Smithsonian rejects Trump's attempt to fire National Portrait Gallery director
The Smithsonian Institution has rebuffed Donald Trump's attempt to fire the director of its National Portrait Gallery, with the museum's governing board asserting its independence in a direct challenge to the president.
In a statement issued after an emergency meeting Monday, the Smithsonian's board of regents declared that 'all personnel decisions are made by and subject to the direction of the secretary, with oversight by the board' – turning away Trump's claim of authority over the institution's staffing.
The standoff centers on Kim Sajet, whom Trump announced he had fired on 30 May, calling her 'highly partisan and a strong supporter of DEI' – or diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives – on social media. Sajet has continued reporting to work, creating a direct confrontation between the White House and the US's flagship cultural institution that has a 178-year-old governance structure built against political interference.
The board backed secretary Lonnie Bunch, saying he 'has the support of the board of regents in his authority and management of the Smithsonian'. The statement also directed Bunch to ensure museum content remains 'unbiased' while maintaining that the Smithsonian 'must be a welcoming place of knowledge and discovery for all Americans'.
The White House did not return a request for comment.
The Smithsonian, which operates 21 museums and the National Zoo and attracts millions of visitors annually, represents America's largest museum and research complex.
In March, Trump signed an executive order targeting 'anti-American ideology' at the museum system, claiming the institution had fallen 'under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology' and instructing Vance to remove 'improper ideology' from its museum system.
Trump's attack on Sajet focused, among other reasons, on her Democratic political donations and her rejection of a pro-Trump painting by artist Julian Raven. Sajet reportedly told Raven his artwork was 'too pro-Trump' and 'too political' for the gallery, the artist told the Washingtonian in 2019.
And unlike the Kennedy Center, which Trump successfully overhauled by installing himself as chairperson, the Smithsonian operates under a unique governance model with board members representing all three branches of government, including JD Vance, the vice-president, and John Roberts, the chief justice.
The clash is all part of Trump's broader assault on cultural institutions. His administration has gutted the National Endowment for the Arts and Humanities while proposing a 12% cut to the Smithsonian's budget, including complete elimination of funding for the Anacostia Community Museum and the National Museum of the American Latino.
Trump's attempted cultural revolution has already devastated the Kennedy Center, according to the Washington Post, where ticket sales have plummeted about 36% since last year and artists have launched boycotts since his takeover. The president posted on social media there would be 'NO MORE DRAG SHOWS, OR OTHER ANTI-AMERICAN PROPAGANDA' at the venue in May – though the father-disguised-as-nanny Mrs Doubtfire is scheduled to go on.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
No state is safe: Trans people are planning to move overseas rather than live in Trump's America
Isabella remembers the moment she knew she needed to leave the U.S. It was March 2023, when Daily Wire host Michael Knowles gave a chilling speech to one of the most influential conservative gatherings in the country. "There can be no middle way in dealing with transgenderism. It is all or nothing," Knowles told the Conservative Political Action Conference. "For the good of society, and especially for the good of the poor people who have fallen victim to this confusion, transgenderism must be eradicated from public life entirely: the whole preposterous ideology, at every level." To Isabella, who is trans, this declaration was a clear sign of the Republican Party's increasing embrace of hardcore anti-trans politics — and a potential harbinger of "genocidal action." This spring, after years of preparation, she moved to Chile. She is not alone. In the wake of the Supreme Court's recent decision in US v Skrmetti, which upheld Tennessee and other red states' rights to ban transition healthcare for minors, four trans people told The Independent that the case had solidified their plans to escape the USA. Like every single person interviewed for this story, Isabella would only speak under a pseudonym out for fear of reprisals from far-right extremist groups, or perhaps even government officials. And while the Skrmetti decision only concerned trans children, those who spoke to The Independent feared that the Court's reasoning could make it easier to restrict trans healthcare for adults too — as Republicans are already trying to do nationally. "Before the 2024 election, my timeline for relocating abroad was more like five to ten years out, if at all. Before today, I was considering sometime within the next year or two. But now, I am thinking of moving by the end of the summer," said Wayne, a trans man in his late forties in Washington state, on the day the Skrmetti ruling came down. Though he also has personal reasons to leave the country, he said the Skrmetti ruling was "another falling domino." "I don't want to leave my country, but things have been on a downward trajectory for trans rights for the past several years," he said. "We have transitioned from a system of democracy into an electoral autocracy... no one is coming to save us." 'I won't accept second class status' In the past few years, 25 U.S. states have passed laws restricting banning transition healthcare for minors, according to the pro-LGBT+ Movement Advancement Project — covering an estimated 37 percent of all trans under-18s. Some states have also enacted restrictions on adult care, and Republicans in Congress have made repeated attempts to defund or limit access at the federal level. Meanwhile, conservative rhetoric about trans people has become ever more venomous. Knowles likened them to "demons." One Republican candidate claimed pro-trans teachers should be "executed." Multiple serving GOP legislators have falsely claimed that random mass shooting suspects are trans, while Donald Trump Jr has alleged — contrary to all available evidence — that trans people are "the most violent domestic terror threat" in the country. Then came Donald Trump's second inauguration, and his blitzkrieg effort to centralize federal power under the office of the president. Since then migration has become a regular topic among trans people both online and in person, along with acidic social media debates about the ethics and class politics of fleeing one's country. "My plans for emigration have been in a holding pattern,' said one trans lawyer in her forties, who began transitioning roughly 25 years ago and is now considering leaving the country. "Getting all the documents and background checks and apostilles to be able to move, and contacting contractors... but not making any decisions yet in the increasingly vain hope that abandoning my family and home country won't become a necessity,' she said. "This [Skrmetti] decision definitely made me get back into planning mode. I had begun to build up some steely resolve about fighting for my country... but days like this really suck out all the air. "When you find yourself crying at random songs, no matter how limited their emotional appeal would be in any other situation, it's hard not to look at your hands and then up and the sky and say 'where do I go now?' "I won't accept being a pariah, or being denied hormones despite being post-[surgery]. I won't accept second or third class status." The lawyer also argues that the SCOTUS ruling may be widened, since there is "nothing in the decision that indicates it will remain confined to pediatric care questions." Stacy Davis, a 42-year-old Nashville realtor who has a trans child, told The Independent that her family will stay in Tennessee as long as they possibly can, even if it means traveling regularly for medical care at great expense. But if they are forced to move, it would probably be abroad. 'I think it would have been easier to move from Tennessee to a blue state if [Kamala Harris] would have won, because at least then we would have had some reassurances that on a federal level we would be more protected,' she said. But now, 'it almost feels like a blue state can't save us.' Multiple groups have sprung up to help trans people migrate, either within the U.S. or internationally. Some are open and legally incorporated, such as the Denver-based non-profit Trans Continental Pipeline. "At the heart of it, we're glorified movers, trying to help people get where they want to go and out of traumatic situations," founder Keira Richards told Mother Jones last year. Other groups are more secretive and ad-hoc, fearful of attacks and harassment by anti-trans extremists. "We've had a few people today contact us and/or announce their desire to emigrate faster from the USA, considering the broader implications of this ruling," a member of one such group told The Independent. "People of course are stockpiling hormones and getting passports in order if they can... I can tell you our top destinations are Canada, Germany, Portugal, Spain, Thailand, and the Netherlands in particular." The group includes trans people in countries across the world, this person said, including some lawyers who help people understand the implications of new U.S. anti-trans policies. In some places, they have contacts who can help trans immigrants get settled in and find community. Group members gather and share information on immigration pathways, visa requirements, and the level of freedom and protection available to trans people in various countries. 'We've read our history books. We know where this goes' The story of one trans woman we'll call Rachel illustrates how individual areas and then the entire USA have become progressively more hostile to trans people. Back in 2023, having already moved from the Tennessee countryside where she grew up to the big city of Nashville, she felt forced to flee her home state entirely. "At that time I was highly skeptical that it would ever get to the point where I had to emigrate," Rachel told The Independent. "I have to say that I completely stand corrected." Initially, Nashville had felt safe enough for her to finally transition. But beginning in around 2020, when conservative news site The Daily Wire moved its headquarters to Nashville, she felt a major "tonal shift." Relatives who'd once been supportive began to turn against her. Nazi flyers were stuffed into her mailbox. She received "direct threats" from people she believes were probably her neighbors, and suffered repeated housing discrimination despite having a steady income. Daily Wire host Matt Walsh, a prominent anti-trans activist, held a "rally to end child mutilation" at the state capitol. In March 2023, on the same day Tennessee's Republican governor Bill Lee signed the healthcare ban at the heart of the Skrmetti case, someone draped a huge swastika-emblazoned banner from a Nashville bridge thanking him for "tirelessly working to fight trannies and fags." At another point, Rachel recalls, someone projected the words "TRANS-FREE TENNESSEE" on a local building. Rachel even had a brush with Skrmetti himself: that is, Tennessee's attorney general Jonathan Skrmetti, against whom the Supreme Court lawsuit was filed. In 2022 he demanded detailed patient records from Rachel's trans healthcare provider Vanderbilt University, leading to accusations that he was trying to compile a "list" of trans people. "Skrmetti seems like the ghost that will hound me for the rest of my life," complained Rachel. "It's always Tennessee! It's a state out of which the current manifestation of conservative politics has grown. And I was there to witness it.' Now those politics have taken root in the White House, and Rachel is applying for citizenship in the foreign country where one of her parents was born — something she's always been eligible for, but only recently started seriously working on. For her, the new Supreme Court decision changed nothing. But listening to the oral arguments before Trump's inauguration, and anticipating which way the case would go, was part of what made her plan to leave in the first place. Even though she isn't totally sure whether she'll go, Rachel wants to be ready at short notice. She keeps many of her belongings in storage, and has abandoned some of her hobbies for fear that the equipment would weigh her down. "I think that everything is on the table at this point," she said. "The same rhetorical patterns, in some cases precisely the same accusations, that are being levied at trans people were being levied at the Jewish population [in Nazi Germany]. "We've read our history books. We know the outcome of that is... I think it's naive to think that it's impossible in the United States." (Knowles, for his part, has insisted that his 2023 CPAC speech was not a call for cultural genocide against trans people because they are not a group with shared genetics, and also because they are "not a legitimate category of being.") To Isabella, living in Chile has been both a challenge and a relief. She's still figuring out her medical care, still learning Spanish, still trying to meet new friends. "Winter and summer are flipped, which is so weird to me," she said. Not everyone could have made the move, she notes. She was lucky enough to have some local contacts and a job that she could keep doing from her new country, as well as the financial resources necessary to uproot her life. But she no longer has to deal with the daily drumbeat of assaults on her rights and unashamed demonization of her identity. "You feel like you can breathe better, and you're not worried that you're gonna be the victim of some terrible attack," she said. Even so, she can't completely stop worrying. Conservative politicians across the world have found trans people a tempting punchbag, including in nearby Argentina. The feminist philosopher Judith Butler has argued that transphobia is a central element of modern fascism, from to Hungary to Brazil to the USA and beyond. "You never know, these days, because transphobia is global," said Isabella. "The question is, is it going to come to Chile? That's always a fear. So I'm always keeping my eyes open."
Reuters
22 minutes ago
- Reuters
US Senate bill's clean energy cuts draw backlash from labor, business
WASHINGTON, June 30 (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate's proposed cuts to clean energy subsidies in its version of President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill have drawn searing criticism from business and labor groups since they were unveiled over the weekend, with some arguing the moves will raise power prices and kill jobs. The pushback, which includes a swipe from Trump ally and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, comes as senators started voting on a potentially long list of amendments to the bill on Monday morning, giving renewable energy advocates on both sides of the political spectrum a last window to push for changes. "Taxing energy production is never good policy, whether oil & gas or, in this case, renewables," said Neil Bradley, policy director of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, in a post on X over the weekend. "Electricity demand is set to see enormous growth & this tax will increase prices. It should be removed." "This would be incredibly destructive to America!" Musk posted on X, saying the cuts could endanger the development of energy-hungry artificial intelligence technology, among other things. Trump has said he intends to maximize U.S. energy production, with a focus on fossil fuels, in part to ensure the power industry can supply the AI industry's growth. But he has also promised to wipe out subsidies for renewables. The Senate bill would roll back incentives for wind, solar, batteries and other clean energy technologies created by President Joe Biden's 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, and add a new tax on these projects if they cannot prove their products are made without Chinese parts. Those provisions were harsher on the credits than the previous Senate version and even the House version. Sean McGarvey, president of the North America's Building Trades Unions (NABTU), which represents over 3 million construction workers, blasted the bill's impact on jobs. "If enacted, this stands to be the biggest job-killing bill in the history of this country. Simply put, it is the equivalent of terminating more than 1,000 Keystone XL pipeline projects," he said in a statement, referring to an oil pipeline project blocked by Biden's administration. Republican Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, one of two Republicans who voted against advancing the bill, also blasted the bill on the Senate floor overnight and warned that it will cause power shortages by hamstringing renewable energy and battery storage. Tillis drew ire from Trump for voting against the motion to advance the bill and has since said he does not plan to run for re-election. "What you have done is create a blip in power service, because there isn't going to be a gas-fired generator anytime soon," he said on the floor. Tillis had worked as a consultant covering the utility industry and said the bill ignores the reality of the soaring demand for power by data centers. Brian Schatz, a Democratic Senator from Hawaii, also railed against the bill's impact. "This bill will increase prices. The 500-GW less energy in the next decade is pretty much exactly the amount we will need to meet rising demand," he said. "You don't have to love clean energy or be an environmentalist to understand that this is a basic question of supply and demand," he said.
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Jonn Oliver on Trump's ‘big beautiful bill': ‘Death by a thousand cuts'
John Oliver has expressed deep concerns about Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill' calling it dangerous and potentially deadly for many Americans. On Last Week Tonight, the host joked that it sounded like a 'lumberjack with an OnlyFans page' as it moves through Congress with only the 'narrowest of margins'. It passed by just a single vote and is now being rushed through the next round by Republicans eager to see it pass even though many have admitted that they haven't even read all of it. He said while it was lengthy and its contents unknown by many, the 'broad contours are clear', saying it demanded a 'massive redistribution of wealth' which requires 'cutting critical programs for the most vulnerable'. The bill will lead to 60% of tax cuts going to the top 20% of households and will add trillions to the national debt. One major area affected is healthcare, with estimates suggesting 4.2 million people will become uninsured by the changes. Trump has claimed that Medicaid will be safe, saying 'none of that stuff is gonna be touched' in an interview. Oliver noted that 'following through on the promise not to touch something has never exactly been of one of Trump's strong suits'. He said 'the math just doesn't support those claims', with new work requirements making it harder for many of those who would use it. Nearly two in three people who already have it do work and most of the rest have a disability or they are attending school or caring for family members. The TV host turned Trump loyalist Dr Oz has said that you need to 'prove that you matter' by proving you work. 'So a person only means something if they work?' Oliver said. 'That is not true at all.' He added that people not on Medicaid will be affected too given that this is also a major source of funding for hospitals and studies have projected that there will be 16 million more uninsured people in 2034 than would otherwise be the case. 'It's not like people haven't tried to warn Republicans of the consequences here,' he added. Another key concern is food stamps (Snap) which right now provide assistance to 41 million people. There will be a significant expansion of work requirements, insisted, again, Dr Oz, 'a real piece of shit' who will help oversee a plan that would put 5 million people at risk of losing at least some of their food assistance. Studies show work requirements do not increase work and merely add to the administrative burdens for people who are then deterred by paperwork involved, including time-consuming applications. 'Basically this bill is taking all that bureaucratic bullshit and somehow making it worse,' he said. A program in Georgia has been used as the model, often quoted by Republicans, but there have been significant administration problems, with steep qualifications and technical issues, enough to make you want to 'throw your fucking computer out of the window'. The issues led to it costing $86m with just 6,500 participants. 'If that's what's coming on a national scale then that is fucking terrifying,' he said, saying it was 'death by a thousand cuts' for many. Oliver said Republicans are more alarmed by paperwork and red tape for business but 'this is medicine for the sick and food for the hungry'. He added that 'if it becomes law, we're gonna be looking back on it decades from now' and that 'everyone who votes for this should be held accountable'.
