logo
How to Find Out the Age of Your Current Phone Before Buying a New One

How to Find Out the Age of Your Current Phone Before Buying a New One

CNET03-06-2025

Our phones are such an integral part of our lives that it can sometimes feel like we've had them forever. And as news about possible tariffs on phones and technology loom, you might be wondering if you've held onto your device for too long, and whether you should consider buying a new one.
No matter what your plans are, you are going to need to know how old your phone is when selling it or trading it in for an upgrade, as the amount of credit you may receive towards a new device varies based on how old it is. Or maybe there's a new software update and you're not sure if your phone is compatible with it, potentially making it more vulnerable to security threats or just more sluggish overall. It's also useful to know how old your phone is to find out if it's still under warranty, and also if it's eligible to extend it. In some cases, knowing how old your phone is can help you determine if your phone is capable of running certain applications or games.
Whatever your reason may be, there are a few ways to find out your phone's age.
The iPhone 12 Mini and its box.
CNET
Check the box
If you still have the box your phone came in, that's probably the easiest way to find out when your phone was made. There's often a sticker that tells you the device's exact manufacturing date.
Check your Settings
Another way to find out your phone's age is to check its settings. With an iPhone, you select Settings, go to General and then tap About. With an Android, you tap Settings and then select About Phone.
You'll then see general information about your phone, such as its model name, model number and serial number. Just knowing your phone's model name is enough to get a rough estimate of how old it is. For example, if I know that I own an iPhone 13, then I can look the model name of the phone online and discover that the phone was released in September 2021. That means it is roughly four years old as of 2025. The same can be done for Android phones. You can also check for the date of your last security update, which could be especially helpful if you aren't sure if your phone is still getting them.
The iPhone 16 (front) and the iPhone 12 (back)
Lisa Eadicicco/CNET
Look up the serial number
If you want more specifics about your phone, you can try using your phone's serial number. Each phone's serial number can give you clues as to when the phone was made, though since manufacturers have different ways of encoding and deciphering the serial number, it can be a little complicated. If you want to do a bit of your own sleuthing, you can look up your phone's information online to see if there's a serial number manufacturing code guide for it.
With iPhones, you can use the serial number to look up specific information on when it was purchased and if it's still under warranty. Go to checkcoverage.apple.com, enter in the serial number, solve a captcha, hit submit and you'll see the purchase date of your iPhone as well as if it's still under warranty.
Find the receipt
While finding the phone's receipt might not be able to tell you how old it is, it's still useful if all you want to do is find out when it was purchased and if it's still under warranty. You might also need this proof of purchase when filing a phone insurance claim in the event your device needs a repair, gets lost or is stolen. That's why we usually recommend keeping email receipts for your important purchases, or at least taking a snapshot of a paper receipt.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Apple weighs using Anthropic or OpenAI to power Siri in major reversal, Bloomberg News reports
Apple weighs using Anthropic or OpenAI to power Siri in major reversal, Bloomberg News reports

CNBC

time3 hours ago

  • CNBC

Apple weighs using Anthropic or OpenAI to power Siri in major reversal, Bloomberg News reports

Apple is weighing using artificial intelligence technology from Anthropic or OpenAI to power a new version of Siri, instead of its own in-house models, Bloomberg News reported on Monday. Shares of the iPhone maker, which had traded down earlier in the session, closed 2% higher on Monday. Apple has had discussions with both companies about using their large language models for Siri, asking them to train versions of their LLMs that could run on Apple's cloud infrastructure for testing, the report said, citing people familiar with the discussions. Apple's investigation into third-party models is at an early stage and the company has not made a final decision on using them, the report said. Amazon-backed Anthropic declined to comment, while Apple and OpenAI did not respond to Reuters requests. The company had in March said AI improvements to its voice assistant Siri will be delayed until 2026, without giving a reason for the setback. Apple shook up its executive ranks to get its AI efforts back on track after months of delays, resulting in Mike Rockwell taking charge of Siri, as CEO Tim Cook lost confidence in AI head John Giannandrea's ability to execute on product development, Bloomberg had reported in March. At its annual Worldwide Developers Conference earlier this month, Apple focused more on incremental developments that improve everyday life — including live translations for phone calls — rather than the sweeping ambitions for AI that Apple's rivals are capitalizing. Apple software chief Craig Federighi had then said it is opening up the foundational AI model that the iPhone maker uses for some of its own features to third-party developers, and that the company will offer both its own and OpenAI's code completion tools in its key Apple developer software.

It's 2025: surely Apple will adopt a high-refresh display for the iPhone 17
It's 2025: surely Apple will adopt a high-refresh display for the iPhone 17

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

It's 2025: surely Apple will adopt a high-refresh display for the iPhone 17

When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. As the mercury rises in the Northern Hemisphere, so does anticipation for the next iPhone, which we're currently calling the iPhone 17. But as temperatures increase, I also get hot under the collar. The thing that piqued my temper is kinda not a thing at all... it's the lack of any rumors of a high-refresh rate display for the iPhone 17 and its Plus compadre. It's been literally years that I've bemoaned the lack of a 90Hz or 120Hz display on non-Pro iPhones, and it wasn't until the iPhone 13 Pro that we had such displays even in the most premium iPhones. Comparatively, Android phones pushed into 90Hz years before Apple followed suit, and now all of the best Android phones offer 120Hz displays, often with adaptive technology, for prices that undercut the standard iPhone 16. My hope is that Apple will finally move towards a high-refresh rate display for its standard and Plus iPhones, and I'm crossing my fingers in hope that this happens as soon as the iPhone 17. What brought this to mind was a recent article from my colleague Thomas Deehan who questions the need to go Pro when the standard iPhones are rather good. While I agree with him in part, I also agree with some of the comments on that article which note the non-Pro phones lack the slick displays of their more expensive stablemates and come without the telephoto camera; two things I rather like on my iPhone 16 Pro Max. But while I can live without a telephoto camera - the telephoto camera on the iPhone 16 Pro still uses a 12-megapixel sensor - I cannot swallow a 60Hz display. Neither should you. I absolutely get that there are still swathes of people - less tech-savvy - who might not care about their display's refresh rate. Compared to the old Android phones that used a 60Hz display, Apple manages to make its standard iPhones feel smooth and responsive; such is the nature of iOS and Apple having a tight grip over both its phone software and hardware. I also understand that sticking with a 60Hz display can help get as much life out of a battery on a single charge as possible. But having used 120Hz displays on a range of phones for some time now, I feel that rate, or at least 90Hz, should be the minimum standard for phone screens. Not only does it make the whole experience on both iOS and Android feel notably slicker and more responsive, it's also more comfortable on my eyes. I really think I'd struggle going back to 60Hz - but this article is more about why I think others should be able to enjoy higher refresh rates, especially if you are locked into the Apple ecosystem or can't fork out the cash for an iPhone 17 Pro. What's more, when Apple adopts a technology or a technique, it achieves mastery, even if it's late to the party. I reckon the iPhone 16 Pro and Pro Max offer some of the best high-refresh rate OLED displays on any smartphones. By making 90Hz or 120Hz the iPhone screen standard, Apple could help see the tech improve, perhaps making it more efficient or finding ways to reduce eye strain. The year is 2025 and I think Apple really needs to move past 60Hz displays when the rumored iPhone 17 arrives. Doing so will make the next-generation iPhone the best showcase for iOS 26 and potentially usher in a chapter where iPhones again feel fresh, and not like an iterative update. After six months with my iPhone 16 Pro, I'm still not convinced by the Action button Apple is advertising its F1 movie through the Wallet app, and I think that's a terrible mistake I think the iPhone 17 will be boring, but iOS 26 could save it

Apple must face DOJ antitrust lawsuit over iPhone market domination
Apple must face DOJ antitrust lawsuit over iPhone market domination

USA Today

time5 hours ago

  • USA Today

Apple must face DOJ antitrust lawsuit over iPhone market domination

Apple AAPL.O must face the U.S. Department of Justice's lawsuit accusing the iPhone maker of unlawfully dominating the U.S. smartphone market, a judge ruled on Monday. U.S. District Judge Julien Neals in Newark, New Jersey, denied Apple's motion to dismiss the lawsuit accusing the company of using restrictions on third-party app and device developers to keep users from switching to competitors and unlawfully dominate the market. The decision allows the case to go forward in what could be a years-long fight for Apple against enforcers' attempt to lower what they say are barriers to competition with Apple's iPhone. How to get your cash: Apple's $95 million Siri settlement deadline nears An Apple spokesperson said the company believes the lawsuit is wrong on the facts and the law, and will continue to vigorously fight it in court. A spokesperson for the DOJ declined to comment. Sales of the world's most popular smartphone totaled $201 billion in 2024. Apple introduced a new budget model iPhone in February with enhanced features priced at $170 more than its predecessor. The lawsuit filed in March 2024 focuses on Apple's restrictions and fees on app developers, and technical roadblocks to third-party devices and services — such as smart watches, digital wallets and messaging services — that would compete with its own. DOJ, along with several states and Washington, D.C., says the practices destroy competition and Apple should be blocked from continuing them. Apple had argued that its limitations on third-party developers' access to its technology were reasonable, and that forcing it to share technology with competitors would chill innovation. The case is one of a series of U.S. antitrust cases against Big Tech companies brought during the Biden and first Trump administrations. Facebook parent Meta Platforms META.O and AMZN.O are facing lawsuits by antitrust enforcers alleging they illegally maintain monopolies, and Alphabet's GOOGL.O is facing two such lawsuits. Reporting by Jody Godoy; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama and Franklin Paul

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store