logo
Monster of Avingon's victim Gisele Pelicot is awarded France's Legion of Honour for bravery in speaking out after enduring horrific sexual abuse at the hands of her ex-husband

Monster of Avingon's victim Gisele Pelicot is awarded France's Legion of Honour for bravery in speaking out after enduring horrific sexual abuse at the hands of her ex-husband

Daily Mail​8 hours ago
Gisèle Pelicot has been awarded with a French Legion of Honour for her bravery in speaking out about the horrific sexual abuse she endured at the hands of her ex-husband.
Dubbed the Monster of Avingon, Dominique Delicot, 72, subjected his then-wife to years of abuse by secretly drugging her, raping her and hiring other men to do the same to her.
Over years he filmed the horrific acts and referred to Gisèleas his 'work'.
Dominique Pelicot was sentenced to the maximum of 20 years in prison for raping and organising the mass rape of his wife - with all of his 50 co-defendants also receiving guilty verdicts for their part in France 's most notorious sex crimes trial.
Madame Pelicot emerged from the courtroom after the trial to the waiting cameras of the world's media, telling them she was 'emotional' as she issued a statement after what she said had been 'a very difficult test for me.'
The 72-year-old demanded a public trial 'so that shame would change sides' and stoically attended the trial for three months, watching each of the defendants as they were convicted of her rape and other heinous crimes at the court in Avignon.
Gisèle Pelicot is among the 589 honorees who will be inducted into the Legion of Honour on the occasion of the national holiday, Bild reported.
The list also includes US musician Pharrell Williams, 52, and Auschwitz survivor Yvette Lévy, 99.
Police found some 20,000 lurid images and videos of Madame Pelicot being abused in files on Dominique's computer, as well as pictures of his daughter and his two daughters-in-law naked.
As his sentence was delivered his daughter Caroline Darian yelled at him: 'You will die alone like a dog in jail!'
She directed the phrase at her cowering father, who the family has condemned, throughout the trial.
Among some of men who were found guilty, 63-year-old Romain Vandevelde was knowingly HIV-positive yet raped Mme Pelicot on six separate occasions without wearing protection.
Having waived her legal right to anonymity in order to ensure the case received the maximum amount of publicity, the grandmother refused to be shamed - but instead repeatedly directed any shame at her abusers.
As interest in the case grew, she was clapped and cheered as she arrived at court and left at the end of the day.
Graffiti honouring her bravery was daubed on Avignon's medieval stone walls and protests in support of her erupted all over France.
Her abusers, most from within a 50-mile radius of the Pelicots' home, were seemingly ordinary men from all walks of life.
The fact that broadly represented a cross section of French society saw them collectively described as Monsieur-Tout-Le-Monde - or Mr Everyman.
There was veteran chief fireman Christian Lescole, 57, who protested in court at being locked up after spending 'a lifetime saving people'. Police also found naked pictures of children on his computer following his arrest. He was sentenced to nine years in prison.
Moroccan-born hospital nurse Redouane El Farihi screamed his innocence before a video of him assaulting Madame Pelicot while she lay motionless was played in court. He was sentenced to eight years in prison
There was 'sexual predator' Jerome Vilela, a supermarket worker, who was described by his ex-partner as a 'sex-addict' and told a prison psychologist he saw sex as a 'conjugal right'. He was sentenced to 13 years in prison.
Successful builder Thierry Parisis told the court he had fallen into a spiral of depression and alcoholism following the death of his son in a car crash. He added he remembered very little about his encounter with Madame Pelicot. He was sentenced to eight years in prison.
Retired marine fire-fighter Jacques Cubeau said he was lonely, we was sentenced to five years in prison.
There was IT worker Lionel Rodriguez, 44; painter and decorator Husamettin Dogan, 43; odd-job man Mathieu Dartus, 53; motorcycle mechanic and racer Hugues Malago, 39. They were sentenced to eight years, seven years and six years respectively.
Retired electrician Dominique Pelicot met each of his accomplices on an internet site for voyeurs called 'a son insu' which translates as 'without her knowledge'.
Over almost ten years he invited strangers – up to three times a week – to come to the couple's retirement chalet to rape his wife, which he had rendered unconscious by putting powerful sedatives in her dinner and glass of rose wine.
To ensure they weren't seen, Pelicot told the would-be rapists to park well away from the house, avoid wearing after-shave or smelling of cigarette smoke, and ensure they left nothing behind in the bedroom.
He directed the multiple rapes of his sleeping wife with such attention to detail that a lawyer described him in court as a 'perverted Steven Spielberg'.
The potentially fatal doses of sedatives forced upon Madame Pelicot had a devastating effect on her health. She lost weight, her hair fell out and she suffered lengthy blackouts. Her doctor feared she was in the early stages of Alzheimer's disease. She also became infected with four sexually transmitted disease. She had no idea how.
The abuse only stopped when Pelicot was arrested in October 2020 for taking pictures of women's underwear on his phone at his local supermarket – a form of voyeurism known as 'upskirting'.
A search by gendarmes of his home discovered some 20,000 lurid images and images of his wife being violated in the marital bed on computer files and mobile phones.
The following month, while returning home from Paris where she had been looking after her grandchildren, detectives asked Madame Pelicot to come to the police station.
At first, she did not recognise the woman lying on the bed unconscious being abused in the photograph that the policeman showed her. Then she saw it was her and she had been used by her husband of 50 years in the depraved sex scenes he filmed.
'That day will be seared in my memory for ever,' Madame Pelicot told the court.
'It was a scene of barbarism. I was in a state of shock.
'I remember asking for a glass of water, then a psychologist came into the room, they said my husband had been detained - and everything just collapsed for me.
'We were 50 years together, with three children and seven grandchildren, and our friends said we were the ideal couple. I just couldn't take it in.'
Returning alone to the house where she had been so cruelly betrayed, she called her grown-up children – David, Caroline and Florian – to tell them their father was a monster.
Three days later she arrived in Paris with just two suitcases and her dog, never to return to Mazan.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Southport monster Axel Rudakubana makes chilling new threats to prison staff following attack on a guard
Southport monster Axel Rudakubana makes chilling new threats to prison staff following attack on a guard

The Sun

timean hour ago

  • The Sun

Southport monster Axel Rudakubana makes chilling new threats to prison staff following attack on a guard

KILLER Axel Rudakubana has made more chilling threats to jail guards since he allegedly attacked a prison officer. Rudakubana, 18, is now allowed out of his cell only when five staff in riot-gear unlock him. 2 2 But a source said: "Rudakubana is pure evil - and the threats have continued despite his previous attack. "Staff fear a repeat and he has nothing to lost. "Threats are noted on the system if a prisoner says things like, 'I will kill you' or 'I will smash your face'. 'They are also recorded if a prisoner shouts threats or things like 'Allahu Akbar' "Notes have been kept about Rudakubana - and they all point to him being the most dangerous prisoner in Britain. "It is incredibly rare for someone to be on a five-man unlock. 'The last inmate I can remember who was on it was Charles Bronson in the 1990s and he is a much bigger and stronger guy than Rudakubana. 'It just shows how dangerous he is. 'And it is even more rare for someone to be banned from all IT and computer systems. 'That happens only to the most dangerous terrorists in the system. Southport monster Axel Rudakubana eyes move to 'cushy' secure hospital as he has tests to see if he's 'mad or bad' 'Inmates cannot go online, but they do things like order from the canteen and education courses on the intranet-style system. 'But even that is seen as too dangerous for Rudakubabana. 'He is completely unrepentant and as far from being rehabilitated as you can get.' He is under investigation by police over an incident on May 8, when he is said to have hurled a boiled kettle at guards. Rudakubana — jailed for murdering three girls in Southport last year — is classed as high-risk. He is also barred from using any computers or IT systems at HMP Belmarsh, South London. The Prison Service did not comment.

I've been having great sex with a man who's just become a father & can't end things
I've been having great sex with a man who's just become a father & can't end things

The Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Sun

I've been having great sex with a man who's just become a father & can't end things

DEAR DEIDRE: THE wife of the man I'm having an affair with gave birth to their first child last week – but the sex we have together is so intense I can't bring myself to end things. I'm not completely cold-hearted. When he told me that his wife was pregnant I did try to call it off. But we only lasted a week before we met again and had sex. I'm 27 and have had a couple of long-term relationships in the past, but I have never felt the way I do about this man. He's 35. We met through a mutual friend at their birthday party a year ago. We started chatting and flirting a little but nothing else happened. I then heard that he'd got married. I bumped into him in town a few weeks later and the attraction between us was obvious. We went for a drink and got on brilliantly and he didn't mention his wife once. He then began messaging me and we agreed to meet up. This time we ended up having sex in his car. It was all so passionate and intense. Recently, he got a new job which means more travelling, so we see each other less. But when we are reunited the sex is off-the-scale good. He told me he will never leave his wife, but he becomes jealous and possessive when I tell him my plans. I'm not seeing anyone else but he hates me going out with my friends. Dear Deidre: Cheating and can you get over it Now that his wife has had their baby, I know deep down that I must let him focus on her and their child, but each time we meet we have sex. It is so passionate that I cannot resist him. DEIDRE SAYS: You must be the one to draw a line under this dead-end affair. It's not fair on you or his wife. He will continue with the arrangement as long as it's on offer. There is another lovely guy out there for you but you're not going to find him while you are having secret sex with this man who is never going to leave his wife. He has made that perfectly clear. My support pack, Your Lover Not Free?, will help you think this through. Block all contact with him to help you move on. Yes, it will take a while to get over this affair but the sooner you start, the sooner you will be through the worst of the heartache. Then you'll be ready to broaden your social life, meet new people and find love with someone more suitable. TOO TIMID TO ASK HER OUT DEAR DEIDRE: EVERY time I decide to ask this woman I work with out on a date, nerves get the better of me. I end up bottling it at the last moment and then get really annoyed with myself. I am 23 and she is 24. We have worked together at a busy pub at weekends for a few months now. The time seems to pass quickly when we are together, and she always makes time to chat with me after work. I can't decide whether she likes me or not. Sometimes I think she is interested in taking things further but then another part of me says she is just being friendly because she is like that with all the other staff too. I really want to ask her out, but I don't want to risk our friendship if this is something she doesn't want. It would make it awkward to carry on working together. DEIDRE SAYS: When you feel desperate it can affect the way you behave. See her as someone to get to know better as a friend, at least for now. While chatting, mention that you'd like the chance to get to know her better and perhaps suggest seeing a film. See it as friends going out rather than a date. That way you can relax and enjoy spending time with her. If she declines, you won't have damaged your friendship. My support pack, Shyness And Social Anxiety, will help you. WIFE WON'T MIX THINGS UP IN BED DEAR DEIDRE: I'M not asking my wife to act like a porn star, but a bit of variety now and again would stop our sex life being so boring and repetitive. I am 37 and my wife is 35. We have been together for ten years and have two young daughters. Everything is great in our relationship, except when it comes to sex. My wife is always complaining that she is too tired. Even when she does agree to it, there is rarely any foreplay and it is always in the same position. I get the sense she can't wait for it to be over. I bought her a sex toy for her birthday, but it lies in the box unopened. We both work and share childcare. Life is very busy, but I still think there should be time for sex to be a bit more exciting and for us to have fun in bed. What can I do? I can't carry on like this much longer. DEIDRE SAYS: Looking after young children can be a stressful time and puts many relationships under pressure. Pick a quiet moment when you can explain how important intimacy is to you. Start by kissing and cuddling more to bring you physically closer. Most people have one or two favourite positions for sex but sometimes need some fresh ideas. Many positions come naturally through experimenting and discovering what feels good. My support pack, Best Positions For Sex, explains more. HE'S GAY BUT IN TO WOMEN PORN DEAR DEIDRE: MY gay boyfriend is into hardcore porn involving women. While I accept watching porn is normal, it feels like he is betraying me when he watches such extreme stuff and with women. Our sex life is suffering as a result. He is 22 and I am 24. We have been together for almost a year. I love him but know that he has many faults. He lies constantly and his porn habit is now causing a lot of rows. He regularly pleasures himself to female porn and has even admitted that he thinks about having sex with women. I feel so confused and mixed up. I have always identified as gay and I always will. I have previously slept with women, but I have no wish to do so in the future. Now I wonder whether my boyfriend is pretending that I am a woman when we have sex. He tells me he loves me and doesn't want to be bisexual, but I am struggling to believe him. How can I when he behaves like this? I have been researching ways to reduce someone's sex drive. I know it might seem selfish, but I want my boyfriend to only think about me sexually. I don't know where to go from here. Your boyfriend is clearly capable of being attracted to men and women. Many people believe sexuality is fluid – and that it's not someone's sex or gender we fall in love with, but the individual. He can't change who he is but putting him under pressure to make commitments he can't keep will help neither of you. He may be uncertain himself. His lies could reflect that, but whatever reason, he doesn't sound ready to commit to your relationship. Tell him how you feel about your relationship and that you want to know him better. My Bisexual Questions support pack explains more.

It's beyond time to end the scandal of IPP
It's beyond time to end the scandal of IPP

The Independent

time4 hours ago

  • The Independent

It's beyond time to end the scandal of IPP

It comes to something when a senior member of a recent government – the former justice secretary, no less – describes actions by the state that were part of his remit as 'overbearing, unfair and almost totalitarian'. Yet this is how Alex Chalk KC, who held that office for 14 months in the government of Rishi Sunak, describes imprisonment for public protection (IPP) orders – which can keep someone in prison indefinitely after conviction for a relatively minor crime. Ousted from government by his party's defeat at the last election, and also from his parliamentary seat, Mr Chalk has returned to his legal practice. It is from this perch that he is now asking his successor, Shabana Mahmood, to consider new proposals – from the Howard League and a former lord chief justice, Lord Thomas – with a view to righting this now longstanding wrong. At The Independent, we make no apology for returning once again to the iniquity of IPP orders that go against so much of what should constitute any civilised judicial system. Two features stand out. There is the glaring disproportionality in so many cases between the crime and the punishment, with some prisoners having served almost 20 years (and still counting) for offences such as robbing someone of their mobile phone or laptop. This is not, by the way, to diminish such crimes, but to point up the disparity between the standard tariff for such a conviction and the actual time served by many of those still subject to IPP orders. The other feature is the cruelty of imposing a sentence that has no end, which has been described by the UN as psychological torture. With no prospect of a release date, more than 90 such prisoners have taken their own lives. Altogether, more than 2,500 are still languishing in jail on IPPs. This is in spite of these indefinite prison terms having been abolished in 2012, just seven years after they were introduced. The clear mistake then was not to have made the abolition retrospective. It applied only to new convictions, not to those already in jail, leaving the glaring injustice that one day could make a difference between someone left to serve what could become a lifetime sentence and someone convicted of a similar crime with a clear idea of the timetable for release or parole. The failure to make abolition of IPP orders retrospective has had consequences of its own. At least some of those still not released are now so damaged by their experience and will be so hard to rehabilitate that they could indeed present a danger to society if they were released. This is the very opposite of what a penal system should set out to achieve and amounts, in Mr Chalk's words, to nothing less than a failure on the part of the state. At which point, there is an obvious and not unreasonable question for the former justice secretary to answer. If the injustices and perverse effects of IPP orders were so apparent when he came to office – as they were – why did he not do something about it? Why did he not condemn the policy in the same terms as he is doing now and make the changes he is demanding be made by his successor? Part of his answer is that he did do something. He reduced from 10 to three the number of years that a released IPP prisoner was on licence and so subject to recall. That is not nothing, but it was nothing like enough. Two small pleas might also be made on his behalf in mitigation. As he says, there was 'not a single vote' in even the change in the licence period that he made, because of the general lack of public sympathy for prisoners. As he does not say – but is a sentiment with which the current government could well concur – a year can be too short a time in UK politics when it comes to getting anything done. The ponderous nature of the legislative process can be a minus as well as a plus. On the other hand, the size of the Labour government's majority and the years it still has to run mean it has time on its side. After more than a decade of political foot-dragging around IPP orders, however, there is no time to lose. The proposals from the Howard League and Lord Thomas show how this could be done, and offer sufficient safeguards for the public in terms of conditions for those who may be released and a new drive to rehabilitate those still considered a danger to society. At a time when other prisoners are being released ahead of schedule to free up scarce cell space, and the Exchequer needs every penny of saving it can get, it makes no sense at all to keep IPP prisoners inside any longer than the public's safety requires. As Alex Chalk says of the one reform he did make, this may not win a single vote, but it would be the right thing to do. Indeed it is – and the sooner it is done, the better.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store