Kate dazzles in dark red silk at state banquet return
The future queen joined the King, Queen Camilla and the Prince of Wales and some 160 guests including Sir Mick Jagger and Sir Elton John in Windsor Castle's impressive St George's Hall.
Ready for what promises to be a wonderful State Banquet this evening in Windsor 🇫🇷🇬🇧 pic.twitter.com/l07Jg4olOd
— The Prince and Princess of Wales (@KensingtonRoyal) July 8, 2025
Kate, who was diagnosed with cancer in 2024 and confirmed she was free from the disease at the start of this year, last made an appearance at a grand royal dinner 20 months ago in November 2023 in honour of the South Korean president.
Her gathered evening gown featured caped back detailing.
The princess, with her hair down, was also wearing her favourite Lover's Knot tiara – a piece much loved by Diana, Princess of Wales.
Kate and her husband William were pictured smiling and gazing at each other as they arrived together, walking side by side before the banquet at the castle.
She carried a lily of the valley embroidered evening clutch and wore the Rosette of Grand Officier l'ordre nationale du merite, the Royal Family Orders of Charles III and Elizabeth II, the Grand Cross of the Royal Victorian Order and GCVO sash and star.
Kate was earlier shown smiling in the gardens of Windsor with William before the event, with Kensington Palace's social media declaring: 'Ready for what promises to be a wonderful State Banquet this evening in Windsor.'
The prince was dressed in white tie, with the Most Noble Order of the Garter Sash with the Lesser George, miniature medals and a series of chest orders.
Last week, the princess opened up about her 'rollercoaster' cancer recovery, its life-changing impact and putting on a 'brave face' during a visit to Colchester Hospital.
She was seated next to President Macron and the pair chatted ahead of the start of the King's toast, while on her other side was art historian Christophe Leribault, chairman of the Musee D'Orsay.
✨ Final preparations are taking place ahead of this evening's State Banquet in St George's Hall, Windsor Castle. pic.twitter.com/timKDXAi8i
— The Royal Family (@RoyalFamily) July 8, 2025
Kate studied history of art at university.
Camilla, meanwhile, was dressed in an ivory silk and crepe embroidered evening gown by Fiona Clare, and a sapphire and diamond tiara, necklace, earrings and bracelet, all part of Queen Elizabeth II's sapphire suite.
The Queen was also wearing the Legion d'Honneur French sash, Garter Star and the King's family order.
Mrs Macron wore a vivid blue caped evening gown with gold epaulettes-style detail on the shoulder.
It was both William and Kate's first time at a Windsor Castle banquet, with the last one being staged there 11 years ago for the Irish President Michael D Higgins in 2014.
Earlier, Kate carried out royal duties as the first French state visit to the UK for 17 years began, accompanying the Macrons to Windsor with William, taking part in the carriage ride, the ceremonial welcome, the royal luncheon and Royal Collection exhibition.
The princess had already embraced French fashion, choosing Christian Dior for her daytime engagements.
Her blush pink Dior jacket was the 30 Montaigne Rose Des Vents Bar Jacket and a piece from the 2024 collection, and Kate paired it with a tulle skirt.
L'Entente Cordiale in the Kitchens!🇬🇧🇫🇷
Chef @Raymond_Blanc OBE, an ambassador for the @KingsFdn, was invited to join the chefs at Windsor Castle to create the First Course and Dessert for this evening's State Banquet menu. pic.twitter.com/gEw9oDYVBR
— The Royal Family (@RoyalFamily) July 8, 2025
It was reimagined by Maria Grazia Chiuri, who was inspired by the original first created in 1947 by Dior himself.
Kate's sleek hat was by Jess Collett.
The princess was charmed with a kiss to the hand by Mr Macron as she and William met the French leader as he disembarked from his plane at RAF Northolt.
Mr Macron took the princess's hand and leaned forward to deliver an air kiss towards it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Record
2 hours ago
- Daily Record
Netflix 'masterpiece' breaks third record with 160,0000 views in just 12 days
Squid Game is back for its third and final season and has already broken an impressive record. Netflix's most successful show Squid Game returned for its third and final season last month and has now broken another impressive record. The South Korean psychological thriller is by far the most watched series on the streaming platform ever with season one alone securing 265.2m views after its release in 2021, securing the crown for the number one show globally. Season two, which came out in December last year, was another huge success with a staggering 192.6m views. It appears to be a recurring theme as season three has now broken another record for the second week in a row, hitting 106.3M views in just 10 days, which is more than any Netflix series in any language has ever reached in two weeks, Variety reports. The third installment of Squid Game has now joined the first two seasons at the top of the most-watched non-English shows on Netflix, sitting in third place. Last week, the show was hailed as the biggest TV launch for Netflix in history after accumulating an eye watering 60.1M views in just three days, the Metro reports. For those who have now seen the show, the plot of Squid Game follows Player 456, Seong Gi-Hun, played by Lee Jung-jae, who enters a competition with a prize of 45.6bn won (£24.9M). However, the life changing jackpot comes with a deadly catch as each task kills off more players with only one person left alive by the end of the games. After winning in the first season, Gi-hun re-enters the game in second season with the sole purpose of enacting revenge. In the third season, we see Gi-hun's attempts to take the lethal games down from the inside as he goes face-to-face with the overseer, the Front Man (Lee Byung-hun). The highly anticipated finale has received mixed reviews from critics. The Verge wrote in a review: "The third season's worldbuilding efforts remain frustratingly unimaginative for the most part, although the season's final 10 minutes deliver some of its most glorious moments that take place outside the games" Meanwhile, the Hollywood Reporter wrote: "It brings me no pleasure to report that the third and thankfully last of Squid Game seasons only confirms that we, like Gi-hun (Lee Jung-jae), should've left that cursed island behind for good after his first victory." Meanwhile The Wrap argued: "The show proves it's still more than capable of rendering a tragically compelling story that manages to entertain and have you emotionally invested in its characters." Fans will have to tune in to find out what happens in the grand finale of the show and whether or not creator Hwang Dong-hyuk managed to pull a hatntrick out the bag. Join the Daily Record's WhatsApp community here an d get the latest news sent straight to your messages One thing is for sure, Lee has no doubts that playing the leading role in Squid Game has been a 'career defining role' for him. After the season three premiere, he told the Metro: "When I was reading the scripts for seasons two and three, I knew that he would be put on another rollercoaster, and even more so. So I thought, wow, if I just play this character very well, it's going to be a very amazing, career-defining role for me." Meanwhile, Hwang has already teased his ideas for a potential spin off meaning there may still be more to come for the Squid Game universe.
Daily Mirror
2 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Princess Kate heartbreak as righthand woman for 15 years makes bombshell move
Natasha Archer has been a member of the Royal Family's staff since 2010 when she joined as a personal assistant for Princess Kate and Prince William - but now she has reportedly stepped away Princess Kate's righthand woman has reportedly stepped away from her service after 15 years. Natasha Archer is set to leave Kensington Palace after 15 years of dedicated service to Kate, according to People. Known affectionately as "Tash," Archer, 37, joined the staff for the Royal Family in 2010 as a personal assistant for Princess Kate and Prince William. After taking on the role, Archer became a key part of Kate's team and was known as her unofficial stylist. She was recently the senior private executive assistant to the Prince and Princess of Wales. With an eye for British fashion, Archer became instrumental in curating Princess Kate's wardrobe ahead of several royal engagements and tours, including Australia and New Zealand where Kate wore 24 outfits in 19 days. Archer helped Kate emerge as a prominent wearer of designers Alexander McQueen and Kenny Packham. The apparent " Kate Middleton Effect" became a fashion phenomenon with items she ended up wearing selling out shortly afterwards. In a daring first for a Royal, Archer ended up persuading William to wear a traditional sherwani to a 2019 reception in Pakistan. She also worked alongside Kate to upscale several of her dresses in a bid to become environmentally conscious, which led to her renting a dress for the Earthshot Prize Awards in Boston, Massachusetts, in 2022. The top staffer joined Kate during a tough five-hour hike in the mountainous country of Bhutan in 2016, in case the princess needed an outfit change. Archer has not just been by Kate's side for trips and tours, and was by her side at St Mary's Hospital to assist by handing over an outfit and baby seat shortly before the birth of Prince George in 2013. Archer went on to have some baby joy of her own, and is now a mother of two after she married Getty royal photographer Chris Jackson in 2017. She was promoted in 2022 and led a senior private executive assistant role. Archer is now moving on to her next chapter while William and Kate remain focused on their roles, with the latter easing her way back into public life after she was diagnosed with cancer last year.
Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
93 phalluses and well-hung horses - the Bayeux Tapestry decoded
The mysteries of the propaganda and porn of England's most important historical relic show the embroidered tale of William's invasion was just as important in Anglo French relations in 1066 as it is now The Bayeux Tapestry is coming home for the first time in 900 years – where experts believe it was made in the first place, as a piece of medieval propaganda by Kent needleworkers with a saucy sense of humour. Nearly 70m long and 50cm tall, the wool-embroidered fragile linen cloth is a woven story of the events leading up to the Norman Conquest of England in 1066 – but history, as we know, belongs to the victors. In the spring of that year, the King of England Edward the Confessor had died, leaving his country in political turmoil. Into the breach stepped William, Duke of Normandy, who had almost certainly been promised the crown by his first cousin once removed, Edward. But Harold, who was the son of the real power behind the English throne, Godwine, Earl of Wessex, took it for his own, despite having sworn an oath of support to William. It was for this reason that William's ruthless Norman invasion fleet crossed the English Channel and decisively trounced King Harold II - slaughtering thousands on a hilltop near Hastings, in the fading autumn light of October 14, 1066. That date – which is etched into every schoolchild's mind – changed the course of history for England. Even now, 900 years later, the 11th century tapestry is the most iconic image of its time. 'It tells the story of probably the most important event in English history, a massive transformation in society, culture and economy in England,' explains Dr Dave Musgrove, content director of BBC History Magazine and the HistoryExtra podcast, and also co-author with Prof Michael Lewis of the Story of the Bayeux Tapestry. 'It is such a powerful, resonant, vivid document using the power of the imagery which still speaks to us today.' President Macron's announcement at the dazzling state banquet in front of King Charles, the royal family and rock stars Mick Jagger and Elton John that he will loan the Bayeux Tapestry to the British Museum next year, was made in the spirit of Anglo French Entente Cordiale. But the extra layer of intrigue is that, according to historian Dr Musgrove, the tapestry may have been commissioned in the first place to placate the defeated English – and bring together the warring countries. Much of the history of the relic is unknown and open to a great deal of interpretation – both now and by medieval minds. The characters buried within the 58 scenes of several stitched cloth panels, that were sewn together to make one piece, reveal a lot about the fashions, politics, carpentry and ship-building of the time. READ MORE: 'Gran's saucy paintings were slammed – but we're having last laugh' Historians have also unravelled its rude secrets and found willy-waving soldiers and well-hung horses. But, a bit like a medieval social media post that lacks nuance, it was probably created as a 'simplistic narrative' that William had a 'decent claim to the throne of England, that he was justified in his invasion, and his adversary, Harold, was a worthy opponent to be applauded for his military prowess'. Dr Musgrove says you have to read between the woven lines. 'The beauty of the tapestry are the little Latin captions which are very terse and don't really tell you anything, which is one of the reasons it might have been made to bring people together, because you can read it and look at it in so many different ways,' he says. Before we even get to the blood and gore of the battle itself, the tapestry starts about a year before the main event. READ MORE: 'We drank to excess and had debauched sex parties – but one drug split the band' 'It's the story of how Harold Godwinson, who at that point was an important earl in England, but not the King, gets himself entangled in Normandy,' explains Dr Musgrove. 'He goes on a sea voyage to Normandy, finds himself probably as an unwelcome guest of William, and then they go on some adventures together and Harold is painted as heroic.' History lessons tell us the Normans brutally asserted their control over his newly-conquered kingdom, but there is another theory to explain why the English are treated well and Harold is painted as a hero in the tapestry. 'We think this might have been made at a particular moment in time shortly after the battle, when William was trying to bring everyone together,' says the historian. This very un-Normanlike touchy-feely attitude didn't last long. 'By 1070 William had enough of rebellions and took a much harsher line,' says Dr Musgrove. One of the more famous scenes in the tapestry is the Halley's Comet which appeared in the sky in 1066 after the death of King Edward. Dr Musgrove continues: 'It's a portent of bad luck, so this is a commentary on the fact that Harold has had himself crowned when he shouldn't have, because he's made this oath to William'. Nobody is sure exactly why the tapestry was commissioned or exactly when, but there are theories about it, including a story as old as time about a boastful power-seeking nobleman. 'The main theory is that it was created by Bishop Odo of Bayeux, who was William the Conqueror's half-brother, because he has surprising prominence in the tapestry,' says Dr Musgrove. 'Perhaps he wanted to be memorialised in an artefact for his cathedral? Or he wanted to curry favour with William, who he'd fallen out with and wanted to sort of show what a marvellous thing the Norman conquest was.' It clearly worked, as Bishop Odo was made Earl of Kent after the conquest. But the first clear documentary reference for the tapestry wasn't until 1476 when it appeared in an inventory at Bayeux Cathedral. However, Dr Musgrove says most experts would agree that it was probably made in Canterbury by English seamstresses, who were famous for their needlework. 'We had a rich tradition in Anglo-Saxon embroidery, and also in the Latin captions there are bits of English language,' he explains. 'Importantly, some of the scenes seem to be almost directly copied in their content and their style from scenes in illuminated manuscripts, which we know were held in monastic libraries in Canterbury in the 11th century.' And there was one more link – the power-crazed Bishop Odo was also in charge in Canterbury. The original embroidery is kept in the Bayeux Museum in Normandy, but a replica created in the late 19th century is held at Reading Museum. 'Seeing Mick Jagger at the banquet reminded me that Charlie Watts also owned a replica of the Bayeux tapestry – there were a few copies made in the 19th century,' adds the author. But the nudity and willy waving figures sewn into the borders around the battle scenes were actually censored by the Victorians in their versions. Underpants were sewn over offending genitals and even horses' genetalia was covered! READ MORE: 'I'm a chemist - Agatha Christie wrote one murder plot better than any other' While pictures of phalluses are often symbols of fertility in different cultures, in our Anglo-Saxon tapestry they very much give off 'rich bloke in sports car' energy. 'There are 93 penises in the tapestry,' confirms Dr Musgrove. 'Although 88 of those belong to horses. What's quite fun is that William the Conqueror is riding a horse with a a memorably large appendage.' There could be a 94th among the human figures of men – and women – with their genitals exposed, but Dr Musgrove says a question hangs over whether 'what's dangling below his garments is a penis or a scabbard or sword'. Again, nobody knows the reason for the rude nudes. They may just be some sort of commentary on what is happening in the main battle. Otherwise, it was created for the monks in Canterbury and, as the historian proposes, 'it's actually a big sort of moral commentary on the sins of worldly people'. Another explanation - given the earthy nature of soldiers - is that it's simply medieval porn. 'The tapestry may well have been created for military men who fought in the Battle of Hastings to remind them of their glories,' suggests Dr Musgrove. 'They might have been the sort of chaps who are amused by depictions of naked people, and they're providing moments of levity to what is essentially a bloody story.' Which basically means the tapestry could also be a 900-year-old sex text!
