logo
Penny Lancaster swipes 'karma gets you' about new doc on the 'fall' of Michelle Mone - two decades after their dispute

Penny Lancaster swipes 'karma gets you' about new doc on the 'fall' of Michelle Mone - two decades after their dispute

Daily Mail​29-05-2025
Penny Lancaster swiped 'karma gets you' about the new BBC documentary on lingerie tycoon Michelle Mone.
Thursday's instalment of ITV 's Loose Women saw panellists Kaye Adams, Nadia Sawalha, Penny Lancaster and Brenda Edwards sit down and discuss the day's hot topics.
During the show, Kaye brought up the BBC One documentary titled The Rise and Fall of Michelle Mone.
The two-part series delves into the story of the high-profile businesswoman who founded lingerie brand Ultimo.
Her husband's, Doug Barrowman, company PPE Medpro has come under scrutiny after it was awarded contracts worth more than £200million to provide equipment during the pandemic upon Baroness Mone's recommendation. Any wrongdoing has been denied.
From A-list scandals and red carpet mishaps to exclusive pictures and viral moments, subscribe to the DailyMail's new Showbiz newsletter to stay in the loop.
Penny Lancaster swiped 'karma gets you' about the new BBC documentary on lingerie tycoon Michelle Mone as she appeared on Thursday's instalment of Loose Women
Penny, who married Rod Stewart in 2007, modelled lingerie for Michelle's underwear company, Ultimo in 2002 but was axed after two years (Michelle pictured in 2019)
Penny, who married Rod Stewart in 2007, modelled lingerie for Michelle's underwear company, Ultimo in 2002 but was axed after two years, the Express reported.
'So she asked you to come and model her lingerie very early on didn't she?' Kaye asked.
'And then she, without telling you, replaced you with Rachel Hunter who was Rod's wife,' Kaye added.
Penny silently nodded and admitted: 'I wasn't informed of the documentary, someone told me it was coming out.
'It didn't surprise me because karma gets you, I guess, but as far as any details I'm prepared to talk about.
'It would have to be the right time and place for that and I've put it behind me for the time being.'
Kaye probed, 'I get that and I totally respect it, but it must have been a difficult period of your life I presume?'
Penny nodded and agreed, 'It was a very difficult time, yeah, but you know.'
During the discussion, Kaye read out a quote from Rod Stewart that he said 20 years ago about the lingerie situation.
She read: 'Michelle really needs to be put in her place and if this is revenge, so be it, I'm sticking up for my old lady.
'Penny doesn't want to admit it but she has been hurt by all of this, she's been in tears, Penny is a beautiful girl, I love her and I hate to see her hurt in this way.
'She did nothing wrong, put yourself in her place. How do you think she feels to be told she's being replaced by Rod's ex-wife.'
Penny explained that she prefers to 'rise above it and be the better one'.
A spokesperson for Michelle Mone told MailOnline: 'I am deeply disappointed by the BBC's decision to broadcast a programme using misleading and one-sided accounts of my life and career.
'I hope that the programme does not discourage young women from pursuing their ambitions. The allegations relating to my husband's company, PPE Medpro, will be defended in court.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Call to empower Kent council to limit disruptive street works
Call to empower Kent council to limit disruptive street works

BBC News

time27 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Call to empower Kent council to limit disruptive street works

Local authorities should be given new powers to limit the disruption caused by street works undertaken by utility companies, a group of MPs has said.A report published on Wednesday by the Transport Committee makes a number of suggestions after hearing that councils felt ill-equipped to manage include tighter controls on the use of "immediate" or "urgent" permits, and allowing all local highway authorities adopt "lane rental schemes" which would charge utility companies for each day that works are carried County Council's (KCC) cabinet member for highways and transport Bill Barrett said they "welcome the report", after road closure permits hit a record high in 2023/24. "We are pleased to have the chance to share the frustrations of Kent's residents and businesses about the increasing number of unplanned utility roadworks," Mr Barrett committee's recommendations, especially tougher rules on immediate permits and longer guarantees on roadwork, "would help the county council to better protect Kent's roads and keep Kent moving", he said."We now urge the government to act on these proposals," he Cadbury from the Transport Committee said: "Street works can feel like a recurring nightmare. "The complaints are all too familiar: temporary traffic lights appearing overnight on a road that was already dug up a few months ago, sites left unattended on weekends, works overrunning, lorries diverted down roads too small for them, and disabled people often unable to negotiate their way around the site safely."The committee said permits allowing companies to dig up roads at short notice should only be used in emergency situations. Increasing repair costs Given the difficulties in monitoring this, it has recommended that the Department for Transport (DfT) consult on a new definition that prevents the use of these permits in non-emergency situations. While some local authorities are permitted to charge up to £2,500 per day while street works are carried out, the committee argues that the DfT should let more councils set up their own lane rental schemes without the need for government executive of utilities representative body Street Works UK, Clive Bairsto, saif this will "lead to the development of inconsistent schemes which will not be in the best interests of the utility bill-payers".Utility companies are currently responsible for the quality of the road surfaces they have reinstated for two years after street works have completed, or for three years for deeper excavations. The committee recommends this period be extended to five years. Any cracks that appear after two years are currently repaired using taxpayers' Bairsto says that this extension "will certainly drive up the cost of utility works" if Works UK members are concerned the arguments put forward against the extension "have not been properly reflected", he added.A DfT spokesperson said: "We wholeheartedly agree that street works are far too disruptive for drivers and that is why we have taken action to prevent the impact on drivers."They added the department "will put measures in place so 50% of surplus lane rental funds must be invested into highway maintenance".

Calls for 20mph limit on Newhaven road after girl hit by car
Calls for 20mph limit on Newhaven road after girl hit by car

BBC News

time27 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Calls for 20mph limit on Newhaven road after girl hit by car

Residents have called for a 20mph speed limit and pedestrian crossing on an East Sussex road where a four-year-old girl was hit by a car.A petition calling for improved safety measures on Lewes Road, Newhaven, launched after the child was injured on Monday, has more than 400 was taken by air ambulance to King's College Hospital in London where she Sussex County Council wished the girl a speedy recovery and said it will consider the petition when it is received. James MacCleary, MP for Lewes, said at Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday that the girl was recovering well in hospital but that residents living in the area have been "warning how unsafe these roads are" around Seaford and Porritt, who has lived on the 30mph road for 40 years, said: "It's very busy, especially in rush hour times it's a nightmare. There's nowhere to cross."There's been a few accidents on this road. It's just a race track, it's not safe for children or the elderly." Carol White, another resident, said the road was used as a "cut through instead of the A26"."I was walking to my allotment on Sunday and a car was doing 70mph in a 50mph [road] leading into the town," she said. "No-one stops to let pedestrians cross."Mark Bunker, who has lived in the road for two years, said: "It's a very busy road, it's fast. "There's a blind spot at the top which is a high risk [area] for an incident."There was a really sad incident the other day. If there was a measure that could be looked at to reduce the speed, I think that would be a good idea."MacCleary asked Prime Minister Keir Starmer if he would intervene to unblock the funding needed to make the A259 and surrounding areas PM gave his "sympathies" to the family and the added that he had heard "a lot about this road" [the A259] and knew "it needs addressing".

Kemi Badenoch's lack of empathy over Rachel Reeves's tears will come back to haunt her
Kemi Badenoch's lack of empathy over Rachel Reeves's tears will come back to haunt her

The Independent

time28 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Kemi Badenoch's lack of empathy over Rachel Reeves's tears will come back to haunt her

The trouble with Kemi Badenoch is that if she sees someone lying on the ground, she can't resist the temptation to kick them. She lacks empathy, to put it politely. There she was at Prime Minister's Questions, facing an open goal for a change, and attacking the prime minister, who, even three days later, can look after himself. Then she spots the chancellor, Rachel Reeves, her lip quivering, seemingly on the brink of crying. Straight in goes the Badenoch boot – she said Reeves looked 'absolutely miserable' and described her as Starmer's 'human shield'. After Starmer failed to confirm Reeves in post for the rest of the parliament – a tall order for any appointee – Badenoch piled on the punishment: 'How awful for the chancellor that he did not confirm she would be in post.' Surely it might have crossed the mind of the Tory leader that the reason the chancellor was displaying unusual emotion might not have been all to do with politics. Most of us, I'm sure, wondered if there'd been some other explanation, some other bad news of a personal nature, as No 10 later disclosed. Even if it was all about the welfare reform fiasco, is it right to treat parliamentary exchanges as blood sports? To revel in the misery of an adversary? To mock them personally for a show of emotion? In fact, it's emerged that in the post-PMQs huddle with the press, Badenoch's spokesman seemingly urged the journalists to go after Reeves. Asked, 'So no matter what is going on in your personal life, you should disclose that to the public?' he replied: 'I think we should find out what's going on'. I was going to say, 'We're all human,' but, giving as good as Badenoch does, there are times one wonders if she is. Through the debates about disability benefits – we're talking about some people in deep despair here – Badenoch sounded arrogant and dismissive. She implied they're all lazy. This was her message to disabled people last week, on X: 'The world owes no one a living. Millions of people cannot just sit on welfare and expect to be paid to do so. And if they don't like it, that's their problem, not the state's.' It was Badenoch at her very worst. Yes, it could work, politically, because there is a callous, wilfully ignorant strand of public opinion that resents any kind of social security system, full stop. Well, excluding the bits they're likely to use, such as the state retirement pension, thoroughly inflation-proofed under its 'triple lock'. Badenoch bangs on about welfare reform, but the biggest element is the old age pension, at three times the spending on sickness and disability benefits. Taming the welfare bill is practically impossible without doing something that hurts pensioners. But does she ever mention that? No, because they're the only demographic voting for her. I'm not sure that either her party or the public likes the Badenoch style. It can misfire, causing sympathy for the victim of her scorn rather than support for her argument. It's possible her aggressive approach to Tuesday's vote reminded some Labour rebels just how dangerous she is, and persuaded them to back the government after all. When she senselessly slagged off Starmer after the last Nato summit, where he had helped keep Donald Trump onside, she sounded negative and, as the PM put it, 'unserious'. One of her own MPs mildly rebuked her for putting party first. Badenoch doesn't connect with the public in the way Nigel Farage does, or Boris Johnson in his heyday. Robert Jenrick, who's continuing with his informal leadership campaign, is better at campaigning and forcing change on the government. Mel Stride is better in the Commons. She was fortunate this week that the government had been so useless that she had no alternative but to succeed. When she stumbles again, as she will, her party might start kicking her when she's down.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store