logo
What the scrap over Mass. Gov. Healey's Sunday show quips explain about our politics

What the scrap over Mass. Gov. Healey's Sunday show quips explain about our politics

Yahoo5 days ago
If you're the sort of person who watches the Sunday political chat shows, then you might have caught Gov. Maura Healey engaging in a time-honored rite of campaign season last weekend: Burnishing her record as she seeks a second term.
And if you're not the sort of person who watches Sunday political chat shows because, say, you were at church or busy packing the car for the beach, then here's a quick object lesson on the perils and pitfalls of being an incumbent with a record.
It starts with an extended consideration of what Healey said when WBZ-TV's Jon Keller teed her up with a question last Sunday about the administration of former Republican Gov. Charlie Baker.
Important context: Healey has been generally deferential to her predecessor. But Mike Kenneally and Brian Shortsleeve, who are now vying for the 2026 Republican gubernatorial nomination, are former Baker aides.
Healey did what most practiced pols do when they're confronted with that kind of question: She flipped the script and turned it into an opportunity to talk about herself. The premise is that the last thing you want to do is give the competition free airtime.
Here's the full quote:
'I think what is important to the voters, for reelection, is what I've done,' she said. '[We] cut taxes — hadn't been done in 20 years. We're building more homes that should have been built before. We're building them out now at a scale because we've got a lower cost. [We're] fixing transportation for the first time, not even in recent memory.'
She continued: 'The T is running on time. No slow zones. We're going to continue to make investments. And we've made sure that Massachusetts is No. 1 in education. We're back atop the ratings this year, and I'm really pleased about that. There are challenges, driving down costs, particularly around housing and energy, [those are] top on my list. But I'm running for reelection, Jon, because I love Massachusetts.'
And now, why it matters:
You had to be paying attention, but Healey's comments were a barely veiled swipe at her two Republican rivals.
Keneally served as Baker's housing and economic development secretary, which means he was the guy who was supposed to fix the state's housing affordability and supply problem.
Shortsleeve was tasked with running the MBTA, and somehow wrestling an aging system, whose repair costs ran to the hundreds of millions of dollars, back into shape.
While progress has been made on the latter, it's pretty safe to say we're a long way from done on the former.
So it will not shock you to learn that Healey's remarks landed with a thud among Republicans.
By Monday afternoon, the state Republican Party had blasted out a lengthy fact-check — and a condemnation — of Healey's comments.
'Misrepresenting a broken record comes naturally to the Healey administration, that has nothing to run on heading into a reelection year,' state GOP Chairperson Amy Carnevale said.
'Voters are living in an opposite reality from the one Governor Healey spoke about Sunday, and they are too smart to believe that she's done anything to make their lives materially better since taking office,' Carnevale continued.
Republicans took specific issue with the Democratic governor's assertion that she was the 'first to come in and reform' the state's hugely expensive emergency shelter system.
'We've driven the numbers in shelter way down, we're driving the cost way down,' Healey told Keller. 'I'm actually the first to come in and reform that system, which needed reform.'
Healey has made some progress when it comes to reducing the number of people in state-run shelters. And most hotel shelters closed last month because there were fewer people in the system.
But the state still had spent nearly $830 million on the system through the end of June, with costs set to exceed $1 billion by the end of the 2024-25 budget year (which closed on June 30), MassLive previously reported.
Republicans pointed to similar progress that Baker had made in reducing the number of people in hotel shelters in 2017 and his efforts to keep people in their homes. That was before the state was rocked by a flood of migrant new arrivals, which filled the system to overflowing in 2023.
Similarly, Kennealy and Shortsleeve each will have to explain their role in helping to fix — or not — two of the state's biggest public policy challenges: housing and mass transportation.
That conversation will shape the campaign to come. And in separate interviews, both have tipped their hands on how they intend to address it.
Kennealy, through a spokesperson, defended his record on housing this week, arguing that new housing starts had increased on his watch and declined under Healey.
Speaking to MassLive in May, Kennealy offered further details.
'We got passed the single most important zoning reform in 50 years in Massachusetts. And that's called housing choice. And it took us three years to get it done,' he said.
'And we looked at local zoning as an impediment to housing production, and it was our view that we're in a housing crisis in Massachusetts,' he continued. 'We have to produce a lot more housing. But you've got to do it in partnership with cities and towns. You cannot mandate to them what to do. You've got to work with them.'
Shortsleeve similarly defended his stewardship of the MBTA, telling State House News Service in a June interview that 'we took out waste and abuse.'
'We streamlined parts of the organization, we rebid contracts, and when we were done, we had the lowest operating expenses in the history of the T,' he continued. 'That shows you what's possible in terms of reforming government when you bring a businessman sort of mindset, an outsider perspective, and a Marine's determination to the job.'
He went further, arguing that Healey 'has never delivered a balanced budget for the T. Today, the T takes a billion dollars more to run than it did six years ago, and the T's costs in almost every area have grown rapidly. What I've seen in the fast past few years is unrestrained cost growth.'
The $60.9 billion budget that Healey signed into law last week provides $470 million in direct support for the MBTA, as well as funding for reduced-price fares for those who qualify for them.
That is some not-insignificant cash.
Still, it's important to pause here to note that there are still some 18 months to go before Election Day 2026. In our hyper-accelerated timeline, that's several political lifetimes away.
But if campaigns and elections are about anything, they're about candidates taking control of their narratives and defining themselves before their opponents have a chance to do it for them.
Don't believe it?
Consider that all it takes is one misguided photo of a guy in a tank to help crater a White House campaign.
Narratives and records matter. And voters, who might need some occasional prodding, do remember it.
These are the Big 3 issues to watch in Boston's mayoral race — and one sleeper
Mass. Senate set to make its first move against Trump in 2025 | Bay State Briefing
How Beacon Hill bosses quietly buried reform bills that threatened their power
Read the original article on MassLive.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Democratic city officers flocking to cop-friendly red states, police leader claims: ‘Why would anyone stay?'
Democratic city officers flocking to cop-friendly red states, police leader claims: ‘Why would anyone stay?'

New York Post

time21 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Democratic city officers flocking to cop-friendly red states, police leader claims: ‘Why would anyone stay?'

Law enforcement officers in areas primarily run by Democrats continue to flock to red states for job security, better pay and bosses who will back them up, according to one police leader. Joe Gamaldi is the national vice president of the Fraternal Order of Police (FOP). He is an active lieutenant with the Houston Police Department, and he said police in blue cities are tired of facing hostility from local leaders. Advertisement 'What we've seen is really a mass exodus of police officers leaving far-left cities for basically greener pastures,' he told Fox News Digital. 'Because, ultimately, people want to feel appreciated for what they do, and when you have a boss — in this case, mayors or city councils, who regularly call you a piece of crap to the public — why would anyone stay?' Florida is one example of a Republican-led state that has benefited from the mass departures. 5 'What we've seen is really a mass exodus of police officers leaving far-left cities for basically greener pastures,' Joe Gamaldi said. AP Advertisement According to a 2024 statement from former Florida Attorney General Ashley Moody, the state welcomed 5,000 law enforcement recruits between 2022 and last year, and 1,200 of them came from out of state. 'Florida is the most pro-law enforcement state in the nation because we back our blue,' Moody said at the time. 'We've been spreading the word about all the great incentives to join our ranks, and individuals like the new Sarasota recruits have answered the call, leaving behind places where their service was not as appreciated as it is here.' She said she was 'as inspired as ever to continue doing all we can to show our support to those who bravely protect and serve' after seeing the influx of police officers into the state. 5 Florida welcomed 5,000 law enforcement recruits between 2022 and last year, and 1,200 of them came from out of state. Fox News Digital Advertisement Gamaldi said officers are also moving to cities that may lean blue but are in red states and still have the support of elected leadership and the community, adding officers are 'voting with their feet.' 'We're also seeing it [in] Texas in Houston, which is a city that leans a little blue, but they have been supportive of police officers,' he said. 'The mayor there has given a massive raise to police officers. You're seeing officers go there. You're seeing officers go to Dallas. So, you're seeing all these communities, and there's one common thread. It's 'We support police officers.'' Gamaldi emphasized that the trend began after the 2020 defund the police movement and said, in many cities, law enforcement officers are afraid to do their jobs in 'critical incident' situations, even when they do them by the book. 5 Gamaldi said officers are also moving to cities that may lean blue but are in red states and still have the support of elected leadership and the community. LightRocket via Getty Images Advertisement 'I think you can look no further than Seattle, Portland, Chicago [and] New York,' he said. 'All of these cities have basically told their police officers, 'We don't support you. We're not gonna be there for you when you need us. We're gonna try to defund you when given the opportunity.' 'I mean, my goodness, right now, one of the mayoral candidates for New York has actively said he wants to defund and dismantle the police department,' Gamaldi said, referring to socialist Zohran Mamdani, who has been open with his anti-police rhetoric. 5 'I mean, my goodness, right now, one of the mayoral candidates for New York has actively said he wants to defund and dismantle the police department,' Gamaldi said Zohran Mamdani /X Blue cities, Gamaldi said, are worse off for driving out their police forces. 'Look at the mass exodus of experience in solving cases and experience of just mentoring the next generation of police officers,' he said. 'I mean, the damage that was done in 2020 with the defund the police movement, rhat's going to reverberate for decades. You don't just recover from something like that when you have all of that experience walking out the door.' 5 Gamaldi emphasized that the trend began after the 2020 defund the police movement. Christopher Sadowski He also pointed to better pay and other financial perks, like cities covering moving expenses, as reasons law enforcement officers are moving away from far-left areas. Ultimately, he posed a question to those who patrol the streets where they are unappreciated, saying, 'Why not leave?' Advertisement 'To anyone watching this right now,' Gamaldi said, 'if your boss was constantly telling you [that] you're doing a horrible job, and, in addition, if you were following the exact policies, training and the law of your job, and yet they are still demonizing you, still throwing you under the bus, still trying to indict you, why the hell would you stay?'

Mamdani fundraises off Cuomo's launch video
Mamdani fundraises off Cuomo's launch video

The Hill

time32 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Mamdani fundraises off Cuomo's launch video

New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani fundraised off a new campaign video from former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo as the two are set to battle in the general election later this year. 'Only 13 percent of New Yorkers voted in the June primary. The general election is in November, and I am in it to win it. My opponent, Mr. Mamdani, offers slick slogans, but no real solutions,' Cuomo said in a campaign video, which was posted Monday on the social platform X. In response to the earlier campaign video Cuomo posted on X, Mamdani posted a link to donate money to his campaign. Mamdani's response had earned 95,000 likes by later Monday night, with Cuomo's original video at 2,900 likes. Mamdani's recent win in the Democratic primary shocked the political world, with a mostly previously unknown democratic socialist taking down Cuomo, a notable political heavyweight. Cuomo has formally announced he is running as an independent in the Big Apple's mayoral race later this year. Cuomo joins Mamdani, Mayor Eric Adams, who is also running as an independent, and Republican Curtis Sliwa in the general election race. Former Obama staffer Dan Pfeiffer, also a co-host of the 'Pod Save America' podcast, slammed Cuomo's Monday ad by saying there was 'no charisma' in it. 'This is one of the least compelling campaign videos that I have ever seen. No message. No charisma. No compelling visuals,' Pfeiffer said in a post on X in response to the Cuomo video. 'Just a visibly annoyed man wearing an ill-fitting shirt saying things he clearly doesn't believe,' he added. When reached for comment about Pfeiffer's remarks earlier Monday, Cuomo spokesperson Rich Azzopardi told The Hill that 'If we upset the pod guys, we must be on the right track.'

Van Hollen standing firm on FBI relocation fight
Van Hollen standing firm on FBI relocation fight

Politico

time42 minutes ago

  • Politico

Van Hollen standing firm on FBI relocation fight

Maryland's senior senator said he isn't budging on his attempt to block President Donald Trump from diverting FBI money intended for moving agency headquarters to his home state — no matter the bureau's assurances. Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) told reporters Monday night that senators are trying to schedule a briefing with the FBI on the rationale for abandoning the plan to move the bureau to suburban Greenbelt, after the senator's stand on the issue derailed committee approval last week of the government funding bill that covers the FBI. But even if the FBI assures senators that Trump's preferred location in downtown Washington, D.C. is a secure site, the Maryland Democrat said he isn't backing off on his attempt to block the administration from diverting about $1.4 billion that has been set aside for relocating the bureau to Maryland. 'This is not a way to resolve the issue. This is a way of having an understanding of what the FBI is saying,' Van Hollen said. 'The fundamental question here is: These monies were put aside for whichever jurisdiction — whichever site — won the competition,' he continued. 'So we'll have to talk to the FBI about that too.' After Van Hollen's amendment was adopted during a markup last week, Senate appropriators halted debate on the bill intended to fund the departments of Commerce and Justice, as well as the FBI and science programs, for the fiscal year that starts in October. The inclusion of Van Hollen's amendment led some Republican committee members to retract their support. Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Ala.), who joined Democrats in voting for the amendment, said she would like to hear the FBI's security assessment of Trump's plan to move the bureau to the Ronald Reagan Building. If Murkowski withdraws her endorsement of Van Hollen's provision, it would fail, appeasing the Republicans who threatened to vote 'no' on the bill. Yet even if Van Hollen were to succeed in the tall order of getting his amendment signed into law in the coming months, it would only block Trump from diverting the funds, rather than force the administration to proceed with building the new FBI headquarters in Maryland. 'I recognize this is a long battle,' Van Hollen said Monday. 'But that was a very important first salvo.' Other Senate appropriators said Monday that they hadn't received updates on resolving the FBI headquarters concerns or moving the larger funding bill forward, while Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) expressed doubt there had been progress over the weekend. 'I don't think there's been any movement whatsoever,' Kennedy told reporters Monday.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store