logo
$50k reward offered as search continues for South LA hit-and-run driver that killed bicyclist

$50k reward offered as search continues for South LA hit-and-run driver that killed bicyclist

CBS News3 days ago

Police once again asked the public for clues regarding a deadly hit-and-run crash that happened in South Los Angeles on June 1, now highlighting a $50,000 reward as their leads have continued to hit dead ends.
Officers were called to the intersection of Century Boulevard and San Pedro Street at around 11:10 p.m. that night after learning of a bicyclist who was hit by a speeding Chevrolet Camaro, said a release from Los Angeles police at the time.
The crash left 34-year-old Jose Villalobos, who was riding a bicycle, dead at the scene.
New images of the possible suspect and vehicle involved in the deadly hit-and-run.
Los Angeles Police Department
The suspect made a right turn onto San Pedro Street, continued heading north and turned westbound onto E. 98th Street following the collision, failing to stop and help the victim, police said.
Since the crash, investigators have been unable to find additional details leading to the suspect's location. On June 18, they shared surveillance footage of the violent crash, which showed the victim being thrown into the road.
The latest request for information from police brought further attention to the standing $50,000 reward being offered by the city as part of the Hit-and-Run Reward Program.
Investigators shared new video of the suspect and their car, including some image of a man believed to be the suspect.
"It has real distinct, two black racing stripes along the center of the vehicle ... from the front bumper to the rear," said LAPD Detective Ryan Moreno during a news conference. "There were several street takeovers that were happening in the area. It is possible that this individual, this car, may have been involved in one of those."
Anyone who knows more is urged to contact LAPD detectives at (213) 321-9681.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

27 men arrested in human trafficking sting in Lake County, sheriffs say
27 men arrested in human trafficking sting in Lake County, sheriffs say

CBS News

time38 minutes ago

  • CBS News

27 men arrested in human trafficking sting in Lake County, sheriffs say

The Lake County Sheriff's Office announced on Saturday that they've arrested 27 men following a two-day human trafficking suppression operation earlier this week. The office said the operation specifically targeted individuals attempting to purchase sex through online classified advertisements—a tactic regularly used by traffickers to market victims. Undercover detectives posed as individuals offering sex for money. When the suspects arrived at a Gurnee-area hotel and offered money for sexual acts, they were arrested and taken to the Lake County Jail. Two of the suspects resisted arrest during the operation. A detective in one instance received minor injuries after being kneed in the face, and the other caused damage to a hotel hallway. Each suspect was charged with one count of soliciting a sexual act. They were cited, processed at the Lake County Jail, and released pending a court date. Those arrested during the operation include: Abelardo A. Velasquez, 30, of Beach Park Robert L. Rowels, 39, of Ingleside James A. Kavinsky, 30, of Niles Jamir D. Holmes, 20, of Zion Mathew Reynolds, 23, of Pleasant Prairie Jesus S. Munoz, 35, of Woodstock Hakeem A. Moore, 22, of Great Lakes Jesus Navarrete-Vega, 30, of Gurnee. He was also charged with resisting a police officer and criminal property damage. Jesus M. Valdez, 28, of Zion Tyree R.L. Alexander, 32, of Gurnee Alexis M. Lopez, 31, of Park City Adrion E. Reynolds, 21, of Park City Eryk P. Plawinski, 26, of Algonquin Daevieon Garland, 21, of Waukegan Joshua L. Powell, 34, of Libertyville Daniel Corona, 29, of Pleasant Prairie Deybys Matute Moncada, 31, of Zion. He was also charged with resisting a peace officer resulting in injury, and aggravated battery after kneeing a detective in the face, causing injury. Charles A. Lintner, 35, of Johnsburg Argyll Piansay, 61, of Gurnee. He was also charged with attempt possession of cocaine. Andre L. Harevey, 41, of North Chicago Ryan P. Gibbs, 26, of Libertyville Ubaldo L. Sanchez, 28, of Waukegan Jonathan R. Litson, 45, of Gurnee Essodong Tchakpala, 25, of Round Lake Beach Adam S.W. Porwit, 26, of Twin Lakes Carl R. Weber, 35, of Muskego, Wisconsin John Garcia, 53, of Kenosha Lake County Sheriff John D. Idleburg said in a statement: "These operations are about protecting victims and holding sex buyers accountable. Suppressing the demand is a critical piece of dismantling the human trafficking pipeline. If there is no buyer, there is no market." The Gurnee Police Department and the Naval Criminal Investigative Service assisted in the operation.

Justin Tucker hopes to thread needle between claiming innocence, accepting responsibility
Justin Tucker hopes to thread needle between claiming innocence, accepting responsibility

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Justin Tucker hopes to thread needle between claiming innocence, accepting responsibility

When the NFL announced on Thursday that former Ravens kicker Justin Tucker has received a 10-game suspension under the Personal Conduct Policy, the initial reaction based on the bare-bones statement was that the league completed its investigation and its in-house legal process with a finding that Tucker had done what he was accused of doing during one or more massage-therapy sessions. It quickly became clear that the suspension didn't result from the procedures created by the NFL. It came from a negotiation between the league, the union, and Tucker. Advertisement And that's what made aspects of the statement issued by Tucker's representative confusing. Especially at the outset. 'We are disappointed with the NFL's decision," Rob Roche began in the comment that was widely distributed to reporters and for the most part disseminated with little if any context or explanation. The NFL's "decision" wasn't to suspend Tucker 10 games. It was to propose (presumably) a longer suspension if the process played out and to offer Tucker a 10-game suspension. It was Tucker's "decision" to accept the 10-game suspension. That fact, obscured by Roche's statement, is an important one. Tucker accepted a 10-game suspension for something he loudly insisted he didn't do. Advertisement "Justin has always strived to carry himself in a way that would make his family and community proud," Roche added. "He stands by his previous statements." But does he? Who accepts a punishment for something they know they didn't do — especially when reasonable minds will be inclined to include that accepting a 10-game suspension represents an admission of responsibility? "In order to put this difficult episode behind him and get back on the field as soon as possible, we have advised Justin to accept this resolution and close this matter," Roche said. "The people who know Justin best know his character and understand that while he remains fully committed to excellence as a football player, he is deeply dedicated to his most important lifetime roles as a father, husband, and friend.' It's one thing to advise Tucker to take a one-game or a two-game suspension. Ten games sends a much different message. Ten games suggests that Roche and others feared the league would emerge from the hearing before retired judge Sue L. Robinson with a much longer suspension. Advertisement And so, on one hand, Tucker still says he didn't do anything. On the other hand, he has accepted a TEN-GAME SUSPENSION for something he swears he didn't do. That's a difficult needle to thread, especially if he plans to eventually sue the Baltimore Banner for defamation based on the reporting that sparked this situation in late January. For a defamation case to fly, Tucker will have to prove that the information was false (and that the Banner knew it was false or acted with reckless disregard to the truth or falsity of the information, since Tucker is a public figure). The suspension means, as a practical matter, that Tucker will also need to show that even the NFL was duped by the false allegations.

The WNBA Has Been Accused Of 'Failing' Caitlin Clark
The WNBA Has Been Accused Of 'Failing' Caitlin Clark

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

The WNBA Has Been Accused Of 'Failing' Caitlin Clark

The WNBA Has Been Accused Of 'Failing' Caitlin Clark originally appeared on The Spun. Has the WNBA failed Caitlin Clark up to this point in her career? That seems to be a major discussion point in the basketball community this month. Advertisement A little over a week ago, Clark was at the center of a wild scuffle involving the Indiana Fever and Connecticut Sun. It all started with her getting poked in the eye by Jacy Sheldon. After shoving Sheldon in return, she got bumped to the ground by Marina Mabrey. Although many people viewed it as a cheap shot, Mabrey wasn't ejected by the refs. After the refs refused to eject Mabrey for her actions, award-winning columnist Christine Brennan said the WNBA "failed to meet the moment." She wasn't the only media member frustrated with the league's officials. "Marina Mabrey being allowed to stay in the game further proves how big of a joke WNBA officials are," David Eickholt of 247Sports said. "A player is holding their eye and gets thrown to the floor from the back." On June 25, Dave Briggs of The Toledo Blade called out the WNBA in a lengthy opinion piece. INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA - JUNE 17: Caitlin Clark #22 of the Indiana Fever dribbles the ball while being guarded by Jacy Sheldon #4 of the Connecticut Sun in the second quarter at Gainbridge Fieldhouse on June 17, 2025 in Indianapolis, Indiana. (Photo by)Briggs believes the WNBA has "unconscionably" failed Clark. Advertisement "With the opportunity to send a clarion message that enough is enough — it is not open season on Clark — the league did nothing," Briggs wrote. "Mabrey was slapped with a flagrant foul, but not ejected, let alone suspended." Despite accusing the WNBA of failing to meet the moment, Briggs made it clear that he's not trying to portray Clark as a victim. "This isn't about casting Clark as a victim. She's tough as hell, dishes it out, and doesn't shy from contact. She's the hotshot every vet wants to put in place — a tale as old as sports — and, truthfully, playing her physical is the only real option. But there is a line. And the WNBA continues to play with fire. Why no suspension for a dirty play after the whistle? Is commissioner Cathy Engelbert really so worried about the feelings of the league's territorial old guard that she's willing to risk the future of the league?" It won't take long for fans to argue over Briggs' opinion. Advertisement Do you believe the WNBA has failed its most popular player? Related: Caitlin Clark Has Been Ruled Out For Thursday Night's Game The WNBA Has Been Accused Of 'Failing' Caitlin Clark first appeared on The Spun on Jun 26, 2025 This story was originally reported by The Spun on Jun 26, 2025, where it first appeared.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store