logo
Stockard on the Stump: Sexton and bail bond industry headed for collision

Stockard on the Stump: Sexton and bail bond industry headed for collision

Yahoo14-02-2025
An attorney for the bail bonds industry is questioning the constitutionality of measure spearheaded by House Speaker Cameron Sexton. Photo: John Partipilo)
The bail bond industry is questioning the constitutionality of a proposed amendment to Tennessee's Constitution that would give judges the discretion to decline bail for some 75 violent crimes.
Michael McClaren, attorney for the American Bail Coalition, sent a letter to Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti and Senate Majority Leader Jack Johnson challenging the measure's legality and saying it would have 'unintended and detrimental consequences' for the state. He stopped short of requesting a legal opinion.
Sponsored by House Speaker Cameron Sexton of Crossville, the amendment would remove the right to bail for capital offenses, terrorism, second-degree murder, aggravated rape of a child, aggravated rape, grave torture and a litany of offenses for which a defendant would have to serve at least 85% of their sentence under a new 'truth in sentencing' law.
Under the state Constitution, capital offenses are the only crime for which bail can be denied, and this would be a massive expansion, although Sexton and House Majority Leader William Lamberth say only a few repeat offenders would be affected.
People want to make sure if you're committing violent crimes, especially if you've done two, three or four, there's an option for you not to get back out.
McClaren's letter says the proposed amendment restricts the right to bail and 'will deny voters and citizens of Tennessee procedural due process' because it fails to give 'clear notice' of what would be prohibited.
'A law is considered unconstitutionally vague if it is so unclear that people of common intelligence must guess at its meaning and differ as to its application,' McClaren's letter says.
More pointedly, he says most Tennesseans don't know which crimes require 85% of a sentence to be served.
(In short, the proposed amendment doesn't 'explain about the 50 ways.' 'Just slip out the back Jack / Make a new plan Stan / You don't need to be coy Roy / Just get yourself free.' Sorry for the Paul Simon lyrics, but they seemed to fit.)
While the bail bond industry's opposition is predictable, it also could be considered practical, as it argues this move could fill up county jails and force local governments to spend millions of dollars to hold defendants while they await trial.
Sexton, the prime sponsor of House Joint Resolution 49, says the bail association is claiming the amendment creates a 'mandate' for denying bail on more than 70 offenses, which, he adds 'is absolutely false.'
'People want to make sure if you're committing violent crimes, especially if you've done two, three or four, there's an option for you not to get back out,' Sexton says.
He questions whether someone has to commit murder before they're ineligible for bail.
'I think we're better than that, and I think the judges with the discretion will make the best decision,' he adds.
The bill passed a subcommittee and is headed for the House Judiciary Committee in a couple of weeks.
The question, though, is not necessarily whether the legislature should act as jury, judge and executioner, although that should be the overriding concern.
In this case, it's whether people are going to know what they're voting on when they go to the ballot box in 2026.
Lawmakers approved the constitutional amendment in 2024, and it must receive a two-thirds vote by the legislature before it can go on next year's ballot where it must receive a majority vote of those who participate in the gubernatorial election.
Sexton must have a great deal of confidence in voters, saying the question will reference voters to the section of the code where the crimes are listed, even though the state law won't be on the ballot with the constitutional question.
His disdain for the bail industry is much clearer than the proposed amendment.
'It's unconstitutional because people can't see what the crimes are? Is that what the bail association is saying? I don't understand the unconstitutional aspect of that,' Sexton says.
Yet he hit it right on the head. If people don't know what they're voting on, that could be a problem. It also causes long lines at precincts when people start scratching their heads in the voting booth. But that's another matter.
Some lawmakers are hesitant to support any constitutional amendments. But this legislature is starting to look like California's State Assembly, which is in the habit of legislating through ballots.
Gov. Bill Lee signed his private-school voucher bill into law Wednesday surrounded by – you guessed it – private school students.
Fawning lawmakers, lobbyists and parents attended the Capitol confab, as well, amid a cacophony of cheers for 'school choice.'
If someone gave me $7,300-plus every year for doing nothing extra, I might cheer too.
When your vote is 54-44 (one of which was miscast), putting you barely above the constitutional requirement in the House to adopt a bill, that is hardly a mandate. The fix was in, considering the state's own report said two-thirds of the 20,000 students who would take the money next school year are going to private schools already.
Lee is moving at warp speed to set up the voucher system, even though questions continue to be raised about the 'hold harmless' provision for public school districts that lose students and whether the new 'entitlement program' will send the state over a 'fiscal cliff.'
Despite complaints from Republican and Democratic lawmakers about the implications of starting a new education program, Lt. Gov. Randy McNally reminded us Thursday the legislature will decide every year whether to fund increases in the program. It's supposed to grow 3% annually with K-12 public schools funding. But the legislature has ultimate oversight.
Says McNally, 'The legislature has always been conservative, especially since Gov. Ramsey came on board, and we won't spend money we don't have, and we won't play games with money.'
(Think about that as you're traversing the Lieutenant Governor Speaker of the Senate Ron Ramsey Tunnel and pondering, 'Ron who?')
OK, if we can't play games, can we just give money away?
Republican Rep. Gino 'Bathroom Bill' Bulso brought us the latest version of potty police-dom this week, pushing a bill through the Education Administration Subcommittee that would force public and private schools to set up separate restroom and changing facilities for transgender kids.
The state law is needed, according to Bulso, because he received a complaint from a parent.
Despite being told he was 'mean' and drawing questions from fellow Republicans who said they had problems with making private schools spend money, Bulso pushed them to a vote in a room packed with jeering LGBTQ+ supporters.
While Republicans on the committee initially appeared ready to deep-six the bill, giving Bulso the option to postpone and work toward a better solution, they voted otherwise.
The bill passed, and we'll see a replay of this soon in a House committee room near you.
Eleven House Democrats walked out of Lee's State of the State address this week in a show of protest against his policies. That left 13 or so House Democrats in the chamber and six Senate Democrats to listen to the profundity.
Hallway talk is that the outnumbered Democrats aren't getting along too well, which could make it even harder than normal to accomplish anything.
Yet House Democratic Caucus Chairman John Ray Clemmons says there was no dissension in the ranks before the walkout.
'We are unanimous in our opposition to this governor's misplaced priorities and his policies. His comments with regard to immigration, his political pandering, his bragging about voucher bills, we all unanimously oppose those policies,' Clemmons says.
House rules don't prohibit members from leaving the chamber during the governor's address, Clemmons adds, giving them a chance to show 'solidarity' in opposition.
That may be true. But if folks such as the poor press corps have to sit through the posturing, then everybody else should too.
The motto for the governor's next budget is 'Innovate 2025,' not to be confused with Project 2025, the blueprint for the new world order.
All through the document, readers kept looking for innovation, such as borrowing $1 billion for collegiate capital projects, usually a no-no for the state, spending $450 million to create a new private-school 'entitlement,' creating a $5.5 million immigration enforcement bureau that can operate confidentially and the list could go on.
He taught us that space and time — once thought to be fixed — are actually interconnected and dynamic, relative to one another.
– Gov. Bill Lee on physicist Albert Einstein
Finally, though, it dawned on us simpletons that the answer was in Lee's words at the State of the State when he spoke about taking a course on Albert Einstein's work.
'He taught us that space and time — once thought to be fixed — are actually interconnected and dynamic, relative to one another,' Lee said.
All we have to do is 'challenge conventional thinking' and prove it wrong, he said.
If only he could persuade the Tennessee Supreme Court to rewrite the theory of relativity. All it takes is a couple more appointments.
'The problem is all inside your head,' she said to me / 'The answer is easy if you take it logically.' *
*'Fifty Ways to Leave Your Lover,' Paul Simon
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'I would win.' Marjorie Taylor Greene passes on running for Georgia governor
'I would win.' Marjorie Taylor Greene passes on running for Georgia governor

USA Today

time7 minutes ago

  • USA Today

'I would win.' Marjorie Taylor Greene passes on running for Georgia governor

Republican Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene is passing on running for Georgia governor after months of speculation that the MAGA-aligned lawmaker would enter next year's contest, but she left the door open for a future bid. "I am humbled and grateful by the massive statewide support that I have to run for governor, and if I wanted to run we all know I would win," Green said in a July 29 post on X. "It's not even debatable." The country's roughly three-dozen gubernatorial races over the next 16 months, starting with New Jersey and Virginia this fall, promise to be some of the most intriguing in recent memory with serious ramifications nationally. Most of the attention will be centered on six of the seven 2024 battleground states, including Georgia, where Republican incumbent Brian Kemp is term limited. Forecasters rate the Peach State as a toss-up as both parties are vying to nab the seat. Georgia Democrats gloated over her decision, saying Greene "officially chickened out" of the race in a statement to USA TODAY. She had already passed on running for Senate at the urging of President Donald Trump and other GOP figures, who believed she would be too polarizing in a general election against Democratic incumbent Jon Ossoff. Greene's decision leaves Lt. Gov. Burt Jones and Attorney General Cris Carr as the most prominent figures in the upcoming Republican primary. In her online comments, the outspoken congresswoman said she is concerned about the state of affairs in Georgia and criticized its male-dominated environment that she said needs to be toppled. "And one day, I might just run without the blessing from the good 'ole boys club or the out of state consulting leaches or even without the blessing of my favorite president," she said. Greene, who first ran for Congress in 2020, has been bucking Trump and the GOP more lately, starting in June when she slammed the president's decision to bomb Iran. On July 29, she became the first Republican member of Congress to describe the ongoing humanitarian crisis in Gaza as a "genocide" citing the flood of pictures and videos of mass starvation in the enclave.

Live updates: Trump faces flurry of economic news; Senate Dems push for Epstein files release
Live updates: Trump faces flurry of economic news; Senate Dems push for Epstein files release

The Hill

time7 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Live updates: Trump faces flurry of economic news; Senate Dems push for Epstein files release

LIVE Video: NTSB begins hearings on deadly DCA crash President Trump's economy faces a big day Wednesday, with a second-quarter GDP report and the Federal Reserve's latest interest rate decision coming two days before new tariffs take effect. The Q2 gross domestic product data released early Wednesday showed the economy grew 3 percent, bounding back from the first quarter and exceeding expectations. The Fed will announce its next interest rate move — no change is expected — at 2 p.m., with a press conference from chair Jerome Powell at 2:30 p.m. Trump said Wednesday he was holding firm on his Aug. 1 deadline — that's Friday — for his global tariffs to take effect. He also railed against the tariffs India is charging the U.S. Many countries still don't have a trade deal. Here's which ones. The president on Wednesday is scheduled to sign legislation and to make remarks at a health technology event. Meanwhile, Senate Democrats are looking to force the administration to release the files of Jeffrey Epstein. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) and other Democrats will make remarks on the matter Wednesday afternoon. Tensions among Democrats over how to deal with the Trump agenda boiled over on Tuesday, as Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.) laid into his colleagues on the Senate floor. 'This, to me, is a problem with Democrats in America right now, is we're willing to be complicit to Donald Trump,' Booker thundered. Catch up:

Civil rights agency sued over handling of trans worker discrimination complaints
Civil rights agency sued over handling of trans worker discrimination complaints

NBC News

time8 minutes ago

  • NBC News

Civil rights agency sued over handling of trans worker discrimination complaints

Legal groups sued the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Tuesday, claiming it is unlawfully refusing to enforce federal workplace protections for transgender workers. Led by Acting Chair Andrea Lucas, a Republican, the federal agency charged with enforcing laws against workplace discrimination has moved swiftly to comply with President Donald Trump's executive order declaring two unchangeable sexes. Under Lucas's leadership, the EEOC has dropped several lawsuits on behalf of transgender workers, stalled progress on some new cases, and subjected others to heightened scrutiny. The lawsuit also alleges that the agency halted payments to state and local civil rights agencies for investigating gender identity discrimination claims. "For over 60 years, the EEOC's mandate has been to protect workers from discrimination, not to pick and choose who is deemed worthy of protection based on political interference," said Skye Perryman, the president and CEO of Democracy Forward, which alongside the National Women's Law Center brought the case on behalf of Maryland LGBTQ+ advocacy group FreeState Justice. "The Trump-Vance administration's unlawful effort to erase protections for transgender people is cruel, and a violation of the law and the Constitution," Perryman continued in an emailed statement. The EEOC declined to comment on the lawsuit, and instead referred The Associated Press to the Department of Justice. The DOJ did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Lucas, who is named in the lawsuit filed in Maryland U.S. District Court in Baltimore, has said that one of her priorities as Acting Chair would be "defending the biological and binary reality of sex and related rights." Last month she defended her decision to drop several lawsuits on behalf of transgender workers during her June 18 Senate committee confirmation hearing, saying her agency is not independent and must comply with the president's orders. "It was impossible to both comply with the president's executive order as an executive branch agency, and also zealously defend the workers we had brought the case on behalf," she said. However, Lucas acknowledged that a 2020 Supreme Court ruling — Bostock v. Clayton County — "did clearly hold that discriminating against someone on the basis of sex included firing an individual who is transgender or based on their sexual orientation." Plaintiffs argue that although the Bostock precedent "cemented protections for LGBTQ+ workers that the EEOC had already recognized for years" the agency has now "foreclosed transgender workers from the full set of charge investigation and other enforcement protections available to cisgender charging parties and categorically refuses to fully enforce the laws protecting against workplace sex discrimination tied to gender identity." The lawsuit, which cites two Associated Press reports detailing EEOC actions related to LGBTQ+ workers, alleges that the EEOC's "Trans Exclusion Policy" violates Supreme Court precedent, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Fifth Amendment's Equal Protection guarantee, and the Administrative Procedure Act. "Instead of serving its critical role to prevent discrimination in the workplace, the EEOC, under Andrea Lucas' leadership, is actually promoting discrimination," said Gaylynn Burroughs, Vice President for Education and Workplace Justice at NWLC, in an emailed statement about the lawsuit. "Transgender workers deserve to be protected against harassment, and the EEOC is obligated to do so under law. But the Trump administration seems hellbent on bullying transgender people in every possible way and ensuring that they are pushed out of all forms of public life, including their workplaces, so we're taking the administration to court."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store