Oral Questions for 13 May 2025
To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following:
See terms of use.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Defence Force cuts 255 civilian roles to focus on front-line personnel
(File) NZDF is cutting 255 civilian roles to help it focus on front line personnel. Photo: Supplied / New Zealand Defence Force The Defence Force is cutting 255 civilan roles as part of a restructure. The agency said it is getting rid of 281 filled roles but establishing 276 new ones, meaning five currently filled positions will be axed. The remaining 250 jobs to be cut are currently vacant. The restructure was announced earlier this year , in March, when it was thought the net loss of roles would be about 370. In a statement, NZDF said the changes would help it focus on "maintaining combat readiness and delivering on core military activities". "In making decisions, the NZDF has consulted with staff and unions, and the feedback received has meant some changes that were initially proposed will not go ahead." Further consultation is still underway on alternative proposals, it said. "Throughout this process, the NZDF has ensured that as many staff as possible are placed into suitable alternative positions in the new structure." The Public Service Association said about 10 percent of the agency's civilian jobs were being cut and that the changes would increase already heavy workloads. This would lead to more stress and burnout, and force those in uniform to pick up the shortfall, it said. National Secretary Fleur Fitzsimons said the government was fooling itself if it thought cutting so many jobs was how to build a modern, combat-ready defence force, at a time of rising security risks. She was pleased the government was investing in military equipment and technology , but said it was blind to the fact that civilian defence workers - like engineers and IT specialists - were needed to support this. Fitzsimons said staff were told the tough fiscal environment has forced Defence to make deep cuts in a number of areas, including cancelling some training activities and major exercises; reducing flying hours, sea days and other training, and; pausing property maintenance. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
8 hours ago
- RNZ News
Waitangi Tribunal pushes pause on seabed mine claim
The Tribunal parking the seabed mine claim is a rare setback for mana whenua who've resisted Trans-Tasman's plans since before the first application in 2013. Photo: Te Korimako o Taranaki The Waitangi Tribunal has rejected the application to halt a fast-track bid to mine the seabed off Pātea - but has left the door open if the process turns out to be unfair. Trans-Tasman Resources (TTR) has applied through the new Fast-Track Approvals Act (FTAA) to mine for iron, titanium and vanadium in the South Taranaki Bight. Multiple South Taranaki hapū and iwi sought a Tribunal injunction to block processing of the fast-track application, and an urgent hearing into alleged Crown Treaty breaches. But Tribunal deputy chair Judge Sarah Reeves agreed with the Crown that the fast-track needed a chance to be proven fair. The Crown argued a panel had not even been appointed - and that iwi will contribute to that selection and get a say once the decision-making panel is working. The Waitangi Tribunal grants urgent hearings in exceptional circumstances: applicants must be suffering - or likely to suffer - significant and irreversible prejudice from current or pending Crown actions. "I do not agree that the risk of significant and irreversible prejudice has crystallised, and the application is premature," said Judge Reeves. "The application does not yet meet the high threshold required to divert the resources and disrupt the Tribunal's inquiry programme that would result by granting an urgent inquiry," she ruled. "However, leave is reserved for the applicants to renew their application if circumstances change." Claimants said they had already suffered prejudice from their decade-long fight against TTR's mining application, right through to defeating the company in the Supreme Court. Mana whenua said government bias made the fast-track process unjust. Judge Reeves said the claimants believe "the Crown's vocal support of the [seabed mining] project and the FTAA appears to make meaningful engagement with the applicants or delay of the project to pursue alternative remedies 'highly unlikely'". On Friday in New Plymouth Shane Jones - the minister of oceans and fisheries, and of resources - called opponents a [ "belligerent, well-organised, rowdy] bunch of activists." He had previously dismissed mana whenua objectors as "pixie-like hapūs" - which many felt was an insult that still rankles in South Taranaki. Taranaki mana whenua claimants to the Tribunal are: Trans-Tasman Resources boss Alan Eggers says the seabed mine would bring jobs and riches without harming the environment. Photo: Te Korimako o Taranaki Other parties include Climate Justice Taranaki, Ngāruahine's school Te Kura o Ngāruahinerangi and from outside the region Te Rūnanga o Ngāti Porou ki Hauraki who also face an FTAA application. For the fast-track bid to be rejected the mine's negative impacts must significantly outweigh national and regional benefits - meaning environmental and cultural damage must be deemed greater than the money the mine makes for Taranaki and New Zealand. Last Thursday the organisers of the fast-track decision process ordered TTR to [ show where it had updated its evidence] since losing in the courts. "Almost all of the technical appendices are dated 2015 and were obviously prepared to support the 2016 application. Only a handful of those reports were updated in 2023 or 2024," noted panel convener Jennifer Caldwell. "The Cultural Values Assessment report, prepared by an independent consultant in 2017, was not updated despite what must have been new information as to the Māori concerns." A month earlier panel conveners ordered the Environmental Protection Authority to dig into the proposed seabed mine's [ environmental and economic impacts]. Every day of operation for at least 20 years the mining ship would discharge 180,000 tonnes of unwanted seabed sediment, a recognised pollutant, into the abundant waters of the Pātea Shoals. TTR claims region benefits of: A report for the miners predicted annual national gains of: LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ on Air.
RNZ News
9 hours ago
- RNZ News
'We're doing this for Auckland': Opponents of rich-listers' private helipad file appeal
The newly built house on Rawene Avenue. Photo: RNZ/Maia Ingoe A group trying to stop Auckland rich-listers Anna Mowbray and Ali Williams from flying a private helicopter from their multi-million-dollar Westmere property are taking legal action. Independent hearing commissioners appointed by Auckland Council approved the couple's controversial resource consent application for a private helipad in June. In a statement, Quiet Sky Waitematā, who oppose private helicopters in residential Auckland, said they filed an appeal against the decision to the Environment Court on Monday. Spokesperson Elena Keith said what they consider to be a "radical ruling" went against overwhelming opposition from the public. "We're not just doing this for Westmere. We're doing this for Auckland. If this decision isn't challenged, the floodgates for helicopters in backyards will open. We simply can't let this terrible decision stand. "The Independent Commissioners have decided that helicopters are 'inherently residential'. Therefore, they say that using a helicopter is a permitted activity - like using a bike or a car. In our opinion, that is absurd. "The decision could open the door for private helicopter operations in residential Auckland without the need for resource consent, putting the burden on neighbours to prove noise limit breaches. How is that fair?" She said communities shouldn't have to endure unnecessary noise and disruption for the benefit of a few individuals. "Auckland is already well-served by public heliports, all within a 15-minute drive." Councillor Mike Lee was expected to bring a Notice of Motion to ban helicopters in residential areas to the council's Policy and Planning Committee on Thursday, which councillors would vote on.
