logo
China badmouths French Rafale to rewire Indo-Pacific arms deals

China badmouths French Rafale to rewire Indo-Pacific arms deals

AllAfrica3 days ago
China has launched a digital dogfight against France, using disinformation and diplomatic pressure to undermine Rafale fighter jet sales and promote Chinese alternatives across the Indo-Pacific.
This month, the Associated Press (AP) reported that French intelligence officials have accused China of orchestrating a targeted disinformation campaign aimed at harming the reputation and sales of Dassault Aviation's Rafale fighter jet, particularly after its deployment in the India-Pakistan conflict in May.
The supposed initiative, led by Chinese defense attachés through foreign embassies, involved lobbying countries such as Indonesia to reconsider their procurement plans and choose Chinese-made alternatives. Online activity surged during the four-day conflict, with over 1,000 new accounts disseminating manipulated imagery, AI-generated content, and simulated combat depictions to portray Rafales as underperforming.
French Air Force General Jérôme Bellanger confirmed that India lost three aircraft: one Rafale, one Sukhoi, and one Mirage 2000. He also dismissed the claims of five Rafale shootdowns as disinformation. The first known Rafale combat loss has prompted global scrutiny among client states.
France's Defense Ministry described the campaign as an attack not only on a weapons platform but also on its strategic industrial reputation. With 323 jets exported, including 42 ordered by Indonesia, the Rafale remains central to France's Indo-Pacific outreach.
China's defense ministry rejected the allegations as 'groundless rumors.' Observers believe China aims to weaken Western defense ties in Asia. AP reviewed intelligence shared on condition of anonymity.
Explaining China's possible disinformation strategy, Dexter Roberts, in a December 2020 Atlantic Council report, outlined how Beijing employs disinformation as a strategic instrument to shape global narratives, undermine the credibility of rival powers, and enhance its 'discourse power' in critical domains like defense.
He explained that China utilizes state-controlled media, social platforms and covert actors to amplify propaganda and discredit adversaries' political systems, social cohesion and technological capabilities. These efforts, he noted, are aimed at advancing China's governance model and curbing Western influence in sensitive arenas by seeding doubt, stoking local grievances and exerting reputational and economic pressure on decision-makers
While China aspires to become a top-tier fighter jet exporter, the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) notes that it has had only modest success, with just 57 combat aircraft on order or preselected for delivery after 2024 – far behind the US (996), France (214), and South Korea (140).
Explaining these weak sales, Richard Aboulafia argued in a February 2023 Citadel article that China's assertive foreign policy significantly undermines its arms export prospects. He noted that countries like India and Vietnam, which have territorial disputes with China, are ruled out as potential buyers, while others like Malaysia and Indonesia remain wary of Beijing's regional ambitions.
These concerns are reinforced by the nature of modern fighter jets, which demand constant technical, logistical, and maintenance support from their manufacturers to stay operational, creating long-term dependencies that can serve as levers of influence.
Such dependencies run counter to Indonesia's longstanding commitment to non-alignment and strategic autonomy. Ron Matthews and others argue in a July 2025 article in the peer-reviewed Asian Security journal that Indonesia's defense acquisition strategy reflects its 'free and active' foreign policy by deliberately diversifying suppliers across the US, Russia, China, South Korea and European countries to avoid being beholden to any single actor.
They emphasize that this approach is not just about building capability – it's a geopolitical maneuver that allows Jakarta to retain sovereignty over defense choices while navigating a multipolar Indo-Pacific without being pulled into great-power rivalries.
That calculus appears to be playing out in real time. While Reuters reported in June 2024 that China had offered J-10 jets, frigates, and other equipment to Indonesia, Defense Security Asia noted this month that Indonesia seeks to acquire 24 more Rafale jets, bringing its total order to 66. If finalized, this deal would replace Jakarta's aging fleet of US F-16s and Russian Su-27s and make Indonesia the largest non-European Rafale operator.
Indonesia's desire to maintain strategic autonomy may align well with France's Indo-Pacific strategy. Eric Frecon, in a February 2022 article for the ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, said France's approach revitalizes 'Gaullo-Mitterrandism' – a diplomatic strategy that emphasizes French interests and values within a multilateral setting. Frecon argues that France's outreach to Indo-Pacific middle powers like Indonesia allows it to sidestep the binary China-US framing and support a more multipolar world order.
Coline Laroche echoes this in a May 2025 piece for the French Institute for International and Strategic Affairs (IRIS), stating that France aims to act as a 'balancing power' promoting multilateralism, grounded in its national interests and permanent seat on the UN Security Council. Laroche notes that France seeks to offer a 'third voice' amid escalating tensions between China's assertiveness and US pressure.
While India and France are in damage control mode and Indonesia's Rafale deal appears stable despite the disinformation blitz, questions remain about how other Indo-Pacific nations will respond to Beijing's push.
A May 2025 article from The China Academy claims that the J-10 is gaining traction among countries seeking cost-effective alternatives to Western jets. It identifies Bangladesh as a potential buyer, citing national defense needs driven by India-centric concerns. It also names Thailand, which has a history of balanced procurement and non-confrontational diplomacy, and Myanmar, long reliant on Chinese systems and now seeking upgrades.
Still, skepticism persists. Rahman Yaacob writes in a January 2025 article for the Lowy Institute that Southeast Asian states increasingly prefer supplier diversity. He cites Russia's declining role, the high political costs of US equipment, and quality issues with Chinese gear as reasons for the shift. Yaacob contends that this dynamic is opening up opportunities for new players – France, Germany, and South Korea – to gain ground in a region that values flexibility over alignment.
As China ramps up its digital warfare tactics to corner Indo-Pacific arms markets, the real battle may not be over airframes but over influence, and whether buyers trust what they see, or what they're being shown.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

So soft resistance is not a legal concept? Why this is a worrying thought
So soft resistance is not a legal concept? Why this is a worrying thought

HKFP

time2 hours ago

  • HKFP

So soft resistance is not a legal concept? Why this is a worrying thought

One does not wish to seem ungrateful, but the enduring mystery of the hour – exactly what do officials mean by 'soft resistance' – has not been much clarified by the secretary for justice, who offered a definition last month. Soft resistance, said Paul Lam, has three main elements: making false or misleading statements, expressing them irrationally with emotional bias, and having the intention to create misunderstandings about the Chinese or Hong Kong governments and their policies. This looks like an extension of the law on subversion, already unmoored from its Common Law attachment to the provocation of violence. If this were the case, it would still leave a variety of tricky questions. For example, would sincere belief in the truth of the statement complained of be a defence? But Mr Lam scotched this notion by adding that 'methods of soft resistance may not always be illegal, but that did not mean they did not harm society.' He also said that although the term was hard to define the government would not use it arbitrarily. 'You can say it is a political term,' he mused. 'Not all issues in society should be addressed by legal means. [Legal means] are also not always the most effective way of handling [matters].' This brings us to a rather alarming question: What non-legal means is the government proposing to use? A few reminders: We have repeatedly been assured that freedom of expression continues to be protected in Hong Kong. Both the Basic Law and the National Security Law reiterate the point, which is often also made by officials. Anyone who complains about apparent infringements will be referred to the relevant part of the Bill of Rights Ordinance, which permits exceptions to protect – put briefly – reputations, public order (including national security) and public decency. But there is one condition attached to these exceptions: They must be 'provided by law.' That means that if a person engages in soft resistance, deplorable though that may be, using methods which are not illegal, then he or she is exercising the right to self-expression and is entitled to Mr Lam's protection while doing so. The answer to soft resistance that does not break the law is, of course, soft repression. This could take the form of counterarguments, pointing out untruths, denouncing irrational language and correcting misinterpretations of government policies. This should not be too difficult. The government has a whole department devoted to putting its version of events before the public. RTHK is at its service, and most of our surviving media take pride in doing more than justice to the government line. The answer to erroneous speech is, or should be, correct speech. Yet somehow, I do not think this was on the mind of the numerous senior officials who thought a 28th Handover anniversary speech was a good opportunity to denounce the evils of soft resistance and promise to extirpate it. Rosanna Law, the secretary for culture, art and tourism, for example, promised to step up scrutiny before allowing funding or the use of venues for shows. Other issuers of permits of various kinds are apparently putting their shoulders to the wheel. Of late, we learn that restaurants can lose their licences, social workers and teachers can be drummed out of their professions. Some people cannot run a bookshop without entertaining a stream of visitors from government departments, citing anonymous complaints about hygiene, fire safety, business regulations or whatever. We may have a government which, as Mr Lam said, welcomes criticism, but it is not very good at looking like that. The problem with this sort of thing is that after a while it makes people suspicious. Maybe the venue you wanted to hire really does have an air-conditioning problem. Who knows? The Lord moves in mysterious ways and routinely refuses to discuss individual cases. Recently the Inland Revenue Department resumed sending me annual tax returns. In normal times I would put this down to a lucrative one-off freelance gig in 2023 after which the employer very properly filed the usual form reporting how much it paid me. As it happened, though, this sudden renewal of interest in my finances coincided with several stories about news media and individual reporters being asked for large tax payments they did not owe. So an innocent bit of bureaucratic routine looks … fishy.

China denies asking firms to collect data illegally after new EU probe on TikTok
China denies asking firms to collect data illegally after new EU probe on TikTok

HKFP

time12 hours ago

  • HKFP

China denies asking firms to collect data illegally after new EU probe on TikTok

Beijing denied on Friday asking firms to 'illegally' collect and store users' personal information, after an Irish regulator helping the European Union regulate data privacy began investigating Chinese social media giant TikTok. 'The Chinese government attaches great importance to and protects data privacy and security in accordance with the law,' foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning said. Beijing 'has never and will never require companies or individuals to illegally collect or store data', Mao said. 'We hope that the European side will respect the market economy and fair competition, and provide a fair, just and non-discriminatory business environment for companies from all countries,' she told a regular news conference. The social media giant has been in the crosshairs of Western governments for years over fears that personal data could be used by China for espionage or propaganda purposes. However, TikTok has insisted that it has never received any requests from Chinese authorities for European users' data. TikTok was fined 530 million euros (US$620 million) in May by the Data Protection Commission over sending personal data to China, although the Chinese social media giant had insisted this data was only accessed remotely. TikTok, which has 1.5 billion users worldwide, is a division of Chinese tech giant ByteDance.

Hong Kong gov't to adopt mainland Chinese standards to build Northern Link lines
Hong Kong gov't to adopt mainland Chinese standards to build Northern Link lines

HKFP

time20 hours ago

  • HKFP

Hong Kong gov't to adopt mainland Chinese standards to build Northern Link lines

The Hong Kong government has said it will adopt mainland Chinese standards for the first time to develop the new Northern Link mass transit lines to speed up the construction process and reduce costs. Andy Yau, director of the Highways Department, told select media outlets at a press conference on Wednesday that the department would apply 'new Hong Kong standards,' which integrate mainland Chinese standards, to build the Northern Link. The new arrangement will help lower costs by around 20 to 30 per cent, Yau said. The mainland Chinese standards will also facilitate streamlining Hong Kong's construction process of rail lines, the official said, and thereby ensuring the Major Line and the Spur Line of the Northern Link will be in service no later than 2034, two to four years earlier than the original schedule. There will be no need to amend Hong Kong laws to introduce the new standards because the national Chinese standards for rail lines meet the safety requirements of Hong Kong's fire services, electrical, and building regulations, Yau said, according to Beijing-backed media Wen Wei Po's report on Thursday. The Northern Link is a joint project of the Hong Kong government and the MTR Corporation (MTRC). It is touted as 'the public transportation backbone' of the proposed Northern Metropolis, a megaproject to provide more than 900,000 homes for some 2.5 million people near the border. The transportation system consists of two lines. The Main Line will comprise two terminals and interchange stations, Kwu Tung and Kam Sheung Road stations, which will connect to the East Rail Line and Tuen Ma Line, respectively. There will also be three intermediate stations at San Tin, Ngau Tam Mei and Au Tau. The Spur Line will connect San Tin Station to Huanggang Port in Shenzhen. Hong Kong authorities originally planned to finish building the Main Line by 2034, while the Spur Line would be in service between 2036 and 2038. 'Burning with anxiety' Xia Baolong, director of the Hong Kong and Macau Affairs Office, and several Hong Kong government officials visited a tech park in the Northern Metropolis in February, according to a government statement. Hong Kong Chief Executive John Lee said at LegCo in May that he was 'burning with anxiety' about the development of the Northern Metropolis. Following Xia's five-day visit to Hong Kong in June, Lee said that the top Chinese official's speeches had pointed the direction for the city's future and that he had promised Xia to accelerate the development of the Northern Metropolis, TVB reported.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store