I do think our current government gets this." Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store