
Risking Beijing's Ire, Mineral-Rich Zimbabwe Wants US Trade
JOHANNESBURG—Zimbabwe, with its struggling economy and high rates of inflation, poverty, and unemployment, became the first country to drop tariffs on U.S. imports.
The move by Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa, who has been under heavy U.S. government sanctions for more than two decades as a key member of the China-friendly ZANU-PF regime, came three days after Trump imposed an 18 percent duty on the southern African nation's goods entering the United States.
Mnangagwa, a former guerrilla who received military training in China in the 1960s, didn't launch his usual anti-American bluster, insults, and accusations of neo-colonialism and imperialism.
Instead, on April 5, he used social media platform X to
Mnangagwa, who seized power from Robert Mugabe by coup in 2017, said Trump's reciprocal tariffs held 'merit,' specifically 'as a tool for safeguarding domestic employment and industrial sectors.'
Related Stories
4/7/2025
4/23/2025
He added that his suspension of all levies on U.S. goods was 'in the spirit of constructing a mutually beneficial and positive relationship with the United States of America, under the leadership of President Trump.'
Statistics from the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative show that commerce between the world's largest economy and Zimbabwe, rated Africa's 17th-largest economy out of 54 countries by the World Bank, remains minimal.
In 2024, the United States exported almost $44 million worth of goods, mainly agricultural machinery, to Zimbabwe, while importing nearly $68 million in ferroalloys, tobacco, and sugar.
Mnangagwa said his tariff measure was intended to facilitate the expansion of American imports while simultaneously promoting the growth of Zimbabwean exports.
'This action underscores our commitment to a framework of equitable trade and enhanced bilateral cooperation,' he wrote in the April 5 X post.
Mnangagwa's ZANU-PF party has been governing Zimbabwe uninterrupted since it gained independence from Britain in 1980, mainly because it rigged elections, according to the United Nations and other observers.
The World Bank has classified Zimbabwe as one of the poorest countries, as the political and business elite allegedly collude to profit almost exclusively from its extensive natural resources, including gold, platinum, diamonds, coal, and critical minerals such as chromium, nickel, and lithium, which are becoming increasingly important to the world's future.
Trump has exempted gold and some critical minerals from import tariffs, as his administration considers them essential to American progress and national security. They are used to make a wide range of products, including cell phones, computers, electric vehicle batteries, and weapons such as missiles and fighter aircraft.
China has a near monopoly on the world's rare earth minerals and metals, in large part due to its dominance in African extractive industries, including those in Zimbabwe.
Mnangagwa's kind words following Trump's April 2 announcement were a far cry from his hitherto regular calls for the downfall of the U.S. dollar and for the 'hegemonic' West to suffer erosion at the hands of a 'new world order' led by Beijing and Moscow, another close ally of Harare.
However, some financial experts warn that Mnangagwa's scrapping of tariffs on American goods could further damage Zimbabwe's economy and upset its two biggest trade partners, China and South Africa, both of which have invested heavily in the African country.
The country is heavily dependent on neighboring South Africa for most products, including food, its economy having melted down in the early 2000s after political violence and Mugabe's seizure of white-owned farms.
'It's unlikely that the U.S. will replace South Africa as Zimbabwe's main trading partner,' Mohamad Razak, an economist at South Africa's University of KwaZulu-Natal, told The Epoch Times, adding that South Africa would not be happy that Mnangagwa is ending tariffs on American imports.
'Zimbabwe taxes a lot of South African imported products, so Pretoria will expect it to stop these taxes and give it tariff-free access to its market as well.'
Razak said Zimbabwe's economic partners across southern Africa—including Botswana, Angola, and Zambia—would also be 'rather disappointed' in Mnangagwa's 'unilateral' approach.
'There's a feeling that SADC [Southern African Development Community] should have decided on a common response to the tariffs, so that the interests of all countries are protected,' he said.
In response, Zimbabwean government spokesperson Nick Mangwana told The Epoch Times the country's rulers have the right, as an elected administration, to make decisions in the 'best interests' of its citizens.
Razak said Beijing, in particular, would feel 'threatened' by Harare's 'cozying up' to the United States.
China has poured billions of dollars into Zimbabwe's extractive industry in recent years and owns 90 percent of the country's mines, according to a September 2024 study by the Harare-based Center for Natural Resource Governance.
Beijing's ambassador in Harare, Zhou Ding, did not respond to requests for comment.
Gold has been Beijing's chief focus so far, according to Zimbabwean independent economist Tapiwa Mupandawana.
Zimbabwe is the world's 25th-largest gold producer, delivering nearly
But lately, Mupandawana told The Epoch Times, the Chinese have shifted their focus to lithium, described by geoscientists as one of the most important critical minerals.
Lithium is essential to the manufacturing of microchips, laptop computers, high-resolution display screens, and battery power sources.
'These technologies form the backbone of the internet, wireless technologies and the IoT (Internet of Things) that support today's infrastructure and are also powering the move to Industry 4.0. Green power and energy storage technologies like wind, solar and EV batteries are also critically dependent' on a small group of minerals, including lithium,
Mupandawana said Chinese-built lithium mines are now prevalent across Zimbabwe, 'with more springing up all the time.'
Harare claims that its experts have found the world's largest known lithium deposit, at more than 11 million tonnes, with the potential to supply at least 20 percent of the globe's lithium once all resources are fully utilized.
'I can think of lesser things than this to provide encouragement to the Americans to patch things up with Zimbabwe,' Booysen said.
She's convinced that access to gold and critical minerals could form the basis of better relations between Harare and Washington.
'I think the Mnangagwa government sees the tariffs and Trump's mercantile nature as a doorway to exactly this,' Booysen told The Epoch Times.
Winning mining and resource rights in Zimbabwe is 'just one piece of the puzzle' that could enable the United States to break China's stranglehold on rare earth minerals, while at the same time strengthening the U.S. economy and national security, Razak said.
But Kim Gundani, a business analyst in Harare, said U.S. sanctions are standing in the way of a rapprochement.
Washington has maintained sanctions on leading ZANU-PF figures and collaborators since 2003, when it accused the Mugabe government of torturing and killing political opponents and election fraud.
In March 2024, then-U.S. President Joe Biden announced a new set of sanctions specifically targeting Mnangagwa and 10 of his allies, including his wife and military commander, for a range of alleged crimes.
The U.S. Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) released a
'Mnangagwa provides a protective shield to smugglers to operate in Zimbabwe and has directed Zimbabwean officials to facilitate the sale of gold and diamonds in illicit markets, taking bribes in exchange for his services. Mnangagwa also oversees Zimbabwe's security services, which have violently repressed political opponents and civil society groups,' the statement reads.
The OFAC said the first lady of Zimbabwe, Auxillia Mnangagwa, 'facilitates' her husband's alleged crimes.
OFAC claimed Auxillia Mnangagwa 'is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in, corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery.'
The sanctions froze all assets owned by the Mnangagwas and their associates in the United States and prohibited American citizens and financial institutions from doing business with the sanctioned individuals and companies.
The government of Zimbabwe at the time described Washington's measures as 'inhumane' and 'illegal.'
Booysen said the Trump administration seems 'far more open to ending the freeze' between Washington and Harare.
'Mnangagwa clearly wants Trump to drop the sanctions just like [Mnangagwa] dropped tariffs on American imports, using the possibility of access to Zimbabwean resources as a carrot,' she said.
The U.S. State Department's Bureau of African Affairs released a
It criticized the Mnangagwa government for continuing to 'use violence against peaceful protestors and civil society, as well as against labor leaders and members of the political opposition.'
The Bureau pointed out that Harare has made little progress in implementing the broad reforms needed for political and economic stability.
It said that American support for the people of Zimbabwe includes 'holding accountable those Zimbabweans who use public resources for private gain and deny their fellow citizens fundamental freedoms,' according to the statement.
At the same time, though, the bureau said the United States 'welcomes the opportunity to increase bilateral trade and investment with Zimbabwe that will benefit U.S. and Zimbabwean businesses alike.'
Booysen said previous administrations in Washington would 'never have opened the door' to Zimbabwe to this extent.
'So it's not beyond belief that one day soon the United States could have a big stake in Zimbabwe's mineral sector, should certain things happen, and one of those would be to lift the sanctions on Mnangagwa and his associates,' she said.
'The Chinese will be angry should the United States enter what it considers to be [Beijing's] market, but [Chinese leader Xi Jinping's regime] is mercenary itself, so it shouldn't complain much if this happens.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
3 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Trump ordered purge of ‘unpatriotic' signage from national parks. How one California spot complied
Four years ago, National Park Service employees seeking to provide a more robust look at the history of Muir Woods National Monument in Marin County began the 'History Under Construction' exhibit. The concept of the work was to expand an existing sign featuring a timeline detailing the preservation of Muir Woods. Employees placed caution tape on the sign within Founder's Grove and used yellow sticky notes to add facts and dates that were missing from the original timeline. Among the information added were the efforts of Indigenous people who originally maintained the land, as well as the role of women in creating the national monument. A letter on the plaque assured passersby that 'everything on this sign is accurate, but incomplete. The facts are not under construction, but the way we tell history is.' But, as of this month, the yellow notes are no more. The expanded exhibit became the first in the nation to be altered following an executive order by President Trump in March to rid park signage of any language he would deem unpatriotic. The president's aim was to restore federal sites that he said had been changed since 2020 to perpetuate a 'false reconstruction of American history' including 'improper partisan ideology.' The Muir Woods change was first reported by SF Gate. Elizabeth Villano, a former park ranger who helped create the new version of the sign, criticized the move, writing in a post on Medium that the Trump administration 'is actively censoring American history from the public.' She said the goal of the project was to make sure nothing on the original sign was erased, but to add details so people could see the difference in how history was told and how it could be expanded to include more voices. 'We wanted to tell the true story of the woods in a way that helped people learn from the past, and apply those lessons towards a brighter future,' she wrote. 'Despite this care not to erase history, here I am, watching history be erased.' A spokesperson for the Golden Gate National Recreation Area, which includes Muir Woods, could not immediately be reached for comment on Wednesday. Before the notes were added in 2021, the first date included in the sign's timeline, called 'Path to Preservation,' was the establishment of the first national park in the United States, Yellowstone, in 1872. The next was 1892 when the Sierra Club was founded in San Francisco with John Muir as the first president. But staff at the time found that some key information was missing from the timeline, namely the work of the Coast Miwok and Southern Pomo people who tended to the land before Europeans arrived in North America. They also included the first campaign to save the region launched by a women's club in 1904. Of course, not all the information added to the timeline was positive. Staff detailed Spanish missionaries exploiting the work of Indigenous people in the Bay Area to build California missions and congressional actions stripping Coast Miwok people of title to their ancestral lands, including Muir Woods. The revised timeline didn't shy away from pointing out the complex legacies of key figures who helped spearhead the creation of the national monument. It noted that John Muir referred to Indigenous people using racist language in his diary, which was published years before his death, and pointed out William Kent's vote in Congress to prevent non-citizens from owning or leasing land. The rangers didn't cast blame for the omissions, saying that the expanded narratives were reflective of increasing diversity among park service employees in the years since the timeline was first unveiled. 'From redwood conservation to the legacy of the country's founders, American stories are enriched by complexity, dimension, and challenge. It's not our job to judge these stories or promote a singular narrative. As national park rangers, it is our mandate to tell complete stories that reflect who we are as a society. And as Americans, it's important that we hear them,' according to a National Park Service post about the changes. Trump's executive order directed the Department of the Interior to identify any public monuments, memorials, statues or markers that had been removed or changed since 2020 to 'perpetuate a false reconstruction of American history,' minimize the value of historical events or figures or include 'improper partisan ideology' and to reinstate prior monuments. The order also directed officials to ensure that monuments do not contain content that disparages Americans. Instead, the monuments should focus on 'the greatness of the achievements and progress of the American people or, with respect to natural features, the beauty, abundance, and grandeur of the American landscape,' the order states. Critics have said Trump's directive demands a rose-colored view of more complex events that make up American history. Villano, the former park ranger, wrote in the Medium essay that it's disparaging to Americans to take away people's ability to think critically and have a better understanding of history. 'Why doesn't the White House want you to see a more complete version of history? Maybe it's because, when we see ourselves in history, we realize that we can reshape it,' she wrote. 'For a government like this, that must feel like a threat. It doesn't benefit people in power to understand that anyone can be a part of history.'


New York Post
3 minutes ago
- New York Post
Columbia must make good on its promises and quash antisemitism
What do you know? The White House has managed to get Columbia University to 'fess up to its sorry record of antisemitism, pay a considerable fine and agree to fresh steps to set it on the right path. That's enormously encouraging — not least because it'll put pressure on other schools that have been resisting changes, like Harvard, to fall in line. President Donald Trump and his team worked hard to reach a deal and deserve great credit. They put the screws to the elite school, cutting off hundreds of millions of dollars in grant support until it agreed to reforms. Advertisement Now Columbia will pay a whopping $200 million to settle discrimination claims and another $20 million specifically to address antisemitism on campus. It also promised to stop racial discrimination in hiring and admissions. Plus, the school has agreed to vet international students more closely and share its data with the feds. That means it won't let in more terror-aligned foreign 'students' like Mahmoud Khalil whose real purpose is to sow chaos on American campuses. Advertisement And just a day earlier, Columbia meted out heavy punishments against more than 70 students for their antisemitic antics, suspending some and expelling others. These are all huge wins. Recall that the school had allowed a mob, including 'community activists' with no university affiliation, to occupy its main square with tents for weeks on end. This rabble harassed Jewish students and faculty, physically blocking their passage around the campus and into university buildings. Jewish students were shoved and bullied. Advertisement The deans did nothing as protestors invaded buildings, chanted antisemitic slogans and destroyed property. Indeed, Columbia abetted a climate of terror. Students wearing keffiyehs as masks disrupted a class on Israeli history taught by an Israeli professor and distributed incendiary fliers reading, 'Burn Zionism to the Ground.' This wasn't just a matter of leniency and laziness on the part of university officials. It was intentional. Advertisement Tenured faculty and top administrators expressed open support for the mayhem, and some were caught mocking Jewish students speaking up about the fear and intimidation they were suffering. Katrina Armstrong, the former interim president, told faculty members in private that she had no intention of making good on her promises to the administration to ban masked protests or reform admissions procedures. This lying and hypocrisy captures the elitist scorn of top Columbia faculty. Tenured radicals turned a blessed institution of culture and science into a pit of rancor and violence in the name of eliminating the Jewish state. Some of that may be about to change — though don't expect all the fixes to come overnight. Notably, Columbia has given in on all the points Harvard is fighting in court, and gotten its grant money restored. Let's hope that resonates with Harvard and nudges it, and other antisemitic schools, to straighten out, once and for all.


Axios
3 minutes ago
- Axios
Exclusive: Massie leans into Trump defiance in first TV ad
Kentucky Rep. Thomas Massie is using his first TV ad to highlight his call for the release of documents related to the investigation of the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Why it matters: Massie is showing that he plans to lean into his defiance of President Trump, who is backing a primary challenge to the Republican congressman. What they're saying: "Look, it's simple: They're attacking me because I'm holding the Washington machine accountable," Massie says in the 30-second spot. In the ad, Massie points to his vote against the Trump-backed COVID relief package in 2020, and to his opposition to Trump's "big, beautiful bill." "Now, I'm leading the charge to force a vote on the complete Epstein files," he also says. Massie is one of 11 House Republicans to call for the release of Epstein-related files, though the Trump administration has said it opposes further disclosures related to the investigation. Zoom in: Trump has vowed to campaign against Massie, and his political operation has aired two ads targeting the congressman. The president's team is also recruiting a primary challenger to Massie, and has spoken with state Sen. Aaron Reed about running. It has also conducted polling indicating that Massie would be vulnerable to a Trump-backed challenge. Between the lines: Massie, who occupies a Trump-friendly central Kentucky district, does not say Trump's name in the spot.