Surya questions BMRCL over Metro yellow line delay
The protest, organized by the BJP, saw the participation of multiple legislators and parliamentarians, including MLA CK Ramamurthy and MP PC Mohan. The group marched from Lalbagh East Gate towards the BMRCL (Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited) MD's office, voicing frustration over the repeated postponement of the launch of yellow line.
Addressing the protestors, Tejasvi Surya said, 'Metro and buses are vital public transport systems. But the key yellow line connecting south Bengaluru to Electronic City has not opened even after four years of delay. It was scheduled to begin in 2021, and even now, there's no clarity.' He further questioned the BMRCL on the recent 100% hike in Metro fares, asking why such an increase was implemented without transparency. 'Where is the fare revision report? The public deserves to know. BMRCL must make the fare determination committee's report public,' Surya demanded.
BMRCL MD Maheshwar Rao had previously stated that the yellow line is expected to be operational by August 15, but growing public discontent is mounting pressure on the authorities. Police had deployed KSRP vehicles and security personnel to manage the protest and ensure order as hundreds marched protesting the delays.
The BJP has accused the BMRCL of inefficiency and is pressing for greater accountability, especially with the yellow llne considered critical for decongesting the city's southern tech corridor.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
17 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Vijay's TVK Rules Out Alliance with BJP, DMK for 2026
Published : Jul 07, 2025 14:10 IST - 5 MINS READ The line-up of alliances for the 2026 Assembly election in Tamil Nadu appears to be nearly complete with actor Vijay's party, Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK), announcing that it will have no truck with the 'ideological enemy,' the BJP, or the 'political enemy,' the Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK). The All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (AIADMK) has aligned with the BJP for the election, which rules out TVK joining hands with the AIADMK. TVK itself ensured that the AIADMK will not able to have any truck with it by announcing that Vijay will be the chief ministerial candidate. Speaking to Frontline recently, K.G. Arunraj, TVK's general secretary (propaganda and policy), had said: 'TVK does not need any tie-up with any party. Vijay is a phenomenon unlike anything Tamil Nadu politics has seen before. But we are still open to anyone who wants to be part of our front. We will welcome them.' Similar sentiments were expressed by senior leaders of the party in separate conversations with this correspondent. On the stage of an executive committee meeting on July 4, Vijay himself clarified, yet again, that his party does not need any of the established parties. 'TVK is not DMK or AIADMK to ally with the BJP for selfish political gains. If we form an alliance, it will always be against both the DMK and the BJP,' he thundered to the loud acceptance of the boisterous and partisan gathering of executive committee members, who are yet to transition from a fan club into a political party cadre. Also Read | Thalapathy Vijay's grand political entry stumbles on basic ideological contradictions Main alliances in fray There are two main alliances in the race for the 2026 Tamil Nadu Assembly election. One is led by the ruling DMK and includes the Congress, the Communist Party of India (CPI) and the Communist Party of India (Marxist), the Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi (VCK), and the Marumalarchi Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (MDMK). This alliance, which also includes a few smaller sub-regional parties, has stayed intact since the 2019 Lok Sabha election. The AIADMK-led front has the BJP as the lead partner, although the national party's strength in the State is minuscule. A clutch of one-man parties, such as the ones run by John Pandian, A.C. Shanmugham, and Pari Vendhar, are also part of this alliance. But none of these parties have any heft and are largely in the front for the leaders' personal reasons and because the BJP is part of it. The two sub-regional parties that the front wants in its fold are the Desiya Murpokku Dravida Kazhagam (DMDK) and the Pattali Makkal Katchi (PMK). Miffed over AIADMK general secretary Edappadi K. Palaniswami not offering the DMDK a Rajya Sabha, party leader Premalatha announced that the party would make an announcement on alliances in January 2026. 'There is no need to hastily join anyone,' she told mediapersons, in response to a question, adding that any front that respects the DMDK's contribution will be the party's preferred alliance partner. PMK's internal troubles The PMK is in the middle of a huge internal dispute between founder and and current president S. Ramadoss and his son, Anbumani. Party sources said that Anbumani was keen on joining hands with the BJP but Ramadoss would have none of it. However, political analysts in the State insist that both father and son are essentially saying the same thing: Ramadoss is comfortable with an alliance with the AIADMK and the son wants to tie up with the BJP. Since both are in the same alliance, there should not be a problem. But the issue has now been sucked into family war turf. Every day there are expulsions and counter expulsions. For instance, on July 5, Ramadoss threw Anbumani out of an executive body, only for Anbumani's advisor Arul Rathinam to hit out, claiming that the expulsion had no effect because Ramadoss had no powers to do so. Anbumani is on record saying that he is now president and cannot be removed by anyone barring the elected general council. Anbumani has packed this forum with his supporters. There have been several mediation efforts but given the complex situation in the PMK, no such ceasefire talks have been effective so far. The PMK is still quite the force in some northern Tamil Nadu constituencies where it can be the deciding factor. This is why Palaniswami called all like-minded parties to join hands against the DMK. 'It is our objective that all like-minded parties should come together and contest the election,' Palaniswami told mediapersons on July 5. Asked if he will join hands with TVK, he said: 'We will be happy to align with those who want to remove the DMK government.' Also Read | Ramadoss-Anbumani face off as PMK's general council meeting turns stormy AIADMK, BJP begin outreach On July 7, Palaniswami began his State-wide public outreach tour from Coimbatore to make people of Tamil Nadu aware of the 'anti-people policies' of the 'corrupt and inefficient' DMK government. 'The Stalin government has not fulfilled a majority of the promises it made ahead of the [2021] election. The people of Tamil Nadu are angry because of this,' he said in an open letter to his party members. The BJP is slated to begin its 2026 election campaign with a zonal conference in Tirunelveli on August 17. The party has decided to organise six more such conferences ahead of the election. Apart from strengthening the grass-roots party structure, the conferences will showcase the achievements of 11 years of BJP rule at the Centre. In effect, political parties in the State have begun preparing for the 2026 election way ahead of time. Before the 2021 election, preparations were muted until about six months before the election. This time, election season has begun about 10 months ahead.
The Hindu
36 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Kerala Crime Branch questioned Union Minister Suresh Gopi as part of Thrissur Pooram ‘disruption' probe
The Kerala Police confirmed on Monday (July 7, 2025) that State Crime Branch (CB) investigators had questioned Union Minister Suresh Gopi as part of a sweeping government-ordered inquiry into the alleged disruption of Thrissur Pooram in 2024. However, CB officials averred that the agency preferred to keep the time or where they questioned Mr. Gopi confidential for now, given the politically sensitive nature of the investigation. The Thrissur Pooram controversy took on political overtones as it dominated the campaign narrative in the run-up to the 2024 Lok Sabha elections. Mr. Gopi found himself at the centre of the dispute after he rode in an ambulance, allegedly flashing its overhead lights and sounding the siren, to the festival office, which the police and district authorities had declared off-limits for vehicles and civilians on the night of the iconic fireworks. Seva Bharathi, an affiliate of the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS), owned the ambulance. Subsequently, the police and the Motor Vehicles department (MVD) booked Mr. Gopi and the operator on the charge of misusing an emergency response vehicle for casual transport. Mobile phone videos of Mr. Gopi parleying with apparently distraught Thiruvambady and Paramekkavu Devaswoms went viral on conventional and social media in the run-up to the poll day on April 26, 2024. The Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) Opposition quickly accused the ruling Left Democratic Front (LDF) of throwing the Thrissur Lok Sabha poll to Mr Gopi, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) candidate from the constituency, by 'wilfully scuttling Thrissur Pooram to stoke Hindu majoritarian religious sentiment among voters.' Mr. Gopi's opponent, Communist Party of India (CPI) leader V.S. Sunilkumar and Congress' standard-bearer in the constituency, K. Muraleedharan, accused the State police of allowing the BJP candidate to gain political mileage by emerging as a champion of Thrissur Pooram lovers, a significant electoral bloc in the constituency. The alleged disarray in the conduct of the festival had caused considerable disquiet among the mammoth festival crowd and the general public, prompting Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan to order a three-tier investigation last year. Subsequently, the CB formed a special investigation team (SIT) to investigate the cognisable offences detailed in the preliminary police enquiry report about the festival 'disruption'. The SIT will likely submit its report to the Additional Director General of Police, Crime Branch, H. Venkatesh.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
No one fully satisfied, says poll panel as Bihar voter roll clean-up continues
In poll-bound Bihar, the Election Commission's massive voter list overhaul has left political parties across the board dissatisfied, for reasons ranging from alleged disenfranchisement to questions over timing and Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar admitted that "for one reason or another, no one (political parties) seems fully satisfied with the current status of the voter list," even as the Election Commission goes ahead with its Special Intensive Revision (SIR) drive, covering nearly eight crore voters in the state ahead of Assembly elections due later this the past four months, the Election Commission has held nearly 5,000 meetings with representatives of several political parties. All 4,123 Electoral Registration Officers (EROs), 775 District Election Officers (DEOs) and 36 Chief Electoral Officers (CEOs) have been engaged in the drive, which aims to weed out ineligible names and ensure an updated roll ahead of the upcoming elections. However, the revision has sparked a legal and political battle. Bihar's chief opposition party, Rashtriya Janata Dal (RJD) has challenged the process in the Supreme Court, alleging it could strike off over two crore voters and questioning why Bihar alone is being targetted when the last nationwide revision was conducted in BJP-led NDA has defended the exercise, citing rapid urbanisation, migration, unreported deaths and the inclusion of illegal immigrants as reasons for the update. It has also accused the RJD-led Mahagathbandhan of raising 'excuses' in anticipation of the the poll panel has insisted that the process is transparent and warned voters against misleading and false claims being circulated by "some people" without reading the official orders. As per the June 24 directive, draft rolls will be published on August 1, including names for which forms are received by July 25. Voters can file claims and objections till June 25 and September 30, nearly 30 million residents will have to produce documentary proof of their date and place of birth. Those born after 1987 must also submit similar documents for each by Article 324 of the Constitution and the Representation of the People Act, 1950, the Election Commission is both authorised and duty-bound to maintain the accuracy of the electoral roll. The Commission has invoked these powers multiple times in the past — most notably during intensive revisions in 1952-56, 1957, 1961, 1965, 1966, 1983-84, 1987-89, 1992, 1993, 1995, 2002, 2003 and 2004.- EndsTrending Reel
