House panel seeks testimony from Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell
July 22 (UPI) -- A House Oversight subcommittee unanimously approved a motion to subpoena former Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell amid renewed interest in the case.
Only four subcommittee members were present when the vote on the subpoena motion was held on Tuesday at the request of Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., NBC News reported.
The motion directs committee chair Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., to subpoena Maxwell to testify before the Oversight Committee regarding former financier Epstein and his alleged ties to President Donald Trump and others.
"The committee will seek to subpoena Ms. Maxwell as expeditiously as possible," a committee spokesperson told The Hill.
"Since Ms. Maxwell is in federal prison, the committee will work with the Department of Justice and the Bureau of Prisons to identify a date when [the] committee can depose her."
Maxwell is imprisoned for 20 years in Florida due to her 2021 conviction on federal sex trafficking charges arising from her activities with Epstein.
She was accused of grooming teen girls, whom convicted sex offender Epstein had abused sexually.
Maxwell's trial and conviction occurred after Epstein killed himself while jailed and awaiting trial on related federal charges in New York City.
Many House Republicans and Democrats seek Maxwell's testimony on the matter, resulting in Tuesday's unanimous vote to subpoena her.
The subpoena request occurs amid criticism over the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein case files.
House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., announced the House will recess until Sept. 2 after concluding business on Wednesday.
Johnson accused House Democrats of engaging in "political games" over the Epstein case files by using the House Rules Committee to potentially force votes related to the Epstein files.
"We're not going to let them use this as a political battering ram," Johnson told media on Tuesday.
"The Rules Committee became the ground for them to do that."
He said the Trump administration already is addressing the matter.
Attorney General Pam Bondi on Tuesday directed Deputy U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche to seek a meeting with Maxwell to review the details of the former case against Epstein.
"I have communicated with counsel for Ms. Maxwell to determine whether she would be willing to speak with prosecutors," Blanche said in a social media post.
He anticipates meeting with Maxwell "in the coming days."
Bondi earlier said she would make public the files from the Epstein case, but recently said there is no client list and nothing of note to share.
The attorney general's handling of the matter triggered disagreement among House Republicans and others, which led to Tuesday's actions in the House and by the Department of Justice.
This week in Washington
House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, R-Minn., speaks during a press conference after the House passed the GENIUS Act at the U.S. Capitol on Thursday. The act, which passed with a bipartisan vote, outlines the first federal rules for stablecoins, a popular form of digital currency. Photo by Bonnie Cash/UPI | License Photo
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Arizona Democrats are having an identity crisis. Do they need a party or a hug?
Arizona Democrats have held the spotlight this month with two very different votes. On July 15, blue voters nominated Adelita Grijalva to fill the congressional seat her father held for more than 22 years. The primary election for Congressional District 7 was widely predictable and a bit of a landslide win for the former Pima County supervisor. Her opponents, former state Rep. Daniel Hernandez and social media strategist Deja Foxx, turned it into a high-profile race, but ultimately, southern Arizona voters decided they wanted the legacy candidate. A second vote came the day after the election, this time from the Democratic Party's state committee members. In a 476-56 vote, after an hours-long meeting, Robert Branscomb was ousted from his position as chair of the state party after only six months in office. Many of the votes against Branscomb came from members who helped him win. Arizona Democrats are riddled with political infighting after losing the presidential election in 2024, and soon the party will need to come together for midterm campaigns, including the re-election of Gov. Katie Hobbs. The question remains: will they be able to unite, find strong challengers, raise money and bring in new votes in just a year or so? This week on The Gaggle, a politics podcast by The Arizona Republic and hosts Ron Hansen and Mary Jo Pitzl are joined by Stacy Pearson. She is a Democratic political strategist and co-founder of Lumen Strategies. Pearson joins the show to give a status update on the party and what these two votes indicate for the future. Listen to the episode The best way to listen is to subscribe to The Gaggle on your favorite podcast app, but you can also stream the full episode below. Note: The Gaggle is intended to be heard. But we also offer an AI transcript of the episode script. There may be slight deviations from the podcast audio. Listen to The Gaggle : Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Stitcher Have a question or comment about Arizona politics? You can share your thoughts with us at 602-444-0804 or via email here. Reach the producer Amanda Luberto at aluberto@ Follow her on X, formerly Twitter @amandaluberto and on Bluesky @amandaluberto. Catch up on previous Gaggle episodes here: This article originally appeared on Arizona Republic: Arizona Democrats divided after leadership, primary shakeups
Los Angeles Times
21 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Letters to the Editor: Palestinians' ‘right to self-determination' needs to be considered too
To the editor: Guest contributor Mark Brilliant makes his opinions clear but fails to convince ('Anti-Zionism is antisemitism — university leaders settle the question,' July 21). His assertion regarding the House testimony ignores how the Trump administration has punished students and researchers at schools that failed to toe its line. Brilliant claims anti-Zionism is 'denying to the Jewish people the right to self-determination.' Here is the question he should ask: Is Zionism a denial of the Palestinians' right to self-determination? Further, were the Palestinian people treated fairly by the partition of their land? Should we continue to support Israel's 70 years of gradual seizure of more Palestinian land in the West Bank, its intention in the long run to prevent the Palestinians from ever having a state of their own and the violence that has ensued as both side's extremists fight for their 'rights'? Is the revulsion many of us feel about how Israel is slaughtering civilians in Gaza 'anti-Zionism' or human decency? Few Americans question Israel's right to exist, but many question the senseless violence of its government in response to the senseless violence of Hamas. Michael Snare, San Diego .. To the editor: Brilliant takes an affirmative response to a gotcha question ('Is denying the Jewish people their rights to self-determination … antisemitism? Yes or no?') and leaps to his desired conclusion: that the university officials agreed that anti-Zionism is antisemitic. But he is wrong when he says that the Jewish right to self-determination is the textbook definition of Zionism. In fact, Zionism is the movement to establish a Jewish state in biblical Israel. I believe everyone has a right to self-determination, so I might have answered the gotcha question affirmatively too. But no one has the 'right' to occupy land where others live just as no one has a right to seize homes and orchards, to tell people where they must live and that they can't leave or to deny others their right to self-determination by basing democratic rights such as the right to vote or the right to travel on one's ethnicity. And, of course, no one has a 'right' to bomb hospitals and starve children. It is not antisemitic of me to say so. Clyde Leland, Berkeley .. To the editor: In response to Brilliant's op-ed that equates anti-Zionism with antisemitism, I would like to point out that people who criticize Zionism probably don't object to Jewish rights to self-determination or statehood. The problem is real estate. The Bible may have promised the land of Israel to the Jews, but if you look at things from a strictly historical perspective, a lot more non-Jews have lived on the land in question than Jews. Many of the people who established the state of Israel came from Europe (for admittedly good reasons) and pushed the native Arab population into refugee camps where it's lived for the last 70-odd years. Now government officials in Israel and the U.S. are talking openly about completely removing this population. That's ethnic cleansing, and as uncomfortable as it is for many to admit, it's hard to see that ethnic cleansing is not intrinsic to Zionism. You can't establish a Jewish state in a place where other people already live without kicking those people out. That's what people don't like about Zionism. If you could take away the mandatory Arab eviction part, I don't think anybody would have a problem with it. William Griffith, Oxnard
The Hill
21 minutes ago
- The Hill
Paul urges DOJ to charge Fauci to test pardon
Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), chairman of the Senate Homeland Security Committee, is calling on the Justice Department (DOJ) to charge former senior national health adviser Anthony Fauci with lying to Congress to test whether former President Biden's pardon of Fauci will hold up in court. 'I do believe Anthony Fauci committed a felony by lying to Congress,' Paul told pro-President Trump activist Charlie Kirk in an interview when asked whether Biden pardon's signed by autopen would hold up in court. 'You have to charge him with a felony, take him to court and then the court will decide whether or not the pardon is upheld,' he continued. 'You can argue until you're blue in the face that you can't do autopens and that maybe the president wasn't aware of it. But the only way to actually do this is to charge someone who has been pardoned.' The Kentucky Republican added, 'I think Anthony Fauci is the most likely to be chargeable. There are other people — Hunter Biden could be charged as well — but someone has to be charged.' Paul says Fauci testified before Congress 'in a very vigorous and heated and animated way' that the National Institutes of Health never funded gain-of-function virus research in Wuhan, China. 'This is directly contradicted by the actual people who were involved in the funding,' the senator said. Other Republicans, however, have expressed skepticism about challenging the autopen pardons after Biden told The New York Times that he personally approved them. 'I made every decision,' Biden told The Times earlier this month. He said he had his staff use an autopen to replicate his signature because 'we're talking about a whole lot of people.' Biden also pardoned his son Hunter, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley and members of the House committee that investigated the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on Congress.
