logo
Islamist ‘entryism': French Muslims refuse to be labelled ‘enemies' within

Islamist ‘entryism': French Muslims refuse to be labelled ‘enemies' within

Middle East Eye30-05-2025
There was no surprise - only dismay and frustration - among French Muslims following the publication last week of a government report highlighting the alleged influence of the Muslim Brotherhood and political Islamism in France.
Commissioned last year to 'clarify the threat posed by Islamist infiltration to security and national cohesion,' the document aims to raise awareness about so-called Islamist entryism.
This is "considered a separatist mode of action" that "is characterised by involvement in local life to access positions of influence and power that enable the obtaining of amendments to existing laws".
On 21 May, French President Emmanuel Macron convened a Defence Council meeting to discuss the report and asked the government to formulate proposals in light of the "seriousness of the facts".
For many Muslims in France, this was just another worrying step in the stigmatisation of their community.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
"After accusing us of separatism, now we are suspected of plotting to seize power,' Salwa Hamiti, a former sports coach at a community centre near Paris, told Middle East Eye.
'How far will this demonisation go, turning us into enemies to be defeated?'
The 34-year-old Muslim woman became a target the moment she decided to cover her head two years ago.
'My manager didn't appreciate seeing me arrive one morning wearing a turban,' she said.
'He immediately took me aside to ask me to remove it. According to him, not only was I breaking the laicite law, but I risked influencing the young girls I was training, most of whom were of Muslim origin,' said Hamiti, who eventually resigned.
'After accusing us of separatism, now we are suspected of plotting to seize power. How far will this demonisation go?'
- Salwa Hamiti, a former sports coach
In France, "laicite" is a form of secularism defined as the separation between the state and religious institutions, which imposes an obligation of neutrality on the state.
In 2004, the country legislated to prohibit the wearing of religious symbols or clothing in state schools, and earlier this year, the Senate adopted a similar law - that still needs to be discussed by the lower house of parliament - during all sports competitions.
Today, although Hamiti has found a job as a saleswoman in a 'Muslim-friendly' store, the former coach still cannot believe she was accused of proselytising.
"A kippah or a cross are fine, but not the veil, the qamis [tunic] and the beard, that are used today as a pretext for the right and the far right to fuel fear and hatred of French Muslims," ​​she said.
'Fifth column'
The report on the Muslim Brotherhood's influence in France unveiled last week highlights primarily alleged lobbying and networking practices.
Interior Minister Bruno Retailleau denounced the "threat" posed by the "entryism" of the Muslim Brotherhood, whose goal, according to him, is "to push all of French society into Sharia law."
For lawyer Sefen Guez Guez, this is "utterly false." And by promoting such a discourse, the authorities validate conspiracy theories about Islam, he told MEE.
French president asks for measures to combat Muslim Brotherhood 'entryism' Read More »
"These theories suggest that there are organisations whose goal is to destabilise the nation, while we are all witnessing a rise in Islamophobia in France," he said.
According to the National Directorate of Territorial Intelligence, anti-Muslim acts have increased by 72 percent when compared to the same period last year.
Dramatic as this rise is, representatives of the Muslim community believe these figures do not show the full extent of the problem as victims do not always file complaints.
Guez Guez considers that "the state contributes to amplifying Islamophobia by suggesting that Muslims represent a danger and constitute a kind of fifth column, especially if they organise and succeed".
"Personally, I am convinced that it is the success of the Muslim community in this country that is disturbing," he added.
In recent years, the lawyer has defended several cases involving Muslim organisations targeted by banning procedures - such as the Collective Against Islamophobia in France (CCIF), dissolved in 2020 - as well as the closure of mosques and private Muslim schools.
All these entities have been accused of colluding with Islamist circles and propagating their ideas.
This is the case of the Averroes Muslim high school, a high-quality establishment located in the northern city of Lille, whose legal team has just obtained, on appeal, the reinstatement of public subsidies after more than a year of legal battles.
'[There is] a clear desire on the part of the state to dismantle any possibility for the Muslim community to build an elite that is professionally successful and at the same time asserts its Islamic identity'
- Sefen Guez Guez, lawyer
In Lyon, in eastern central France, the fate of the Al Kindi high school, also renowned for the excellence of its results, is still in the hands of the courts.
Last January, the local prefecture decided to terminate its contract with the state on the grounds that it "carries out a project contrary to the values ​​of the Republic".
"In court, the director of legal affairs at the interior ministry, who came to defend the case on behalf of the prefecture, said that Al Kindi's real problem was that it was training an elite that would one day be in power,' Guez Guez reported.
The lawyer denounced: 'A clear desire on the part of the state to dismantle any possibility for the Muslim community to build an elite that is professionally successful and at the same time asserts its Islamic identity.'
A year and a half after the promulgation of the so-called 'separatism' law in 2021 - which its detractors say discriminates against Muslims - 3,000 inspections have been carried out in Muslim establishments.
As a result, 187 were closed, including seven mosques and 11 schools.
After Averroes and Al Kindi, Ibn Khaldoun, a school located in Marseille, is now threatened with closure. The right-wing presidents of the region and department have just withdrawn public funding because, according to them, the establishment is part of the "Muslim Brotherhood ecosystem".
"We must expect similar decisions to multiply following the publication of the report," Guez Guez warned.
'A culture of suspicion'
This is also the fear of Christian Di Meglio, president of Sete Olympique, an amateur soccer club near the southern city of Montpellier that was stripped of its license a year ago for emblazoning its players' jerseys with a star and a crescent, two emblematic symbols of Islam.
The club has been accused of 'communautarist' practices and 'separatism'.
'Down with the veil': Muslim athletes outraged by French bill to ban hijab in sports Read More »
"Our logo had never caused any problems since the club's creation in 2016, but with the rise of the far right, we became a target,' he told MEE.
Out of a total of "280 associations affiliated with the movement in a multitude of sectors that affect Muslim life', the government's report on the Muslim Brotherhood mentions 127 sports associations listed in 2020 as "having a relationship with a separatist movement".
"When players pray in the locker room, they are Islamists, but when a footballer makes the sign of the cross upon entering the pitch, it doesn't bother anyone," Di Meglio said, protesting against "the development of a culture of suspicion that exclusively targets Muslims."
The rector of the Grand Mosque of Lyon, Kamel Kabtane, calls it "a presumption of guilt towards Muslims."
"When a Defence Council is convened, it's because the situation is serious, because there is an internal enemy, and they cite it: Islam and Islamism," Kabtane told MEE.
The government report released this month claims that two mosques in Lyon and around 50 associations in the region are Muslim Brotherhood-affiliated.
'Should we consider that 400 people [...] could subvert republican institutions or even Islamise society? It's not credible'
- Franck Fregosi, a researcher at the National Centre for Scientific Research
The rector denies this, and denounces a very anxiety-inducing climate for Muslims in the country, which reminds him of "the way Jews were treated since 1933".
"They are currently scrutinising the ways we dress, behave, and so on,' Kabtane said.
Other Islamic organisations, such as the Grand Mosque of Paris and the French Council of the Muslim Faith, are concerned about the stigmatisation of Muslims in the name of the fight against Islamism.
The Grand Mosque of Paris has denounced in a press release "the construction of a Muslim problem and the insidious development of an increasingly uninhibited discriminatory discourse" whose aim is to 'serve particular political agendas".
Politically-motivated
For Franck Fregosi, a researcher at the National Centre for Scientific Research and a specialist in Islam in France, the report serves in particular the interior minister, "whose presidential ambitions are well known".
The academic, who was interviewed by the report's authors, was surprised to discover conclusions that according to him exaggerate the influence and the threat of the Muslim Brotherhood in France.
"I admit I don't understand the nature of this threat. Should we consider that 400 people, who constitute the centre of the Brotherhood [according to the report], could subvert republican institutions or even Islamise society? It's not credible," he told MEE.
Fregosi points out that Musulmans de France (Muslims of France), a group the report identifies as "the national branch of the Muslim Brotherhood" in the country, is actually losing ground.
'The content of this report serves to scare public opinion and then provide [the government] with the means to act with racist laws against Muslims without the French people being upset'
- Kamel Kabtane, rector of the Grand Mosque of Lyon
Fregosi sees the focus on the Muslim Brotherhood as a pretext to call out Muslim urban visibility, which is intolerable in the eyes of right and far-right supporters.
What's more, the researcher worries that the report will be a pretext to develop new, more restrictive laws against Muslims.
The fear is shared by the rector of the Grand Mosque of Lyon.
"The content of this report serves to scare public opinion and then provide [the government] with the means to act with racist laws against Muslims without the French people being upset," Kabtane said.
Some political leaders are already making proposals.
Gabriel Attal, former prime minister and president of the presidential party, Renaissance, wants to ban the hijab for girls under 15.
Meanwhile, the interior minister wants the issue of the Muslim Brotherhood 'entryism' to be addressed in the same way as terrorism, including by increasing field controls of Muslim businesses, mosques and associations and facilitating administrative obstruction measures.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Macron calls on EU to 'defend European interests' in US tariff talks
Macron calls on EU to 'defend European interests' in US tariff talks

Al Etihad

timean hour ago

  • Al Etihad

Macron calls on EU to 'defend European interests' in US tariff talks

12 July 2025 21:12 Paris (AFP)French President Emmanuel Macron on Saturday condemned US President Donald Trump's threat to impose 30% tariffs on the European Union, calling on the bloc to "resolutely defend European interests".Trump on Saturday warned that Mexico and the EU would be slapped with 30% tariffs starting on August 1, raising the stakes in already tense negotiations with two of the largest US trading France's "very strong disapproval" of the announcement, Macron called on the bloc to "step up the preparation of credible countermeasures by mobilising all instruments at its disposal" if the two sides failed to reach agreement by August 1."France fully supports the European Commission in the negotiation that will intensify to reach a mutually acceptable agreement by August 1, so that it reflects the respect that trade partners such as the European Union and the United States owe each other," he wrote on social media. Earlier on Saturday, European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen hit out at the new tariffs threatened by Trump, but said the EU still sought a deal to avert the measures.

When Britain's 'feminists' cheer for bombs and sneer at Palestinian suffering
When Britain's 'feminists' cheer for bombs and sneer at Palestinian suffering

Middle East Eye

time2 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

When Britain's 'feminists' cheer for bombs and sneer at Palestinian suffering

A familiar breed of British pundit has resurfaced - loud, self-declared feminists whose outrage is as selective as it is performative, and whose moral compass somehow always aligns with western state power. They remain silent as Gaza burns, but are quick to find their voice to cheer on Israel and its allies as they threaten to flatten Iran - civilian casualties be damned. During Israel's recent strikes on Iran, the radical feminist journalist and co‑founder of Justice for Women, Julie Bindel, branded leftist anti-war feminists "Team Iran" sympathisers. It was a disingenuous, grotesquely misleading and dangerously ideological accusation, but not a surprising one. What we're witnessing goes beyond reasoned critique - it is the cynical weaponisation of feminism to uphold state violence. This is no isolated incident. It's a pattern. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters In October 2023, Bindel shared a Telegraph column that championed Israel's genocidal war on Gaza as "a stand for civilisation", while spreading propaganda against Palestinians and vilifying those who defend their humanity. When Palestinian women are pulled from rubble, starved in besieged hospitals, denied reproductive care or give birth next to the corpses of their children, Britain's loudest feminists look away. UN experts have documented acts of sexual violence against women and girls in Gaza - including rape, forced nudity and public humiliation. No statements. No hashtags. No vigils. The same figures who demand global outrage over gender-based violence have nothing to say when those crimes are committed with American firepower and British backing. Smearing solidarity While women in Gaza bleed in silence, these pundits reserve their fury for pro-Palestine protesters - smearing them as extremists, branding solidarity as terrorism, twisting every act of dissent into an endorsement of "jihad" and weaponising antisemitism to crush critique. Such hypocrisy is as strategic as it is shameful. Nothing unnerves Britain's loudest self-styled 'feminist' commentators more than the Palestinian flag - seen not as a cry for justice but an affront to their moral high ground Nothing seems to unnerve Britain's loudest self-styled "feminist" commentators more than the Palestinian flag - a symbol they treat not as a cry for justice, but as an affront to their proclaimed moral high ground. When groups like Palestine Action engage in peaceful civil disobedience - spraying red-paint slogans on Royal Air Force fences and even RAF planes to protest genocide - they are labelled "terrorists". Indeed, those who dare to expose and resist mass killing face criminalisation as part of a calculated assault on any challenge to the status quo. This isn't careless commentary - it is a deliberate ideological distortion disguised as feminist critique. Moreover, it is a betrayal of feminism's proud legacy of nonviolent resistance. From the Reclaim the Night marches that defied police curfews in the 1970s to Southall Black Sisters, who took to the streets to confront domestic violence, state racism and police inaction long before it was politically convenient, this unbroken tradition of protest against gendered state violence lies at the heart of the movement itself. The same voices who once championed the right to free speech - to occupy, stencil and disrupt - now recoil at a banner that simply demands accountability for colonial violence. Smokescreen for war Apparently, the mere objection to the bombing of Iranian civilians is now considered "supporting the regime". It is a framing that is at once ahistorical and a staggering collapse of intellectual rigour. Even those who have previously criticised some of Iran's policies are accused of siding with the Ayatollah simply for opposing western air strikes. When it comes to Iran, these pundits become overnight experts - reciting floggings, hijabs and hangings with righteous certainty. Iranian 'freedom' won't come from Israeli bombs or US regime change Read More » But raise Israel's war crimes - the bombed hospitals, the mass graves, the deliberate targeting of civilians - and their intellectual faculties, let alone moral clarity, suddenly short-circuit. Iran is treated as uniquely monstrous - requiring exceptional condemnation and meriting exceptional violence from the so-called champions of human rights. The doublethink is exhausting. The same feminists who once championed the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq under the banner of "saving women" are now recycling that same logic to legitimise ongoing western aggression. Have we learned nothing from two decades of war, occupation and manufactured consent? This isn't solidarity - it's a smokescreen for war dressed up in feminist language. Equally, opposing Israel's assault on civilians does not imply an endorsement of the Iranian regime. It is a feminist stance against yet another bloodbath disguised as liberation. To dismiss such opposition as regime sympathy is a reductive insult to the Iranian feminists who have risked everything to confront injustice without calling for foreign bombs. As Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe, one of the country's most courageous feminist dissidents who was jailed for defying the state, has made clear, real change will come from within. In Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq, where western intervention was sold as salvation, its bombs left only mass graves, collapsed infrastructure and broken societies. Selective sisterhood Some pro-war commentators have falsely claimed that most Iranians support US or Israeli bombing of their country. In reality, the small crowds seen celebrating air strikes outside Iran's embassy were rallying behind exiled monarchist Reza Pahlavi - a man known for his open support of Israel, who in recent interviews dismissed the killing of his own people as "collateral damage". To frame this fringe display as representative of Iranian opposition is not nuance - it is propaganda dressed up as political principle. Follow Middle East Eye's live coverage of the Israel-Palestine war A hashtag like #TeamIran, barely used beyond one media personality's feed, has been transformed into the centrepiece of a manufactured smear campaign against leftist solidarity. This astroturfed narrative, pushed by pundits and politicians alike, attempts to paint anti-war voices as "regime" loyalists - all to shut down dissent and shore up support for military escalation. These dissenters are then ridiculed as "stupid", "ignorant" or "beyond comprehension". What truly defies comprehension, however, is how some of the UK's loudest feminist voices have spent the past 20 months standing shoulder to shoulder with a military occupier, exposing their casual racism, far-right flirtations and a deep-seated contempt for Muslims cloaked in moral posturing. Western feminism's silence on Gaza lays bare its moral bankruptcy Maryam Aldossari Read More » Their outrage flares only when it flatters imperial power - and disappears entirely when Israeli forces bomb hospitals, block aid convoys or leave women and children to burn while seeking refuge beneath crumbling roofs. Where is their outrage at Israel's catalogue of war crimes? Where is the feminist fury at apartheid policies, the suffocating siege of Gaza and the systematic erasure of Palestinian life? Why has selective sisterhood become the norm - loud for some women, silent for others? Why do so many feminist organisations cower in fear, unwilling to speak unless it serves the powerful? Feminism must mean more than slogans for empire. It is meant to stand against all oppression, not just the kind convenient for white saviours and western allies. It's time to honour that promise by reclaiming it from those who've turned "women's rights" into a weapon of war and whitewashing. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.

"Such good English": Liberia says not offended by Trump gaffe to president
"Such good English": Liberia says not offended by Trump gaffe to president

Al Etihad

time2 hours ago

  • Al Etihad

"Such good English": Liberia says not offended by Trump gaffe to president

12 July 2025 19:42 Monrovia (AFP)Liberia's president was "honoured" to meet US counterpart Donald Trump this week and wasn't offended by Trump's comment about his fluency in English -- his mother tongue -- Liberia's foreign minister said on Friday. The US president's gaffe has even inspired a catchy tribute song in the west African country, Foreign Minister Sara Beysolow Nyanti told AFP on Friday praised President Joseph Boakai on Wednesday on his English-speaking skills, apparently unaware that English is the official language of Liberia. Responding to remarks Boakai made at a White House mini-summit alongside the presidents of five mineral-rich, French-speaking countries in west Africa, the US leader said: "Such good English... Where were you educated?" Boakai -- who, like most Liberians, speaks English as a first language -- laughed uncomfortably and replied he had been educated in his home country. "We were honoured by the White House's invitation to President Boakai for a meeting with President Trump and fellow African leaders," Nyanti said. "No offence was taken."She said Liberia was keen to strengthen ties with the United States, "built on mutual respect". Liberia is the oldest republic in sub-Saharan Africa. It was founded in 1822 when the American Colonization Society, funded by the US Congress and slaveholders, began sending freed slaves to its shores. Thousands of "Americo-Liberian" settlers followed. They declared independence in 1847 and set up a government to rule over the native African majority. English is the official language and the most widely used throughout the country. English King of Africa In response to Trump's faux pas, singer and former cultural ambassador Queen Juli Endee penned a song in tribute to Boakai."We salute JNB, our black president, Beautiful English King of Africa," she and her band sing in a video widely shared on social media. The clip shows them waving US flags and wearing T-shirts bearing the images of Boakai and Trump.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store