Moment French coastguard hand out lifejackets to migrants on small boat as they prepare to cross the Channel for Britain
The coastguard made no effort to stop the inflatable boat before it motored off towards the UK with mainly young men on board near Calais this morning.
The embarrassing footage is yet another humiliation for Sir Keir Starmer as record numbers are crossing the Channel illegally to claim asylum in the UK and he heralded a 'one in one out' deal with France.
It came days after Emmanuel Macron promised a tougher approach was afforded a three-day state visit by King Charles including a lavish state banquet at Windsor Castle.
But this doesn't appear to have been passed on to those policing the French coast.
Today the French authorities approached an overcrowded dinghy that had just set off from the beach at Petit-Fort-Philippe in Gravelines, near Calais.
But instead of turning the perilously full boat around, police came alongside in relatively shallow water and began passing those on board lifejackets.
The dinghy then motored off towards the UK.
No police were seen on the beach when the groups of people came out of the sand dunes and attempted to board the black inflatable boat.
Witnesses saw one boat drop off several men at around 5am, who went into the sand dunes, before a second boat came close to shore, circling until the migrants appeared on the beach.
The people, including a family with two children, put themselves into groups before trying to climb onto the boat.
Around 40 people, believed to be about half of the full group, left on the dinghy.
Last week more than 500 small boat migrants arrived in Britain on the day Sir Keir Starmer signed his 'one in, one out' deal with Emmanuel Macron.
The figures were yet another blow to the Labour leader as the number of crossings over the year so far rose to 21,690, which is more than a 50 per cent higher than 2024.
It came as a pact was agreed by the PM and Mr Macron during his state visit to the UK is already unravelling.
There are questions over whether the scheme - which would see Britain send some Channel arrivals back but agree to take other asylum seekers from France - could even be blocked by the EU Commission.
Unveiling the plan alongside Mr Macron, Sir Keir claimed it was 'ground-breaking' and would 'prove the concept that if you come over by small boats, then you will be returned to France '.
But as the Anglo-French summit was being held, hundreds more migrants were crossing the Channel from northern France. Border experts said the proposals were 'scratching a very bare minimum of the surface'.
Leaks had suggested 50 migrants a week, around one in 17 arrivals, would be sent back to France initially. But that was seemingly not signed off by the leaders.
Touring broadcast studios this morning, Ms Cooper said: 'The numbers are not fixed, even for this pilot phase that we are starting now.
'So this will be a programme that we roll out step-by-step, and we will provide updates as we go.
'But we are going to do this in a steady way.'
Despite signs EU states could object to the UK-France deal, Ms Cooper told LBC she was confident Brussels would let it go ahead.
'We have been talking to the EU commissioners. We've also been talking to other European interior ministers and governments throughout this process,' she said.
'The French interior minister and I have been speaking about this to develop this since October of last year, and the EU commissioners have been very supportive.
'So that is why we have designed this in a way to work, not just for the UK and France, but in order to fit with all their concerns as well.'
She added: 'Because we've done that work all the way through, we do expect the EU Commission to continue to be supportive.'
Ms Cooper also played down Mr Macron's jibe that Brexit had made tackling illegal immigration harder, arguing people smugglers would 'weaponise anything'.
Downing Street said the UK is 'confident' the agreement complies with both domestic and international law and has discussed the plans with Brussels.
The PM's spokesman said: 'We've done a lot of work to make sure the system is robust to legal challenges, and of course, France is a safe country and a member of the ECHR.
'We're confident that this arrangement complies with both domestic and international law, and clearly… we've discussed these arrangements already with the (European) Commission.'
Sir Keir is holding talks with his Cabinet at an 'away day' at Chequers, his grace-and-favour Chequers country estate.
Sir Keir said the governments were taking 'hard-headed, aggressive action'.
'For the very first time, migrants arriving via small boat will be detained and returned to France in short order,' he said.
In exchange for every return, a different individual will be allowed to come here via a safe route, controlled and legal, subject to strict security checks and only open to those who have not tried to enter the UK illegally.'
But the PM failed to say how quickly migrants will be sent back in total or on a weekly basis when the scheme launches, which he said would be in the 'coming weeks'.
Mr Macron said the deal needed legal ratification first, without putting a time frame on it.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
22 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Now Edinburgh Zoo caught up in 'transgendering' row over links with controversial group
Edinburgh Zoo is at the centre of a growing row over its links with a controversial gay and transgender rights group which was once led by a paedophile. Bosses at the popular tourist attraction said 'engaging' with LGBT Youth Scotland (LGBTYS) provides it with access to staff equality training, as part of a drive to ensure visitors and employees 'feel safe and welcome'. It is the latest organisation to sign up to the group's charter despite accusations that it promotes radical trans 'ideology'. The Mail revealed earlier this year that Police Scotland had paid LGBTYS more than £3,500 for training courses - and for 500 'purple button badges' to show solidarity with the gay and trans community. Now a campaign group is calling for members of the Royal Zoological Society of Scotland (RZSS), a wildlife conservation charity which runs the zoo, to raise their concern with zoo managers. Dr Stuart Waiton, chairman of the Scottish Union for Education (SUE) and a sociologist at Abertay University in Dundee, said families had contacted the SUE about the 'transgendering of Edinburgh Zoo'. He said: 'Despite the Supreme Court ruling [in April] that raises questions about transgender ideology and the claim that 'sex' is not binary, we still find that organisations in Scotland are continuing to fund organisations that train their staff to believe the opposite. 'Unsurprisingly, we now find that there are families who have decades of commitment to Edinburgh Zoo but find themselves in a position where they can no longer support the work of the RZSS. 'One concerned parent has not only cancelled her membership with the zoo but has drafted a letter to encourage others to do likewise. 'As she notes, there really is nothing in the charitable objective of the RZSS that requires them to sponsor the transgender ideology of LGBTYS.' A recent SUE newsletter urges RZSS members to send a 'letter of concern' to the charity. James Rennie, the former chief executive of LGBTYS, is serving life in prison for sexually assaulting a three-month-old after being convicted in 2009 along with seven others on sex abuse charges. Andrew Easton, who co-wrote a schools guide for the youth charity, was convicted last year of sharing indecent images of children. He was never an employee or volunteer with LGBTYS but in 2009 he was a young person who attended its services. It was then that he helped to write the guide. LGBTYS has been supported by SNP ministers and receives £1million per year from taxpayer-funded organisations. Last year, Rosie Millard quit as chairman of the BBC's Children in Need charity after protesting about grants given to the charity. The Scottish Tories have said LGBTYS is 'mired in scandal' and that the SNP Government should suspend public funding from the organisation 'until it gets its act together'. Schools which signed up to the charity's scheme, for a fee normally of at least £850, were ranked on how well they catered for LGBT pupils and received guides on how best to achieve this. Secondary pupils have been encouraged to sign LGBT rainbow flags, with children asked to 'celebrate the rainbow' through the way they dress, and by decorating their schools - described by the Campaign for Real Education as 'brainwashing'. LGBTYS insists that 'with [an] increasingly toxic and polarised public debate, it's vital that all young people feel safe, supported and included'. According to LGBTYS, being accredited with its charter sends a 'positive message… that your organisation is a champion of LGBT inclusion where LGBTQ+ employees, students, customers, or service users will be safe, supported and included'. RZSS refused to say how much it has spent on the LGBTYS charter process. It is understood one RSZZ membership has been cancelled as a result of the row so far. An RZSS spokesman said: 'We are continuing to work through the charter with the aim of completing the process by the end of this year. 'Our support for the LGBTQ+ community doesn't change our mission to care for animals and protect endangered species around the world. 'It simply reflects the belief that everyone deserves to feel safe and welcome, whether visiting the zoo or working within it.'
BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
Arrests after migrant hotel protests in England
Fifteen people have been arrested after protests across England outside hotels used to house groups and counter demonstrators clashed in London and Newcastle, and before a march in Manchester city centre. Nine people were arrested in the capital, seven for breaching Public Order Act conditions, the Metropolitan Police said. In an interview with the Sunday Times, Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, says she wants to "restore order and control" to the asylum system by fast-tracking the appeals process. She told the paper changes to the way appeals on asylum are handled will take place in the autumn, adding: "If we speed up the decision-making appeal system and also then keep increasing returns, we hope to be able to make quite a big reduction in the overall numbers".The Home Office has said the number of hotels being used for asylum seekers has decreased from more than 400 in summer 2023, to less than also announced plans to end the use of hotels to house migrants by 2029, which Chancellor Rachel Reeves says will save £1bn a year. A series of protests outside the migrant hotels have been taking place in recent weeks. The protest in London on Saturday was held outside of the Thistle City Barbican Hotel in Islington, with a counter-protest led by the group Stand Up To Met said the protest was organised by local residents under the banner "Thistle Barbican needs to go - locals say no".But police said it had been "endorsed by groups from outside the local community which is likely to increase the number of people attending".The MP for Islington North, former Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn had urged people to join the police had imposed special restrictions ahead of the London demonstration, including setting out specific areas where each group had to remain. In Newcastle, a protest and counter-protest took place outside The New Bridge Hotel. Four people were arrested and remain in custody, according to Northumbria Police."The right to lawful protest is a key part of any democracy, which the police uphold," a spokesperson for the force said. "However, we will not accept people using them as a means to commit crime or disorder."About 1,500 people waved England and Union flags in a march organised by the Britain First group from Manchester Piccadilly rail station to outside the Central Library, where they held a 250 people were also estimated to be at a counter-demonstration led by the Stand up to Racism organisation, with police keeping the groups apart in St Peter's Manchester Police said that a "number of demonstrations passed by peacefully" with "no incidents of note". But two arrests were made during a confrontation at the start of the march, the statement added. One person was arrested for theft and the other for obstructing an arrest.
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Huge sum Ed Miliband's green policies will add to every family's energy bills as PM's pledge to cut costs in tatters
ED Miliband's Net Zero policies will cost every household £389 a year by 2030, Tory analysis today reveals. The Labour government has pledged to totally decarbonise Britain's energy grid within the next five years. 4 4 4 They plan to do this by splurging vast amounts on new wind and solar farms as well as banning new oil and gas drilling in the North Sea. Brits have already spent £700 million this year to pay wind farms to STOP producing energy because the National Grid cannot cope with energy surges. The government's dash to go green will send the cost of bills rocketing to a whopping £22.8 billion by 2030, Tory number crunchers say. This will leave the government's pledge to cut £300 from energy bills in tatters, according to the research. Instead it will end up adding another £389 to the cost of household bills for 27 million UK Brits. Tory MP Nick Timothy - who carried out the research - said: 'Energy becomes more expensive with each day Ed Miliband remains in office. 'While Miliband blames fossil fuels for higher bills, he is pumping up prices by throwing more government-imposed costs onto energy bills. 'Wind and solar are being propped up by a complicated web of hidden cash to hoodwink you into thinking they are cheap. But they are not. 'Renewables will cost billions more. This is Ed Miliband's world – and you're paying for it.' Sir Keir Starmer is under massive pressure to act on UK energy costs - which are some of the highest in the world. Keir Starmer's deranged drive for Net Zero with eco-zealot Ed Miliband is a threat to UK's national security- here's why In stark contrast the US - which uses more fossil fuels - has far lower prices. Donald Trump used a meeting with the PM in Scotland earlier this week to launch a blistering attack on wind farms for pushing up prices and scarring the countryside. In toe-curling scenes, the PM sat ashen-faced as the US President unleashed both barrels on his wind farm push - branding them a 'con job'. Speaking at his Turnberry golf course, Mr Trump fumed: 'Wind is the most expensive form of energy, and it destroys the beauty of your fields and your plains and your waterways.' Urging the PM to lift the ban on new oil and gas drilling, he added: 'You can take a thousand times more energy out of a hole in the ground this big - it's called oil and gas.' The analysis carried out by Mr Timothy's office looked at the hidden cost of renewable energy by trawling through official figures and research papers. It found that Brits pay billions of pounds to subsidise the building of renewable energy plants, like wind and solar. But the National Grid - which carries electricity from power plants to peoples homes - is very old and cannot cope with large surges of energy. This results in a barmy situation which means the government actually PAYS wind farms to stop turning when it is too windy. Some £700m has already been paid this year to turn wind farms off. Wind farms are also paid more for their energy than fossil fuel providers, the analysis found. Offshore wind will cost £113 per MWh under the latest contracts. The average cost of electricity last year was £72 per MWh. These direct subsidies for renewables inflate the cost of energy bills. There are also extra costs known as 'Balancing Costs' - the name given to the process the National Grid has to pay to ensure balance and supply of power is maintained daily. These charges end up being passed onto consumers in higher bills, researchers said. 4 The study found the hidden cost of renewables on our bills was £12.3BN in 2023/24. This is predicted to hit £22.8BN by 2030. This is just the estimated cost to Brits's bills over the next few years - and the overall cost of going green by 2050 is far higher. The Office for Budget Responsibility estimated it will cost a massive £803 billion to hit Net Zero by 2050. A spokesman for the department for Net Zero said: 'These claims are fundamentally misleading. 'They wilfully ignore the benefits of clean power and wrongly assume the required network infrastructure will not be built over the next five years. 'Only by sprinting to clean power by 2030 can the UK take back control of its energy and protect both family and national finances from fossil fuel price spikes.' Time to act now – or we all pay price IT was the most excruciating television I have seen in years. By Nick Timothy, Tory MP for West Suffolk Sitting next to the Prime Minister, Donald Trump said Labour's taxes on North Sea oil and gas 'make no sense' and he called Ed Miliband's wind farms a 'con job'. Keir Starmer looked like a rabbit in the headlights, because he knew what Trump said was true. The eco policies this Labour government is pursuing simply make no sense. They are spinning us a lie. The government tells us we must urgently hit Net Zero targets because the cost of fossil fuels are unaffordably high. But renewables cost more money and push up bills. They say Britain must build more wind and solar farms so we can wean ourselves of foreign gas and become energy sufficient. But at the same time No10 bans new oil and gas drilling in the North Sea - leaving us more dependent on imports. And the government tells us this dash to go green will create thousands and thousands of new jobs. Yet the trade unions who actually represent energy workers say Labour's zealous eco policies could cause tens of thousands of well-paid British workers to be laid off. It is a mad Alice in Wonderland world where down is up and up is down. Ed Miliband has gone through the Looking Glass. His policies are the stuff of the Mad Hatter. And today I can reveal that Labour's Net Zero drive will cost an estimated £23 billion a year by 2030. That is the equivalent of slapping another £389 a year onto the cost of living for households. It is a cost this country cannot afford. Let me give you a few examples to show you just how barmy our energy policy has become under 'Red Ed'. First- the oil and gas industry. Just weeks after winning the election, Labour banned new licences to drill for oil and gas in the North Sea. Furious trade unions said that up to 30,000 UK jobs could be lost, but their dire warnings fell on deaf ears. But the most ridiculous thing is that Britain still imports oil and gas taken from the very same seabed from Norway. So, Norway gets to keep the taxes, profits and jobs, while the UK goes without. It is a grotesque example of self-harm. Second - the bizarre case of the Drax power station in North Yorkshire. It imports wood from halfway around the world to burn, yet the UK taxpayer has spent billions of pounds in green subsidies on the power station. This simply makes no sense. Third - the sky high cost of wind and solar energy. Labour has set the UK insane targets to quadruple offshore wind and double onshore wind in just five years. But energy produced by these wind farms is actually MORE expensive. Ed Miliband has promised wind farms a fixed price of £113 per MWh for the next 20 years. That is 50 per cent HIGHER than the average cost of electricity. The cost of building new wind and solar farms is also enormous. An estimated £40 billion a year will be spent upgrading the National Grid, and rolling out new pylons and battery storage sites. Worst of all, wind and solar are even paid NOT to produce energy. This is because our creaking National Grid cannot handle big surges of energy. So when it is particularly windy they have to pay wind farms to switch off. This year alone we have paid £700 million to wind farms to STOP generating power. It is bananas. Brits also have to pay for environmental levies. These are extra charges baked into energy bills to pay for the development of new greener energy supplies. Labour are sending environmental levies hurtling towards £14.8 billion in 2030. The PM promised he would cut energy bills by £300 by the next election. But the opposite is true. They are getting bigger and bigger. No wonder President Trump thinks we are mad. Our energy costs are twice those in America. As a result their economy is booming while ours is stagnating. The US President could see the truth and was unafraid to say it. Britain needs to completely change course. It's time to junk the clean power target and support energy policies that actually work. We should take the US President's advice and 'drill baby drill' in the North Sea. We should expand nuclear energy. And we should ditch our expensive green energy levies and subsidies. Otherwise we remain Ed Miliband's mad world – and we will all pay the price.
