Chinese investors spun by fugitive Michael Gu now stuck in Salter fund
The multibillion-dollar Salter Brothers asset management empire was seeded with money from Chinese investors steered into a fund run by Michael Gu, the Lamborghini-driving alleged fraudster who fled the country after his property business collapsed owing more than $60 million.
Documents and investor testimony obtained by The Australian Financial Review show that the foundations of Salter Brothers' $4 billion portfolio can be traced back to the Atlas Capital SIV Fund – a 2015 vehicle co-founded by Gu and Paul Salter to attract wealthy Chinese nationals under a scheme that offered visas in return for major investments in Australia.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


West Australian
39 minutes ago
- West Australian
Anthony Albanese denies he's prioritising Beijing over Washington, says Donald Trump meeting will come
Anthony Albanese has dismissed suggestions he's prioritising Australia's relationship with China over the United States, as he denied being 'embarrassed' about not yet meeting Donald Trump. In a morning media blitz, the Prime Minister said he would meet the United States President in the 'coming months', suggesting the two leaders would likely meet multiple times during the second half of the year on the sidelines of summits like the Quad, G20, and APEC. With Foreign Minister Penny Wong currently in Washington to meet with her Quad counterparts, the Prime Minister shrugged off suggestions it was 'embarrassing' he was the only Quad leader to have not yet met with Mr Trump. 'We'll have a meeting. We've had a few constructive discussions. I'm sure when we meet, it will be constructive as well,' he said, going on to describe their relationship as 'respectful'. With the deadline for negotiating on Mr Trump's so-called 'liberation day' tariffs approaching next week, Mr Albanese was keen to stress on Tuesday morning that Australia has one of the best deals on the US President's 'reciprocal' imports. 'There's no country in the world that has a lower tariff than Australia. So, that's the starting point,' he said. In a later interview with Sky News, Mr Albanese rebuffed claims he was prioritising China above the US. The Prime Minister is slated to travel to China later this month if a meeting with Xi Jinping can be locked in. Challenged on why he had met the Chinese President more times than he had met the American, Mr Albanese took umbrage. 'Well, Xi Jinping has been in office for some time and the person who had Xi Jinping address our national parliament here was Tony Abbott, just for the record,' Mr Albanese said. 'I've met with the US President more than I have met with the President of China since I've been the Prime Minister and I've travelled five times to the United States and one time to China.' Over on Channel 7, Mr Albanese said his Government was using all of its 'assets' in the US to give Australia a leg up with the Trump Administration. Asked if that included Gina Rinehart or Greg Norman, who the Prime Minister has confirmed spoke to before the ill-fated G7 bilateral meeting, Mr Albanese said he was working in Australia's interests. 'Well, we talk to all of our assets, if you like, the great Australians who make a difference around the world,' he told Sunrise. The Prime Minister was also asked about reports in the Australian Financial Review covering an auditor-general's report that revealed military chiefs failed for almost 2.5 years to provide formal updates to Defence Minister Richard Marles on the readiness of the army, air force, and navy to be deployed on missions. The report released on Friday reportedly showed Defence stopped giving Mr Marles half-yearly 'preparedness' reports. Mr Albanese dismissed the AFR's reporting as 'absurd'. 'We meet regularly. I certainly have met with heads of all of the armed forces regularly. And, you know, that is just completely incorrect,' he said. 'The idea, this $57 billion that we've added to our defence investment of our capability, has come directly after discussions and engagement, obviously, with defence … Don't believe everything you read in the papers.'

AU Financial Review
6 hours ago
- AU Financial Review
Chinese investors spun by fugitive Michael Gu now stuck in Salter fund
The multibillion-dollar Salter Brothers asset management empire was seeded with money from Chinese investors steered into a fund run by Michael Gu, the Lamborghini-driving alleged fraudster who fled the country after his property business collapsed owing more than $60 million. Documents and investor testimony obtained by The Australian Financial Review show that the foundations of Salter Brothers' $4 billion portfolio can be traced back to the Atlas Capital SIV Fund – a 2015 vehicle co-founded by Gu and Paul Salter to attract wealthy Chinese nationals under a scheme that offered visas in return for major investments in Australia.

Sydney Morning Herald
15 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Australia's lawsuit over rare minerals is a geopolitical litmus test
In a move that would have been unthinkable a decade ago, Treasurer Jim Chalmers has launched a Federal Court lawsuit to force Chinese-linked entities to divest from a key rare earth miner. This isn't just a legal dispute; it's a test of whether Australia is willing to enforce its sovereignty in the face of economic intimidation and strategic competition. The test is one of enforcing set red lines or, in Seinfeld parlance, not just knowing how to make a reservation but knowing how to hold a reservation. That's why, if we're serious about holding onto the strategic advantages of our critical minerals sector and not just making short-term profits, this is a moment for resolve. At the heart of the matter is Northern Minerals, an Australian company developing the Browns Range heavy rare earths project in WA. It is an operation that could become one of the first non-Chinese sources of the critical minerals essential for advanced military systems, clean energy technologies and high-end electronics. Despite a clear directive from Chalmers last year for five Chinese-linked entities to divest their stakes in Northern Minerals, at least one, Indian Ocean International Shipping and Service Company Ltd, allegedly failed to comply. Now, in a move that's both unprecedented and essential, the Commonwealth is suing. Yes, we are dealing with companies but there really is no such thing as the Chinese private sector. As much as the Australian government will rightly make the case for this being about a commercial matter, this is all about the threat from the Chinese government and its objective of controlling critical minerals not just as economic leverage but as a strategic weapon. Loading It's deeply concerning that foreign investors have openly defied a directive from the Australian government. That would never be tolerated by Beijing. In China, foreign companies must abide by a highly restrictive, state-controlled investment environment or risk being expelled immediately. Yet in Australia, even after years of intensifying economic coercion and evidence of strategic interference, certain state-linked actors have come to believe that our foreign investment laws are optional or that the fear of retaliatory action by Beijing would result in Australian inaction. To the credit of the government, this lawsuit challenges that dangerous assumption head-on. Chalmers' statement was unequivocal: 'Foreign investors in Australia are required to follow Australian law.' What is at stake isn't just legal precedent – it's Australia's ability to protect the integrity of its critical minerals sector. These minerals – such as dysprosium, terbium and neodymium – are the foundational inputs for technologies ranging from F-35 fighter jets and hypersonic missiles to electric vehicles and offshore wind turbines.