Maxwell Hairston lawsuit: Bills rookie sued for sexual assault
"Plaintiff inquired about the purpose of Defendant's visit, to which Defendant responded that he wanted to hang out with Plaintiff. Plaintiff declined and further expressed that she was tired and going to bed before turning around and walking away from the door," according to the lawsuit.
The lawsuit states that Hairston followed the woman into her bedroom and ignored her repeated refusals to engage in sexual contact. Hairston then forcibly removed the woman's pajama shorts and sexually assaulted her, the suit states.
"Our client showed remarkable strength in coming forward, and we are proud to stand with her in pursuit of accountability and justice," said Peter Flowers, one of the women's attorneys. "No one - regardless of their status or athletic success - is above the law."
Hairston was selected with the 30th overall pick by the Bills in April's draft. When asked about Hairston, Bills general manager Brandon Beane said that the draft pick was properly vetted.
"We did a lot of research. I think all teams were aware of the Title IX thing. That was fully investigated by the school. He even volunteered to do a polygraph and had notes. It was one of those where there was zero information saying that this actually happened, to what the accusation was. You can't take someone's account and think that's the truth. But yes, we fully investigated that," Beane said. "Every person you talk to at Kentucky, teammates, staff there, plus what we've done, I would say this is a heck of a young man, every person you ask. That's unfortunate when things like that are attached to someone's name; in this case, it doesn't seem to be anything there."
The woman, who is seeking a jury trial and compensatory damages on all counts, reported the incident to law enforcement and transferred out of the University of Kentucky.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
3 hours ago
- NBC News
Kilmar Abrego Garcia suffered psychological and physical torture in El Salvador prison, attorneys say
Kilmar Abrego Garcia was stripped naked, had his head shaved, beaten, forced to kneel for hours overnight, and lost over 30 pounds during his time at the notorious CECOT prison in El Salvador, his attorneys say in a new court filing. Abrego, of Maryland, was deported to El Salvador in March by the Trump administration in an "administrative error" and was returned to the U.S. in June to face federal charges. At the time of his removal from the U.S., Abrego was protected from deportation by a 2019 court order. His high-profile case was pushed into the national spotlight, sparking heated debate over Trump's immigration crackdown and the race to deport people, at times without due process. Abrego was deported on March 15 to El Salvador and placed into CECOT, a mega prison and terrorism confinement center known for brutal and harsh conditions. There, he was allegedly subjected to severe beatings, sleep deprivation, inadequate nutrition, and psychological torture, his attorneys said in an amended complaint filed Wednesday. That complaint is part of a federal lawsuit filed by Abego's wife against the Trump administration in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland. The complaint states that upon arrival at CECOT, Abrego was forced to strip, issued prison clothing, kicked in the legs with boots, and struck on his head and arms to change faster. His head was also allegedly shaved, and he was frog-marched to a cell while being hit with wooden batons. The following day, he had "visible bruises and lumps all over his body," the complaint said. In that cell, he and 20 other Salvadorans "were forced to kneel from approximately 9 p.m. to 6 a.m., with guards striking anyone who fell from exhaustion," the filing said. During that time, Abrego was denied bathroom access and soiled himself, according to the complaint. The inmates were confined to metal bunks with no mattresses in overcrowded cells without windows and bright lights that stayed on 24 hours a day, the complaint says. While there, prison officials repeatedly told Abrego that "they would transfer him to cells containing gang members who, they assured him, would 'tear' him apart," the complaint says. The attorneys said Abrego observed prisoners violently harm each other without intervention. "Screams from nearby cells would similarly ring out throughout the night without any response from prison guards or personnel," the complaint says. In his first two weeks, he lost 31 pounds. On April 9, the complaint says Abrego and four others were transferred to a different module in CECOT. But the next day, he was transferred alone to the Centro Industrial prison facility in Santa Ana, El Salvador. Throughout his time in El Salvador, his lawyers say Abrego was denied any communications with his family and access to counsel until Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) visited him on April 17. The Supreme Court ruled in April that his removal was 'illegal' and determined that a judge's order for the administration to facilitate his return was proper. Abrego was ultimately returned to the U.S. on June 6, following a contentious back-and-forth between the court and the Trump administration that raised concerns about defiance of the judicial branch. The government has repeatedly accused the 29-year-old of being involved with the gang MS-13 — claims Abrego's family and attorneys have denied. His attorneys say Abrego, who is from El Salvador, left the country when he was around 16 years old to flee gang violence. In 2011, Abrego entered the U.S. without inspection and stayed in Maryland, where his older brother, a U.S. citizen, lived, the complaint said. In the Wednesday filing, attorneys for the Abrego family ask Judge Paula Xinis to rule that over the course of this entire ordeal — from the time he was picked up in that Maryland parking lot to when he was returned to the US — the government violated laws, and his Fifth Amendment right to due process. They also want Abrego returned to Maryland and, separately, want a habeas corpus hearing held in Maryland. When Abrego returned last month, the Justice Department said he would face human smuggling charges in Tennessee. He is accused of transporting people not legally in the U.S. within the country. He allegedly participated in a conspiracy over nine years to move people from Texas deeper into the country, including members of MS-13, the Trump administration said. Abrego's wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, has insisted that he was not involved in criminal activity. "Kilmar worked in construction and sometimes transported groups of workers between job sites, so it's entirely plausible he would have been pulled over while driving with others in the vehicle," his wife previously said in a statement. "He was not charged with any crime or cited for any wrongdoing" at the time. The family's attorney, Chris Newman, previously said the Trump administration's efforts are part of a "campaign of disinformation, defamation against Kilmar and his family."
The Herald Scotland
10 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Lia Thomas vs. $175M: Why Penn struck a deal with Trump
More: Reaction mixed at UPenn to transgender swimmer Lia Thomas' records being rescinded The trio was celebrating a controversial announcement made by the Education Department earlier in the day: The University of Pennsylvania, an Ivy League school in Philadelphia, agreed to work with the federal government to resolve an investigation into its campus. As part of the deal, the university sent apology letters to female swimmers who competed alongside Lia Thomas, a transgender former student who won a national title while competing for the school in 2022. Read more: Lia Thomas records erasure illustrates NCAA transgender policy change In 2022, trans rights advocates celebrated the moment as historic. Many conservatives have since criticized Thomas' win, arguing she had an unfair competitive advantage. Penn also said this week it would bar trans athletes from participating in women's sports. That change had no immediate effect, though, since Penn no longer has any athletes who are trans women. Following an order by President Donald Trump that such participation was illegal, no university in the National Collegiate Athletic Association has allowed student-athletes who aren't assigned female at birth to compete in women's sports. Read more: NCAA updates transgender athlete participation policy after Trump executive order In exchange for Penn's concessions, the Trump administration took a step it has rarely taken since the government began targeting elite colleges: It lifted a pause on a multimillion-dollar chunk of Penn's federal funding, which had been frozen for months. Some condemned the accord as another political assault on higher education. Others hailed it as a win for female athletes. Trump v. higher ed: University of Virginia president to step down after pressure from DOJ The education secretary seemed to view it as a blueprint for colleges that decide that working with the Trump administration is in their best interest. "We hope that that agreement is going to be a template for other universities who acknowledge that there is no room for men in women's sports," she said on Fox. March: $175 million frozen In March, the federal government suspended roughly $175 million in contracts to Penn, alleging the university had violated Title IX, the primary law governing sex discrimination at schools, when it allowed Thomas to compete. It wasn't long before professors started receiving stop-work orders on a wide array of projects. Research on preventing hospital-acquired infections, drug screening for deadly viruses and protecting against chemical warfare ground to a halt, the university said at the time. The effects were immediately harmful, said J. Larry Jameson, Penn's president. "Federal funding freezes and cancellations jeopardize lifesaving and life-improving research, the loss of which will be felt by society and individuals far beyond our campus for years to come," he said in a public statement on March 25. That funding will now start flowing again, according to Madison Biedermann, an Education Department spokeswoman. In a new statement on July 1, the university's president called the issue "complex" and said he was glad to have reached a resolution with the government. "Our commitment to ensuring a respectful and welcoming environment for all of our students is unwavering," he said. "At the same time, we must comply with federal requirements, including executive orders, and NCAA eligibility rules, so our teams and student-athletes may engage in competitive intercollegiate sports." 'Negotiation' or 'extortion'? Some higher education leaders criticized Penn's agreement as unnecessary capitulation. Todd Wolfson, president of the American Association of University Professors, called it "negotiation in the face of extortion." What Penn did sent a harmful message to trans students on campus, he said. "At a meta level, universities can't sell out trans people to satisfy the ideological demands of a thug," he said. Amanda Shanor, an associate professor at the Wharton School, said students have been divided over whether Penn's decision was the right one. The day after the announcement, she felt a sense of "sadness and rage" among faculty like herself. "Are they going to leave Penn alone after this?" she said. "I don't know." Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @
The Herald Scotland
10 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Maxwell Hairston lawsuit: Bills rookie sued for sexual assault
The lawsuit, filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky and obtained by USA TODAY Sports, alleges on the night of March 24, 2021, Hairston came to the women's dorm room uninvited. She says she first met Hairston earlier in 2021 outside their shared on-campus residence hall at the University of Kentucky. "Plaintiff inquired about the purpose of Defendant's visit, to which Defendant responded that he wanted to hang out with Plaintiff. Plaintiff declined and further expressed that she was tired and going to bed before turning around and walking away from the door," according to the lawsuit. The lawsuit states that Hairston followed the woman into her bedroom and ignored her repeated refusals to engage in sexual contact. Hairston then forcibly removed the woman's pajama shorts and sexually assaulted her, the suit states. "Our client showed remarkable strength in coming forward, and we are proud to stand with her in pursuit of accountability and justice," said Peter Flowers, one of the women's attorneys. "No one - regardless of their status or athletic success - is above the law." Hairston was selected with the 30th overall pick by the Bills in April's draft. When asked about Hairston, Bills general manager Brandon Beane said that the draft pick was properly vetted. "We did a lot of research. I think all teams were aware of the Title IX thing. That was fully investigated by the school. He even volunteered to do a polygraph and had notes. It was one of those where there was zero information saying that this actually happened, to what the accusation was. You can't take someone's account and think that's the truth. But yes, we fully investigated that," Beane said. "Every person you talk to at Kentucky, teammates, staff there, plus what we've done, I would say this is a heck of a young man, every person you ask. That's unfortunate when things like that are attached to someone's name; in this case, it doesn't seem to be anything there." The woman, who is seeking a jury trial and compensatory damages on all counts, reported the incident to law enforcement and transferred out of the University of Kentucky.
