
Republicans hound Hochul in DC
Or at least they tried.
The two GOP members of Congress eyeing Hochul's seat in 2026 — upstate Rep. Elise Stefanik and Hudson Valley Rep. Mike Lawler — volunteered to join a House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform to question the Democratic governor they may challenge one year from now.
Stefanik used her time to ask Hochul if she knew who Sakir Akkan, Sebastian Zapeta-Calil, Raymond Rojas Basilio and Wilson Castillo Diaz were. Each name was an undocumented immigrant accused of a crime.
'We deserve a governor who stands up for law-abiding New Yorkers, doesn't put illegals first, but actually puts New Yorkers first,' Stefanik said from the dais today.
With each name Stefanik listed, Hochul, furtively, pleaded ignorance.
'I don't have the details on every single person in a state of 20 million people,' Hochul said at one point during the hearing, when Ohio GOP Rep. Jim Jordan picked up where Stefanik left off and listed the name of another undocumented immigrant accused of a crime. (Spoiler alert: Hochul did not know that name, either)
While the back-and-forth wasn't pretty, Hochul largely avoided the type of bite-sized moments of Congressional upbraiding that go viral on social media.
'Rather than going after the viral moment, I suggest you look at the facts,' the governor said during the hearing, to an unrelenting Stefanik.
And her team celebrated it as a win: 'Elise Stefanik's attempt at going viral went about as well as her failed UN ambassador stint,' state Democratic party spokesperson Addison Dick said. 'Stefanik is all talk — she knows nothing about how to keep New Yorkers safe.'
Stefanik, an ally of President Donald Trump, has been making moves that would indicate an interest in ousting Hochul from the Executive Mansion, including a recent trip to the state Capitol to decry her as the 'worst governor in America.'
Lawler, who will face a tough reelection challenge in his district if he doesn't run for governor, will likely be questioning Hochul later this evening.
While Hochul spent the day attempting to ward off her potential 2026 rivals — and other Republicans like Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene — she faced another onslaught from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Trump announced he is suing Hochul — again — for state policies that his administration says prevent federal immigration authorities from making immigration arrests at New York courthouses.
The lawsuit comes after ICE officials have arrested undocumented immigrants who show up to courthouses for immigration hearings.
'Lawless sanctuary city policies are the root cause of the violence that Americans have seen in California, and New York State is similarly employing sanctuary city policies to prevent illegal aliens from apprehension,' Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement. 'This latest lawsuit in a series of sanctuary city litigation underscores the Department of Justice's commitment to keeping Americans safe and aggressively enforcing the law.' — Jason Beeferman
FROM THE CAMPAIGN TRAIL
YOU'VE GOT ('BLATANTLY ISLAMOPHOBIC') MAIL: A proposed mailer from a pro-Cuomo super PAC appeared to thicken mayoral rival Zohran Mamdani's beard — sparking online outrage from his supporters and leading the Muslim lawmaker to slam the incident as islamophobic.
The mailer, which clearly enlarges Mamdani's beard, was never sent out, according to Liz Benjamin, a super PAC spokesperson.
She said the PAC quickly rejected the draft mailer.
'The mailer was proposed by a vendor; upon review it was immediately rejected for production and was subsequently corrected,' she said. 'We are disturbed that this was posted online without our consent.'
The proposed mailer came to light after it was posted on X from Forward reporter Jacob Kornbluh.
Nevertheless an executive for DoorDash — the super PAC's top funder — issued a statement distancing the company from the rejected design and attacking Mamdani for his outrage.
'The Mamdani campaign knows full well DoorDash doesn't make creative decisions for Fix the City, definitely doesn't design mailers, and obviously doesn't condone Islamophobia. We are glad to hear that this design was rejected. This is a cynical attempt to create a controversy where one doesn't exist,' said John Horton, head of North America public policy for DoorDash.
Cuomo's campaign said through spokesperson Rich Azzopardi that 'it's absurd and disrespectful for anyone to attempt to distort anyone else's image in campaign material — period.'
The Mamdani campaign said the Cuomo super PAC was 'trying to buy this election through fear-mongering and ignorance.'
'Thickening and darkening my beard — playing into racist tropes — was meant to make me look threatening, because Andrew Cuomo and the donors propping up his flailing campaign are scared,' the candidate said in a statement. 'This same breed of attacks was lodged against President Barack Obama when he too built a movement based on hope rather than fear. And like President Obama, we will rise above it.'
During Cuomo's 2018 campaign for governor, Cuomo said the state Democratic party — which he controlled — made a 'mistake' when it sent out a mailer linking his Democratic rival Cynthia Nixon to antisemitism and inaccurately stating her position on Israel.
'The mailer was a mistake,' he said at the time. 'I said that as soon as it came to light and as soon as I saw it. The tone was not appropriate.' In this case, the mailer was sent by a committee that is legally barred from coordinating with the campaign it's boosting. — Jason Beeferman
TISCH TOCK: Members of the wealthy Tisch family this week contributed $50,000 each to a super PAC supporting Andrew Cuomo's mayoral bid.
Andrew Tisch, Jonathan Tisch, Ann Rubenstein Tisch and Elizabeth Tisch made the donations, according to state Board of Elections filings. The PAC has raised more than $13.2 million since it was formed in March, making it the best-funded super PAC in city history. Donors include well-heeled executives from finance and real estate as well as Trump-supporting figures like Bill Ackman.
The Tisch donations are notable given that their relative, Jessica Tisch, serves as Mayor Eric Adams' police commissioner. Cuomo has praised Tisch's handling of the job, but has not publicly committed to keeping her if he becomes mayor. — Nick Reisman
LANDER'S LAVISH SPENDING: City Comptroller Brad Lander, still polling in a distant third place in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor, touted his endorsement today by a panel convened by The New York Times as vindication for his campaign's high spend rate.
As POLITICO recently reported, Lander has spent nearly $1 million more than his leading rivals.
The city's financial manager said his campaign's burn rate was money well spent.
Citing his strong showing with the panel, Lander said, 'that says to me that we're running a campaign that's gotten our information out well, and that this set of people have concluded, based on what they've seen, that I would be the best candidate for mayor.'
In a break from tradition, The New York Times opted not to endorse in the local race to pick the Democratic nominee seeking to oust Adams and instead convened a group of New Yorkers to offer their assessments of the candidates. Lander got by far the most support — seven people picked him as their top choice, compared to two for Cuomo, who is leading the race.
With $2.8 million left in the bank as of the latest filing period, Lander said his campaign plans to integrate the newspaper's recommendation into his soon-to-air advertisements.
'It makes sense to me that we would have spent most of our money on the [you know] nearly a year I've been running, and that we've got plenty left to get our message out over the next few days,' he added at today's press conference, held to tout the new support.
With 10 days left in what he termed a 'three man race' — between himself and frontrunners Cuomo and Mamdani — Lander said he will use tonight's debate to zero in on the sexual harassment allegations leveled against the former governor. Cuomo denies the allegations, which were included in a report from the state attorney general that precipitated his resignation in 2021. — Amira McKee
From City Hall
EXTRA PICKLES: A grand jury is still meeting in the bribery and conspiracy case against Ingrid Lewis-Martin, Manhattan prosecutors said today.
The revelation means that more evidence or even new charges could come to light that would further imperil Adams' former top confidante.
'This grand jury investigation is still ongoing,' Assistant District Attorney Kenneth Moore Jr. said during a virtual status hearing.
Moore was referring to a ruling that restricted access to sensitive discovery material. He planned to request an extension of that protective order until Sept. 1, suggesting the grand jury might conclude its work by then.
In December, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg charged Lewis-Martin, her son and two real estate executives with bribery and conspiracy in a case that involved accusations of official government favors proffered in exchange for cash gifts and assistance setting up a Chick-fil-A franchise. All have pleaded not guilty.
Lewis-Martin abruptly resigned days before the charges were unveiled. — Joe Anuta
IN OTHER NEWS
— MAMDANI IN YIDDISH: The mayoral candidate gave an interview to a Yiddish-language newspaper where he said he will work to protect the Jewish community from antisemitism. (The Forward)
— 'FUCKING STOP IT, LAWLER!': Democratic Syracuse Rep. John Mannion appeared to scream at Lawler in the House chamber, causing a hush among the other lawmakers as he told the Republican lawmaker to 'get some fucking balls.' (WATCH)
— SUOZZI FOR CUOMO: Long Island Democratic Rep. Tom Suozzi endorsed Cuomo for mayor. (New York Post)
Missed this morning's New York Playbook? We forgive you. Read it here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Post office in Plains, Georgia, to be renamed to honor Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter
A small-town post office is about to see a big change. The post office in Plains, Georgia — home to just over 500 people — is set to be renamed in honor of the town's most famous residents: the late former President Jimmy Carter and First Lady Rosalynn Carter. The Plains Post Office will be renamed the Jimmy and Rosalynn Carter Post Office on Wednesday after Congress passed a bill last year implementing the change. The post office's new name will be celebrated with a ceremony at the Plains Community Center. "This dedication ceremony will celebrate the Carters' significant contributions to society, and the building will serve as a lasting symbol of their legacy and inspire future generations to engage in service and advocacy for those in need," the Post Office said in a statement, according to Fox 5 Atlanta. The former president grew up in Plains and returned there after losing his reelection bid in 1980. The Carters are buried on the grounds of the former president's childhood home and farm, which has since been preserved as a national historical park. The couple's son, James 'Chip' Carter III, is expected to attend the Wednesday celebration. Rosalynn Carter's sister, Lillian Allethea Smith Wall, is also set to make an appearance, according to local outlet 11Alive. Georgia Representative Sanford Bishop introduced a bill to rename the post office in September. Georgia Senators Jon Ossoff and Raphael Warnock seconded the bill. "Renaming the post office in Plains, Georgia, in honor of President Jimmy Carter and First Lady Rosalynn Carter is a tribute to their lifelong service," Ossoff said at the time. "The Carters have left an indelible mark on our nation and the world. A post office named in their honor in Plains is a small but fitting tribute to their legacy." The former president died at 100 in December 2024, one month before the bill was signed into law. The former first lady died at 96 in November 2023. Jimmy Carter, a Democrat, served in the White House from 1977 to 1981. He is known for both his political career, and humanitarian service after leaving Washington, including building homes for Habitat for Humanity. Former President Joe Biden hailed Jimmy Carter's 'strength of character' as he delivered his eulogy in January. 'A white southern Baptist who led us on civil rights, a decorated Navy veteran who brokered peace, a brilliant nuclear engineer who led on nuclear nonproliferation, a hard-working farmer who championed conservation and clean energy ... through it all, he showed us how character and faith start with ourselves and then flows to others,' Biden said of the former president.


New York Post
42 minutes ago
- New York Post
Paramount, CBS forced to pay eight-figures, change editorial policy in settlement with Trump
Paramount Global and CBS agreed on Tuesday to pay President Donald Trump a sum that could reach north of $30 million to settle the president's election interference lawsuit against the network. Trump will receive $16 million upfront. This will cover legal fees, costs of the case, and contributions to his library or charitable causes, to be determined at Trump's discretion. Advertisement There is an expectation that there will be another allocation in the mid-eight figures set aside for advertisements, public service announcements, or other similar transmissions, in support of conservative causes by the network, Fox News Digital has learned. Sources close to the situation told Fox News Digital that CBS has agreed to update its editorial standards to install a mandatory new rule. Going forward, the network will promptly release full, unedited transcripts of future presidential candidates' interviews. People involved in the settlement talks have referred to this as the 'Trump Rule.' Trump was seeking $20 billion in his lawsuit against CBS over its handling of a '60 Minutes' interview last year with then-Vice President Kamala Harris, accusing the network of election interference leading up to the 2024 contest. CBS is not acknowledging any journalistic wrongdoing with the settlement. Advertisement 4 President Donald Trump boards Air Force One at Joint Base Andrews on July 1, 2025. REUTERS The lawsuit alleged CBS News deceitfully edited an exchange Harris had with '60 Minutes' correspondent Bill Whitaker, who asked her why Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu wasn't 'listening' to the Biden administration. Harris was widely mocked for the 'word salad' answer that aired in a preview clip of the interview on CBS' 'Face the Nation.' However, when the same question aired during a primetime special on the network, Harris had a different, more concise response. Critics at the time accused CBS News of deceitfully editing Harris' 'word salad' answer to shield the Democratic nominee from further backlash leading up to Election Day. Advertisement The raw transcript and footage released earlier this year by the FCC showed that both sets of Harris' comments came from the same response, but CBS News had aired only the first half of her response in the 'Face the Nation' preview clip and aired the second half during the primetime special. 4 Vice President Kamala Harris during her '60 Minutes' interview. 60 Minutes / CBS 4 '60 Minutes' Bill Whitaker interviews Vice President Kamala Harris for the show's election special. 60 Minutes / CBS CBS News had long denied any wrongdoing and stood by the broadcast and its reporting. Advertisement Paramount and Trump's legal team had agreed to mediation designed to help the sides reach a settlement. It was widely believed that Paramount Global controlling shareholder Shari Redstone wanted to settle the suit ahead of a planned multi-billion-dollar merger with Skydance Media in hopes of preventing potential retribution by Trump's FCC, which has the authority to halt the transaction. Trump confidently declared the case against CBS a 'winner' in April. 'They cheated and defrauded the American People at levels never seen before in the Political Arena. Kamala Harris, during Early Voting and, immediately before Election Day, was asked a question, and gave an answer, that was so bad and incompetent that it would have cost her many of the Votes that she ended up getting,' Trump posted on Truth Social ahead of mediation, going on to accuse the newsmagazine of perpetrating a fraud on the American people. Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and eight Democratic colleagues sent a letter to Redstone in May asking her not to settle the lawsuit against CBS News, which they called an 'attack on the First Amendment.' They called the potential settlement a 'grave mistake' and 'a blatant attempt to intimidate the media and those who speak out against him, President Trump.' 4 The Parmount and CBS News signs outside the company's building of One Astor Plaza in New York on June 13, 2025. Christopher Sadowski The letter also stated 'presidents do not get to punish or censor the media for criticizing them' in the United States. Earlier this year, FCC Chair Brendan Carr ordered CBS News to hand over the unedited transcript as part of its probe into whether the network violated the FCC's 'news distortion' policy after a complaint was filed. CBS had refused to release the unedited transcript until the FCC got involved. Trump's attorneys amended their lawsuit to include multiple excerpts from the unedited transcript in hopes of bolstering their case that CBS News withheld unflattering exchanges in order to help the Democratic nominee. Advertisement The saga emerged as a distraction inside CBS News and longtime '60 Minutes' executive producer Bill Owens walked away from the job in April because he wasn't able to make the 'independent decisions' needed for the program to thrive. Owens, who had insisted CBS did nothing wrong with the Harris edit, was vehemently against offering any sort of apology to the president. CBS News President and CEO Wendy McMahon, who is believed to have been against settling with Trump, announced on May 19 that she was stepping down in another stunning move for the embattled company. 'It's become clear that the company and I do not agree on the path forward. It's time for me to move on and for this organization to move forward with new leadership,' McMahon told staffers in a memo that was obtained by Fox News Digital. Advertisement ABC also settled a defamation lawsuit in December with then-President-elect Trump for $15 million, after anchor George Stephanopoulos repeatedly and incorrectly asserted Trump had been found 'liable for rape' in a civil trial last year. Fox News Digital's Brooke Singman contributed to this report.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump keeps saying the GOP mega bill will eliminate taxes on Social Security. It does not
WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald Trump keeps saying that Republicans' mega tax and spending cut legislation will eliminate taxes on federal Social Security benefits. It does not. At best, Trump's 'no tax on Social Security' claim exaggerates the benefits to seniors if either the House or Senate-passed proposals is signed into law. Here's a look at Trump's recent statements, and what the proposals would — or would not — do. What Trump has said Trump repeatedly told voters during his 2024 campaign that he would eliminate taxes on Social Security. As his massive legislative package has moved through Congress, the Republican president has claimed that's what the bill would do. Trump said on a recent appearance on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures" that the bill includes 'no tax on tips, no tax on Social Security, no tax on overtime.' A temporary tax deduction But instead of eliminating the tax, the Senate and House have each passed their own versions of a temporary tax deduction for seniors aged 65 and over, which applies to all income — not just Social Security. And it turns out not all Social Security beneficiaries will be able to claim the deduction. Those who won't be able to do so include the lowest-income seniors who already don't pay taxes on Social Security, those who choose to claim their benefits before they reach age 65 and those above a defined income threshold. The Senate proposal includes a temporary $6,000 deduction for seniors over the age of 65, contrasted with the House proposal, which includes a temporary deduction of $4,000. The Senate proposal approved Tuesday would eliminate Social Security tax liability for seniors with adjusted gross incomes of $75,000 or less or $150,000 if filing as a married couple. If passed into law, the tax deduction would last four years, from 2025 to 2029. The deductions phase out as income increases. White House touts impact Touting a new Council of Economic Advisers analysis, the White House said Tuesday that '88% of all seniors who receive Social Security — will pay NO TAX on their Social Security benefits," going on to say that the Senate proposal's $6,000 senior deduction 'is estimated to benefit 33.9 million seniors, including seniors not claiming Social Security. The deduction yields an average increase in after-tax income of $670 per senior who benefits from it.' Garrett Watson, director of policy analysis at the Tax Foundation think tank, said conflating the tax deduction with a claim that there will be no tax on Social Security could end up confusing and angering a lot of seniors who will expect to not pay taxes on their Social Security benefits. 'While the deduction does provide some relief for seniors, it's far from completely repealing the tax on their benefits,' Watson said. Economic effect The cost of actually eliminating the tax on Social Security would have massive impacts on the economy. University of Pennsylvania's Penn Wharton Budget Model estimates that eliminating income taxes on Social Security benefits 'would reduce revenues by $1.5 trillion over 10 years and increase federal debt by 7 percent by 2054" and speed up the projected depletion date of the Social Security Trust Fund from 2034 to 2032. Discussions over taxes on Social Security are just part of the overall bill, which is estimated in its Senate version to increase federal deficits over the next 10 years by nearly $3.3 trillion from 2025 to 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Administration officials have said the cost of the tax bill would be offset by tariff income. Recently, the CBO separately estimated that Trump's sweeping tariff plan would cut deficits by $2.8 trillion over a 10-year period while shrinking the economy, raising the inflation rate and reducing the purchasing power of households overall. Fatima Hussein, The Associated Press