US Ruling That Trump Tariffs Are Unlawful Stirs Relief and Uncertainty
Among the United States' big trading partners, in the throes of negotiation with the Trump administration, Germany said it could not comment, as did the European Commission.
'We ask for your understanding that we cannot comment on the legal proceedings in the US, as they are still ongoing,' a spokesperson for Germany's economy ministry said.
'We continue to hope that a mutually beneficial solution can be reached in the negotiations between the EU Commission and the US government.'
ADVERTISEMENT
Winners on financial markets included chip makers, banks, luxury stocks and auto industry, all hit hard by tariff-led disruptions.
The US dollar rallied 0.2 percent against the yen and 0.3 percent against the Swiss franc as currencies and assets that have benefited from the tariff-induced market turmoil fell.
Wall Street stock index futures rose by more than 1.5 percent
The trade court ruling on Wednesday dealt a blow to Trump's central policy of using tariffs to wring concessions from trading partners.
His administration immediately said it will appeal and analysts said investors will remain cautious as the White House explores its legal avenues.
Following a market revolt after Trump's major tariff announcement on April 2, the US president paused most import duties for 90 days and said he would hammer out bilateral deals with trade partners.
But apart from a pact with Britain this month, agreements remain elusive and the court's stay on the tariffs may dissuade countries like Japan from rushing into deals, analysts said.
Another pause in Trump's stop-start trade policy could be helpful to opponents of his tariffs and to traders who relish volatility.
ADVERTISEMENT
'Assuming that an appeal does not succeed in the next few days, the main win is time to prepare, and also a cap on the breadth of tariffs – which can't exceed 15 percent for the time being,' George Lagarias, chief economist at Forvis Mazars international advisers, said.
Turmoil
Trump's trade war has shaken makers of everything from luxury handbags and trainers to household appliances and cars as the price of raw materials has risen, supply chains have been disrupted and company strategies redrafted.
Drinks company Diageo, automakers General Motors and Ford are among those who have abandoned forecasts for the year ahead.
Non-US companies including Honda, Campari and pharmaceutical companies Roche and Novartis have said they are considering moving operations or expanding their US presence to mitigate the impact of tariffs.
As markets assessed the latest twist in the trade upheaval, European export-sensitive sectors, such as autos and luxury stocks, were among leading gainers on Thursday.
The pan-continental STOXX 600 was up 0.4 percent, while France's CAC 40, which has a heavy weighting of luxury and bank stocks, rose 0.8 percent. Overall sentiment was also lifted by strong results late on Wednesday from AI bellwether Nvidia.
Spot gold declined for a fourth straight day, while US Treasury yields rose. Bond yields move inversely with prices.
But the gains in shares may be short-lived, analysts said, with those who relish risk making the most of them.
ADVERTISEMENT
'I think we are in a period of higher volatility - we will get some more spikes on the way, I think. But volatility is the friend of the active investors,' Kevin Barker, global head of active equities, UBS Asset Management, told a media briefing.
By Sarah Marsh, Samuel Indyk
Learn more:
Trump Tariffs Hit European Luxury, Shares Tank
LVMH and Hermès stock fell about 3 percent and 4 percent respectively, in line with sector peers including Kering, Prada and Burberry, after the US president announced a 50 percent duty on imports from the European Union.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
ICE Agents in Despair Under Stephen Miller's Impossible Orders
A new report from The Atlantic's Nick Miroff finds morale at Immigration and Customs Enforcement is suffering as the agency, under the direction of President Trump and Homeland Security adviser Stephen Miller, targets undocumented immigrants who haven't committed crimes. While the Trump administration may claim its deportation campaign prioritizes violent criminals and gang members, in reality, it has focused on arresting noncriminals, evidently to hit quotas passed down by Trump and Miller. And while the administration may claim ICE agents are happier than ever, Miroff's report—based on conversations with 12 current and former ICE personnel—shows that the change is frustrating many agents and officers. One ICE veteran finds the job so 'infuriating' that the agent is considering quitting. 'No drug cases, no human trafficking, no child exploitation,' said the agent, who complained about having to focus instead on 'arresting gardeners.' A former agent told Miroff that 'morale is in the crapper,' and 'even those that are gung ho about the mission aren't happy with how they are asking to execute it—the quotas and the shift to the low-hanging fruit to make the numbers.' Another former ICE official suggested that this shift is vindicating criticisms the agency has faced in the past, observing, 'What we're seeing now is what, for many years, we were accused of being, and could always safely say, 'We don't do that.'' One of Miroff's interviewees was Adam Boyd, a young attorney who resigned from the agency's legal department because it's no longer focused on 'protecting the homeland from threats.' Instead, he said, 'It became a contest of how many deportations could be reported to Stephen Miller by December.' Boyd told Miroff: 'We still need good attorneys at ICE. There are drug traffickers and national-security threats and human-rights violators in our country who need to be dealt with. But we are now focusing on numbers over all else.' One former ICE official said that there are now 'national-security and public-safety threats that are not being addressed,' as the agency moves staff from its Homeland Security Investigations division, focused largely on transnational crime, to its Enforcement and Removal Operations division—a move that many perceive as retaliation for HSI in recent years distancing itself from the agency's deportation arm. When Miller issued his demand for 3,000 arrests per day, he reportedly steamrolled any veteran officials who dared to speak up about its impracticality, which has led many to keep silent since then for fear of drawing his ire, Miroff writes. This means that 'no one is saying, 'This is not obtainable,'' an ICE official told him. 'The answer is just to keep banging the [ICE rank-and-file] and tell [them] they suck. It's just not a good atmosphere.'
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tariffs will hit harder in the coming months, with traders growing weary of the trade drama, Morgan Stanley's CIO says
Tariff pain will be felt more acutely in the coming months, Mike Wilson says. The Morgan Stanley CIO predicts three consequences from tariffs that could show up this quarter. Stocks could take a hit as investors wait for more concrete trade deals to materialize, Wilson said. Morgan Stanley's chief investment officer says investors are growing weary of the trade drama, warning that tariffs' negative impacts could start showing up for companies and in markets soon. Mike Wilson, the chief US equity strategist at Morgan Stanley, said he foresaw a slew of consequences stemming from President Donald Trump's tariffs, which could begin to impact markets as soon as the third quarter. Investors have stayed relatively calm so far this week, despite Donald Trump escalating his trade war. The president announced fresh tariffs on more than 20 countries this week, a separate 50% tariff on copper imports, and pushed out his original deadline to August 1. "I would say, 'Here we go again,'" Wilson said, speaking to Bloomberg on Friday about the latest tariff announcements. Here's what Wilson sees ahead. Investors are familiar with Trump's tariff negotiating playbook after seeing the president whipsaw on his trade policy during Liberation Day, Wilson said. "I mean, this is President Trump's style. He goes hard, and then he, you know, he doesn't back off completely, but it's a back-and-forth," Wilson said. But traders hungry for more concrete trade deals could soon grow tired of the drama, Wilson said. Trump — whose team once pushed the idea of 90 trade deals in 90 days — hasn't nailed down many deals with trading partners yet. "That's not going to work forever. Eventually we have to get to some deals," Wilson said. "There will become a point of exhaustion, is the way I like to think about it." Corporations have been shielded from the impact of tariffs so far, thanks to businesses relying on existing inventory to sell products to consumers. But that could change in the next few months, Wilson said. Smaller corporations could be especially affected in third quarter earnings season, he added, as they don't have as much pricing power to be able to pass along the cost of tariffs to consumers. "It hasn't begun to flow through to pricing or margins. But that we think begins to change in the third quarter, and that could be the catalyst, because stocks will react to a hit in margins," he added. Inflation could also begin to creep higher in the third quarter as tariffs finally start to work their way through the economy, Wilson speculated. Tariffs are widely thought to raise inflation, as companies can hike prices to offset the cost of import duties. That could also push out the market's expectations for interest rate cuts, as the Fed will look to keep rates elevated if inflation grows hotter. "Perhaps we get a spike in inflation, which, you know, then causes the Fed to sound more hawkish, and the market will care about that for sure," Wilson added. Read the original article on Business Insider
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Can an ‘ethical' spyware maker justify providing its tech to ICE?
Paragon, an Israeli spyware company that claims to operate as an 'ethical' surveillance vendor, faced scrutiny when earlier this year Italy was caught using Paragon's tools to spy on the phones of two journalists. Paragon responded by cutting Italy off from its surveillance products, becoming the first spyware company to ever publicly name one of its customers after the misuse of its products. Now, Paragon might face a new ethical dilemma: whether or not it will allow ICE agents to use its spyware. A $2 million one-year contract that Paragon signed in September 2024 with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) remains under review and has not yet taken effect, and Paragon has so far not supplied ICE's Homeland Security Investigations with its spyware tools, the company told TechCrunch. Since taking office in January, the Trump administration has authorized ICE to carry out large-scale immigration raids across the U.S., leading to the detention of thousands of migrants — and numerous U.S. citizens — in part thanks to data stored in federal databases and using technology provided by govtech giant Palantir. Considering ICE is poised to get a significantly larger budget following the passing of Trump's flagship Big Beautiful Bill Act into law, spyware could serve as a powerful surveillance tool in the Trump administration's immigration enforcement operations. With two months left before the contract expires, Paragon may never supply its spyware to ICE. But until the contract runs out on September 29, the U.S. government could approve it at any moment, forcing Paragon to make a decision about the use of its tools on U.S. soil. Right now, the company doesn't want to talk about this dilemma at all. When asked by TechCrunch, Paragon would not say what it plans to do if the contract passes review, or clarify what will happen with its relationship with ICE if the contract goes forward. Do you have more information about Paragon? From a non-work device, you can contact Lorenzo Franceschi-Bicchierai securely on Signal at +1 917 257 1382, or via Telegram and Keybase @lorenzofb, or email. You also can contact TechCrunch via SecureDrop. Paragon's contract with ICE has been on pause since the paperwork was signed. Homeland Security issued a near-immediate stop-work order with the goal of reviewing whether the contract complied with a Biden-era executive order. The order restricts U.S. government agencies from using commercial spyware that could (or has been) abused by foreign governments to violate human rights, or to target Americans abroad. At the time, a Biden administration official told Wired that the U.S. government had 'immediately engaged' top leadership at Homeland Security, which houses ICE, to determine if the contract met the requirements of the executive order. Nine months on, Paragon's contract with ICE remains in limbo, and officials in the Trump White House did not have an update on its status. Trump administration spokesperson Abigail Jackson referred TechCrunch's questions to Homeland Security, and would not comment, when asked, about the Trump administration's position on the Biden-era spyware executive order, which remains in effect. A spokesperson for Homeland Security and ICE did not provide comment when contacted by TechCrunch. Spyware companies have historically been reticent to name their customers in any context, often for fear of reputational damage or risking lucrative government contracts. After WhatsApp revealed earlier this year that around 90 of its users, including journalists and human rights dissidents, had been targeted with Paragon's spyware, the company sought to distance itself from the hacks. Paragon's executive chairman John Fleming told TechCrunch then that it only sells to 'a select group of global democracies — principally, the United States and its allies.' In other words, Paragon wanted the world to know that it would sell to responsible government customers, and its response to the Italy scandal appears to reinforce the company's position. But in calling itself an ethical spyware vendor, Paragon has put the onus on itself to judge who it deals with. In doing so, the company has also opened the door for others to scrutinize its government customers and their ethics — whether they are the Italian government or ICE. As governments and their leaders change over time, Paragon may face the choice of having to re-evaluate who it works with. 'Given this administration's record of attacks on human rights and civil society organizations, we hope that Paragon would reconsider the agreement,' said Michael De Dora, the U.S. advocacy manager at Access Now, a nonprofit that has worked to expose spyware abuses. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
