Consultant gynaecologist who 'went on warpath' towards terrified pregnant mother amid row over C-section and using forceps as she gave birth is suspended
Dr Premila Thampi, 62, from Mitcham, South London, was said to have 'gone on a bit of a warpath' when she realised the woman was unable to have the baby naturally.
It was claimed as colleagues at the Milton Keynes University Hospital in Buckinghamshire looked on, Dr Thampi refused the patient's plea to have a caesarean section.
Instead she declared: 'What you need to understand and appreciate is that I am a Consultant, and it is after six o'clock and I could have gone home and left one of my Registrar's to delivery this baby!'.
She then 'pressurised' the patient into letting her use the forceps adding: 'You need to let me do this as I don't know what is going to happen to your baby. You are putting your own baby at risk.'
The woman begrudgingly agreed to the use of the surgical instrument but shouted: 'I hate you, you haven't listened' at Dr Thampi as the forceps were applied.
She said she was left traumatised by the birth and claimed the forceps caused damage to her baby's head and face.
At the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service in Manchester Dr Thampi, was found guilty of serious professional misconduct and was ordered to be suspended from practise for three weeks.
The incident occurred in October 2016 when she was working as a Consultant in Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the Milton Keynes University Hospital.
The woman known as Patient A had been admitted at 41 weeks and 3 days' gestation and was transferred to the labour ward and given pain relief whilst her mother was at her bedside.
In a statement Patient A, who suffers from a neuromuscular condition said that Dr Thampi came to check on her after she was admitted and suggested the use of forceps, which she said she clearly refused
She said: 'At around 17.45, Dr Thampi attended to review my progress. She explained I was fully dilated and asked if she could come and give me an instrumental delivery. I told Dr Thampi, "I don't want that, I want a caesarean section"'.
'But Dr Thampi just said that we 'could talk about it later' and left the room. She then next came to the delivery room shortly before 18.30 explained I was fully dilated and that she was going to give me an instrumental delivery.
'She just marched into the room to ask me if I was ready for an instrumental delivery and then marched back out again. Dr Thampi didn't explain what an instrumental delivery would involve, or what the instruments to be used were. I knew about the use of suction and a ventouse, and I verbalised to Dr Thampi that I was against the use of forceps.
'But Dr Thampi didn't explain any alternative options to an instrumental delivery. She just said, "no, you can't have a c-section" when I mentioned it and she didn't give me any explanation as to why I couldn't have a C-section.
Patient A said she was very clear she wanted to have a C-section but felt intimated by Dr Thampi.
The new mother said: 'I remember thinking at the time she was on a bit of a warpath, so I was reluctant to ask. I didn't want to keep pushing back as I was making her angry by refusing to have an instrumental delivery.
'I could tell Dr Thampi was angry by her demeanour, how abrupt she was being with me and her poor bedside manner. She was giving me no explanation as to anything, she just kept waltzing in and out of the room.'
Patient A said prior to the delivery day, she had told her midwifery and antenatal team about her objection to forceps but was ignored by the consultant.
She added: 'Miss Thampi said, "Will you let me try with the suction, the Kiwi cup?". I felt that if I had to agree, I had to agree to that because otherwise, it would be a forceps, and I did not want a forceps. In hindsight, I wouldn't have had either because of the damage it had done to my child's head and face.
'She explained, in reference to the forceps, that, "you need to let me do this as I don't know what is going to happen to your baby." It was due to this comment I felt forced into consenting to the use of forceps. I just said, "do whatever you want, you're going to do whatever you want anyway."
'I was getting louder throughout as I repeatedly declined the use of forceps, and I didn't feel like Dr Thampi was listening to me. Eventually I became so frustrated I swore at Dr Thampi. I was just scared and was trying to get her to stop her doing something to me that I clearly didn't want her to do to me.
'She said "well it's too late for a C-section now, you need to let me use the forceps because I don't know what is going to happen to your baby!" I said "I didn't want forceps I told you that!" but Miss Thampi said, "[Patient A] I am a Consultant I cannot get your baby out, you are putting your own baby at risk by not allowing me to use the forceps."
'During the process of having my legs put into the stirrups, I was saying "I do not want the forceps to be used and I haven't pushed yet." Miss Thampi then said something I will never forget for the rest of my days - "What you need to understand and appreciate is that I am a Consultant, and it is after six o'clock and I could have gone home and left one of my Registrar's to delivery this baby!"
Patient A confessed she felt pressured to do what Dr Thampi wanted and felt that she was being threatened with sub-standard care if she refused.
'I felt Miss Thampi was pressuring me into something I did not want by implying that if I didn't agree I would be left to receive a substandard level of care,' she said, 'I got the impression Dr Thampi just wanted to go home.
'She kept saying, "it's after six o'clock, I could have gone home, you need to let me do this."
'She was implying that I would receive a substandard level of care from her registrar, and instead, she had stayed so I had consultant care. She actually said, "I'm a consultant".
'I think these comments were made coercively to try and scare me into letting her do the instrumental delivery so that I wouldn't have been left in the hands of the registrar, who she made out to be incompetent.
'I felt forced into consenting to the use of forceps. I just said "do what the f**k you want, you're going to f**king do it anyway, you haven't listened to me all day! "I have thought what happened every day - it still rules my life.'
Patient A's mother said: 'When Miss Thampi came back into the room, she said that Patient A would now need to have an instrumental delivery. She didn't give any explanation as to why the instrumental delivery was required, just that it was necessary.
'Miss Thampi said that she was a consultant and that Patient A needed to listen to her. She said that it was now after 6pm and she could have gone home and left a junior to deliver the baby. The discussion went around in circles with Miss Thampi pressurising Patient A to have an instrumental delivery and my daughter kept saying no.'
For the General Medical Council Simon Jackson KC said: 'No patient should be 'pressured' into agreeing to any procedure that they make clear they do not want.
'Dr Thampi's way of treating patients, and her own decision-making processes in relation to the key issues of consenting to an instrumental delivery showed a rigidity of approach, and a lack of willingness to reflect on how things could and should have been done differently.'
Dr Thampi said in a statement: 'I discussed the option of an assisted delivery with Patient A, advised her about the use of Ventouse and also the possible use of forceps.
'She expressed concern that forceps can damage babies, but I did not interpret her comment at that point to indicate a refusal. I provided reassurance that forceps are one of the commonest tools for assisted birth and Patient A gave her consent to proceed with a ventouse delivery and was positioned ready for the delivery.
'She was happy when I said forceps will not damage the baby and she said, 'You can go ahead with the delivery'. I explained to her that we might be able to deliver with the ventouse, possibly forceps.
'Once it was apparent that delivery could not be facilitated solely by the use of ventouse, I discussed further with Patient A the use of forceps and the need for an episiotomy. Patient A said she did not want a forceps delivery but only when, in my clinical judgment, it was too late to safely change to a Caesarean section.
'Patient A's clinical condition and the position of the baby's head meant the use of forceps was the most reasonable option in Patient A's and the baby's best interests. A Caesarean section was more likely to cause harm than using the forceps.'
In her evidence Thampi added: 'I appreciate the effects that a traumatic birth can have on a mother and baby. I am very sorry that Patient A had the birthing experience that she did and I have reflected on this deeply.
'It was undoubtedly a tense and difficult delivery and one that I will always remember. I found it truly upsetting to hear Patient A's evidence. I would never wish for any patient to feel the way Patient A feels about her birthing experience. I am very sorry.'
She denied making the comment about it being 'after six o'clock' saying she was contractually obliged to be at work until 7pm. The panel agreed with that assertion but found her guilty of other charges. She was cleared of misconduct charges relating to two other women.
MPTS chair Mrs Tehniat Watson said: 'Whilst the conduct involved one patient a significant number of years ago, the failure to obtain informed consent, Patient A being pressurised into agreeing to a forceps delivery, and inappropriate communication were serious matters and action is needed to mark the seriousness to uphold the wider public interest.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Pharmacy warning of unsustainable demand for weight loss medication
The National Pharmacy Association (NPA) has issued a warning that the burgeoning demand for weight loss injections may be unsustainable, citing a significant mismatch between public interest and clinical suitability for the treatments. The NPA, which represents over 6,000 independent community pharmacies, highlighted this concern. A poll commissioned by the association revealed that 21 per cent of respondents had attempted to access weight loss treatments in the past year, either online or directly from a pharmacy. This figure surged to 35 per cent among 16 to 34-year-olds, contrasting sharply with just seven per cent of those over 55. There were also 41% who agreed they would opt for weight loss treatments on the NHS if they were made available to them. This figure rose to 64% among 25 to 34-year-olds, despite many of these patients being unlikely to be clinically eligible. The NPA says the poll, in which 2,002 people were interviewed, reflects an increasing demand for private and NHS weight loss services. NPA chairman Olivier Picard said: 'Weight loss jabs are one of the biggest drug innovations this century, but growing demand for weight loss treatment highlights the need to make sure this is appropriate for those who want it. 'It's clear from this polling that many more people are interested in getting weight loss jabs than would actually be suitable for treatment. 'We want to make sure supplies are carefully managed so that those in most clinical need can benefit from weight loss medication.' Spiralling demand, fuelled partly by social media, could see people being tempted to resort to unregulated online suppliers instead of regulated pharmacies staffed by medical professionals, they fear. Online suppliers may not be offering weight loss jabs alongside a structured programme aimed at helping them change their behaviour. Wegovy and Mounjaro are among a number of drugs that are recommended to help tackle obesity on the NHS. Mounjaro and Wegovy are licensed by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) for use in patients with a BMI of over 30 or between 27 and 30 but with a weight-related co-morbidity. This occurs when an individual who has obesity develops another medical condition due to their weight. The NHS currently rolls out Mounjaro to patients with a BMI of over 40 and at least four co-morbidities, the NPA says. The NPA is calling for new regulations to protect patients buying weight loss medication online, so there is a full two-way consultation and all relevant historical medical records are reviewed before the treatment is prescribed. They are waiting for more details about the role pharmacies could play in the rollout of the NHS weight management programme. At least 85% of weight loss medication prescriptions were made by pharmacies in April this year, the NPA estimates. Mr Picard said: 'Pharmacists are experts in medication and many have extensive experience delivering weight loss injections as part of a package of care, including lifestyle advice. 'Pharmacies are well placed to help roll this treatment out on the NHS, and help people make the best use of these powerful medicines.'
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Grandmother died of sepsis after being misdiagnosed with stomach complaint
A grandmother died of sepsis after doctors failed to recognise signs of a urinary tract obstruction, a coroner has found. Suzanne Edwards, 71, of Leighton Buzzard, Bedfordshire, visited her GP on Nov 29 2024 with abdominal pain and vomiting but despite urgent blood and urine tests she was not sent to hospital. Later that day her symptoms worsened and she went to A&E at Milton Keynes University Hospital, Bucks. Her test results were indicative of systemic inflammation and dehydration but she was diagnosed with gastroenteritis and discharged. Her condition deteriorated further and the following day her family called NHS 111. She was directed to an urgent care centre and transferred to Bedford Hospital where clinicians identified a 7mm stone in her urinary tract and sepsis. She underwent emergency surgery but died later on the evening of Dec 1 from septic shock. 'Heart of our family' Stacey Edwards, her daughter, said: 'My mum was the heart of our family – full of warmth, compassion and humour. 'It's devastating to know that her death may have been avoided if the signs of sepsis had been recognised sooner.' Her family described her as 'an unbelievably kind and caring woman with a wicked sense of humour and fun'. She leaves behind husband Terence, two children and two granddaughters. Stacey said: 'When she visited her GP she was so unwell she used a wheelchair. 'After she was taken to A&E we were told it was likely gastroenteritis. She was given IV fluids and pain relief but she was still in pain and struggling. 'There was very little communication from doctors and when she was discharged we were simply told to come back if symptoms returned. 'At home, things got worse. But because she'd been examined by medical professionals we thought she just needed time to recover. 'The call we received later that evening asking us to come in urgently is something we'll never forget. 'Neither is watching her suffer in those final days.' Jewellery went missing Soon after her death Mrs Edwards' family realised her jewellery worth thousands of pounds – three necklaces and four bracelets – were missing. Stacey said: 'Mum never took off her jewellery. 'It is heartbreaking to think someone may have taken advantage of such a tragic situation.' Bedfordshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust launched a full investigation and search at the time but the items were never found. Tom Osborne, the senior coroner for Milton Keynes, recorded a narrative verdict saying there was a failure to recognise the signs of a urinary tract obstruction, leading to missed opportunities to treat Mrs Edwards before sepsis developed.
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Parents, beware the devastating consequences of measles
After reading the letters about vaccine misinformation and hesitancy (Measles surge shows why vaccinations are crucial, 20 July), I felt I must write to tell you of one unrecognised cause of the drop in vaccine uptake: when I worked as a community school nursing sister in the 1980s, with 11 state schools and a number of private schools that took up the vaccine service, we had 98% uptake of vaccines in the school setting. This was due to the system of sending letters home to parents requesting their consent and following up by phone, if necessary, by the school office staff. The children came in class batches. Then the local health authority decided that this service should be discontinued and parents were invited to take their child to the local GP surgery for their vaccinations. The uptake plummeted to less than 40% of eligible children due to children not taking the letters home, or parents forgetting or losing the letter – or being unable to take time off to take their child to the surgery. When I asked the GPs at the local health centre what the uptake for the cohort of eligible children was, they looked at their records and were surprised, but reluctant to do anything about it. Health visitors were responsible for, and very successful in, advising new mothers when vaccines were due, where to get them and encouraging uptake. It should be compulsory for all vaccines for preschool children (which includes measles) to be done before a child is admitted to school, as in many other countries. As a midwife, I saw a baby born to a mother who had contact with rubella in early pregnancy. The little girl was born with a body rash, had bilateral cataracts and was totally deaf. She was was very ill. Schools for deaf children may return again for these children if vaccination is not taken up for whatever reason. How StephensLiphook, Hampshire I contracted measles just before the NHS was established. With it came serious ear infections, burst eardrums, etc. There were no vaccines, just ear drops. Over the years the infections and operations continued and now, aged 82, I have no hearing with complications. I beg people to think seriously about vaccination. The consequences of measles can sometimes be devastating. Jean JacksonSeer Green, Buckinghamshire I caught measles aged six in 1953, at a time when parents hoped their children would get it (and chicken pox and mumps) so as to gain immunity. My dad, aged 54, had not had measles as a boy, caught it from me and nearly died. The risk of not vaccinating children is not just to WallLondon
