Army kills 30 militants trying to cross from Afghanistan
According to the statement, a large group of militants affiliated with the Indian proxy network 'Fitna al-Khwarij' attempted to infiltrate through the Pakistan-Afghanistan border in the Hassan Khel area during the nights of July 1–2 and July 2–3. The movement was promptly detected and responded to with precision by Pakistani forces.
'All thirty terrorists were neutralized in a precise and skillful engagement,' the ISPR said, adding that a significant cache of weapons, ammunition, and explosives was recovered from the site.
The military praised the exceptional vigilance and professionalism of the troops involved, noting that their swift response averted a potential large-scale terrorist attack.
The statement also urged the Interim Afghan Government to prevent the use of its territory by foreign proxies to launch attacks against Pakistan.
'Pakistan's security forces remain resolute in defending the country's borders and are determined to eliminate the scourge of terrorism, particularly that which is abetted by hostile foreign elements,' the statement concluded.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
5 hours ago
- Business Recorder
X suspends Reuters account in India after ‘legal demand', government denies making request
NEW DELHI:The Reuters News account on X has been inaccessible to users in India since Saturday, when the social media platform suspended it in response to what it described as a 'legal demand'. A spokesperson for the Indian government's Press Information Bureau, however, told Reuters there was no requirement from any agency in the government of India to 'withhold the Reuters handle. We are continuously working with X to resolve the problem'. Reuters could not immediately determine what specific content the demand referred to, why its removal was sought or the entity that had lodged the complaint. Representatives for X did not immediately respond to requests for comment. A Reuters spokesperson said in a statement, 'We are working with X to resolve this matter and get Reuters account reinstated in India as soon as possible.' Musk announces forming of 'America Party' in further break from Trump Reuters World, another X account operated by the news agency, has also been blocked in India. The main Reuters account, followed by more than 25 million users globally, has been blocked in India since Saturday night. A note tells X users that '@Reuters has been withheld in IN (India) in response to a legal demand'. In an email to the Reuters social media team on May 16, X said: 'It is our policy to notify account holders if we receive a legal request from an authorized entity (such as law enforcement or a government agency) to remove content from their account.' 'In order to comply with X obligations under India's local laws, we have withheld your X account in India under the country's Information Technology Act, 2000; the content remains available elsewhere'. Reuters could not ascertain if the May 16 email was linked to Saturday's account suspension. While the email did not specify which entity had made the request or what content they sought to remove, it said X had been advised that in a case of this sort, a user could contact the secretary of India's Information and Broadcasting Ministry. The secretary, Sanjay Jaju, did not immediately respond to requests seeking comment. The 2000 law allows designated government officials to demand takedown of content from social media platforms they deem to violate local laws, including on the grounds of national security or if a post threatens public order. X has long been at odds with India's government over content-removal requests. The company sued the federal government in March over a new government website the company says expands takedown powers to 'countless' government officials. The case is continuing. India has said X wrongly labelled an official website a 'censorship portal', as the website only allows tech companies to be notified about harmful online content.
Express Tribune
11 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Reuters' X account withheld in India citing legal demand: reports
The official X (formerly Twitter) handle of international news agency Reuters has been withheld in India, reportedly 'in response to a legal demand,' Indian media reported on Sunday. Users attempting to access @Reuters and @ReutersWorld from within India were greeted with the message: 'Account withheld. @Reuters has been withheld in IN (India) in response to a legal demand.' While Indian media outlet The Print first reported the restriction took effect around midnight on July 6, the Indian government has denied issuing any recent legal directive related to Reuters' accounts. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) told India Today that no such request had been made, adding that the government was working with X to resolve what it termed a 'mistake' by the platform. 'There is no requirement from the Government of India to withhold the Reuters handle,' a ministry spokesperson told India Today. Citing official sources, Indian news agency PTI reported that the original demand for blocking Reuters' X account — along with several hundred others — dates back to Operation Sindoor, a military offensive launched in May during which India reportedly targeted sites in Pakistan. At the time, a number of social media accounts were withheld, though Reuters' had remained accessible until now. Government sources suggested that X appears to have acted on that earlier directive belatedly, possibly in error. Despite the restriction on the main handles, affiliated Reuters accounts — including @ReutersTech, @ReutersChina, @ReutersAsia, and @ReutersFacts — remain accessible within India. The agency's main website also remains unaffected. Reuters, which employs over 2,600 journalists in 165 countries, has not issued an official statement on the development. This is not the first time X has restricted access to accounts in India in response to legal demands. On May 8, 2025, the platform revealed it had received executive orders from the Indian government to block over 8,000 accounts. At the time, X said the orders included demands to block accounts belonging to international news organisations and prominent individuals — without specifying the posts in violation or providing sufficient evidence. The company, which was acquired by Elon Musk in 2022, has consistently expressed its disagreement with such demands, terming the blanket restrictions as censorship and a violation of free speech. 'Blocking entire accounts is not only unnecessary, it amounts to censorship of existing and future content,' X said in a May statement. However, it noted it was unable to publish the orders due to legal constraints.
Business Recorder
12 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Birkenstock cracks down on fakes in India, court-ordered factory visits held, sources say
NEW DELHI: Indian court-appointed legal representatives inspected small-scale factories in recent weeks to seize suspected counterfeit Birkenstock footwear, after the German brand launched an infringement lawsuit, people familiar with the matter said. Birkenstock's case is occurring around the same time other shoemakers are in the news in India. Crocs this month secured a court nod to pursue a nine-year-old infringement case, while Prada is facing heat over showcasing sandals similar to ethnic Indian footwear without initially giving credit to India. Reuters is first to report the Indian case details related to Birkenstock sandals, which have evolved from a counterculture symbol to a trendy fashion item, and are also popular in India. In May, Birkenstock filed an infringement lawsuit in the Delhi High Court against four footwear traders, four factories and two unnamed individuals. Its complaint stated an internal investigation found counterfeits were being made in rural areas in and around the tourist hub of Agra, and sold locally and exported to other countries. On May 26, Delhi judge Saurabh Banerjee issued a confidential order that was only made public on the court's website last week. It said 10 local lawyers were appointed as commissioners to visit the suspected factories. The judge said commissioners can 'seize, pack and seal the infringing products', and his order included photographs that Birkenstock submitted showing the alleged counterfeit footwear and shoe boxes with the company's branding. The visits have been completed and reports were submitted confidentially to the judge, the three people familiar with the matter said on Saturday, asking to remain unidentified. The next hearing in the case is set for October 6. The visits were conducted in Agra, home to the Taj Mahal, and in India's capital New Delhi, the people said, declining to give further details from their inspection. Birkenstock did not respond to queries from Reuters and its lawyers from Delhi-based law firm Lall and Sethi declined to comment, citing the pending legal case. In his May order, Banerjee said he reviewed photographs and samples of the alleged counterfeit products in court, and they 'seem like a cheap knock off' of Birkenstock products. 'There is all likelihood of the public getting deceived … The differences, hardly if any, are not something which can be discernable to the naked eyes,' he wrote. Once popular with hippies, tech enthusiasts and medical professionals, Birkenstock gained widespread attention after Australian actress Margot Robbie wore a pair of pink Birkenstocks in the final scene of the 2023 hit movie 'Barbie'. In February, a German court said Birkenstock sandals do not qualify as art and are therefore not protected by copyright, dismissing a lawsuit brought by the German company. In India, Birkenstock footwear for women is priced between $46 and $233.
