Air pollution uneven across town: research
Research shows air quality is not consistent across Gore — instead air pollution gathers in two specific areas of the town.
A study from Niwa indicated during winter last year, Environment Southland contributed funding to place 28 clarity monitors that measure PM2.5 levels to assess the variation in air quality across Gore. PM2.5 and PM10 are types of particulate matter small enough to be inhaled and reach deep into the lungs and are used as indicators of air quality.
Environment Southland said in a statement the monitors were deployed in a uniform grid across the urban area of the town and measured the PM2.5 levels daily between April 22 and June 25.
Environment Southland team leader air and terrestrial science Dr Nick Talbot said the council funded the project because it had the responsibility to monitor air quality in its airsheds.
"Part of that responsibility is determining whether the permanent air monitoring station is in the right place.
"Gore has only had two exceedances of the National Standards for Air Quality in four years, both of which were last year.
"While that looks great on the surface, we wanted to ensure that it was an accurate reflection of what the air quality was for the town.
"We need to make sure the monitoring station is located in the right area to measure correctly."
The work revealed one large area in the southwest of the town and another smaller area in East Gore experienced higher levels of air pollution in winter.
"Plumes of smoke are found not to move as freely in Gore as in Invercargill. Instead, they pool in specific locations due to hilly topography and airflow.
"This work clearly shows that the monitoring site adopted by council is on the fringe of the correct location to accurately represent the concentrations of pollution in the worst affected areas of Gore."
The amount of air pollution in those areas compared with the rest of the grid clearly indicated the number of homes using fireplaces was the cause, Dr Talbot said.
As a result, a temporary testing site has been placed in West Gore for two years to measure the air quality throughout winter.
"Our message for those at home this winter is that home heating is one area where people can make the biggest difference to our air quality.
"Not only does burning wet wood create a large amount of smoke, it gives off much less warmth than dry wood."
Environment Southland operates a Good Wood approved suppliers' scheme, in which firewood retailers voluntarily agree to supply wood at the recommended moisture level of less than 25%.
— APL
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
2 days ago
- Otago Daily Times
Air pollution uneven across town: research
Research shows air quality is not consistent across Gore — instead air pollution gathers in two specific areas of the town. A study from Niwa indicated during winter last year, Environment Southland contributed funding to place 28 clarity monitors that measure PM2.5 levels to assess the variation in air quality across Gore. PM2.5 and PM10 are types of particulate matter small enough to be inhaled and reach deep into the lungs and are used as indicators of air quality. Environment Southland said in a statement the monitors were deployed in a uniform grid across the urban area of the town and measured the PM2.5 levels daily between April 22 and June 25. Environment Southland team leader air and terrestrial science Dr Nick Talbot said the council funded the project because it had the responsibility to monitor air quality in its airsheds. "Part of that responsibility is determining whether the permanent air monitoring station is in the right place. "Gore has only had two exceedances of the National Standards for Air Quality in four years, both of which were last year. "While that looks great on the surface, we wanted to ensure that it was an accurate reflection of what the air quality was for the town. "We need to make sure the monitoring station is located in the right area to measure correctly." The work revealed one large area in the southwest of the town and another smaller area in East Gore experienced higher levels of air pollution in winter. "Plumes of smoke are found not to move as freely in Gore as in Invercargill. Instead, they pool in specific locations due to hilly topography and airflow. "This work clearly shows that the monitoring site adopted by council is on the fringe of the correct location to accurately represent the concentrations of pollution in the worst affected areas of Gore." The amount of air pollution in those areas compared with the rest of the grid clearly indicated the number of homes using fireplaces was the cause, Dr Talbot said. As a result, a temporary testing site has been placed in West Gore for two years to measure the air quality throughout winter. "Our message for those at home this winter is that home heating is one area where people can make the biggest difference to our air quality. "Not only does burning wet wood create a large amount of smoke, it gives off much less warmth than dry wood." Environment Southland operates a Good Wood approved suppliers' scheme, in which firewood retailers voluntarily agree to supply wood at the recommended moisture level of less than 25%. — APL
RNZ News
17-06-2025
- RNZ News
Scientists may have found a big, mysterious carbon sink in the South Island
Fiordland forest. Photo: Supplied / James Williams, NIWA Scientists may have found a big, mysterious carbon sink in the South Island. But they caution more work is needed to solve the puzzle before New Zealand could claim the discovery as a climate win. NIWA scientists have suggested the reason might be that native forests in the South Island are capturing much more carbon than previously thought, which could pave the way for New Zealand to use pest control and other conservation efforts to boost forest health and help meet the country's climate targets. The study leader, NIWA atmospheric scientist Beata Bukosa, said researchers first need to resolve the mystery of where tens of millions of tonnes of seemingly disappearing carbon dioxide are going to. The carbon sink was found over parts of the south west South Island dominated by mature native forests, including Fiordland. "The next thing we have to do is really identify the exact process responsible for this carbon uptake and figure out where the carbon goes," Bukosa said. "At the moment, with our methods we can see the signal that the carbon is basically disappearing in that region but we can't identify where exactly that carbon goes and what is happening after it disappears." The study uses a different technique from the official estimates used in New Zealand's official greenhouse gas inventory. The official inventory uses a variety of methods, including so-called "ground up" estimates of natural carbon storage based on real measurements of trees growing in our native forests. For the latest study, scientists from several universities and research institutes analysed carbon dioxide measurements taken between 2011 and 2020 from Wellington's Baring Head and Lauder research station in Central Otago and used modelling to work out how that carbon dioxide was being transported. Beata Bukosa. Photo: Supplied / Lana Young They found much more carbon was disappearing than other methods had suggested -- around 50-140 million tonnes a year more than the previous estimates, or between one and three years' worth of all New Zealand's carbon dioxide emissions from human activities. Bukosa said they expected to get different results from using different methods, but the differences they found were bigger than could be explained by varying calculation methods. "You would expect some difference just from the way the methods there was still a stronger [carbon] sink in our estimates," she said. "Earlier estimates of how much carbon was removed by New Zealand land ecosystems ranged from a net 24 to 118 million tonnes a year. "Our research found that New Zealand's natural environment absorbed approximately 171 million tonnes of CO2 annually." As for what was behind the difference, she said the south west South Island location suggested it could be native forests but it could also be something less beneficial to nature and the climate, such as rain or landslides carrying soil - and the carbon it contains - down rivers and away from New Zealand, to be released somewhere else. "That's the crucial question we are trying to answer at the moment," said Bukosa. "The region where we found the biggest difference and the strongest sink is around Fiordland and the southwest coast of the South Island and these are also regions where we have quite a bit of erosion, which could lead to frequent landslides which transports carbon. "The forest might be behaving differently due to climate change, or even regenerating due to pest control. We need to add up all the numbers and see how it is contributing." If native forests are capturing much more carbon than previously thought, it could pave the way for New Zealand to use pest control and other conservation efforts to help meet its climate targets and boost the health of native species. Separate studies are tracking the impacts of pest control on boosting carbon storage in native forests in the South island and the East Coast of the North Island. "Depending what the answer is, that could open up new doors on how to mitigate climate change and potentially reduce our reliance in international carbon credits," Bukosa said. The research grew from a 2017 pilot study suggesting native forests in Fiordland and other parts of southwest New Zealand might be sequestering up to 60 per cent more carbon dioxide from the atmosphere than expected. Bukosa said the latest study extended the period analysed from three to 10 years and improved the atmospheric modelling used. "The results basically confirmed what we saw in 2017 as well, which is that it seems like there is more carbon dioxide being absorbed across New Zealand relative to what we thought before." Previous estimates used by the Ministry for the Environment and others to create the country's official greenhouse gas estimates say native forests are overall almost carbon neutral - releasing about as much carbon overall as they absorb. But those figures are uncertain, with some forests losing carbon and some forests gaining. Bukosa said previous studies may have underestimated the amount of carbon taken up by mature indigenous forests. Dr Andrea Brandon of the Ministry for the Environment was also involved in the study. She said the findings "indicate there may be additional carbon uptake somewhere in the system that we are currently not tracking. We need to identify what we are missing so that we can further refine our Inventory methods to capture it." As well as Brandon, the NIWA scientists worked with researchers from GNS Science, Manaaki Whenua, the University of Waikato and overseas as part of a Ministry for Business, Innovation and Employment-funded Endeavour programme called CarbonWatch NZ, which ended last year. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
Scoop
17-06-2025
- Scoop
New NIWA Study A 'wake-up Call' For Government To Tackle Out Of Control Pest Animals
Forest & Bird says groundbreaking NIWA-led research, just released, shows New Zealand's native forests are absorbing significantly more carbon dioxide than previously thought and this should be the catalyst for urgent Government action to knock down populations of pest deer, pigs, goats, wallabies, and possums that are wrecking native forest carbon sinks. 'This new research from NIWA proves that our native forests are working hard to draw down vast amounts of carbon from the atmosphere,' says Forest & Bird's forests advocate, Dean Baigent-Mercer. 'But our ngahere is achieving this with one hand tied behind its back. This incredible carbon capture – approximately 171 million tonnes of carbon dioxide annually between 2011 and 2020 – is happening despite the fact that many of our native forests are under constant attack by millions of pest deer, pigs, goats, wallabies, and possums.' A report by Federated Farmers has already put the economic cost of these out-of-control pests at more than $200 million per year to our primary industries. 'The NIWA-led study is a wake-up call and reinforces the urgent need for large-scale co-ordinated action to knock pest animals to low levels, and keep them down, so our native forests have the greatest opportunity to lock in even more carbon each year,' Mr Baigent-Mercer says. 'This is the best spend for taxpayers' money, not sending taxpayers cash overseas as our Nationally Determined Contribution on climate change to pay other countries to lock in carbon. We need to back our own native forests. 'We are currently in a devastating cycle of destruction where native forests are constantly being eaten from the top-down by possums and from the ground-up by deer, goats, wallabies, and pigs, year in year out, which really undermines how much carbon native forests can lock in. 'These pests scoff the next generation of forest before it can grow, as well as killing mature trees. As trees die, they rot and release carbon dioxide, which feeds more climate change, which kills more trees that rot and release more carbon dioxide, fuelling more climate change. 'These damaged native forests can't hold land or water as well as they used to, so the risk of flooding downstream of homes, businesses, and towns increases. The only way to stop this cycle is to have co-ordinated long-term action across catchments with people resourced and working together to keep pest animal numbers as low as possible – allowing forests to recover to their full carbon capturing potential. 'Protecting our native forests is one of the smartest investments we can make. It is a win-win-win by restoring our native biodiversity, preventing erosion and sedimentation in our waterways, as well as locking in carbon and connecting New Zealanders with nature.' Forest & Bird is calling on the Government to act on this new evidence and support the full climate-fighting potential of our native forests. This requires: Continued Government investment in scientific research to improve how we measure carbon sequestration and emissions in native forests. Funding and prioritising co-ordinated large-scale pest control on public and private land to protect these vital natural carbon sinks. Resetting the governance of browsing pest animal control to enable effective action. Creating incentives to better recognise and incentivise the carbon sequestration and biodiversity benefits of protecting and restoring native forests. Rejecting the Herds of Special Interest (HOSI) proposals put forward by the Minister of Hunting & Fishing that changes the legal status of introduced pests by giving them special protected status within national parks and other protected areas.
