
Builder held for firing into air during birthday celebration
The accused has been identified as Dinesh Babulal Singh, 40, a resident of Thomas Colony in Mamurdi, Dehu Road. The incident reportedly occurred on Tuesday night at Vrindavan Farm House in Sus Gaon. The complaint was filed on Thursday by the caretaker of the farm house, Devram Dinesh Warma, 24.
According to the police, Dinesh had organised a birthday party at the farm house, which was attended by several of his friends and associates. In the midst of the celebrations, he allegedly took out a licensed revolver and fired two rounds into the air.
Hearing the sounds of gunfire, several residents alerted the police. A senior police inspector handling the case said, 'Firing in public places, even during celebrations, is a serious offence. The accused has been arrested under sections 110,125,351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita and section 30 of the Arms Act.'
Following the case registration, police have appealed to all citizens to refrain from celebratory firing and warned that strict legal action will be taken against those who endanger public safety.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Surat man held at Ahmedabad airport for travelling on fake passport
Ahmedabad: A Surat resident was arrested at the Ahmedabad airport on Friday for allegedly travelling on a fraudulently obtained Indian passport. Pramod Ithape, security assistant at the Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport registered a complaint against Prakashkumar Dave, a resident of Punagam in Surat. Ithape stated that on Friday, Dave, holding Indian Emergency Certificate No. X1022911 approached for immigration clearance after arriving from Berlin via Qatar on a Qatar Airways flight. The certificate had been issued in Berlin on May 27 this year and was valid until Nov 26. Ithape found no departure details against Dave's passport. When asked how he had departed from India, Dave allegedly told him that he had travelled to Paris from Delhi in Jan this year. The complainant stated that on further inquiry, Dave confessed that he had fraudulently obtained an Indian passport in the name of Rakesh Joshi, a Mumbai resident, allegedly with the help of two agents, whom he named as Mahesh and Dishu. He reportedly admitted to have travelled to Berlin on the fake passport for which he had paid the agents Rs 15 lakh. In Berlin, he had approached the Indian Embassy for the emergency certificate, claiming the loss of his original passport. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Dementia Has Been Linked To a Common Habit. Do You Do It? Memory Health Learn More Undo You Can Also Check: Ahmedabad AQI | Weather in Ahmedabad | Bank Holidays in Ahmedabad | Public Holidays in Ahmedabad Dave has been handed over to Airport police who have registered a case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Sections 319(2) (cheating by impersonation), 336(2) (forgery), 336(3) (forgery, intending that the document or electronic record forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating), 338 (forgery of valuable security, will), 340(2) (forged document or electronic record and using it as genuine), and 54 (abettor present when offence is committed) against him and the agents.


The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
Burial of bodies in Dharmastala: Complainant produces some skeletal remains
The person, who claims to have buried many persons who were murdered and raped in Dharmastala, on Friday (July 11, 2025), July 11, produced before the Principal Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate First Class, Belthangady court, some of the skeletal remains of the bodies that he claimed to have exhumed on his own. He also gave a statement before the Magistrate. In a statement here, the Dakshina Kannada district police said they seized the body parts in front of advocates representing the complainant and 'panch' witnesses. The complainant, who claims to have worked as a sanitary worker in Dharmastala between 1995 and December 2014, filed a complaint on July 3, stating that he was forced to bury many bodies in Dharmastala a decade ago. These bodies were of both men and women, who were allegedly murdered and raped. While asking police to conduct an inquiry into those deaths by exhuming the remains, the complainant sought police protection. He also offered to show police the places where he claims to have buried bodies. The bodies included those, which according to him, were murdered in a 'cruel manner' before him. After taking permission of the court, the Dharmastala police registered for offence under section 211 (a) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita on July 4. As requested by the complainant not to reveal his identity, the police did not reveal his name. The police did not post the FIR on the Karnataka Police's FIR portal. On Friday (July 11, 2025), the complainant came to the Magistrate court along with a team of advocates. A mask was placed on his face of the complainant as he entered the court. The Magistrate recorded his statement by sending advocates out from the court hall. Inquiry The police said advocates representing the complainant have posted the FIR and also released press note, which gave details including the age, nature and period of work, place of work, in the social media. These details have led to many locals, narrowing down on the identity of the complainant. This was despite the complainant seeking identity protection, which led police to maintain the identity undisclosed for all official purposes. A separate inquiry by Deputy Superintendent of Police has been initiated on the advocates of complainant. The protection of the complainant was approved by the competent authority in the district on Thursday (July 10, 2025) and it has come into immediate effect, the police stated.


India Gazette
3 hours ago
- India Gazette
Karnataka: Complainant's statement recorded in Dharmasthala Mass Burials case; granted witness protection
Dakshina Kannada (Karnataka) [India], June 12 (ANI): In a key development in the Dharmasthala Mass Burials case, the complainant's statement was recorded today by the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Belthangady Taluk, Dakshina Kannada. The statement was taken under Section 183 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNSS), which corresponds to Section 164 of the former Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). However, the process has raised concerns among the complainant's legal representatives, advocates Ojaswi Gowda and Sachin Deshpande. The advocates stated that they had 'firmly and clearly instructed' the complainant that one of them should be present during the recording of the statement. They pointed out that the complainant is 'illiterate, has never been to a Court before and had expressed serious difficulty with the process.' Despite raising these concerns and requesting to be present, the statement was recorded in their absence. 'This is for information and record,' the advocates said. In a related development, the complainant has been granted protection under the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018. A formal communication in this regard was sent to the complainant's legal team on the evening of July 10, by the concerned authorities. The complainant has expressed gratitude to the District Judiciary of Dakshina Kannada, the police authorities, and the Government of Karnataka for promptly acting to ensure his safety. The case came to light after a complaint was filed at the Dharmasthala Police Station, alleging the secret disposal of multiple bodies in a village in the Dakshina Kannada district. The complainant, a former sanitation worker at the Dharmasthala temple, has claimed he was involved in disposing of several bodies under threat. His identity has been kept confidential for security reasons. Driven by guilt, he approached the Superintendent of Police with a request for protection and expressed willingness to fully cooperate with the investigation, on the condition that legal protection is granted to him and his family. The complainant has offered to share detailed information about those involved and the specific locations where the bodies were disposed of, once safety assurances are in place. (ANI)