Son of Chinook 1994 helicopter crash victim asks for answers
Joel Hornby, whose father Major Anthony Hornby was one of the victims, visited a memorial cairn at the crash site on Saturday and again on Sunday.
He and other families have said they will press on with seeking a judicial review after the Ministry of Defence (MoD) dismissed their demands for a judge-led public inquiry into the incident, and have written to Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer asking him to intervene.
READ MORE:
Families of Chinook crash victims demand full release of sealed documents
Mr Hornby, who was seven when his father died, visited the site with his one-year-old son and laid a wreath at the cairn along with a note which read 'Dad, we are still fighting for you'.
Speaking afterwards Mr Hornby, who lives in Berlin in Germany, said: 'We, the families of those lost, have still been denied answers over 30 years on.
'The MoD has rejected our request for a full judge-led public inquiry, and furthermore, has sealed documents relating to the crash for 100 years.
'We are requesting that the Prime Minister, Sir Keir Starmer live up to his promises on duty of candour and overrule the MoD's decision.'
He has also urged people to sign a change.org petition calling on the Prime Minister to overturn the MoD decision and release the documents.
Following the crash, the Chinook's pilots, Flight Lieutenants Richard Cook and Jonathan Tapper, were accused of gross negligence, but this verdict was overturned by the UK Government 17 years later following a campaign by the families.
The RAF Chinook helicopter crashed on the Mull of Kintyre in 1994
A subsequent review by Lord Philip set out 'numerous concerns' raised by those who worked on the Chinooks, with the MoD's testing centre at Boscombe Down in Wiltshire declaring the Chinook Mk2 helicopters 'unairworthy' prior to the crash.
In a statement after the calls made by the families on Friday an MoD spokesperson said: 'The Mull of Kintyre crash was a tragic accident, and our thoughts and sympathies remain with the families, friends and colleagues of all those who died.
'We understand that the lack of certainty about the cause of the crash has added to the distress of the families.
'We provided a detailed and considered response to the pre-action protocol letter stating the reasons why we cannot accept the demand for establishing a new public inquiry.
'It's unlikely that a public inquiry would identify any new evidence or reach new conclusions on the basis of existing evidence.
'The accident has already been the subject of six inquiries and investigations, including an independent judge-led review.'
The MoD has been asked if it wishes to make further comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Western Telegraph
22 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
China and US ‘should be in toughest tier' of foreign influence scheme
The UK must also engage with Beijing economically 'even if this prompts retaliation' from the White House, the paper published by the Chatham House foreign affairs think tank concludes. Sir Keir Starmer's Government has sought to balance a revival of Chinese relations in its pursuit of growth with matters of national security amid concerns about Chinese interference in Britain. However, Beijing has been spared from the most stringent requirements of the UK's new Foreign Influence Registration Scheme (Firs), which would see anyone working for the state to declare influence activities in Britain. Under existing rules, China is in the lower tier of the scheme which requires the declaration of 'political' activity alone, while Iran and Russia have been placed in the higher 'enhanced' tier covering a wider range of activities. In its report, Chatham House called for both the US and Beijing to be placed in the enhanced tier 'as part of a wider move to build UK resilience to great power influence'. Report author William Matthews said: 'Including both China and the US on the enhanced tier of Firs need not entail casting them as threats, and should be considered in terms of a policy of adapting the UK to a world of great power competition. 'Inclusion of the US could offset the risk of antagonising China, though China would still likely respond angrily, and would almost certainly provoke an angry response from the US. 'However, in the long-term it would be better for this to happen now if the UK seeks to maintain an autonomous foreign policy in its own interests, rather than at a future point when… risks are amplified due to intensifying US-China competition, which would make it harder to diverge from Washington where interests do not align.' Foreign Secretary David Lammy welcomes China's foreign affairs minister Wang Yi ahead of a meeting at the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (James Manning/PA) Among the risks posed by great power rivalry are the likelihood that America will show more 'transactional' behaviour as its 'relative power' declines, and the potential for the UK to be 'targeted coercively' by Beijing if it is seen to act as a proxy for US interests, he said. Chinese dominance of supply chains for critical raw minerals, electric vehicles and green power means the UK cannot avoid economic engagement with the country, the report warns. In its recommendations, it urges against the UK taking sides in the rivalry between the US and China and calls on the Government to be prepared to diverge significantly from Washington in its approach to Beijing. 'The UK cannot afford to lock in dependence on the US at the expense of supply chains and technologies essential for economic prosperity,' it says. However, alongside maintaining economic ties it urges the Government to introduce key protections to guard against 'the risks of Chinese political interference'. Among its recommendations is a call to carry out safety checks on Chinese digital components entering UK markets, to be modelled on the previous Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre – nicknamed the Cell. Where the risks can be mitigated, Chinese technology investments should be considered – outside of projects involving Government procurement and critical national infrastructure, it says. The Government should also formally make permission for entities linked to the Chinese Communist Party (CPC) to operate in Britain conditional on their adherence to UK democratic norms and civil liberties, the report recommends. A 'coordination centre' bringing together policy-makers, business chiefs, academic experts and civil society should be established and meet regularly to share approaches to China-related issues, it says. A spokesperson for the Foreign Office said: 'This Government is taking a consistent, long-term and strategic approach to managing the UK's relations with China, rooted in UK and global interests. We will cooperate where we can, compete where we need to and challenge where we must. 'This includes supporting UK business to engage with the second largest economy in the world – one of our largest trading partners – while being open-eyed to any risks and ensuring security and resilience.'
Times
37 minutes ago
- Times
Keir Starmer considered George Osborne for US ambassador
One was a principle architect of New Labour who was instrumental in the rise of Sir Tony Blair. The other was the strategic political brain behind Lord Cameron of Chipping Norton who consigned Labour to fifteen years in the wilderness. Now it has emerged that Sir Keir Starmer came close to appointing George Osborne instead of Lord Mandelson in the high-profile and critical role as Britain's ambassador to the US. In the updated edition of his biography of the prime minister, the journalist Tom Baldwin reveals that Osborne made it to a shortlist of two for the prestigious and diplomatically fraught role as Britain's consigliere to the Trump administration. The former chancellor is understood to have discussed the role with senior Downing Street figures and was prepared to sacrifice his multimillion-pound salary from the financial advisory firm Robey Warshaw to take it. Baldwin said that Osborne's name had been added to the process late after months of speculation over who would replace Dame Karen Pierce, the outgoing and highly respected incumbent. Alongside Mandelson, those publicly in the frame for the job included the former foreign secretary David Miliband and Cathy Ashton, the former EU high representative. But Trump's victory in November's presidential election threw the recruitment process wide open and some in Downing Street questioned whether it would be strategically smart to appoint someone from the right. • Who is the real Peter Mandelson? From New Labour to Washington 'Just days before [Mandelson was appointed] the name of George Osborne [was] added to the final shortlist presented to the prime minister by Downing Street advisers,' Baldwin wrote in The New World magazine. 'They are understood to have invested considerable effort in pushing the former Tory chancellor's application, even though that perhaps unnecessarily complicated what Starmer would ultimately regard as a relatively simple decision.' It is understood that one of those pushing Osborne's candidacy was Morgan McSweeney, Starmer's chief of staff. Baldwin also reveals that Starmer nearly failed in his attempt to flatter Trump in their Oval Office meeting by presenting him with a letter from the King inviting him for a state visit. The letter had been in the hands of an aide, who had refused White House demands for it to be submitted in advance. 'Starmer suddenly realised he would need to present the letter himself but was surrounded by White House staff preparing the president for the media,' Baldwin wrote. 'I'm told that the envelope had to be gently lobbed over their heads to the prime minister who, it turns out, has a reassuringly safe pair of hands.'
Times
37 minutes ago
- Times
Special needs situation is ‘lose, lose, lose', says Keir Starmer
Children with learning difficulties or disabilities and their parents face a 'lose, lose, lose' situation, Sir Keir Starmer has said, as he pledged to press ahead with reforming special needs support in schools. Downing Street backed Bridget Phillipson, the education secretary, after she was criticised by Labour MPs and campaigners for refusing to guarantee that children with special needs would continue to have the same legal rights to bespoke support in school. Ministers said that retaining the existing system would end up 'failing children and failing parents' and insisted that reform should not result in the overall level of support for special needs being cut. Under the system, education, health and care plans (EHCPs) legally require councils to provide children with a set amount of support to meet their needs. It can include the right to be educated in a special school, the help of a dedicated teaching assistant or paid transportation.
