logo
Consultant gynaecologist who 'went on warpath' towards terrified pregnant mother amid row over C-section and using forceps as she gave birth is suspended

Consultant gynaecologist who 'went on warpath' towards terrified pregnant mother amid row over C-section and using forceps as she gave birth is suspended

Daily Mail​08-07-2025
A consultant gynaecologist has been suspended after she was accused of bullying a terrified mother-to-be into agreeing to the use of forceps as she was giving birth to her first child at a NHS maternity unit.
Dr Premila Thampi, 62, from Mitcham, South London, was said to have 'gone on a bit of a warpath' when she realised the woman was unable to have the baby naturally.
It was claimed as colleagues at the Milton Keynes University Hospital in Buckinghamshire looked on, Dr Thampi refused the patient's plea to have a caesarean section.
Instead she declared: 'What you need to understand and appreciate is that I am a Consultant, and it is after six o'clock and I could have gone home and left one of my Registrar's to delivery this baby!'.
She then 'pressurised' the patient into letting her use the forceps adding: 'You need to let me do this as I don't know what is going to happen to your baby. You are putting your own baby at risk.'
The woman begrudgingly agreed to the use of the surgical instrument but shouted: 'I hate you, you haven't listened' at Dr Thampi as the forceps were applied.
She said she was left traumatised by the birth and claimed the forceps caused damage to her baby's head and face.
At the Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service in Manchester Dr Thampi, was found guilty of serious professional misconduct and was ordered to be suspended from practise for three weeks.
The incident occurred in October 2016 when she was working as a Consultant in Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the Milton Keynes University Hospital.
The woman known as Patient A had been admitted at 41 weeks and 3 days' gestation and was transferred to the labour ward and given pain relief whilst her mother was at her bedside.
In a statement Patient A, who suffers from a neuromuscular condition said that Dr Thampi came to check on her after she was admitted and suggested the use of forceps, which she said she clearly refused
She said: 'At around 17.45, Dr Thampi attended to review my progress. She explained I was fully dilated and asked if she could come and give me an instrumental delivery. I told Dr Thampi, "I don't want that, I want a caesarean section"'.
'But Dr Thampi just said that we 'could talk about it later' and left the room. She then next came to the delivery room shortly before 18.30 explained I was fully dilated and that she was going to give me an instrumental delivery.
'She just marched into the room to ask me if I was ready for an instrumental delivery and then marched back out again. Dr Thampi didn't explain what an instrumental delivery would involve, or what the instruments to be used were. I knew about the use of suction and a ventouse, and I verbalised to Dr Thampi that I was against the use of forceps.
'But Dr Thampi didn't explain any alternative options to an instrumental delivery. She just said, "no, you can't have a c-section" when I mentioned it and she didn't give me any explanation as to why I couldn't have a C-section.
Patient A said she was very clear she wanted to have a C-section but felt intimated by Dr Thampi.
The new mother said: 'I remember thinking at the time she was on a bit of a warpath, so I was reluctant to ask. I didn't want to keep pushing back as I was making her angry by refusing to have an instrumental delivery.
'I could tell Dr Thampi was angry by her demeanour, how abrupt she was being with me and her poor bedside manner. She was giving me no explanation as to anything, she just kept waltzing in and out of the room.'
Patient A said prior to the delivery day, she had told her midwifery and antenatal team about her objection to forceps but was ignored by the consultant.
She added: 'Miss Thampi said, "Will you let me try with the suction, the Kiwi cup?". I felt that if I had to agree, I had to agree to that because otherwise, it would be a forceps, and I did not want a forceps. In hindsight, I wouldn't have had either because of the damage it had done to my child's head and face.
'She explained, in reference to the forceps, that, "you need to let me do this as I don't know what is going to happen to your baby." It was due to this comment I felt forced into consenting to the use of forceps. I just said, "do whatever you want, you're going to do whatever you want anyway."
'I was getting louder throughout as I repeatedly declined the use of forceps, and I didn't feel like Dr Thampi was listening to me. Eventually I became so frustrated I swore at Dr Thampi. I was just scared and was trying to get her to stop her doing something to me that I clearly didn't want her to do to me.
'She said "well it's too late for a C-section now, you need to let me use the forceps because I don't know what is going to happen to your baby!" I said "I didn't want forceps I told you that!" but Miss Thampi said, "[Patient A] I am a Consultant I cannot get your baby out, you are putting your own baby at risk by not allowing me to use the forceps."
'During the process of having my legs put into the stirrups, I was saying "I do not want the forceps to be used and I haven't pushed yet." Miss Thampi then said something I will never forget for the rest of my days - "What you need to understand and appreciate is that I am a Consultant, and it is after six o'clock and I could have gone home and left one of my Registrar's to delivery this baby!"
Patient A confessed she felt pressured to do what Dr Thampi wanted and felt that she was being threatened with sub-standard care if she refused.
'I felt Miss Thampi was pressuring me into something I did not want by implying that if I didn't agree I would be left to receive a substandard level of care,' she said, 'I got the impression Dr Thampi just wanted to go home.
'She kept saying, "it's after six o'clock, I could have gone home, you need to let me do this."
'She was implying that I would receive a substandard level of care from her registrar, and instead, she had stayed so I had consultant care. She actually said, "I'm a consultant".
'I think these comments were made coercively to try and scare me into letting her do the instrumental delivery so that I wouldn't have been left in the hands of the registrar, who she made out to be incompetent.
'I felt forced into consenting to the use of forceps. I just said "do what the f**k you want, you're going to f**king do it anyway, you haven't listened to me all day! "I have thought what happened every day - it still rules my life.'
Patient A's mother said: 'When Miss Thampi came back into the room, she said that Patient A would now need to have an instrumental delivery. She didn't give any explanation as to why the instrumental delivery was required, just that it was necessary.
'Miss Thampi said that she was a consultant and that Patient A needed to listen to her. She said that it was now after 6pm and she could have gone home and left a junior to deliver the baby. The discussion went around in circles with Miss Thampi pressurising Patient A to have an instrumental delivery and my daughter kept saying no.'
For the General Medical Council Simon Jackson KC said: 'No patient should be 'pressured' into agreeing to any procedure that they make clear they do not want.
'Dr Thampi's way of treating patients, and her own decision-making processes in relation to the key issues of consenting to an instrumental delivery showed a rigidity of approach, and a lack of willingness to reflect on how things could and should have been done differently.'
Dr Thampi said in a statement: 'I discussed the option of an assisted delivery with Patient A, advised her about the use of Ventouse and also the possible use of forceps.
'She expressed concern that forceps can damage babies, but I did not interpret her comment at that point to indicate a refusal. I provided reassurance that forceps are one of the commonest tools for assisted birth and Patient A gave her consent to proceed with a ventouse delivery and was positioned ready for the delivery.
'She was happy when I said forceps will not damage the baby and she said, 'You can go ahead with the delivery'. I explained to her that we might be able to deliver with the ventouse, possibly forceps.
'Once it was apparent that delivery could not be facilitated solely by the use of ventouse, I discussed further with Patient A the use of forceps and the need for an episiotomy. Patient A said she did not want a forceps delivery but only when, in my clinical judgment, it was too late to safely change to a Caesarean section.
'Patient A's clinical condition and the position of the baby's head meant the use of forceps was the most reasonable option in Patient A's and the baby's best interests. A Caesarean section was more likely to cause harm than using the forceps.'
In her evidence Thampi added: 'I appreciate the effects that a traumatic birth can have on a mother and baby. I am very sorry that Patient A had the birthing experience that she did and I have reflected on this deeply.
'It was undoubtedly a tense and difficult delivery and one that I will always remember. I found it truly upsetting to hear Patient A's evidence. I would never wish for any patient to feel the way Patient A feels about her birthing experience. I am very sorry.'
She denied making the comment about it being 'after six o'clock' saying she was contractually obliged to be at work until 7pm. The panel agreed with that assertion but found her guilty of other charges. She was cleared of misconduct charges relating to two other women.
MPTS chair Mrs Tehniat Watson said: 'Whilst the conduct involved one patient a significant number of years ago, the failure to obtain informed consent, Patient A being pressurised into agreeing to a forceps delivery, and inappropriate communication were serious matters and action is needed to mark the seriousness to uphold the wider public interest.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Princess Anne opens garden in Sheffield spinal injuries unit
Princess Anne opens garden in Sheffield spinal injuries unit

BBC News

time23 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Princess Anne opens garden in Sheffield spinal injuries unit

The Princess Royal has opened an accessible garden for patients at a spinal cord injuries unit to Anne attended the opening ceremony at the Princess Royal Spinal Injuries Centre, which is part of the Northern General Hospital in Sheffield, outdoor space was developed by spinal injury charity Horatio's Garden, and was based on an award-winning design from the Royal Horticultural Society's Chelsea Flower Show in charity's founder, Olivia Chapple, said: "It's an incredible feeling; seeing patients explore this garden for the first time was one of the most moving experiences." It is the eighth garden installed in a spinal injury unit by the charity since the first was opened in Chapple was inspired by her teenage son, Horatio Chapple, who had come up with the idea whilst volunteering at the Duke of Cornwall Spinal Treatment Centre in Salisbury in died in 2011, aged 17, after he was killed by a polar bear on an expedition in Svalbard, Norway."He recognised that people really needed somewhere that was beautiful and natural to get away from the ward environment - he did the research and set up all the plans," Mrs Chapple said."It's about creating an environment that really enhances rehabilitation for people who are facing life-changing injuries and trauma, and giving them a space that feels like home." Nottingham-born actor George Robinson, an appeal ambassador for the project, called the garden "incredible".He was a patient at the spinal injuries unit for almost eight months in 2015, after suffering a severe spinal injury during a game of rugby when he was 17, which left him said: "When you spend so much time in hospital, you're focused on your physical rehabilitation, but as the days go by, you realise you also need that mental rehabilitation - sometimes that clinical environment isn't the best place for that."You can feel separated from the world, but a garden connects you back to it."He added the space would give patients a "sense of purpose" by taking part in activities such as gardening. Current patient James Hunter, who has a rare autoimmune disorder called Guillain-Barré syndrome, said the five months he had spent in hospital had been "disconnecting"."The condition attacked my whole body, and the thing that's most affected currently is my arms, so I can't use a phone or reach out to people he said spaces like the garden "really help bring people together".He said he was planning on celebrating his birthday in the garden next week, and that it was "lovely" to join the opening ceremony."Long term, it's just a case of getting some fresh air when possible, weather depending, and keeping on with the recovery." Listen to highlights from South Yorkshire on BBC Sounds or catch up with the latest episode of Look North.

Man's penis amputated after 'injecting it with Vaseline' in worrying UK trend
Man's penis amputated after 'injecting it with Vaseline' in worrying UK trend

Daily Mirror

time26 minutes ago

  • Daily Mirror

Man's penis amputated after 'injecting it with Vaseline' in worrying UK trend

Brits have been warned about unregulated 'pop up clinics' offering back street Botox procedures to enlarge manhoods as many men later require NHS treatment for complications A man had to have his penis amputated after a botched Botox procedure as more and more people are needing NHS help following unregulated cosmetic procedures. ‌ In a worrying new trend, men have been heading to unregulated 'pop-up clinics' in Glasgow to treat erectile dysfunction or 'enlarge' their manhoods. The procedure sees Botox or fillers injected into the patient's genitals and some patients have been forced to seek urgent medical treatment at NHS A&E departments with a range of complications. And in one severe case a patient has required amputation of his penis after the botched Botox procedure. ‌ ‌ There has been an influx of patients in recent months presenting at the Royal Alexandra Hospital in Paisley, an insider told the Daily Record. The NHS source said one patient attended A&E after having a Vaseline-type substance injected into his penis. 'The side effects were so severe he had his penis amputated,' they said. 'We also had a patient in his 30s who had Botox injected into his penis. He ended up suffering an extremely severe reaction. The number of male patients we are seeing coming through the doors with similar issues from botched aesthetic procedures is increasing. ‌ 'Pop-up clinics in the Glasgow area are rife. There are day clinics with unregulated people dishing out new treatments then leaving customers to deal with the consequences. 'The men who come in looking for help with side-effects say there are often queues down the street to get into one of these day clinics.' Medical experts have confirmed Botox can be prescribed to treat erectile dysfunction by relaxing muscles and improving blood flow. While filler can be injected into the body to rejuvenate volume. ‌ The procedures are gaining popularity in the UK through the influence of social media which can be a fertile ground for rogue practitioners. A clinic in Glasgow is reportedly offering penis enlargement treatment using fillers with prices starting from £950. Dr Ben Taylor-Davies, who runs the Stockbridge Clinic in Edinburgh and also works as an A&E doctor said his own clinic was recently approached by a company looking for premises to offer genital procedures but they refused. He said: 'I am horrified to hear what is happening to male patients who go to 'pop-up clinics' but I am not surprised. There are very few specialist doctors who can perform cosmetic injection procedures on male genitals. ‌ "It is not a procedure I would ever recommend to a patient, even if you went to a specialist, never mind a back-door pop-up clinic. Injections in these areas carry a high risk of infection and could lead to death. This is another example of the dangers the public faces over the lack of regulation in aesthetics.' Plastic surgeon Dr Darren McKeown warned seeking injectable treatment is not a quick fix. He added: 'These procedures for men are very popular due to the rise of social media. 'Many practitioners promoting these procedures on platforms like TikTok make it seem very easy to quickly increase the length and girth of your penis. ‌ 'Men need to understand that this is not the quick fix and they have a low chance of success. The reality is patients will be plagued with health problems. If a man is considering a procedure to their penis you should always seek specialist advice from a urological surgeon.' The 'back-street Botox' boom has already been blamed for putting pressure on A&E departments at hospitals. Healthcare Improvement Scotland has since been tasked with bringing in a regulatory framework for cosmetic surgery. Private clinics have to be registered with the authority. There are over 500 registered and regulated clinics across Scotland. A spokesperson for Healthcare Improvement Scotland said: 'Having a cosmetic treatment is a serious undertaking that should only be entered into with due consideration of the very real risks to an individual's health and safety. 'We would urge anyone looking to get cosmetic interventions to think about their health and wellbeing, and put their care into the hands of professionals with appropriate training and experience, and where they can trust them to make their wellbeing a priority. People should always check that a clinic is registered with Healthcare Improvement Scotland before undertaking treatments.'

Ozzy Osbourne's final days revealed after air ambulance raced to save him
Ozzy Osbourne's final days revealed after air ambulance raced to save him

Metro

timean hour ago

  • Metro

Ozzy Osbourne's final days revealed after air ambulance raced to save him

An air ambulance was dispatched to Ozzy Osbourne's Buckinghamshire estate on Tuesday morning in a final bid to save the legendary rock star's life. The 76-year-old Black Sabbath frontman died at his Grade II-listed mansion, Welders House, near Chalfont St Giles. Ozzy – real name John Osbourne – died on July 22, with his family sharing a statement confirming the news. While it was known that the rocker was in poor health, fans and family alike were shocked that he died just weeks after he appeared on stage for the final time, during the Back to the Beginning concert in Birmingham. His daughter, Kelly Osbourne, shared a video of Ozzy on social media just two days before his death in which he appeared in good spirits while eating breakfast. Emergency services were alerted around 10:30am after a critical incident was reported at the property, prompting Thames Valley Air Ambulance to send their helicopter from RAF Benson in Oxfordshire, some 27 miles away, according to MailOnline. The chopper landed in the grounds of Ozzy's sprawling 350-acre estate and specialist paramedics remained on-site for around two hours. A spokesperson for the air ambulance confirmed to the publication that they had been deployed to deliver 'advanced critical care.' Tragically, despite efforts by the emergency crew, Osbourne could not be revived. Locals in the nearby village of Jordans noticed the red helicopter circling and landing near the mansion, with one resident recounting to MailOnline: 'We immediately feared it may be for him as he was known to be in fragile health.' The helicopter was seen departing again around 12:30pm. Thames Valley Air Ambulance, which operates without government or NHS funding, relies entirely on public donations. The service recently logged its 20,000th callout since becoming an independent healthcare provider in 2018. A source has said that Ozzy was in peace at the time of his passing, telling People: '[Sharon's] deepest hope was fulfilled, and this is her focus now. Ozzy's final days were spent in England, surrounded by family, music and in the place he called home. He was in peace.' They added that his farewell concert 'meant everything,' and 'brought his career full circle.' Osbourne had been open in recent years about his complex health challenges, including being diagnosed with Parkinson's in 2019 and spinal issues that limited his mobility. In preparation for his final years, he and wife Sharon oversaw an extensive renovation of Welders House, which included installing a rehabilitation wing and other modifications to support his care. More Trending The air ambulance call-out offered a rare glimpse into the final moments of a star whose career spanned six decades and revolutionised the landscape of heavy metal music. Known for his electrifying stage presence and rebellious spirit, Ozzy was also a devoted family man. His wife Sharon and their children Aimee, Jack, and Kelly were reportedly at his side when he passed. Ozzy's death left the music world in mourning, with stars lining up to pay tribute to the rock legend on social media. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: Hollywood superstar worth $1.4 billion admits he had to financially cut off family members MORE: Matthew Perry's doctor pleads guilty to supplying Friends star with ketamine before his death MORE: Justin Timberlake slammed for doing 'bare minimum' at his concerts

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store