Personal Insolvency Arrangements to address mortgage debt rise 28%, report shows
The latest annual report from the ISI said there were 1,189 approved insolvency arrangements during 2024, of which 861 were PIAs — an increase from the 929 recorded in 2023, of which 671 were PIAs.
In the report, ISI director Michael McNaughton said the combination of increased living costs and higher interest rates 'continues to put pressure on many households and individuals in meeting their mortgage payments as well as rental and utility bills'.
In managing these situations, and through no fault of their own, many people may find themselves burdened with an unsustainable level of debt.
Mr McNaughton said although the number of people in long-term arrears has fallen in recent years, 'it remains stubbornly high at around 19,000 accounts', adding that the Abhaile scheme 'continues to serve as a crucial entry point into the insolvency framework'.
The Abhaile scheme provides a range of services to help people in mortgage arrears and offers free access to financial and legal advice by way of a voucher. The scheme issued 1,958 vouchers for a free Personal Insolvency Practitioner (PIP) consultation during the year.
The report said a representative sample from Abhaile data shows of those borrowers who have availed of a PIA, 100% had terms which saw them remain in their family home, while 28% of borrowers had a reduction in their mortgage debt through a write-down of the principal.
The report also showed court-approved Debt Relief Notices, a solution aimed at resolving unsecured debt, increased by 48% to 240 last year compared to the 162 recorded during 2023. A DRN is a solution for people with low income, no mortgage and very few assets that allows for the write-off of debts up to €35,000.
During 2024, there were 1,544 new insolvency applications made to the ISI, of which 1,165 were PIAs.
The ISI had 1,600 active estates under management in bankruptcy last year. Assets with a value of close to €6.4m were realised across 227 bankruptcy estates last year.
The number of people adjudicated bankrupt during 2024 stood at 71 — compared to 72 in 2023. The report also noted 75 people exited bankruptcy during the year.
There were 1,344 protective certificates (PC) issued during 2024. A PC is a certificate issued by the court that offers a period of protection to a debtor from creditors when applying for relief.
The report noted there has been a 17% increase in approval of PCs since 2022, which it said could be attributed to increasing cost of living and rising interest rates.
'This combination created considerable uncertainty in individuals' personal circumstances and it is expected this will remain a further challenge in 2025,' the report said.
Read More
Average Irish mortgage rate sixth highest in euro area despite recent fall
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
14 hours ago
- Irish Times
Provisional liquidator for steel fabricator working for blue chip construction firms
The High Court has appointed a provisional liquidator to a steel fabrication firm providing products for blue chip construction sector companies. Farleng Engineering Ltd, of Laraghcon Farm, Lucan, Co Dublin, is insolvent and does not have enough money to discharge debts to creditors, Mr Justice Brian Cregan was told by Ross Gorman BL, for the firm, which petitioned the court for the appointment. Until recently, it had 42 full time employees. Counsel said the company had unusually twice been through examinership, the first in 2021 and the second in April last when the Circuit Court appointed an examiner. This protection was removed in late June after a potential investor withdrew interest and the examiner recommended the appointment of a provisional liquidator, he said. A liquidator can only be appointed by the High Court. READ MORE Among the reasons why the decision was taken was that the company was owed in excess of €230,000 for work in progress and another €446,000 in retentions much of which related to projects that have been completed. The liquidator could commence trying to recover this money. Counsel also said one of the key reasons was to ensure that the employees can avail of a collective redundancy process which can only commence when the liquidator has been appointed. Until that happens the workers are 'in limbo' and cannot obtain social welfare or start a new job. The firm also has several hundred thousand euro worth of assets, including plant, machinery and tools which are depreciating assets and which need to be sold as soon as possible. In the petition seeking the appointment of the provisional liquidator, the company, which was incorporated in 1999 and leases its premises in Lucan, said it operates in the construction sector providing specific steel fabrication for data centres and pharmaceutical manufacturing site construction. The 2021 examinership was successful with reasonable profitability recorded for the last three-and-a-half years. However, it has suffered significant cash flow issues for reasons including the impact on working capital due to big contract delays. It was also impacted by general delays in customers paying up and variances between what the firm claims and what is assessed by the customers' quantity surveyors. A planning issue also arose with Fingal County Council sending a warning letter last March stating the company may be in breach of planning regulations by changing the use of an agricultural building to light industry and the laying of a concrete surface without permission. The company believes a liquidator can explore the possibility of the acquisition of the business by a number of investors who have expressed interest in it. Mr Justice Cregan said he was satisfied to appoint Padraic O'Malley of JW Accountants as provisional liquidator. He adjourned the application to the end of the month.
Irish Examiner
a day ago
- Irish Examiner
Rachel Reeves gets Keir Starmer's backing after she was seen crying in the Commons
Rachel Reeves will be Britain's Chancellor for a 'very long time to come', Keir Starmer has said after she was seen crying during Prime Minister's Questions. The British prime minister said it was 'absolutely wrong' to suggest the Chancellor's visibly tearful appearance in the House of Commons related to the welfare U-turn, which put an almost £5bn black hole in her plans. 'It's got nothing to do with politics, nothing to do with what's happened this week. It was a personal matter for her. 'I'm not going to intrude on her privacy by talking to you about that. It is a personal matter,' he added while speaking to the BBC's podcast Political Thinking with Nick Robinson. Asked if Ms Reeves would remain in her post, Mr Starmer said: 'She will be Chancellor by the time this is broadcast, she will be Chancellor for a very long time to come, because this project that we've been working on to change the Labour party, to win the election, change the country, that is a project which the Chancellor and I've been working on together.' The Chancellor has done a 'fantastic job', Mr Starmer also told the BBC, adding: 'She and I work together, we think together. In the past, there have been examples — I won't give any specific — of chancellors and prime ministers who weren't in lockstep. We're in lockstep.' Markets took fright after scenes of Ms Reeves's tears spread, with the value of the pound and long-term Government bonds slumping sharply. Kemi Badenoch said the Chancellor looked 'absolutely miserable' (House of Commons/UK Parliament) In the Commons, Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said Ms Reeves looked 'absolutely miserable' and challenged Mr Starmer to say whether she would keep her job until the next election. Mr Starmer dodged the question about whether Ms Reeves would be in place for the remainder of the Parliament, saying Mrs Badenoch 'certainly won't'. Downing Street then insisted Ms Reeves was 'going nowhere' and will remain as Chancellor. Allies, meanwhile, said she was dealing with a 'personal matter' when asked about her tears. Mr Starmer, who stumbled on his way out of Downing Street for Prime Minister's Questions, faced questions over his handling of a welfare reform package, which has been stripped of key elements to limit the scale of a Labour revolt. Changes to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip) were abandoned on Tuesday, just 90 minutes before MPs voted on them, wiping out the savings that Ms Reeves had counted on to help meet her goal of funding day-to-day spending through tax receipts rather than borrowing. As Ms Reeves left the Commons after Prime Minister's Questions, her sister, Ellie Reeves, took her hand in an apparent show of support. Reports suggested Ms Reeves had been involved in an altercation with Commons Speaker Lindsay Hoyle shortly before Prime Minister's Questions. Mr Hoyle was said to have censured Ms Reeves for her approach to Treasury Questions earlier in the week, and the Chancellor reportedly responded that she had been 'under so much pressure'. A spokeswoman for Mr Hoyle said: 'No comment.' Asked why Mr Starmer did not confirm in the Commons that he still had faith in Ms Reeves, his press secretary told reporters: 'He has done so repeatedly. 'The Chancellor is going nowhere. She has the prime minister's full backing. 'He has said it plenty of times, he doesn't need to repeat it every time the Leader of the Opposition speculates about Labour politicians.' Asked whether Ms Starmer still had confidence in Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall, the press secretary said: 'Yes.' Labour has promised that income tax, employee national insurance contributions and VAT will not be increased, restricting Ms Reeves's options for raising money if she does look to hike taxes. The Institute for Fiscal Studies's incoming director, Helen Miller, said: 'Since departmental spending plans are now effectively locked in, and the Government has already had to row back on planned cuts to pensioner benefits and working-age benefits, tax rises would look increasingly likely. 'This will doubtless intensify the speculation over the summer about which taxes may rise and by how much.' Mr Starmer declined to rule out tax rises later this year, telling MPs: 'No prime minister or chancellor ever stands at the despatch box and writes budgets in the future.' Read More Europe's heatwave moves east as row erupts in France over air conditioning
The Journal
a day ago
- The Journal
Labour Chancellor Rachel Reeves in tears after criticism over major welfare reform u-turn
LABOUR CHANCELLOR RACHEL Reeves appeared to cry in the Commons this afternoon as British prime minister Keir Starmer declined to guarantee she would remain in place until the election. Starmer faced MPs at Prime Minister's Question after being forced to scrap key planks of his welfare reforms. The welfare u-turn has left an almost £5 billion (€5.8b) black hole in Reeves's spending plans and has fuelled speculation she could be forced to hike taxes. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch said Reeves looked 'absolutely miserable' and challenged Starmer to say whether the Chancellor would keep her job until the next election. Watch as Chancellor Rachel Reeves sheds tears during Prime Minister's Questions 📽️ — The National (@ScotNational) July 2, 2025 Starmer dodged the question about whether Reeves would be in place for the remainder of the UK Parliament, saying Badenoch 'certainly won't'. The Tory leader said: 'How awful for the Chancellor that he couldn't confirm that she would stay in place.' Despite Starmer not backing her in the Commons, Downing Street insisted she was 'going nowhere' and had the prime minister's 'full backing'. Asked about Reeves's tears, a spokesman for the Chancellor said it was a 'personal matter'. Welfare u-turn Welfare spending in the UK stood at £40billion before the Covid pandemic but is projected to skyrocket to £100 billion by 2030. In March, reforms to the UK's welfare system – aimed at encouraging more people off sickness benefits and into work – were announced. The aim was to make welfare savings of £4.8 billion by 2029-30. But yesterday, Starmer was forced to abandon a key plank of his welfare reform package in the face of a Labour rebellion. Advertisement The climbdown came just 90 minutes before MPs were due to vote for the first time on the Universal Credit and Personal Independence Payment (Pip) Bill. Universal Credit is a means-tested benefit that replaced and combined six 'legacy' benefits – it is paid to those looking for work, unable to work due to illness or disability, those on a low income or those with caring responsibilities. Meanwhile, Pip is a payment for people who have extra care needs or mobility needs as a result of a disability. With around 1,000 new Pip awards every day, the UK Government argued the current situation was unsustainable. Proposals to cut the health element of universal credit by almost 50% for most new claimants from April 2026 remains in place following yesterday's u-turn. However, the UK Government shelved plans to restrict eligibility for the Pip and any changes will now only come after a review of the benefit, which is due to conclude in the autumn of 2026. The move caused a major headache for Reeves as the welfare squeeze was originally meant to save £4.8 billion a year, which was subsequently reduced to £2.3 billion when the Bill was first watered down last week. But after another concession yesterday, it is uncertain how much the reforms will save from the soaring welfare bill, if anything. Indeed, the Resolution Foundation think tank suggested the concessions meant there would now be no 'net savings' from the reform by the end of the decade. The Bill changed so much in the interim that MPs questioned if there was even any point in voting on it. Tory leader Kemi Badenoch accused Labour of 'utter capitulation' and said the legislation was now 'pointless'. She said: 'They should bin it, do their homework, and come back with something serious. Starmer cannot govern.' A previous effort to kill the Bill had attracted more than 120 Labour supporters, but was dropped after the first partial u-turn on the legislation last week. And in yesterday's vote, Starmer faced a revolt of almost 50 MPs despite the changes, with the legislation clearing its first parliamentary hurdle by 335 votes to 260, a majority of 75. -With additional reporting by Diarmuid Pepper
