Donald Trump, EU's Ursula von der Leyen to meet on Sunday to clinch trade deal
Before the meeting, expected at 1530 GMT on Trump's golf course in Turnberry, western Scotland, U.S. and EU teams were in final talks on tariffs for crucial sectors like cars, steel, aluminium or pharmaceuticals.
U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick flew to Scotland on Saturday and EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic arrived on Sunday morning.
'We're cautiously optimistic that there will be a deal reached,' said a Trump administration official, who spoke on condition of anonymity. 'But it's not over till it's over.'
Ambassadors of EU governments, on a weekend trip to Greenland organised by the Danish presidency of the EU, held a teleconference with EU Commission officials on Sunday to agree on the amount of leeway von der Leyen would have in the talks.
In case there is no deal and the U.S. imposes 30% tariffs from August 1, the EU has prepared counter-tariffs on 93 billion euros ($109 billion) of U.S. goods.
EU diplomats have said a deal would likely include a broad 15% tariff on EU goods imported into the U.S., mirroring the U.S.-Japan trade deal, along with a 50% tariff on European steel and aluminium for which there could be export quotas.
The EU deal would be a huge prize, given that the U.S. and EU are each other's largest trading partners by far and account for a third of global trade.
EU officials are hopeful that a 15% baseline tariff would also apply to cars, replacing the current 27.5% auto tariff.
Some expect the 27-nation bloc may be able to secure exemptions from the 15% baseline tariff for its aerospace industry and for spirits, though probably not for wine.
The EU could also pledge to buy more liquefied natural gas from the U.S., a long-standing offer, and boost investment in the United States.
Trump told reporters there was 'not a lot' of wiggle room on the 50% tariffs that the U.S. has on steel and aluminium imports, adding, 'because if I do it for one, I have to do it for all.'
The U.S. president, in Scotland for a few days of golfing and bilateral meetings, told reporters upon his arrival on Friday evening that von der Leyen was a highly respected leader and he was looking forward to meeting with her.
He said there was a 50-50 chance that the two sides could reach a framework trade pact, adding that Brussels wanted to 'make a deal very badly'.
The EU now faces U.S. tariffs on more than 70% of its exports, with 50% on steel and aluminium, an extra 25% on cars and car parts on top of the existing 2.5% and a 10% levy on most other EU goods. Trump has said that without a deal, he would hike the rate to 30% on August 1, a level EU officials said would wipe out whole chunks of transatlantic commerce.
Further tariffs on copper and pharmaceuticals are looming. The uncertainty and higher tariffs have already hit profits of EU companies in several sectors.
A 15% tariff on most EU goods would remove uncertainty but would be seen by many in Europe as a poor outcome compared to the initial European ambition of a zero-for-zero tariff deal on all industrial goods.
Seeking to learn from Japan, which secured a 15% baseline tariff with the U.S. in a deal earlier this week, EU negotiators spoke to their Japanese counterparts in preparation for Sunday's meeting.
For Trump, aiming to reorder the global economy and reduce decades-old U.S. trade deficits, a deal with the EU would be the biggest trade agreement, surpassing the $550 billion deal with Japan.
So far, he has reeled in agreements with Britain, Japan, Indonesia and Vietnam, although his administration has failed to deliver on a promise of '90 deals in 90 days.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
28 minutes ago
- Hans India
Tata Motors shares slide over 4 pc amid reports of $4.5 billion Iveco acquisition talks
Following reports that Tata Motors is in advanced negotiations to purchase the truck division of Italy's Iveco Group in a possible $4.5 billion deal, the company's shares experienced significant pressure on Wednesday. They fell by almost 4 per cent in early trading. Tata Motors' stock was down 3.08 per cent from the previous close at Rs 671.85, as of 11:23 A.M. The drop is a result of investor apprehension about the scope and consequences of what might turn out to be the second-largest foreign acquisition for the Tata Group after its $12.9 billion acquisition of Corus Steel in 2007. The talks with Iveco, which is owned by the Agnelli family, are reportedly centred on purchasing its Defence and commercial truck businesses. Iveco has admitted to looking into the possibility of selling its industrial vehicle division, but no firm decision has been made as of yet. However, it has been reported that the deal may receive Board-level approvals as early as today. If completed, the deal would be Tata Motors' largest acquisition since its 2008 $2.3 billion acquisition of Jaguar Land Rover and could greatly increase the company's presence in the global commercial vehicle market. The timing is notable, as Tata Motors is spinning off its commercial vehicle business into a separate entity, a process expected to conclude by December 2025. In India, that division has a 30 per cent market share for light commercial vehicles (LCVs) and a 49 per cent market share for heavy commercial vehicles (HCVs). It generated Rs 75,000 crore in revenue in the previous fiscal year. The foundation of Iveco's industrial operations is its truck business, which generates 70 per cent of total industrial revenue. The company's bus and powertrain divisions each contribute 15 per cent. Iveco maintained an 8–9 per cent presence in the medium and heavy truck segment and a 13.3 per cent share in the European LCV market in 2024.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
28 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump says US, Israel to run more Gaza food centres, offers few details
President Donald Trump said Tuesday that the US will partner with Israel to run new food centres in Gaza to address the worsening humanitarian crisis there, but he and US officials offered few additional details about the plan or how it would differ from existing food distribution centres. Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One as he returned from a trip to Scotland that Israel would preside over the new food centres to make sure the distribution is proper. We're going to be dealing with Israel, and we think they can do a good job of it," Trump said. The opaque details come as the Trump administration is facing calls at home and abroad to do more to address the hunger crisis in Gaza. The U.S.'s close ally, Israel, is at the center of an international outcry as more images of emaciated children continue to emerge. That pressure comes after the U.S. pulled out of talks last week to try to broker a ceasefire in the 21-month Israel-Hamas war, accusing Hamas of acting in bad faith. But Trump this week broke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, disagreeing publicly with him about starvation in Gaza and citing the pictures of hungry people. The White House described it as a new aid plan to help people in Gaza obtain access to food and promised that details would emerge. It did not elaborate. State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce said Tuesday that she didn't know "the framework of how the new aid distribution would work. I'm waiting for the president to return. I don't want to get ahead of him, Bruce said. Democrats in Congress have implored the Trump administration to step up its role in addressing the suffering and starvation in Gaza. More than 40 senators signed a letter Tuesday urging the Trump administration to resume ceasefire talks and sharply criticizing the Israeli-backed American organization that had already been created to distribute food aid. Sen. Tim Kaine, a Virginia Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, questioned why the U.S. was not allowing long-standing aid groups to run food centers. I'm glad that the president is saying that this is a problem. But if we want to solve the problem, turn to the folks who have been doing this for decades," Kaine said. The few details Trump provided about the new food centers appeared similar to a program that was already rolled out in May, after Israel had blocked all food, medicine and other imports for 2 months. The Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an Israeli-backed American contractor, opened four food distribution sites that month. Israel and GHF said that system was needed to prevent Hamas from siphoning off aid. The United Nations, which has been distributing food in Gaza throughout the war when allowed, denies any significant diversion of aid by Hamas. Hundreds of Palestinians have been killed by Israeli forces while heading to the GHF sites, according to witnesses, health officials and the U.N. human rights office. Israel says its forces have only fired warning shots at people who approach its forces, and GHF says its armed contractors have only used pepper spray and fired occasional shots in the air to prevent dangerous crowding. The aid sites are in Israeli military zones, which is off limits to independent media. The U.N. refuses to cooperate with GHF, saying its model violates humanitarian principles by forcing Palestinians to travel long distances and risk their lives for food and because it allows Israel to control aid and use it to further mass displacement. Trump said Tuesday that he last spoke to Netanyahu two days earlier and that the Israeli leader wants to distribute food in a proper manner. I think Israel wants to do it, Trump said. And they'll be good at doing it. The president, for the second day in a row, remarked on the images of starving people and kids in Gaza, which seemed to prompt him this week to announce the new plan and his break with Netanyahu. Trump said Tuesday that everyone who saw the images coming out of Gaza would declare it terrible unless they're pretty cold-hearted or, worse than that, nuts. Those are kids that are starving. They are starving, Trump said. They've got to get them food. And we're going to get them food. The shift brings Trump closer to some in his MAGA base, who have rejected the Republican Party's long-standing, unequivocal support for Israel and see aid money flowing to the country as yet another misguided foreign intervention. They include Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a staunch Trump ally, who has echoed the rhetoric of progressive Democrats in recent days. I can unequivocally say that what happened to innocent people in Israel on Oct. 7th was horrific. Just as I can unequivocally say that what has been happening to innocent people and children in Gaza is horrific. This war and humanitarian crisis must end! she wrote on Sunday on X. On Monday night, she went further, calling what is happening in Gaza genocide. But Greene's comments do not represent MAGA as a whole. On Monday, podcaster Charlie Kirk, who leads the powerful Turning Point network, railed against what he deemed a propaganda campaign trying to make it seem as if Israel is intentionally starving the people of Gaza.
Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Motilal Oswal calls current market phase the 'middle overs' — Time for strategy, not aggression
India's market journey has moved into a consolidation phase resembling the 'middle overs' in a cricket match, according to the July 2025 Alpha Strategist report by Motilal Oswal Private Wealth (MOPW). Drawing a cricketing analogy, the firm likens the current investment environment to a high-scoring pitch with stable macro fundamentals, and suggests investors focus on strategy and discipline rather than aggressive plays during this phase. MOPW says the earlier Mar–Apr 2025 correction served as the 'PowerPlay overs,' where entry points offered attractive value, resulting in quick gains over the following three months. However, post-rebound, the markets have entered the "middle overs" — a period where investors should aim to rotate strike rather than go for sixes. This means accumulating quality assets, managing risk carefully, and positioning portfolios for long-term performance rather than chasing short-term momentum. The report underlines that this phase in markets calls for patience and careful navigation, just as middle overs in cricket require intelligent shot selection and steady run accumulation. Blind aggression, it warns, could be counterproductive at this stage. MOPW highlights that global equity markets have witnessed divergent trends in 2025, with geopolitical uncertainty dominating the first half of recent months. However, in the latter half, a relative sense of calm returned despite tensions between Iran and Israel and the temporary disruption of oil flows through the Strait of Hormuz. Notably, crude oil prices, after spiking briefly, resumed a downward trend — a sign of the global economy's reduced dependence on the Middle East. In the US, concerns are rising over a widening twin deficit. The 'Big Beautiful Bill' is expected to push the fiscal gap wider by USD 3.3 trillion over the next decade, with the current account deficit projected to exceed 6 percent — levels last seen in 2006. While trade agreements with partners like India and the EU are underway, MOPW notes that delays in negotiations may extend uncertainty into the next quarter. On the domestic front, MOPW remains constructive on India's outlook, with positives such as robust services exports, Production Linked Incentive (PLI) payoffs, and Free Trade Agreements (FTAs) offsetting global headwinds. Benign crude prices are also acting as a macro stabiliser. The country's GDP is expected to grow between 6.2–6.7 percent, driven by government spending and resilient consumption. However, near-term high-frequency data presents a mixed bag. GST collections grew in single digits in June, while IIP slowed to 1.2 percent in May from 2.7 percent in April. In contrast, manufacturing and services PMIs hit multi-month highs, showing sectoral resilience. Foreign Institutional Investor (FII) flows have remained modestly positive over the past three months, but equity mutual fund flows have decelerated. Historical data suggests that in nearly 90 percent of instances, negative FII flows have coincided with negative monthly equity returns, even if Domestic Institutional Investors (DIIs) continued to buy. Meanwhile, valuations across sectors and market caps have risen sharply, calling for more selective allocation. Equities: The equity allocation strategy remains neutral with a suggested mix of 65 percent in large caps and 35 percent in mid- and small-cap stocks. For under-allocated investors, the firm recommends considering lump-sum allocations to hybrid funds. In the case of pure equity categories, staggered investments via SIPs or STPs are advised to manage market volatility effectively. Fixed Income: With the Reserve Bank of India proactively easing policy and ensuring adequate liquidity, the yield curve has steepened. MOPW suggests an overweight position on accrual strategies across credit categories, including Private Credit Strategies, InvITs, and select NCDs. Arbitrage funds, income-plus-arbitrage Fund of Funds, and conservative equity savings strategies may also be considered as tax-efficient fixed income alternatives. However, with limited room for further capital appreciation in long-duration bonds, the report advises gradually reducing exposure to 10–15 year duration strategies. Gold & Silver: The stance on gold remains neutral, while silver is seen as a tactical bet rather than a substitute for gold. The report cautions investors not to treat silver as a safe-haven hedge in the same way as gold. Disclaimer: The views and recommendations made above are those of individual analysts or broking companies, and not of Mint. We advise investors to check with certified experts before making any investment decisions.
