logo
Is Hollywood inspired by the CIA, or the other way around?

Is Hollywood inspired by the CIA, or the other way around?

Miami Herald19 hours ago
LANGLEY, Va. - At CIA headquarters, beyond the handsome granite seal on its lobby floor and a wall of stars carved in honor of the agency's fallen, experts are at work in the complex tasks of spycraft: weapons-trained officers, computer engineers, virologists, nuclear scientists.
But there are also storytellers, makeup artists, theater majors and ballerinas - Americans who probably never thought their skills would match the needs of a spy agency. Yet the CIA thought otherwise.
Though it rarely gets the spotlight, there's a revolving door of talent between the country's premiere intelligence agency and its entertainment industry, with inspiration and influence often working both ways.
The agency is targeting professionals at the intersection of arts and technology for recruitment, CIA officers told The Times, and continues to cooperate with entertainment giants to inspire the next generation of creative spies.
This month, the agency is assisting a New York Times bestselling author on a young adult book examining the foundations of the CIA laid during World War II. Scenes from a major upcoming film production were just shot at its headquarters, a logistical feat at an intelligence campus tucked away in the Virginia suburbs behind rings of security perimeters, where officers roam cracking down on Bluetooth signals. Another popular streaming TV series will be back at Langley to film this fall.
But their collaboration goes far deeper than that, officers said. Creative minds in Hollywood and the entertainment industry have long had a role at the Central Intelligence Agency, devising clever solutions to its most vexing problems, such as perfecting the art of disguise and harnessing a magician's ability to cast spellbinding illusions. Indeed, in the 1950s, a magician from New York named John Mulholland was secretly contracted with the agency to write a manual for Cold War spies on trickery and deception.
These days, the officers said, creative skills are more valuable than ever in such a technologically complex world.
"You're only limited by your own imagination - don't self-censor your ideas," said Janelle, a CIA public affairs officer, granted the ability to speak under her first name at the request of the agency. "We're always looking for partners."
An elusive history
David McCloskey, a former CIA analyst and author of "Damascus Station" and other spy thrillers, offered several theories on why the agency might be interested in fostering a robust relationship with Hollywood, calling it "a two-way street."
"There definitely have been operational applications for espionage," McCloskey said. "It's probably the exception to the rule, but when it happens, it's compelling."
It's easy to see why CIA leaders would be interested in Hollywood, he said, in part to shape impressions of the agency. "But their bread and butter business is receiving people to give secrets," he continued, "and part of that is getting close to people in power."
"The closer you are to Hollywood," McCloskey added, "that's a really interesting 'in' to having a lot of interesting conversations."
Some of the CIA's most iconic missions - at least the declassified ones - document the agency's rich history with Hollywood, including Canadian Caper, when CIA operatives disguised themselves as a film crew to rescue six American diplomats in Tehran during the Iran hostage crisis, an operation moviegoers will recognize as the plot of "Argo."
"'Argo' was almost too far-fetched to even believe," said Brent, an in-house historian at CIA headquarters. "It's almost more Hollywood than Hollywood."
Canadian Caper was both inspired by Hollywood and relied on Hollywood talent. Agent Tony Mendez had been a graphic artist before joining the agency and helping craft the mission.
Another key player was John Chambers, the makeup artist who gave the world Spock's ears on "Star Trek" and won an honorary Oscar for his trailblazing simian work on "Planet of the Apes." He was awarded the CIA's Intelligence Medal of Merit for his work on the covert rescue effort.
Just a few years before, Howard Hughes, then one of the world's richest men and a tycoon in media, film and aerospace, agreed to work with the CIA to provide cover for an effort by the agency to lift a sunken Soviet nuclear submarine off the floor of the Pacific Ocean.
Deploying Hughes' Glomar Explorer under the guise of mineral extraction, the CIA was able to salvage most of the sub before The Times broke a story blowing its cover - "the story that sunk our efforts," in CIA parlance.
And another mission was made possible thanks to a device invented by a professional photographer - a gadget that later became the inspiration of an over-the-top scene in the blockbuster Batman film "The Dark Knight."
In Project Coldfeet, CIA agents gathering intelligence on a Soviet station erected on a precariously drifting sheet of ice in the Arctic needed a reliable extraction plan. But how does one pick up an agent without landing a plane on the ice?
The answer was the "skyhook": Balloons lifted a tether attached to a harness worn by an agent high into the sky. A CIA plane snagged the tether and carried the agent off to safety.
In "The Dark Knight," Batman makes a dramatic escape deploying the same kind of balloon-harness contraption.
'The superhero spy'
CIA leadership often says that acceptance into the agency is harder than getting into Harvard and Yale combined. Yet the agency still has challenges recruiting the type of talent it is looking for - either in reaching those with unconventional skills, or in convincing them that they should leave secure, comparatively well-paid, comfortable jobs for a secretive life of public service.
It is no easy task managing work at the agency, especially with family, CIA officials acknowledged. Deciding if and when to share one's true identity with their children is a regular struggle. But Janelle said the CIA tells potential recruits there is a middle ground that doesn't require them to entirely abandon their existing lives.
"People don't have to leave their companies to help their country and to work with CIA," Janelle said. "People come here because they love their country and know they can make a difference."
Janelle is part of a team that regularly engages with creatives who want to portray the agency or spies as accurately as possible.
"Some producers and directors reach out and they do care about accuracy," Janelle said, "but they ultimately pick and choose what's going to work for the film or show."
CIA analysts have also been known to leave the agency for opportunities in the entertainment industry, writing books and scripts drawing from their experiences - so long as they don't track too closely with those experiences.
Joe Weisberg, the writer and producer behind the television series "The Americans," and McCloskey, who is working on a fifth novel focused on U.S. and British intelligence, were both part of the agency before launching their writing careers. And as CIA alumni, they had to submit their works for review.
"There's a whole publication and classification-review process," Brent said.
That process can be a bit of a slog, McCloskey said: "They quite literally redact in black ink."
But it is far more difficult for nonfiction writers than novelists.
"There could be bits of tradecraft, or alluding to assets, or people at the agency, which are clear no's," McCloskey said. "But with novels, it's not that hard to write them in a way to get them through the review board."
Try as they may, studios often repeat the same falsehoods about the CIA, no matter how often they are corrected. Officers and agents aren't the same thing, for one. And as disappointing as it may be for lovers of spy thrillers, the majority of officers are not licensed or trained to carry weapons.
"One thing Hollywood often gets wrong is the idea that it's one officer doing everything, when it's really a team sport here," Janelle said.
"Zero Dark Thirty," an Oscar-winning film released in 2012 about the hunt for al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden, was widely acclaimed but criticized by some within the intelligence community over the credit it lends a single, fictional CIA analyst for tracking him down.
McCloskey sympathizes with the writer's dilemma.
"I can't have 35 people on a team. From a storytelling standpoint, it just doesn't work," he said, acknowledging that little in the field of espionage is accurately captured on screen, even though there are plenty of former spies available to work as consultants.
"There's no lack of sources to get it right," he said. "It's that the superhero spy - the Jack Ryans and Jason Bournes - are pretty much the Hollywood representation of espionage."
However inaccurately glorified and dramatized, the agency hopes that Hollywood's work can keep the revolving door moving, inspiring atypical talent to join its ranks.
"We have architects, carpenters, people who worked in logistics," Brent said. "People might not realize the range of skill sets here at CIA."
And as Canadian Caper showed, sometimes spycraft requires stagecraft. It's possible that what's needed most to complete the next mission won't be oceanography or data mining, but costume design. Or maybe another ballerina.
Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wordle hint today: Clues for July 10 2025 NYT puzzle #1482
Wordle hint today: Clues for July 10 2025 NYT puzzle #1482

USA Today

time2 hours ago

  • USA Today

Wordle hint today: Clues for July 10 2025 NYT puzzle #1482

WARNING: THERE ARE WORDLE SPOILERS AHEAD! DO NOT READ FURTHER IF YOU DON'T WANT THE JULY 10, 2025 WORDLE ANSWER SPOILED FOR YOU. Ready? OK. We've seen some hard Wordle words over the years and if you're here, you're probably struggling with today's and are looking for some help. So let's run down a few clues with today's Wordle that could help you solve it: 1. It has one vowel and a rare consonant. 2. It's an adjective. 3. It's associated with nervousness. And the answer to today's Wordle is below this photo: It's ... JUMPY. While you're here, some more Wordle advice: How do I play Wordle? Go to this link from the New York Times and start guessing words. What are the best Wordle starting words? That's a topic we've covered a bunch here. According to the Times' WordleBot, the best starting word is: CRANE. Others that I've seen include ADIEU, STARE and ROAST. Play more word games Looking for more word games?

Two Things Can Be True: Cierra Was Wrong & Love Island USA Mishandled Her Exit
Two Things Can Be True: Cierra Was Wrong & Love Island USA Mishandled Her Exit

Refinery29

time4 hours ago

  • Refinery29

Two Things Can Be True: Cierra Was Wrong & Love Island USA Mishandled Her Exit

Polarising debates happen online everyday, yet scores of keyboard warriors tend to forget one thing before getting on their soapboxes: several things can be true at the same time. That's absolutely the case for the latest Love Island USA controversy which centers on Cierra Ortega. During Sunday's episode, the 25-year-old, who came into the villa on day two as a bombshell, was booted from the show 'due to a personal situation.' Just a week prior, Ortega came under fire after old screenshots surfaced of her using an anti-Asian slur on two separate occasions. As the photos began circulating on social media, folks pointed out the fact that she used the word again after getting called out and apologising for it in the past. While getting Botox in 2023, Ortega used the slur to describe her eyes. She had nearly 1 million Instagram followers ahead of the controversy and lost more than 200,000 followers afterwards. Minutes into the episode, narrator Iain Stirling announced her departure without the show giving any other details. Fans assumed that Ortega's previous posts are the reason, making her the second Season 7 contestant to get kicked out for using racist language. Yulissa Escobar was the first after folks discovered the Florida native used the n-word several times during a podcast interview. Though Ortega has yet to comment on the matter, her parents shared a statement on her Instagram stories. 'We're not here to justify or ignore what's surfaced. We understand why people are upset, and we know accountability matters. But what's happening online right now has gone far beyond that,' the statement read. 'The threats. The cruel messages. The attacks on her family, her friends, even her supporters, it's heartbreaking. It's uncalled for. And no one deserves that kind of hate, no matter what mistake they've made.' ' There's a double standard at play. Both Cierra and Nic used anti-Asian language, yet only one is being held accountable. taryn finley ' There are a few things at play here. Ortega was wrong as hell for using the language, especially more than once. Though she used the word to describe her own features, she used willful ignorance and the model minority myth to shield her. In the late 1800s, white Americans created the slur to be weaponised against Chinese immigrants who they believed were taking their jobs. Sound familiar? Unfortunately, America's education system works overtime for its PR, constantly minimising and erasing the pain and wrongdoings against communities of colour. And the current U.S. administration aims to erase any progress this past century has seen. I find it hard to believe that Ortega, who is of Puerto Rican and Mexican descent, doesn't know that. So while her ignorance doesn't make it right, her insensitive language does show just how casual racism can be. Now, let's be very clear. The buck doesn't stop with Ortega. And I'm not completely sure that kicking her off the show rectified the real problem here. Especially when the producers are picking and choosing who to punish. When an old video recently surfaced of Nic Vansteenberghe making a stereotypical joke about Chinese people eating cats, both fans and producers seemed to largely ignore it in comparison. In the wake of controversy, Ortega's comment section — which is currently disabled — was full of name calling and threats while Nic's is flooded with people rooting for his relationship with Olandria Carthen. And just days ago, Austin Shepard, who was voted out last week, was outed for reposting racist TikToks before going on the show. The videos promoted violence against Black women and spread myths about crime in Black communities. Shepard issued an apology on Saturday, blaming his 'dry sense of humour.' There's a double standard at play. Both Cierra and Nic used anti-Asian language, yet only one is being held accountable. Austin shared racist ideologies about Black people, yet his Instagram and TikTok posts are filled with positive comments. All of their old posts are a reflection of how this country continues to approach race. Though it's important to correct people when they say and do offensive things, nothing good comes from dogpiling onto those already facing scrutiny. That effort would be better spent pressuring legislators to pass bills that actually help disenfranchised communities. And the fallout speaks to how easy it is for society to 'cancel' women over men. Likeability and favouritism have done wonders for men this season. With the show getting the biggest ratings spike in its seven seasons on Peacock, there's a lot more at play in terms of viewer engagement. The more people who watch and develop parasocial relationships with the Islanders — carrying with them sexism and personal prejudices — the more folks who will go digging for old tweets, screenshots and scandals. And in many cases, it feels more like viewers are prioritising creating a viral moment and dogpiling vitriol against their least favourite contestants over educating and holding folks accountable. ' In many cases, it feels more like viewers are prioritising creating a viral moment and dogpiling vitriol against their least favourite contestants over educating and holding folks accountable. taryn finley ' In Ortega's case, it seemed that the louder the social media conversation got, the closer producers got to letting her go. From the jump, this was a messy situation that didn't need to happen. Ortega's past comments should have prevented her from being cast on the show to begin with. The Love Island producers seemed to prioritise content creators with an already strong following this season, seemingly chasing the success of last season. But with a growing fandom for the U.S. franchise and a tragic history with extreme bullying, it's evident that things need to change in how both the producers and fans handle controversy. That these people are getting let go without the Love Island production making any official statements beyond vague voiceovers. Are we just to assume that they don't condone racism and hateful language? Because in 2025 with federal agencies and corporate agencies backing away from diversity, equity and inclusion, opting to play it safe with 'colourblind' politics is not the move. They're avoiding actually condemning racism, which is honestly the bare minimum. Saying folks are leaving 'due to personal reasons' feels lazy and dishonest, especially when there are plenty of viewers without social media who have no idea of the real reasons behind these exits. You also also have to factor in the ages of these castmembers (most in their early 20s) and how chronically online this generation has been their whole lives. Blunders are bound to resurface. Yes, there should be consequences. And the team behind Love Island has a responsibility to protect its cast — and its audience — from situations like this. The vetting process clearly needs to be more thorough. And how they handle the fallout from these decisions to remove Islanders mid-season also needs an overhaul.

Today's NYT Mini Crossword Clues And Answers For Thursday, July 10th
Today's NYT Mini Crossword Clues And Answers For Thursday, July 10th

Forbes

time6 hours ago

  • Forbes

Today's NYT Mini Crossword Clues And Answers For Thursday, July 10th

Looking for help with today's NYT Mini Crossword puzzle? Here are some hints and answers for the ... More puzzle. In case you missed Wednesday's NYT Mini Crossword puzzle, you can find the answers here: It's Thursday, or if you want to get a little mythological with it, Thor's Day. Several of our weekdays are named after Norse gods. Tuesday for Tyr, Wednesday for Odin, Thursday for Thor, Friday for Freya. Saturday, of course, bucks this trend and gives the Roman god Saturn his very own day. Stranger still, Saturday is not named after a Roman god in most Romance languages. In Spanish, sábado is derived from the Hebrew Sabbath. In any case, we have a NYT Mini Crossword to solve, so let's solve it! The NYT Mini is a smaller, quicker, more digestible, bite-sized version of the larger and more challenging NYT Crossword, and unlike its larger sibling, it's free-to-play without a subscription to The New York Times. You can play it on the web or the app, though you'll need the app to tackle the archive. Spoilers ahead! FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™ Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase Pinpoint By Linkedin Guess The Category Queens By Linkedin Crown Each Region Crossclimb By Linkedin Unlock A Trivia Ladder Before we get to the answers, here's the first letter for each word in today's Mini. Across 1A. 5x5 crossword – M 5A. Breakfast sandwich option – B 6A. From way back when – O 7A. Like much toothpaste – M 8A. First, second or third, but not fourth – B Down 1D. Party game with accusations from 'villagers' – M 2D. Total legends – I 3D. Actor Nick on the Hollywood Walk of Fame – N 4D. The N.B.A.'s Pacers, familiarly – I 5D. Fail at stand-up – B Okay, onto the answers! Remember, spoilers ahead! Across 1A. 5x5 crossword – MINI 5A. Breakfast sandwich option – BACON 6A. From way back when – OF OLD 7A. Like much toothpaste – MINTY 8A. First, second or third, but not fourth – BASE Down 1D. Party game with accusations from 'villagers' – MAFIA 2D. Total legends – ICONS 3D. Actor Nick on the Hollywood Walk of Fame – NOLTE 4D. The N.B.A.'s Pacers, familiarly – INDY 5D. Fail at stand-up – BOMB Today's Mini 1-Across was so obvious that it wasn't obvious. I overthought it right away, wondering if there was a specific 5x5 grid where all the boxes were open that was called something specific. I quickly realized how silly this was and plugged in MINI. I was a little less certain of the next couple words and skipped ahead to MINTY. Then I turned to the DOWNs and plugged in NOLTE. From here I had enough letters filled in to start guessing at some of the ones I wasn't sure of. It took me 1:21 to solve this one, though I found it quite tricky at first. How did you do? Let me know on Twitter, Instagram or Facebook. If you also play Wordle, I write guides about that as well. You can find those and all my TV guides, reviews and much more here on my blog. Thanks for reading!

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store