Zahid confirms no going solo, Umno to contest GE16 under BN
LUMUT : Umno will not contest the next general election on its own, party president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi confirmed today, saying the party will remain a component of Barisan Nasional for the elections.
Umno would continue to contest the general election (GE16) under BN's dacing (scales) symbol without sidelining partners such as MCA, MIC, Parti Bersatu Rakyat Sabah and its unity government partner Pakatan Harapan.
Saying Umno had never contested on its own in the past, Zahid dismissed claims that the party's losses in several by-elections were due to its partnerships with other parties in BN and with Pakatan Harapan.
'(The suggestion to contest solo) was not only brought up in Kedah — yesterday I was in Johor, and it was the same sentiment, urging us to go solo,' he said at the Lumut Umno divisional meeting today.
'There are resolutions from some divisions implying that our defeats stem from having allies in BN and PH … that we've been at a disadvantage because we did not contest alone,' he said.
Yesterday, Umno secretary-general Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki had also stated that the party would not go solo at the general election as the party had never done so despite the changing political dynamics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malaysiakini
2 hours ago
- Malaysiakini
Rafizi, the rakyat is with you
YOURSAY | 'RCI the only way for Anwar to clear himself.' PKR MPs call for RCI on judiciary, fear new VK Lingam-esque scandal HLT34: Bravo, Rafizi Ramli and your comrades! This is what the rakyat expect our elected MPs to do - voice out our fears before things get out of hand. Don't let VK Lingam's Saga 2.0 happen. I wish more MPs would stand together with Rafizi, even the newly minted PKR deputy Nurul Izzah Anwar. For Rafizi and your comrades, be prepared to be sacked or charged. But please remember, the rakyat is with you. Mazhilamani: Two things are very clear: One, there is a build-up of a faction in PKR; two, the delay in appointing replacements for retiring top judges as proposed by the then CJ, is beginning to look contentious. The PM's motive is in question. I don't think Rafizi and the other PKR MPs are getting personal with the prime minister. They just want the PM to carry out the reformasi he promised nearly three decades ago, to cleanse the politics, which is starting to bleed the country. The time is now when he is still the PM. As I had mentioned earlier, it is best for MPs to make an honest decision. Mechi: I know we can count on Rafizi. His mantra is rakyat and nation come first. I cannot trust the PM anymore. If Malaysia wants to change, we need qualified leaders with integrity. The PM does not have it, like his Umno stooges. We hope the rakyat will stand against corruption. Otherwise, all the court charges against Umno leaders will be DNAA (dismissal not amounting to an acquittal). Times are interesting for both PKR and Umno. Corruption seems to be the common denominator. Undecided: When PMX prioritises dubious politics over fundamental principles of good governance, it is not surprising that he will get himself into a bind. A Royal Commission of Inquiry (RCI) is the only way he can clear himself. Keep up the pressure, Rafizi and co. Rakyat will support your call for action. RedHamster4450: I beg to differ. Now that Rafizi is no longer in the cabinet, he's reverted to his previous self - activist and using his voice to bring attention to issues which plague Malaysia. Not being a cabinet minister or deputy president of PKR is not the end of the road, just new beginnings. After all, look at KJ (Khairy Jamaluddin), kena tendang parti (got kicked out of the party), but his following is larger than ever. MarioT: The Judicial Appointment Commission's (JAC) recommendations were totally ignored by the 'dictatorial' actions of our globetrotting Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim. The judiciary is in limbo with no clear leadership at the top. Anwar thinks and behaves like his one-time long-serving mentor. The judiciary is the most honoured and respected custodian of the laws of the country, and if it is treated as unimportant and if it is manipulated by the PM, then he has failed his duty to upkeep decorum and order within the judiciary. There was ample time to decide to extend the term of service of the retiring chief justice (Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat), and other senior judges or find replacements for the vacant posts. However, the PM, due to his own self-serving reasons, kept silent and did not endorse JAC's dutiful and adjudicated recommendations. If he cannot prioritise his work and spends more time on overseas trips of little value, it is time he is replaced. Once in power, he forgets the rakyat have placed him in that position and that they can also remove him for having lost confidence in him Bobbyo: PKR needs to replace their leader if it wants to make an impact at the next election. Anwar has led the nation down by kowtowing to the demands of Umno. He appears to be showing or repeating the unpopular decisions made by former premier Dr Mahathir Mohamad. There seems to be so much of Umno and Mahathir's DNA that flows through Anwar. The people feel that they have been let down very badly. This act of not renewing the service of our former CJ points to the fact that Anwar may have either something to fear, or he wants only those who toe the line to be in position. The recent extension of Azam Baki's tenure as MACC chief commissioner, the promotion of a junior officer (special branch director) to the level of IGP (Khalid Ismail), and now allegedly interfering in the judicial process show that PMX wants only 'yes' men or women in positions. The judiciary, the last pillar that holds this nation, will collapse if it is compromised by judges with no integrity. It is time an RCI be set up to investigate all the complaints. To make sure that there is no political power in play in the selection of compromised judges. The above is a selection of comments posted by Malaysiakini subscribers. Only paying subscribers can post comments. In the past year, Malaysiakinians have posted over 100,000 comments. Join the Malaysiakini community and help set the news agenda. Subscribe now. These comments are compiled to reflect the views of Malaysiakini subscribers on matters of public interest. Malaysiakini does not intend to represent these views as fact.
Free Malaysia Today
13 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Lawyer moots designated areas for peaceful assemblies
Lawyer Andrew Khoo said peaceful assemblies should be allowed and that the police should facilitate them as required by law. PETALING JAYA : A lawyer has proposed that the government designate areas for peaceful assemblies nationwide, following the Federal Court's decision yesterday that the penalty for failing to notify the police of proposed rallies is unconstitutional. Andrew Khoo, a former co-chair of the Bar Council's constitutional law committee, said the decision of the apex court affirmed the freedom to peacefully assemble. 'After 13 years of the coming into force of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012, it is well past due for the state and federal governments to designate convenient and easily accessible places in every town and city in the country to hold peaceful assemblies,' he said in a statement. Khoo added that the proposed 'maidan' or public squares should be places where the voice of the people is heard, not feared. 'Maidan' is a term of Persian origin referring to designated open spaces where the public can gather and exercise their right to assemble. Khoo said peaceful assemblies should be allowed, and that the police should facilitate them as required by law. 'The proper legal recourse lies in the Penal Code for any violation of peace and order by the organisers or participants of the assembly,' he said. The Federal Court had unanimously ruled that it is unconstitutional to criminalise the failure to notify the police five days in advance of holding a peaceful assembly. Outgoing Chief Justice Tengku Maimun Tuan Mat, delivering the decision of a five-member panel, said Section 9(5) of the Peaceful Assembly Act 2012 imposes a punishment that exceeds the limits permitted under Article 10(1)(b) of the Federal Constitution. Article 10(1)(b) guarantees the freedom of speech, assembly, and association. She said the section was 'a disproportionate intervention' and amounted to a prohibition rather than a restriction of that right. The decision stemmed from a constitutional challenge brought by former Muda secretary-general Amir Hadi, who was charged in 2022 with failing to give the police five days' notice before organising a protest outside the Sogo shopping complex in Kuala Lumpur. Home minister Saifuddin Nasution Ismail said yesterday that his ministry would examine the Federal Court's ruling. The ministry is expected to table an amendment to Section 11 of the Act, which requires organisers of assemblies to obtain the consent of the location's owner or occupier, at the next parliamentary sitting.
Free Malaysia Today
13 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Najib gave conflicting answers over source of funds, court told
SRC International is suing Najib Razak and former CEO Nik Faisal Ariff Kamil for wrongfully receiving company property, and dishonestly and wrongfully conspiring to convert company property for their own use. KUALA LUMPUR : A lawyer for SRC International Sdn Bhd told the High Court today that former prime minister Najib Razak gave conflicting answers when confronted about the source of money that entered into his accounts more than 10 years ago. Lead counsel Lim Chee Wee said Najib had, in his testimony under oath, given various versions of the source of funds that entered his accounts when cross-examined. Submitting at the close of the SRC International trial, Lim said Najib had, in an affidavit affirmed in 2015, claimed that a 'personal donation' of US$700 million and another sum of RM42 million originating from SRC International had been channelled into his account by Gandingan Mentari Sdn Bhd and Ihsan Perdana Sdn Bhd without his knowledge. 'He first said the affidavit was 'very badly drafted', and then he said the admission was based on 'allegations at that time'. 'He later said that he was 'misled' and backtracked to say it was the information he received. And another version was that he was misled by media reporting,' Lim said after the defence had closed its case. SRC International is suing Najib and former CEO Nik Faisal Ariff Kamil for wrongfully receiving company property, and dishonestly and wrongfully conspiring to convert company property for their own use. A judgment in default of appearance has been entered against Nik Faisal. The suit originally included former chairman Ismee Ismail, as well as former directors Suboh Yasin, Shahrol Azral Ibrahim Halmi, Azhar Osman Khairuddin and Che Abdullah @ Rashidi Che Omar, as co-defendants. SRC International later dropped the case against them. However, they were added as third parties by Najib. Lim also said Najib never informed his Cabinet about the RM42 million he allegedly received, and that he continued to helm decisions involving SRC International. 'It cannot be said that he was acting in the country's interest, or that his actions can be downplayed to mere recklessness,' he said. The hearing continues before Justice Ahmad Fairuz Zainol Abidin on Tuesday, with Najib's lawyer, Shafee Abdullah, submitting in his defence, followed by lawyers appearing for the various third parties.
