Sassa to conduct 93,142 grant reviews in KZN, grant beneficiaries urged to comply with verification process
Image: File
The South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) has warned grant recipients to present themselves for the verification process it is conducting or risk their grants being suspended.
The verification process is meant to ensure that grant beneficiaries are eligible. About 93,000 people in KwaZulu-Natal must present themselves for verification this financial year due to discrepancies uncovered by Sassa.
The verification process has led to concerns, with reports of grant recipients allegedly not receiving their grants. Civic organisation Black Sash said it had received hundreds of complaints about the process.
Sassa spokesperson in KZN, Sandy Godlwana, stated, "In terms of Chapter 5 of the Social Assistance Act, Sassa is mandated to review social assistance and is empowered to suspend, increase, or decrease the amount of assistance provided, depending on the outcome of the review."
She said Sassa in KZN was urging affected social grant beneficiaries to present themselves for grant reviews scheduled for the 2025/26 financial year. A total of 93,142 reviews will be conducted across the province to ensure continued eligibility and compliance with legislative requirements.
Godlwana mentioned that beneficiaries who do not comply with the review process risk suspension of their social grant. If a grant is suspended, the beneficiary will be informed in writing and has the right to appeal the decision within 90 days to the Independent Appeals Tribunal.
Oliver Meth, communications manager at Black Sash, said their helpline had received hundreds of cases of people not getting paid that it was dealing with.
"We are currently monitoring during this grant payment week. Today (Wednesday) we are at Esikhawini, northern KZN. We've since been to local retailers and the local Sassa office where hundreds of beneficiaries are querying the non-payment of their grants. Issues range from duplicate IDs to some flagged as fraudulent recipients, reviews, and more."
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The verification process by Sassa he added, has been marked by delays and limited communication. Many grant recipients have been flagged due to inconsistencies in their personal data, but the systems to notify beneficiaries—especially in rural areas—are not always reliable or accessible.
He stated that if a grant recipient has been flagged for a discrepancy, they are advised to visit their nearest SASSA office with their valid identity document and any supporting documentation that can help verify their details.
"We urge SASSA to improve communication by using local radio, community networks, and ward councillors to alert affected individuals. Many recipients have not been adequately informed and remain unaware of the reason for non-payment or the process to follow.
"Black Sash continues to call for a fair, transparent, and accessible appeals process that does not penalise people for system errors or lack of access to digital communication. It's important to note that in many cases, these discrepancies are the result of outdated government records, clerical errors, or weaknesses in interdepartmental data-sharing—not wrongdoing by grant beneficiaries."
He added that very little has been done to adequately assist vulnerable groups - elderly people, those with disabilities, and rural residents who lack access to mobile phones, the internet, or the resources to travel to Sassa offices for verification.
He said Black Sash was calling on Sassa and the Department of Social Development to proactively engage communities through mobile units, community halls, local NGOs, and traditional leaders to ensure that no one is left behind.
"There must be a more humane and accessible system in place—especially given the critical nature of these grants in combating poverty," Meth concluded.
DA spokesperson on Social Development in KZN, Shontel De Boer, said it is understood that during the verification process, there will be delayed payments to those who need to verify their information.
"We encourage everyone who is affected to declare their correct information. The Democratic Alliance believes that every citizen who qualifies for a Sassa grant has the right to access that grant and should be able to do so."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
Sassa payments delayed due to review process
Several Pietermaritzburg residents were unable to collect their South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) grants on Wednesday due to a review process targeting beneficiaries suspected of having undisclosed income. According to an article published by The Witness, Sassa said payments have not been suspended, but reviews are being conducted to ensure that only eligible individuals receive grants. When The Witness visited payout points yesterday, some beneficiaries said they were advised to wait before checking their accounts. 'I have received my payout as my details are correct. We are shocked that there are people among us who are dishonest and getting extra money, while we are in need,' said one beneficiary, who asked not to be named. Lower Northdale Ward Councillor Rooksana Ahmed sent out a notice informing beneficiaries that they should check again with their respective banks the following day, due to the review. In a statement, Sassa said it is reviewing the eligibility of targeted beneficiaries who may have other income sources not disclosed at the time of their application. 'These targeted beneficiaries are expected to present themselves at a Sassa local office where their eligibility will be reviewed. Those who fail to comply may face suspension of their grants. Continued non-compliance may result in permanent cancellation,' the agency said. Sassa emphasised that beneficiaries are legally required to fully disclose all income sources during the application process and report any changes in financial circumstances thereafter. Sassa national spokesperson Paseka Letsatsi said failure to comply with these rules is a violation of the Social Assistance Act 13 of 2004 and may lead to corrective action. 'Sassa has undertaken a review of its database and processes to root out fraud and ensure grants go to eligible recipients. Reviews are focused on those active in the labour market, especially where income exceeds the means threshold and was not declared,' said Letsatsi. He added that no grants have been suspended at this stage. 'Only the payment schedule has been amended for those asked to undergo the review.' Letsatsi said Sassa is concerned that many clients do not update their contact details, which causes missed notifications. A second payment date has been issued for those under review, but if no contact is made within two months, the grant will be suspended. Beneficiaries will then have one month to respond before the grant is permanently cancelled. A fraud investigation may follow. Sassa urged all beneficiaries to declare any additional income or bank accounts and to replace green ID books with smart ID cards due to the risk of fraud. For more information, contact Sassa on 0800 60 1011 or email [email protected]. Breaking news at your fingertips… Follow Caxton Network News on Facebook and join our WhatsApp channel. Nuus wat saakmaak. Volg Caxton Netwerk-nuus op Facebook en sluit aan by ons WhatsApp-kanaal. Read original story on At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!
IOL News
2 days ago
- IOL News
Sassa to conduct 93,142 grant reviews in KZN, grant beneficiaries urged to comply with verification process
SASSA conducting a verification process of grant recipients Image: File The South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) has warned grant recipients to present themselves for the verification process it is conducting or risk their grants being suspended. The verification process is meant to ensure that grant beneficiaries are eligible. About 93,000 people in KwaZulu-Natal must present themselves for verification this financial year due to discrepancies uncovered by Sassa. The verification process has led to concerns, with reports of grant recipients allegedly not receiving their grants. Civic organisation Black Sash said it had received hundreds of complaints about the process. Sassa spokesperson in KZN, Sandy Godlwana, stated, "In terms of Chapter 5 of the Social Assistance Act, Sassa is mandated to review social assistance and is empowered to suspend, increase, or decrease the amount of assistance provided, depending on the outcome of the review." She said Sassa in KZN was urging affected social grant beneficiaries to present themselves for grant reviews scheduled for the 2025/26 financial year. A total of 93,142 reviews will be conducted across the province to ensure continued eligibility and compliance with legislative requirements. Godlwana mentioned that beneficiaries who do not comply with the review process risk suspension of their social grant. If a grant is suspended, the beneficiary will be informed in writing and has the right to appeal the decision within 90 days to the Independent Appeals Tribunal. Oliver Meth, communications manager at Black Sash, said their helpline had received hundreds of cases of people not getting paid that it was dealing with. "We are currently monitoring during this grant payment week. Today (Wednesday) we are at Esikhawini, northern KZN. We've since been to local retailers and the local Sassa office where hundreds of beneficiaries are querying the non-payment of their grants. Issues range from duplicate IDs to some flagged as fraudulent recipients, reviews, and more." Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The verification process by Sassa he added, has been marked by delays and limited communication. Many grant recipients have been flagged due to inconsistencies in their personal data, but the systems to notify beneficiaries—especially in rural areas—are not always reliable or accessible. He stated that if a grant recipient has been flagged for a discrepancy, they are advised to visit their nearest SASSA office with their valid identity document and any supporting documentation that can help verify their details. "We urge SASSA to improve communication by using local radio, community networks, and ward councillors to alert affected individuals. Many recipients have not been adequately informed and remain unaware of the reason for non-payment or the process to follow. "Black Sash continues to call for a fair, transparent, and accessible appeals process that does not penalise people for system errors or lack of access to digital communication. It's important to note that in many cases, these discrepancies are the result of outdated government records, clerical errors, or weaknesses in interdepartmental data-sharing—not wrongdoing by grant beneficiaries." He added that very little has been done to adequately assist vulnerable groups - elderly people, those with disabilities, and rural residents who lack access to mobile phones, the internet, or the resources to travel to Sassa offices for verification. He said Black Sash was calling on Sassa and the Department of Social Development to proactively engage communities through mobile units, community halls, local NGOs, and traditional leaders to ensure that no one is left behind. "There must be a more humane and accessible system in place—especially given the critical nature of these grants in combating poverty," Meth concluded. DA spokesperson on Social Development in KZN, Shontel De Boer, said it is understood that during the verification process, there will be delayed payments to those who need to verify their information. "We encourage everyone who is affected to declare their correct information. The Democratic Alliance believes that every citizen who qualifies for a Sassa grant has the right to access that grant and should be able to do so."
The Citizen
2 days ago
- The Citizen
Sassa cracks down on recepients flagged for not disclosing income
Sassa said that about 210 000 people have been identified through credit bureau checks. The South African Social Security Agency (Sassa) is cracking down on beneficiaries suspected of having alternative sources of income that were not disclosed to the agency. Sassa in May said that about 210 000 people have been identified through credit bureau checks. Warning The agency stated that it was acting in accordance with the Social Assistance Act, which requires beneficiaries to declare all sources of income when applying for a grant and to report any changes after the grant has been approved. 'Failure to comply with these requirements constitutes a violation of the Act and may result in corrective action,' Sassa said. Grant suspension Now, in an effort to ensure that the right grant is paid to the right person, Sassa said these targeted beneficiaries are expected to present themselves at a Sassa local office where their eligibility will be reviewed to ascertain whether they remain eligible for the social grant that they initially applied for. 'Beneficiaries who fail to comply with this process risk having their grants suspended. Continued non-compliance may lead to the permanent lapsing of their grants'. ALSO READ: Sassa grants: Here are the July payment dates and amounts Review Sassa said it has undertaken a review of its database and grant administration processes to root out fraud and ensure that assistance reaches those who are eligible. 'These reviews are specifically focused on individuals who appear to be active in the labour market and whose incomes are close to or exceed the means threshold; particularly where such income was not disclosed at the time of application or where changes in circumstances were not reported thereafter.' Amended payment schedule Sassa's national spokesperson, Paseka Letsatsi, also stressed that no grant have been suspended yet. 'Sassa has only amended the payment schedule for those beneficiaries who have been requested to come in for a review. From previous reviews, Sassa has become aware that most clients do not maintain their contact details with Sassa, and as a result, often don't get notifications that the Agency issues. 'While it is a legislative obligation for all beneficiaries to ensure that their contact details are always up to date and would have little recourse should their grant be suspended due to failure to respond to a notification issued by Sassa', Letsatsi said. ALSO READ: More than 200 000 will experience Sassa grant delays — here's why Letsatsi said the agency has issued an additional payment date, specifically for recipients placed on review, as a means to further communicate with clients that there is a need for them to contact Sassa. 'Should no contact be made after two months, as per legislative requirements, only then will these beneficiaries' grants be suspended. 'During the time of suspension, the beneficiary has one month to approach Sassa should they believe they still qualify. After this period, the grant will be permanently cancelled and depending on their circumstances, a fraud investigation opened', said Letsatsi. Disclosure Sassa has encouraged all beneficiaries to disclose any alternative sources of income and to report any additional bank accounts not previously declared. 'Furthermore, beneficiaries still using the green bar-coded ID book are urged to replace it with the smart ID card, due to the increased risk of fraud associated with the older ID format. 'Sassa reiterates its zero-tolerance stance on fraud and should there be evidence of any officials colluding with beneficiaries to defraud the system, immediate disciplinary and legal action will be taken to safeguard the integrity of the agency and prevent financial losses,' the agency said. Meanwhile, with half the year over, Sassa on Monday announced its July payment schedule, which will be welcomed by beneficiaries. Payments are expected to be made in phases over three days to avoid overcrowding at pay points and ATMs. More than 18 million people rely on grants from Sassa. ALSO READ: Ten of 11 accused in Sassa R260 million fraud case granted bail
