US Senate bill's clean energy cuts draw backlash from labor, business
WASHINGTON, June 30 (Reuters) - The U.S. Senate's proposed cuts to clean energy subsidies in its version of President Donald Trump's tax and spending bill have drawn searing criticism from business and labor groups since they were unveiled over the weekend, with some arguing the moves will raise power prices and kill jobs.
The pushback, which includes a swipe from Trump ally and Tesla CEO Elon Musk, comes as senators started voting on a potentially long list of amendments to the bill on Monday morning, giving renewable energy advocates on both sides of the political spectrum a last window to push for changes.
"Taxing energy production is never good policy, whether oil & gas or, in this case, renewables," said Neil Bradley, policy director of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, in a post on X over the weekend. "Electricity demand is set to see enormous growth & this tax will increase prices. It should be removed."
"This would be incredibly destructive to America!" Musk posted on X, saying the cuts could endanger the development of energy-hungry artificial intelligence technology, among other things.
Trump has said he intends to maximize U.S. energy production, with a focus on fossil fuels, in part to ensure the power industry can supply the AI industry's growth. But he has also promised to wipe out subsidies for renewables.
The Senate bill would roll back incentives for wind, solar, batteries and other clean energy technologies created by President Joe Biden's 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, and add a new tax on these projects if they cannot prove their products are made without Chinese parts.
Those provisions were harsher on the credits than the previous Senate version and even the House version.
Sean McGarvey, president of the North America's Building Trades Unions (NABTU), which represents over 3 million construction workers, blasted the bill's impact on jobs.
"If enacted, this stands to be the biggest job-killing bill in the history of this country. Simply put, it is the equivalent of terminating more than 1,000 Keystone XL pipeline projects," he said in a statement, referring to an oil pipeline project blocked by Biden's administration.
Republican Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina, one of two Republicans who voted against advancing the bill, also blasted the bill on the Senate floor overnight and warned that it will cause power shortages by hamstringing renewable energy and battery storage.
Tillis drew ire from Trump for voting against the motion to advance the bill and has since said he does not plan to run for re-election.
"What you have done is create a blip in power service, because there isn't going to be a gas-fired generator anytime soon," he said on the floor.
Tillis had worked as a consultant covering the utility industry and said the bill ignores the reality of the soaring demand for power by data centers.
Brian Schatz, a Democratic Senator from Hawaii, also railed against the bill's impact.
"This bill will increase prices. The 500-GW less energy in the next decade is pretty much exactly the amount we will need to meet rising demand," he said.
"You don't have to love clean energy or be an environmentalist to understand that this is a basic question of supply and demand," he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
7 minutes ago
- BBC News
White House says Canada's Carney 'caved' to Trump on tech tax
The White House said Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney "caved" to pressure from President Donald Trump in rescinding a tax on big US technology firms. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters on Monday Canada had made a mistake in trying to levy the tax, and that Carney called Trump on Sunday evening to say he would drop it. Since Trump returned to office, the two countries have been fighting over trade. In response to the tax, which he called a "blatant attack", Trump on Friday called off trade deal negotiations and threatened to raise then said it would halt collection of payments, which were due on Monday, and introduce legislation to scrap the tax. "President Trump knows how to negotiate, and he knows he is governing the best country and the best economy in this world," Leavitt said in response to a question from a reporter. "Every country on the planet needs to have a good relationship with the US," she said, and called removal of the tax a "big victory for our tech companies and our workers here at home". Canada's digital services tax (DST) would have meant US tech giants including Amazon, Meta, Google and Apple faced a 3% charge on Canadian revenue above $20m (£15m).On Sunday, Canada's finance minister, François-Philippe Champagne, issued a statement saying the tax would be rescinded."The DST was announced in 2020 to address the fact that many large technology companies operating in Canada may not otherwise pay tax on revenues generated from Canadians," he said."Canada's preference has always been a multilateral agreement related to digital services taxation," the statement Poilievre, the leader of Canada's opposition Conservative Party, criticised scrapping the tax at the "11th hour". In a post on X, he said the prime minister had "put his elbows down" - in reference to the "elbows up" phrase used by Carney and his Liberal Party when campaigning in this April's election to signify they were prepared to defend Canadian interests against the US. Poilievre urged Carney to "insist that the US immediately rescind softwood lumber tariffs" in exchange, adding that "we need to make gains for our workers in these talks". Many countries, including the UK, are changing how they tax large multinational technology firms, which have millions of customers and advertisers around the world, but high corporation tax bills due to the way their businesses are was estimated that Canada's tax would cost the tech giants more than C$2bn ($1.5bn; £1.06bn) in its first year as the tax was being applied retroactively to January year's federal budget estimated the tax would bring in C$5.9bn in total over the next five years.
Time Out
16 minutes ago
- Time Out
How patriotic is New York? Here's how it ranks among other U.S. states
As fireworks stands pop up across the tri-state and red, white and blue takes over bodegas and bagel shops, one question lingers: Just how patriotic is New York? Spoiler alert—per a new study, it's not. In fact, it's nearly dead last. According to a new report from WalletHub that ranks all 50 states by patriotism, New York landed at an unimpressive 49th place. Only Arkansas scored lower. The study crunched data from 13 metrics, including military enlistment, veteran population, voting rates and community volunteerism. Turns out, for all our skyline views and Lady Liberty pride, New Yorkers aren't exactly flag-waving overachievers. Start with military service: New York has the fewest veterans per capita in the country—three times fewer than Alaska, the leader in that category. And while we may show up to protest with flair (see: anti-Trump flag art and marches in Washington Square Park), civic engagement doesn't exactly run deep. The state ranked 44th in voter turnout for the 2024 presidential election. Even more sobering: New York came in last in voter turnout and near the bottom in overall civic engagement, a category that includes volunteering and jury service. While places like Virginia (No. 1 overall) and Montana (No. 2) boasted high civic participation and, in Virginia's case, strong military ties as well, New York lagged behind across the board. Virginia, in particular, earned its top spot thanks to a potent combo of military infrastructure (hello, Pentagon) and strong voter turnout. WalletHub analyst Chip Lupo told the New York Post: 'Virginians love to think that they're basically the bedrock of the country as we know it.' Back in New York, some might argue patriotism here just looks a little different. Maybe it's less about uniforms and ballots and more about rallying in the streets, fighting for civil rights or keeping the wheels of American culture turning. Still, with July 4th on the horizon, WalletHub's list is a reminder that patriotism isn't just about popping sparklers and queuing up Springsteen. It's about service, engagement and showing up for your community. While the rest of the country salutes Old Glory this week, New Yorkers might want to consider a little extra effort—at the polls, in the neighborhood or, yes, even at the ballot box next time around.
Reuters
17 minutes ago
- Reuters
Euro zone facing increased inflation volatility, Lagarde says
SINTRA, Portugal, June 30 (Reuters) - Uncertainty is bound to remain a key feature of the global economy, likely making inflation more volatile and requiring the ECB to act more forcefully to keep prices around its target, ECB President Christine Lagarde said on Monday. The ECB unveiled an updated strategy on Monday and concluded that major deviations from its target in either direction would require "appropriately forceful or persistent" policy action to ensure price growth comes back to 2%. Explaining this conclusion, Lagarde argued that the global environment had changed fundamentally in the post-pandemic years, as firms changed prices more quickly in this new period of uncertainty and supply shocks. "The world ahead is more uncertain – and that uncertainty is likely to make inflation more volatile," Lagarde told the ECB Forum on Central Banking in Sintra, Portugal. Inflation in the euro zone is now around 2%, right on the bank's target, after a decade of first undershooting this figure despite massive stimulus, then overshooting it. While the ECB sees inflation staying around these levels over the next several years, Lagarde admitted there were risks as corporate pricing behaviour has changed. "Firms tend to react more quickly to shocks – especially supply ones – in order to protect against potential future losses," Lagarde said in a speech. "They are more likely to adopt more flexible pricing strategies, which means prices may respond not just to major shocks, but also to smaller frictions and local disruptions." Another problem was that pricing adjustment may not be linear, meaning that inflation could quickly accelerate or slow. The way to tackle such risks, Lagarde argued, was by acting forcefully early, including tightening policy quickly to prevent a feedback loop between prices and wages. Similarly, early action against too-low inflation would minimise the time the ECB would have to spend at ultra-low interest rates.
